Breaking News: Ron Paul gives up the race, but not The Revolution

Please sit down to read this.

We are very sorry to be the blog that breaks this news to you. But it's our job. Many of you will be saddened, even devastated, to learn this. Others will say, "What?" or "Who's he?"

But Rep. Ron Paul, whom we've affectionately come to call the Libertarian-like, 10-term, 72-year-old Republican representative from Texas, appears to be -- this is so hard to write -- if not quitting, then almost certainly sort of stopping his race for the Republican nomination for president. Probably.

It's true. No fooling here.

There, it's out. In a special message to supporters late tonight, the congressman, who Tuesday won an overwhelming 70:30 primary victory to continue representing Texas' 14th Congressional District in the House of Representatives, doesn't actually...

use the word "quit" or "stop" or "halt" or "surrender" or "give up" or "forfeit" or "walk away" or "submit" or "retire" or "abandon" or "cease" or "resign."

And, for unexplained reasons, he does urge "loyal volunteers" to keep up the struggle to gain delegates to the GOP convention in September, although John McCain already has acquired more than enough to win the nomination. Paul sounds rather like the general who got safely off the island radioing back to his stranded troops to keep up the good fight.

But it sure sounds like a farewell message that will be a big relief to McCain. Paul says things like: "The presidential campaign will soon wind down." And: "I will continue to make every effort to visit states where enthusiasm for liberty exists."

And also: "While victory in the conventional political sense is unavailable in the presidential race, many victories have been achieved due to your hard work and enthusiasm. For that I am deeply grateful and encouraged."

In a seven-minute, 38-second video, Paul also says: "We must remember that elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." He says his campaign, which followers won't admit was hopeless from the beginning, was "a significant first step" in launching what many followers called the Ron Paul Revolution.

This would involve a radical downsizing of the federal government, an end to threats to personal liberties such as the Patriot Act, bringing all U.S. troops home, a strict interpretation of the Constitution and abolition of the Federal Reserve that prints too much money.

Although largely ignored by most media -- Fox News even barred Paul from a New Hampshire debate although he had already beaten Rudy Giuliani in the Iowa caucuses -- Paul's campaign was intriguing to The Ticket for its grassroots power and spontaneity and the involvement of many earnest people new to the political process. Because a few people claiming to be Paul supporters prowled the Internet around the clock leaving crude messages and threats IN BIG LETTERS WITH LOTS OF EXCLAMATION MARKS !!!! AND YOU K*** W*** WORDS AND MISPILNGS, Paulunteers got a reputation as a bunch of loonies.

But with little national organization, thousands of sincere supporters coalesced into some 1,400 diligent meet-up groups for discussion, door-to-door campaigning, letter-writing, sign-painting and, above all, fund-raising in a dedicated effort to work within the political system despite what they saw as biased media. They made a music video and some female Paulunteers even got mostly-undressed to pose for a Ron Paul pinup calendar.

Paul did capture some fourth, fifth and second places, including the Nevada, Maine and Montana Republican caucuses. But he was dissed by fellow GOP candidates and got noticeably less speaking time in debates, which the grandfatherly former OB/GYN quietly accepted. Still, Paul lasted longer in the GOP White House race than any of those better-known rich guys who were supposed to be front-runners.

In the third quarter of 2007, Paul raised $5 million, five times what Mike Huckabee collected. And in the fourth quarter, Paul raised nearly $20 million, more than any other Republican, including gazillionaire Mitt Romney. Paul's website boasts collecting another $6.15 million this quarter.

Paul said he has formed Liberty PAC to support like-minded candidates around the country. "I don't mind playing a key role in The Revolution," Paul said tonight. "But it has to be more than a Ron Paul Revolution." He suggested "a cadre of hard-core believers is the key to success."

Paul said for legal reasons his campaign could not sponsor a much-discussed march on Washington this summer to demonstrate their numbers, but he might attend if someone else organized it and suggested June 21 was a good date.

He also spoke of "a society slipping into chaos" and cited the ongoing financial turmoil as evidence to back up his denunciation of the Federal Reserve. "We live in dangerous and exciting times," the shirt-sleeved Paul said, cracking his familiar straight face. "The dollar crisis will certainly see the decline of the American empire. And that is no small event."

In his message, Paul urged followers to continue the struggle, adding: "Today's events should be seen as a tremendous opportunity to change our country for the good."

--Andrew Malcolm

Comments

[Flo]

SHAME ON YOU FOR PRINTING NON-SENSE.
YOU USUALLY DO BETTER THAN THIS.

RON PAUL HAS NOT QUIT THE RACE. ABC SCREWED UP AND EVERY PARROT OUT THERE STARTED CHIRPING.

(I know. I refused to believe it myself at first. Did you listen to the video?)

[Andrew]

It's truly a sign post. That is, the fact that the presidential election has been officially relegated to a popularity contest. In 2012 the candidates will rant about who is the greater "slave to fashion" on their FaceBook profiles. All the while Ron Paul will be proposing concrete solutions to concrete problems. It's big business that owns the American people... and that's the way they like it.

Your post smacks of the typical small minded criticism so often extended by those who can't, toward those who are.

[Dan]

Whoa whoa whoa... he never said he was dropping out or anything... he admitted it was unlikely he'd win, and it's impossible to win through the primary process... but he's not dropping out, so why is that in the headline?

And I'm sorry, I'm not sure I buy into your sentiments... they seem awfully sarcastic and mocking. If that's the case then you really ought to be ashamed. There were a lot of people who believed in this man and it's not a laughing matter. It's almost as if you enjoyed writing this article, as if you were writing Paul's tombstone... but I've got news for you. He's been reelected and our movement is just getting started. If I were the political, corporate, and media establishment I'd be worried.

(I know. I know. It was shocking to us too. But we'll all just have to learn to live with the new reality.)

[James]

I will still write in Ron Paul on my California absentee ballot in November.. Better than not voting at all..

Not a Neo-Conned Republican...

James

[Nathan Carter]

LA Times, SHAME ON YOU! First Fox, then CNN, now the LA Times! You're all the same. He never quit. If he never said the word "quit" then he didn't. I hope you get sued for this false information.

(:) You're funny, Nathan. If you have a chance, read the actual words in the blog. It often makes the comment more relevant. Thanks.)

[TB]

Ron Paul has not left the race! You are absolutley incorrect, please retract this article. If your mother tells you she loves you. CHECK YOUR SOURCES!

Thanks,
Tim

(Take a minute, Tim. And read the item. Or have someone read it to you. it makes your comment more to the point. And be sure to send us the date, place and time for Dr. Paul's next presidential campaign appearance.)

[Blonduxo]

Andrew...did you listen to the Missouri radio broadcast??? That is all the proof you need Buddy!

The campaign is just changing tactics. In the meantime let McCain spend his money and get dragged through the mud. Dr. Paul is a statesman but he is also a shrewd dude when it comes to winning campaigns. I did not hear him thanking us and bowing out, did you? Fasten your seat belts...

(Changing tactics, you say? I know how hard it must be to accept. Disappoiunting here too. But we'll all just have to move on best we can.)

[Elizabeth]

Andrew,

You reported the words, but you missed the message.

Where does he say that he is "almost certainly sort of stopping his race"?

He says plainly that efforts should continue to gain the maximum number of votes and that we should continue the caucus process, and that he will visit any state where enthusiasm for liberty exists.

This makes you look bad, Andrew.

In the past I have appreciated the attention you gave Paul, but this looks like an attempt on your part to gleefully hammer a nail into the coffin of Dr. Paul's presidential campaign. On NPR I heard the same twisted message.

You make up stuff where none exists. You are going to catch hell from us on this one, Andrew. This makes you look like part of the Lame-Stream Media.

[MichelleCB]

First I want to thank you for at least trying to sound considerate when breaking this story, even though you are incorrect. If you have followed Ron Paul at all you should know that HE is one of the most streight-forward honest people you will ever meet. He is not one to beat around the bush. If he was dropping out he would have said "I HAVE DROPPED OUT OF THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE" Which HE DID NOT! Slowing down is not stopping. He still encouraged voters and delegates to support him. AND I HOPE THEY WILL DESPITE THESE KINDS OF STORIES!

I know that you may think we are a bunch of crazies but don't count the good Dr. Paul out just yet. Those of us who still believe in personal liberties and responsibility, smaller government, a HUMBLE foreign policy, sound currancy and the Constitution will NOT yield, we will NOT roll over and play dead, nor will we vote for a candidate we neither believe nor believe IN. (this includes all 3 of the other "main-stream" candidates" ) We will write him in if we have to but Ron Paul has won MY vote, and I am not alone.
He even has a new song .

(Who said anything about crazy? Obviously, Dr. Paul is a political realist. He's very smart. It'll be interesting to find out about his next presidential campaign appearance. Thanks.)

[Jaynee Germond]

Shame on you! Dr. Paul did NOT say he was dropping. In fact, he is going all the way to the convention. Contrary to what the MSM wants us to believe, McCain does NOT have all the delegates he needs. It is not over until the delegates say it's over. The popular vote does not decide the primary election. get your facts right. Reports are supposed to REPORT not interpret.

[John Armstrong]

Count me in as a member of the cadre.

Ron Paul is to me what Playboy is to 12 year old boys: Something to get excited when initially viewed, but its only lasting impact was to open eyes to the naked truth and stimulate individual exploration.

While that exploration occasionally leads to heartbreak, when the right person does come along, the result is climatic.

Thanks Andrew. Well written.

I can't wait for the bandwagon to turn over to see who is still standing. I will be. And I'll not have one foot on the left and one on the right; I'll have them both buried deeply below that great divide in the soil of liberty. Faithless is he who says farewell when the road darkens--J.R.R.T.

JA

(Thanks, John. It'll be very interesting to see how the movement carries on and who steps up. Please keep us posted.)

[Michael Lee]

I'm curious why you say "Paul's campaign ... was hopeless from the beginning," particularly when you later say most media ignored him.

Had Dr. Paul gotten any serious media coverage, don't you think there would be justified hope?

Anyhow the "hope" you don't see was never just about electing one man -- it is about changing our nation for the better. Change how? For one, bringing real ideas of liberty back into the political discourse, and to percolate vast numbers willing to institute those ideas.

The delegates you wonder why Dr. Paul encourages are messengers of this change. Or did you think strong grass-roots is only good for cheerleading?

(Exactly, the election being, as he says, a shortterm part of a much longer process.)

[SafetyJoe]

Ron Paul states campaign continues and asks to keep electing delegates in this teleconference.

BTW Lincoln Won with Less than 10% of Delegates!

(Clearly, many of us are in a state of denial with this news. But the video is quite compelling and convincing.)

[vinceman]

he did not drop out of the race. shouldn't you check his offiical website www.ronpaul2008.com before you make such a comment?

don't stop believing!

(You're right, it is hard to believe after all this time. But the video on the website is pretty straightforward.)

[steve]

Andrew,
I appreciate your attempt to not sound sarcastic, though in some blogs it does come across. It seems you do have a real admiration for what Ron Paul has done, in spite of his lack lustre showing in vote totals to date. You do a fine job of balancing some reality with not insulting the many Paul supporters intelligence. However, if voters would vote their conscience, look at the real issues and real solutions being brought forth and voting for what they claimed to believe in, we would have a different result. I applaud the Paul supporters (of which I am one) for sticking to their guns (which they may not have in the not-to-distant future with the way things are going) and for adamantly voicing their stance. What Dr. Paul failed to realize or admit is that he is not welcome in the Republican Party. There will probably never be another (R) front-runner who has the convictions of Dr. Paul.
I urge all of his supporters to check out the Constitution Party, the fastest growing alternate party in the States. It is not time to end the revolution, it is time to shift gears. Some will not appreciate the CP stance on reliance on God, but have you read the founding documents lately? In any case, don't let one issue qualify, or disqualify, anyone. We will not likely ever find one candidate who has each of our own convictions on every issue, unless we run ourselves.
The Constitution Party www.constitutionparty.com
Our ONLY real hope at this point.

(Interesting, Steve. I'll have to read up on that. Thanks for the guidance.)

[Duke]

I always find it amazing how the media twists and turns things to try to sway public oppinion and of course some people will believe this article just as they believe that there is no vote fraud or that there is an Easter Bunny. Actually this is the most successful attempt at misleading information about Ron Paul I have yet seen. I was beginning to think there that Mr Malcolm was a freedom loving patriot but now I see he is just another neo-con Bush/Mcain defeatist.

(It's tough, I know, to watch that video. But if Dr. Paul can face the facts, I imagine his followers will too eventually.)

[Juliet Annerino]

Dear Andrew,

Thank you for this fair report of Dr. Paul's latest message to us, his faithful followers. Though I too, see signs of your maudlin humor and sarcasm here, I also sense a true simpatico for the movement itself, as you have become familiar with the spirit of this Revolution, as expressed so sincerely in the energy and enthusiasm of the individuals serving as its torch-bearers!

We must all remember that from the very beginning, Ron Paul himself told us that this New American Revolution was not about a single man, but about a philosophy, a movement, a People of Revolution. The thunderous call of this New American Revolution, is merely the echo of those fearless men and women who rose up before us. This is our legacy. It is now up to us to defend our United States Constitution and those audacious, tenacious individuals who had embarked on this brave experiment of Freedom, over two hundred years ago. These men and women who risked and sacrificed all that was dear to them for an ideal of a country that had never existed before on the face of the earth!

Indeed we are a privileged nation and the rest of the world knows this. Through my travels I have heard us referred to as bullies, fat children, credit-card wielding idiots. And like spoiled children, we have become soft, complacent, dependent, indifferent, lazy and jaded.

I know, because I was one of those spoiled children. When friends or family asked me why I didn't get involved in politics, I'd scornfully reply that it was too late, that the only solution was revolution. (They responded in alienation, disbelief or just shock). I just didn't care. This was simply an excuse for me to do nothing. The beautiful ideals of Freedom I had once held dear, had died inside me.

All that changed when I heard Dr. Paul's message and met my Brothers and Sisters of the New Revolution. At that point, I felt a sense of connection and profound awakening to the true meaning of my heritage as an American. I felt the great responsibility that comes with such an awesome and heroic inception and ideology as ours. For in truth, noblesse oblige. And "From whom much is given, much shall be required" (Luke12:48)

As I have said before, our Congressman Ron Paul was the Ignition of Inspiration. WE are the Fire of Revolution! Let us be a Light unto the World not only as Hope, but as Proof that a Free and Peaceful society can and will, exist and thrive once more!

This June 21st, I will be back in the United States after a two-month tour with musicians in India, but I will be ready to jump on a plane from Los Angeles to Washington, if my Revolution calls for it! And I know that my faithful Brothers and Sisters will be by my side as we stand tall together for the principles of our Beloved country.

For Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness,
Juliet Annerino

www.Hotties4RonPaul.com
www.LibertyPoster.org

(Good points all, Juliet. And we'll be here to chronicle whatever the developments turn out to be. Thanks for reading and taking the time to post such a personal and eloquent comment.)

[Ward]

Ron Paul's gone
but not forgotten
nor his backers
each missing a button

[Norman]

Ron Paul represents the Libertarian movement which is doomed as the vested interests wish to keep government omnipotent and omniscient. The original intent of the framers of our constitution was to keep government small, specifically the Federal Government. Over the years as localities looked to Washington DC to cure all ills, finance every program and take care of our personal crises it has become cumbersome and threatens our individual liberties more and more. So rather than ridiculing the man cherish his dedication.

[Sandra]

Where did you see that he dropped out from the video?

[Myrica gale]

Anarcho-capitalist suckers,

This crypto confederate was simply on a book tour/PR junket on your dime. Dr. Pork is laughing all the way to the bank! Time to go back to your government job Ron.

[Keir]

He Hasn't quit, and neither have we- If you listen for the truth, sometimes you hear it. We Know what we are fighting for. Liberty or death. "Peace without freedom isn't possible, because No man can be at peace if he does not have his freedom"

(It is hard to accept.)

[rplat]

This dolt is an absolute moron and why the media even mentions his name is a mystery.

[Deeptoad]

*sigh*

He said he was continuing the caucus process and asked others to do the same. I think it should be a requirement of reporters and other journalists to complete some rudimentary comprehension training.

[Kathy Smith]

You just don't get it!

(It's tough to accept, I know.)

[George]

Ron Paul is a very decent human being, and would make a very good president. He should run as an independent.

(A number of people have suggested that, but he's always said no. And that's understandable given the incredible legal hoops (and costs) for an independent to jump through to get on the ballot individually in ALL 50 states.)

[voiceofthepeople]

The media may understand Paul supporters better now but they misunderstood them as well as him at the start. Human nature dictates that we ridicule and belittle that which we misunderstand and fear. The policies the good doctor advocated, as ancient as the Constitution itself, went against everything many inside and outside the media had been indoctrinated to believe was good for them. Big government was the way to show you had a big heart and cared about your fellow man. Taking care of yourself and your family first was a sign of blatant selfishness. Vociferously bemoaning a declining dollar was tin foil hat lunacy.

The majority of Ron Paul supporters are passionate but respectful. The LA Times was more times than not respectful to the campaign. THANK YOU FOR THAT.

(Thank you. We try to make this an interesting community of people intrigued by and wanting to understand politics. And few things were more intriguing this time than the Ron Paul phenomenon. mainly his followers and their impressive dedication and creativity. Thanks for visiting and hope you'll stick around and continue to share your insights.)

[John-Ross Swanstone Cromer]

Go Ron Paul!

[Christi]

All I can say is just get out and vote write his name in november. Let everyone you know to vote for ron paul they always nice guys finishes last well lets make it different lets make it to where our nice guy finishes first let knock the socks off of everyone that in running and then knock the socks off of the country.

(Admire your involvement and hope you'll continue to share it here.)

[Aaron B. Walker]

Ok... let's look at the sentences you quote from Paul's video message and analyze them a bit. There just might be an alternative meaning to them that does not fit the mold that ABC News would like it to... (it is ABC, of course from which your conclusions flow... they "broke" this story first).

1) "The presidential campaign will soon wind down." - Well of course it will. Super Tuesday is long over and "Super Tuesday #2" ended on the 4th. There are a handful of primaries left and the season for politicking will soon be over and we'll be on to the convention... where the rubber actually meets the road. This could be perceived as a concessiatory statement, or simply a statement of fact... the season is winding to a close... and it is - not only for Paul, but for McCain, Clinton and Obama as well.

2) "While victory in the conventional political sense is unavailable in the presidential race, many victories have been achieved due to your hard work and enthusiasm. For that I am deeply grateful and encouraged." - This also could be viewed as a statement of withdrawl and concession... or, it could be viewed as a statement and acknowledgement of what all of us true insiders into Paul's grassroots movement knew from day one... there was no way that Paul would come away with a popular vote "win", such as the one that McCain now enjoys (thanks to Romney's mysteriously premature exit from the race). There's still the convention and the nomination process by the delegates, which, as I stated in my post here yesterday, is the true measure of whether or not one gets nominated in the GOP. I must further remind you and your readers that McCain absolutely DOES NOT have the required delegates to seal the nomination. Of the 1200 or so he is counting on today, only a little less than 900 of those are "bound" delegates who have no choice but to vote for him. The remaining delegates are free agents who are not bound and have the freedom to cast their vote for whomever they want. We are still very much headed toward a brokered convention.

I sense from the tone of your blogs that you are really mocking most of the hard core Paul supporters, but I do also get a sense that you understand that Paul is much, much more than a kook and a looney bird. I appreciate your at least pointing out the positive positions for which Paul takes a stand. I'm afraid, however, that you are inaccurate in your assessment of Paul's pseudo-withdrawl from the race. He is still very much in it... no concession speeches or congratulatory phone calls being made on the part of the campaign.

[Chris Watson]

Get your facts straight before you "Report"

Ron Paul is in it till the end!

[lizzie bee]

Well, Andrew Malcolm, talk about sarcasm!!! The only thing you didn't do - physically stab Ron Paul. You even have the audacity to criticize people's spelling or grammar as if you are the epitome or proper grammar and spelling. Here's an example - you used the word lead (in the past tense) when the proper spelling is 'led.' You are confusing the metal 'lead' to the past tense of lead being 'led.' And, of course, your numerous typos. So, before you point your finger outwardly remember that three point back at you. Now, regarding Ron Paul - indeed there is no one like him out there in politico-land. I don't need to state what Ron Paul stands for because thousands in the USA now know about him - as well as up here in Canada. Well, this is my first and hopefully not the last post.

[Ellen]

I watched the video, he didn't say he was dropping out of the race. Keep spreading the lies, it's what the media does best.

[Karri]

Dr. Paul didn't say "decline of the American Empire", he said "disinegration". It's not over till it's over. The world is ready for another Abraham Lincoln.

[Jim W]

Don't give up, everyone! Just re-focus your energies! It's time to join the RuPaul Revolution!

[Richard]

I am a Ron Paul supporter. It is the message and philosophy that has always been important. Most people aren't UNDERSTANDING what is going on; they think only in terms of winning a presidential race as the final objective.

The race was the apparatus that allowed us to get the message out to the maximum number of people and the current mortgage meltdown and it's continuing global unwinding will provide the fertile ground for the seeds of change to take root and grow.

Most people don't realize that the early Christian movement ALMOST died out in the early centuries until certain individuals with passion came along and provided the energy and leadership to cause a new idea to take root - almost 100 years after Christ. That was a whole generation of people.

This is what Ron Paul is speaking of when he says this is about the ideas and not about Ron Paul.

This is the Freedom Movement and NOT the Ron Paul Movement.

We as human beings, no matter what country we live in, want the same things. We want freedom from tyrannical governments with sick thinking, safety, hope, prosperity, love, appreciation. I want that, YOU want that and ever those people you don't like want the same thing you and I want.

We speak different languages, have different color skin, some of us are Muslim, Jew, Christian, Buddhist, and even atheist. and we are in UNITY together as we want to have those things in life common to each of us.

I ran for public office at a low level and WON and I will continue to move forward in my own way to share these ideas of Liberty, Peace and Freedom and to expand the base of people all over the country who are educated.

My goal is to help prepare people to become political candidates who support Liberty and the ideas Ron Paul has helped to bring to the forefront.

The North American Empire is in the early stages of crumbling and out of the ashes will be born a new and more healthy country and way of living.

Read your history books and try to find any country that has remained "at the top" forever. There are none.

There is no reason to expect the pattern to change and so the next questions are "when" and "how" and "what next".

The future IS exciting because when the world is in a state of change, you and I have an opportunity to participate in a positive way in that change.

We can make the new world what ever we want it to be and today we have more technology and communications than ever before to make it happen.

That is what this movement is REALLY about. Ron Paul is not the key component here; you and I are.

Ron Paul has just handed the "Baton of Liberty" to the next runner.

[George]

TERROR & FEAR....... are used to achieve complacency and obedience, especially when citizens are deluded into believing they are still a free people.

[USA Mabry]

I could care less if he *actually did* announce his intent to quit. I am still supporting his ideas and ideals not his cult of personality. My party , of which I am a county delegate, has strayed from the principles that make this country great. Both parties trample on civil liberties and give us soft fascism / socialism tilted either "right" or "left".

I will write him in come November.

[Joe]

I think it's about time to revolutionize the mainstream media. In fact, that's part of our plan. I'm sorry that you won't be a part of it. You can claim that this article was accurate but the biggest flaw is in headline, which you know is the only thing most people will read, since it completely inaccurate. There are a lot of people catching on to how this society works and they are determined to fix it for their children's future. You can keep playing along or you can do some good.
"Know what's right, do good, use common sense."

[DX10]

Ever notice that commenters like rplat never really have anything of substance to say?

I knew when I saw the fire in Tim Russerts eyes that Dr. Paul would never get a break from the MSM and that he would only wind up a footnote in the election. But he has invigorated a lot of us old folks who remember, and illuminated a lot of young people who have begun to understand what is being done to them.

It is in the nature of governments to grow and for liberty to recede. Perhaps in time the few can persuade the many.

In my opinion your blog has been fair.

[Nathan]

No he hasn't completely quit the campaign and definitely the Revolution will go on but face the facts that Ron Paul has NO way of winning the Republican nomination. I hope that Ron Paul supporters realize this but still continue on with the Ron Paul Revolution and elect Ron Paul Republicans to congress because real change takes time and a change in the mindset of the general public. If people continue supporting Ron Paul's values and ideas for the next 4 years and longer then in 2012 hopefully someone with his beliefs will run for President and win!!!

[DenisL]

It ain't over until WE say it is over.
Ron Paul has not quit.
He is still spreading the message. We will do the rest.
He has not asked for his name to be removed from any ballot.
Lightning may strike between now and the convention.
Goodness knows that McCain is NOT well liked among Republicans. He is just the best that Americans can vote for with MSM like your self slanting the results.

Please quit spreading falsehoods. Admit the ambiguity of what he said in the video and URGE people to listen to the video themselves. There is a strategy afoot that needs McCain to shoot himself in the foot. You are hurting this by saying he is out when he is only talking about realities and odds. We know the odds. Do you? And the outcome if we fail? Get real and start helping

We ain't giving up!

[Lynn]

Sorry to see you get slammed, Andrew, when you've done so much good for the freedom movement. We are a passionate group! I woke up this morning to the NPR report that said Ron Paul appeared to be dropping out. I give you credit for the fact that you made a point of saying that Ron Paul didn't actually use the word "quit" or any of the others you listed. The reason he encouraged people to keep up the fight to become delegates is exactly the point that this revolution is bigger than the Presidential campaign.

When I attended my precinct convention on Tuesday, there were 16 people there. Of those 16 only 11 volunteered to be delegates--our precinct has 21 open slots. While I know for sure that 7 of the 16 people were specifically Ron Paul supporters, the others were just as fed up with the way the GOP party has departed from its roots of limited government and fiscal responsibility. We passed resolutions that were consistent with Ron Paul's ideas, so I think that the more important battle that night was achieved. If we can have the same impact at the county convention, there will be that many more people going on to our state convention pushing for more freedom and less government--the idea is to get the message all the way up to the national convention in September.

Some supporters still hold on to the slight chance that McCain will self-destruct before September--that would be good, but I'm not holding my breath. Besides, big-government Mitt Romney only suspended his campaign and could jump back in at the last minute to win the nomination. What I see here is a long-term battle of winning over the mass of Republicans who don't necessarily love John McCain but will blindly follow any candidate the neocon establishment puts in front of them. Getting to the national convention is the first big step.

For all those supporters who are discouraged by reports like this, realize that revolutions are not won with a single battle. Those in power at the top will not just step down--we have to vote them out, even if that means (gasp) voting for a Democrat in November. In my own state of Texas, Democrat Rick Noriega is sounding a lot more like Ron Paul than his opponent, Senator John Cornyn, who's a solid Bush backer. Is Noriega a perfect candidate for Ron Paul supporters? Maybe not, but I would much rather vote for someone who supports SOME of Ron Paul's ideas than someone who will do everything possible to thwart them. Remember that Dennis Kucinich is also a strong supporter of the Constitution.

Keep talking about freedom to your friends and family. It's a fact that if we hear something repeated over and over, we eventually will believe it--and what's more believable than the truth?

[granny miller]

I watched his video message last night and I have to agree - he's has withdrawn from the race.
I find it heartbreaking.

I had harbored a secret hope that he would run as an Indie, but it doesn't look like that's going to happen.

I was planning on going to Washington for the rally/march, but have changed my mind and will stay home.

Ron Paul will have my vote this April 22 & on November 4, but I'm not going to donate any more money or time to the effort.
I think this Nation is screwed no matter who "wins" in the Fall.
We have crossed the Rubicon.
I'm going to batten down the hatches and do the best I can to survive :-(

[Web Smith]

Well, Ron got some MSM coverage with this latest "message". You get the feeling that they are drooling for an actual announcement so they can jump all over it and beat the living hope out of anyone still dreaming of freedom.

Perhaps what we have here is a "coded" message from a Zionist prison.

Elizabeth Kucinich leads one to believe that there is more to Dennis than meets the eye.

[Carlo C]

Andrew, after reading your approach to Dr. Ron Paul and his Constitutional message over these few months, and assuming you are an educated person (educated on our Constitution and its contrast with today's abusive government) I have come to the conclusion that you are nothing more than a wolf in sheep's clothing who happens to be Anti-American and at the end "bought" and "paid for" by the people who really own the LA Times.

The US is full of people of weak character like yourself in key positions within our Media and Government, people who had to make a choice between what is right and what is immediately beneficial to themselves (two positions given to you by the elite and opposite to each other).

At least you have kept your job but you have underlined that our "Free Press" stopped being Free a long, long time ago.

Carlo
Miami, FL

[Michelle]

As a freshman at UNC Chapel Hill, these past few days have been very difficult. The death of our student body president has left the campus in a shocked state, and now Ron Paul giving up the race is just the icing on the cake.

I learned about Ron Paul last October and since then, I have been an ardent supporter, donating what little money I had to his campaign, all the while defending my decision to support him even though my extremely Republican family has criticized me (they were Romney supporters...ugh.) I've become more cynical of our country and the world since becoming a Ron Paul supporter, but my ideas of liberty and freedom have blossomed into something I cherish more than anything.

I will continue the fight for freedom, but it will be difficult. I cherish Ron Paul as I would my favorite teacher, and it pains me to move on, but I must use the information he has taught me. He did not create the American ideals of Liberty and Freedom, our founders did. I must remember that this is not his revolution, it is the people's.

(Well put. Thank you for sharing your thoughts in such a personal way. That seems to be an attribute of many Paul supporters.)

[brelena]

Hi there, Malcolm. I've enjoyed your writings quite a lot, but I'm afraid you missed the point here. This message from Ron Paul is perfect! He’s saying this revolution isn’t about top down management (which is the status quo and doesn’t work.) This is about the principles that each of us can espouse, spread, and live by. At a grass roots level, the liberty movement has sparked so many of us to start turning our local governments around, from the ground up. THIS is the victory. Each of us understands the message. It can be replicated over and over. When one person goes down, ten more of us pop up. We are an army with a message. What a gift this movement is for all of us.
Cheers!
Elena

(And we'll be watching for developments with great interest. Please keep us posted.)

[ellen]

This sounds like an obituary. A very kind, sympathetic and respectful one, but perhaps premature! While Dr. Paul spoke of this campaign "winding down" very soon, it could be that he is merely trying to frame, for his supporters, the longer-range perspective that will be necessary to push the movement forward (only one aspect of which is his presidential bid.)

At first watch of the video, I, too, experienced a profound sense that he was dropping out, even though he never actually said that.

Upon my third listen to the video, a few different points began to stand out in my mind: The grassroots has been "energized", and these "dangerous and exciting times", are quite hopeful ones, because the message is finding unprecedented support. The grassroots must continue its passionate and creative dissemination of the message, with certain centralized functions in which Dr. Paul is willing to play a key role. Examples are: increased organization, funding of candidates, education, Dr. Paul's new book which outlines the core ideas, his availability to speak, etc. What I actually DID NOT hear, is that he is ending the campaign, or dropping out!

Dr. Paul is a seasoned veteran of politics, (and a good steward of the funds entrusted to him.) He sees more efficient uses of resources at this moment than fruitlessly begging the media to notice him. The attention now turns to the energetic determination of the grassroots, and you, Mr. Malcolm and Mr. Frederick, are to be congratulated for your solid journalistic instincts in noticing our existence!

[Joe]

I will still be writing in Dr. Paul and will still proudly have his signs in my yard. The man is what this country needs and it's very sad that the media confirms the hype that the elections are a popularity contest. It's even more upsetting that they wouldn't let him be heard. I've spoken to many people who say, "Ron who?" I always point them to the internet and let them do their own research. Then they are 100% for him and his stances after they research him. Come on people, this is OUR country! Don't tell me you don't know how to read and you don't have internet!

[s]

I and many others will still write his name in on the ballot because we know that McHillobama surely doesn't deserve our votes nor will they get them.

[DouglasSavedFromApathy]

I Pledge Allegiance
To the Constitution
Of the United States of America!

One Nation, Sovereign,
Free from Foreign Control.
Of the People for the People,
To uphold Freedom,
Liberty and Justice
For All Citizens.

I will protect our Inalienable Rights
From all Enemies
Foreign or Domestic,
Regardless of Rank or Station,
Race, Religion or Gender.

With this Pledge I bind myself
To the Constitution
Of the United States of America.
Of its Ideals set by our Forefathers,
Until such time that Spirit has Perished.

- Written by Douglas D. West
February 2, 2008

I wont post the entire Constitution here as it is far too long, however please take time at some point to refamiliarize yourself with it here:

http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution.html

The Bill of Rights: A Transcription

The Preamble to The Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights."

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

[MJ]

We have to work hard PAUL folks. We are now delegates. McCain does not have all his delegates we know this. We will work on resolutions the whole way up. MY PRECINCT DID NOT ELECT MCCAIN!!!!

WE MUST WIN IN THE NONTRADITIONAL SENSE ---
AT THE CONVENTION!!!!

GO RON PAUL

[Aaron]

Geez....same message, same media. I wonder how many times this is that Paul has reportedly 'quit the race.' The press keeps making the same mistakes over and over again...why not actually watch the video? Get the words from the 'horse's mouth' instead of some other media outlet. We Paul supporters have A LOT of the GOP delegates....it will be interesting to see what happens at the National convention. If we see the GOP platform change their stance on things such as the gold standard, policing the world, and overspending, then we have done a great job. Hopefully, and only then, will more people begin to realize what a great policy he has.

Just Took over a Texas precinct convention and will do the same at the county convention for Paul's message!!!!

[MJ]

We will win! IN A NONTRADITIONAL SENSE!!!!

GO RON PAUL!!!

UPCOMING STATES PLEASE FIGHT HARD!!!!

[charles ranalli]

it seems that Doctor Paul
has given an uncharacteristically ambiguous
and even obscure message this time.
that seems to be the source of the controversy
in this blog.

perhaps i may be putting words into his mouth
but i suspect that
what Doctor Paul was trying to convey
is actually a double-edged message
to all his loyal supporters -
implying that each of us has the right
to decide what he or she wants to do
at this unique point in time.

for those who feel that his campaign
has effectively reached the end of the road -
he says -
go in peace -
with your head held high -
and thanks for all the wonderful work you have done.

and for those who have the stomach
for a long - drawn-out - glorious
but most probably futile
fight-to-the-finish -
he is saying -
God bless you -
my special ones.
thank you -
and go for it -
and know that i will be with you all the way.

Doctor Ron Paul is
first and foremost a man of
promethean integrity
sincere goodwill
profound humility
and most heartfelt gratitude.

his latest message -
which i think i have interpreted correctly here -
expresses his very essence -
and he knows that
we love him for who he is
as well as what he represents.

charles ranalli
albuquerque

(Thanks for your interpretation. The need for it may help explain why Dr. Paul did not connect too well with so enough voters anywhere to win a primary. Appreciate your help.)

[Lucas]

Wow, after all of your positive (if somewhat sarcastic) information given about and on the subject of Ron Paul, to sit and read some of my fellow Paul backers rip into you like this in the comment section, well, I've read almost every blog you've posted on Ron Paul, but never felt the need to comment. I'm commenting now, and the comment is 'Good job, you've reported the news as you heard it, filtered through you. You don't deserve the nasty remarks left here, though I"M sure you expected them.'

(Thanks, Lucas, for your kind words, but most of all for reading us so regularly. Look forward to having you back and commenting more often.)

[Bill Moore]

sounds like the news releases here in Texas the week before the election. They claimed he quit back then too.

[ABC LIES]

Cite your source.

I call shenanigans!

[Burt]

SHAME ON YOU FOR PRINTING NON-SENSE.
YOU USUALLY DO BETTER THAN THIS.

RON PAUL HAS NOT QUIT THE RACE. ABC SCREWED UP AND EVERY PARROT OUT THERE STARTED CHIRPING.

IT ALL BS! THE YOU CFR AND THE MEDIA THAT THEY OWN.!

[Walt, Virginia]

Ron Paul should give up, as should his followers.

The country has spoken, and to ignore those that have voted in their tens of millions to reject him is an insult to their intelligence.

even in "Live Free or Die" New Hampshire, 90% of republicans and independants chose "death" rather than his philosophy.

that really should tell the paulists something.

[J. O'Brien]

Andrew Malcom, A Real Talent for Tabloid and Truthiness.

Yet again, you seek to ridicule Ron Paul. You always manage to avoid any real substance to the issues Ron Paul (and our country founders) stand for.

Your title says, "Ron Paul gives up the race" but then you go on to say he didn't actually say he was giving up the race. One of your statements must be a lie. Contrary to what you said in your blog and responses to reader posts, Ron Paul said in the video, "I will continue to make every effort to visit any state...". Yet again, more contradictions to what you write. Ron Paul also states in the video "The campaign will continue to be a grass roots effort and not a top down rigidly controlled central operation.". In effect, this means the campaign will be over when the grassroots support says it's over. This is also what Ron Paul has repeatedly said throughout his campaign. In giving you the benefit of doubt, I think you understand this but you chose to imply otherwise.

When I read your blog, you always seem to mix lies, sarcasm, satire, and distorted facts taken out of context. You then use just enough truth to stitch it all together and give it that "truthiness" feel. It occurred to me that this is exactly the kind of reporting and writing papers like the National Enquirer do.

When those 200 LA Times job cuts get names assigned to them, you might want to check out the tabloids. I think you have a real talent there.

[AndrewAlso]

Andrew,

Your "general off the island" metaphor is pretty close, although you forgot to mention that the general will still happily accept money from those still fighting the good fight. Can't have a r3volution without donations to the general!

Little do the Paultards realize, but they've just personally funded a decade's worth of re-election campaigns for this nut. He was never serious about running for President, and is now laughing all the way to the bank with their millions of dollars. Good example of how the free market works, though- some people will throw their money at the most ridiculous things!

[Cory B]

Nice article Andrew. Sadly some did not read more than the headline before commenting, thus giving credence to the notion that Paul supporters are often times delusional.

My advice: realize that the bid is over for 2008, that you made a greater than expected impact on the race, and move on to continue the "revolution". Do any more than that, (such as show denial like those above) and the loonie label will forever continue. One last tip, if Paul wants a chance in 2012, get him to spend part of that pile of cash on speaking lessons.

[Jake]

I love Dr. Paul and I love the United States. Andrew, I even love you for writing about Dr. Paul. I honestly can't tell what you think of Dr. Paul (which really shouldn't matter because true journalism is rooted in objectivity), but I'm thankful you write about him. I have been one of those faithful bloggers and Ron Paul organizers that heard about Dr. Paul last summer and my life has never been the same since. He has not only cured my political apathy, he has made me a better person. In the decades to come, I am so grateful that I will be able to say that I stood for what Dr. Paul stood for and that I fought for what he fought for, which is the cause of liberty.

(Jake, your story is one of the intreresting things that intrigued us about Dr. Paul's candidacy or rather the campaign of so many followers and their dedication. Thanks for reading and taking the time to share it.)

[Jim]

Mr. Malcolm,

I have been following your blog now for quite some time (yes, even articles that were *not* about Ron Paul) and I have a few comments that I have been holding that I would like to make now. First, however, I would address the readers:

To the few of you I have seen post and comment here with some respect and couth: thank you for speaking truth and maintaining dignity at the same time. The same goes for all the rest of you that supported RP in the conventional way -- i.e. respectably. Thank you.

To the others who are here simply to flame Mr. Malcolm: Shame on you. Your crass, rude, arrogant, and often ignorant postings are a big reason we didn't have a chance from the beginning (that's right -- I said it). From the jump people took notice of all of your crass and rude behavior. That never helped us. Other people read these comments, you know. If you are rude and hateful when you claim to speak for the Revolution, you HARM the Revolution. If you people could have kept your common sense about you and played this "game" like ADULTS we would have had better results, media be damned. All you people who stalk the blogs, foaming at the mouth, just waiting for an Andrew Malcolm or Don Frederick to pounce on, "SCARED" others who might have otherwise listened to Dr. Paul. I know because several people have told me that's exactly why they didn't support him -- because of his "crazy" and "rabid" supporters. They simply would not get in line with YOU.

Stop trying to blame others, and LOOK IN THE MIRROR.

Let this be a lesson to you -- we're not trying to make Ron Paul the Captain of a bowling team for Pete's sake, we're talking the PRESIDENCY! You can NOT act like animals and expect to be taken seriously! Chasing Hannity down in the street?! Yeah, brilliant move, guys.

There are probably a LOT of people like me -- conservative Republicans who support Ron Paul -- that are REALLY pissed off at the lot of you people who seem to live only to harass people about not covering Ron Paul, but never once posting a cogent comment with any SUBSTANCE. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Politics is a grown-up game. If you can't play like a grown-up, then go back to the sandbox and leave it to those of us who CAN.

Now then, Mr. Malcolm:

I have to give you credit -- you are one of the few "mainstream" blogs that kept up with the Ron Paul campaign, and for the coverage, I thank you. However, even bearing in mind the old adage "any publicity is good publicity," the tone in which you reported on those items was, shall I say, less-than-objective. You took every opportunity to mock or make fun -- though I have to give you that it was (at times) very subtle and probably glossed over by many in the rush to crucify you in the comments section. :)

Indeed, people thanked you quite often for belittling them and their cause... it was interesting and sad to observe.

I will not jump on the "bash Andrew" bandwagon; you sir are entitled to your opinion and you get paid cover the news. It is only natural that your personal opinions or feelings come through in your writing. You have a talent for writing, no doubt, and a sense of humor that is very keen and sharp -- forgive me for saying though that you come across a bit arrogant and condescending in your posts. especially when you brandish your sarcastic flavor of humor.

I will not argue that you posted false information -- because I do not feel it IS false. Indeed, the fact is that RP all but gave up the race after Super Tuesday. I am one of the RP supporters who are realists, and I knew since mid-to-late 2007 that RP didn't have a snowball's chance. Still, hope is a potent thing, especially for those who have had none for a long time. Ron Paul gave (gives) people hope -- hope that there really ARE politicians and people in positions of authority who DO care about the people and haven't sold their souls to the lobbyists and special interest groups; Hope that our country is not doomed to the whims of the corporations and neo-Cons. This campaign -- this Revolution -- is more about hope than anything else, if you think about it. People want real change, not just empty words and a stuffed shirt.

So -- listen to me Mr. Malcolm, this is just for you -- when you mock people's HOPE, as you have done repeatedly in this blog, even if it seems to you that it is funny and you might say to yourself: "wow, that was really a zinger! I'm SO clever!" It speaks more to the type of person you are than anything else, as far as I'm concerned. That you would take people's hope and either try to tear it apart, or just mock the s**t out of them for having the NERVE to feel hope and believe in something in this demoralized world of instant gratification, sensory overload and "news" that consists of which bubble-gum pop star is in court this week and for what -- it is a disgusting thing to behold.

At least you, sir, can report something worthwhile. I am pleased that I have never read the words "Britney Spears" on your blog. Kudos for that. However, I would urge you to think, before you wield your considerably sharp pen in this manner again, of people like me who see through it and thus, see the real Andrew Malcolm.

We are out there, and we are less than impressed.

Good day to you, sir.

[Jake]

Andrew, I think this is the first blogpost of yours that I have replied to, although I have read many.

I can tell that you've been hurt before. I know that you only act curmudgeonly because you are trying to protect your [political] heart. ;-)

Anyhow, I know that the "Ron Paul phase" of the Revolution -- or at least the "Ron Paul for President" phase -- has come to all but an official end (although he hasn't formally quit so as to hold out hope for any technicalities that may arise).....

But that's not really what this is all about, anyway.

Sure, it would have been grand and swell if we'd been able to deliver a knock-out blow to the glass jaw of today's GOP, and force it to return to its roots in Round One. But that didn't happen.

Who will fight Round Two? It will almost certainly not be Ron Paul, but he's a cagey old fighter (just ask Chris Peden). I would bet my annual salary that we certainly haven't seen the last of him.

[poppatml]

Andrew, I have to admitt you are consistent. The question I have for you now that you have completed Congressman Pauls campaign for President with wit and humor why not explain to your readers why Congressmen Pauls message missed the mark. Surely with your keen insight one edittorial piece could set the record straight on true conservtive values of modern day politics. Com'on I know you want to let him have it. Show us your stuff, we are such a easy mark.

[Jake]

I think this is the media's way to move to phase two. TOTAL blackout of Ron Paul, even on the LA Times Top of the Ticket blog.

Shame on you Andrew, you know he hasn't quit. We'll see you in St. Paul for Dr. Paul.

[blonduxo]

So Andrew you did not listen to the Missouir radio broadcast?

Not sure what CNN is reporting from Jessie Benton but my campaign for him, other RPR candidates, and the R3VOLution will never end.

Ron Paul Now More Than Ever!

[Will]

This is really sad news. I imagine this is especially hard on you, Mr. Malcolm; how will you get people to read your blog without including the words "Ron Paul" in your articles?

[Thomas]

Andrew, thank you for your kind and generous words in brining this to us.

Ron Paul showed many that they were not alone but had comrades. They were able to stand by side with others, the remnant, as Paul called it, a biblical reference. As lone coals in a fire die out, bunched coals keep burning.

Some of the revolutionaries will continue to work within the GOP. Harvesting votes and delegates might be part of that. Delegates can be a positive influence at the national convention.

Supporting freedom in those issues that Ron Paul brings to the House is related. It works for liberty and demonstrates Ron Paul's leadership in this nation and encourages it in the House. So is supporting like-minded candidates, though that can spill to other parties.

Paul's book will help continue the spread of the message. Is this the "cookbook" from the movie "Lady in the Water" by M. Night Shyamalan? Or is the "cookbook" from a new writer. Paul hinted that some are taking on projects communicating liberty through history and economics. Will economics and history departments be swamped come September?

Paul is a man of character and a man of faith. This attracted many, but was used to harm him and the campaign. Even with that, it was good to see a man who always told the truth, who assumed we were smart, who shows his creativity, who loves individuals, who did good. He spoke to ideas rather than attack people. He is a humble man, aware of his own limitations. He is generous with apprentices, even the revolution which took on his name. Minor parties would serve us well to nominate candidates like Ron Paul.

The campaign is winding down. That which continues does so for the growth of liberty, even as a Presidential campaign. New things are coming.

Things will continue on. How much? Will there be a growth of a love for liberty and simply good sense? I don't kno;; I wish the best for this nation. Paul has handed that to the Revolutionaries. He will be a part of many efforts. He will work in Congress. But, it is really up to those who love liberty. Many who see catastrophe on the horizon fear it is too late. Let us choose to believe it is not too late. Let us give the nation another chance.

The revolution continues, Andrew. Thank you for recognizing that we are here and for your generous recording of this phase of history. Your patient humor has led to wisdom for us as we figure out who we are and what we are doing, a fine and gentle mirror that showed our good features, sometimes repeating our own words in a manner much better than first blurted.

[Scott AM]

This shouldn't be so confusing and I believe that it's probably the fault of many parties not just one including the campaign itself, but with all the disinformation and slander already why should believe this to be entirely true. If McCain were to be disqualified an any way(yeah it won't happen right...) are you saying that Ron Paul would not have a chance. Are you saying that there would be no nominee for the republicans and they would have to either start over or pick someone at random.

[Kahuna]

Paul never had a chance of winning and, right from the beginning, he was regarded as a nut-case. Only in a true democracy could someone like him be a candidate for the presidency.

In any other country, he would already be in a mental institution.

[chris]

Still waiting on your answer...
-sigh-

In all seriousness I proposed marriage to you in total jest. I, for one, have appreciated your blogs on the subject of Ron Paul's campaign. I am somewhat bummed out you are receiving so much flack from some of my other brothers and sisters in the Revolution.

Thank you Mr. Malcom for your coverage.

Christina

[dan butler]

america is the greatest country in the world at this time.
I MAINTAIN THAT THE FORSAID COMMENT CAN BE PROFESSEDLY PROCLAIMED BY THE FACT OF , IF AMERICA SNEEZES THE WORLD CATCHES A COLD. WE HAVE BECOME THE WORLDS' POLICEMAN AND WE CAN ILL -AFFORD TO.
I RAN FOR PORT COMMISSIONER IN SEATTLE , YEARS AGO , WHY BECAUSE I THOUGHT THAT THERE WERE AREAS OF NEEDED CHANGE ON THE WATERFRONT THAT WEREN'T BEING PROPERLY ADDRESSED.
DID I HAVE A CHINAMANS CHANCE IN HELL OF BEING ALLECTED? NO ! AND I WASN'T , AND IT HURT EVEN THOUGH I LOST. BECAUSE NO ONE RUNS WHO DOSEN.T EXPECT TO WIN. I KNEW THAT MY VIEWS WOULD BE HEARD AND I COULD EXPRESS THOSE AREAS THAT I THOUGHT NEEDED TO BE IMPROVED UPON. THE EXISTING COMMISSIONERS LISTENED TO MY VIEWS AND THEY DID MAKE THE CHANGES THAT I ADVOCATED AND SEATTLE WAS THE BETTER FOR THEM, I BELIEVE.
MR RON PAUL HAS ALSO ADVOCATED CHANGES THAT I BELIEVE THE CANIDATES WILL TAKE UNDER ADVISEMENT.
I HAVE BEEN INVITED TO ATTEND VARIOUS MEETINGS ON IMPORTANT ISSUES FACING SEATTLE OVER THESE PAST YEARS AND I BELIEVE MY COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED AS TRYING TO SOLVE VARIOUS PROBLEMS BEING DISCUSSED.
THERE IS A SAYING THAT SUGGESTS, " IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY - STAND UP AND SAY IT - IF YOU DON'T SHUTUP AND SIT DOWN,". YOU MAY NEVER KNOW HOW MANY OTHERS FEEL THE SAME WAY YOU DO UNTIL IT IS SAID.
MR. PAUL WILL BE ASKED FOR HIS COMMENTS MORE NOW AFTER MAKING HIS PRESIDENTAL BID AND PUTTING HIS NECK ON THE LINE. WE ALL CAN BE VERY THANKFUL FOR HIS EFFORTS. WE NEED MORE PATRIOTS LIKE HIM.
WE CAN ALSO BE THANKFUL FOR SITES LIKE THIS ONE.
WHERE ARE VIEWS CAN BE ADDRESSED.
THIS IS PROBABLY GETTING TO BE TO LONG.
IF ANYONE IS INTERESTED IN MORE OF MY THOUGHTS SEND ME A BLOGG. WILD BILL HICHOCH

[HistoryBuff]

_Paul sounds rather like the general who got safely off the island radioing back to his stranded troops to keep up the good fight._

Don't beat around the bush, man, just say "Douglas MacArthur" already.

[Michael Dane Petersen]

Shame on the L.A. Times for printing this. Congressman Ron Paul is still in the race and will be heading to the Republican National Convention in Sept. to challenge Senator John McCain, the war-monger, for the Republican nomination. People, don't believe the Main Stream Media and their lie's.

(Well, be sure to come here and tell us where and when his next presidential campaign appearance is. Otherwise, we'll be writing about him at the convention.)

[Colt-1]

I agree that many Paul supporters were over the top; certainly did come across as "loonies". But for the ones who aren't, which is the majority of them, are people sincere people with the best of intentions.

I also think it's interesting to have come across "blog" after "blog" from people who consider themselves journalists... who bait, condescend, and patronize the most extreme of the bunch to make a living.

(Thanks, Colt. Dr. Paul and his followers are an intriguing story that hardly anyone else was covering. Glad you found us and appreciate your insights.)

[brian]

Thanks for giving us a fair shake Malcolm. If only there had more reports like the one's you've produced, well, everything would still have turned out pretty much the same.

But didn't he go gracefully, last one standing, catalyst for a movement. I for example, beat a neo-con who doesn't think we have a right to privacy 67:33 for Precinct Chair, started a student organization on campus (liberty caucus), and will continue to fight. Many of my colleagues are doing the same.

Yes he's still on the ballots, but guys, come on. This is the new phase. We've got to stick together and move forward.

[brian]

Thanks for giving us a fair shake, Malcolm.

(You bet, Brian. It's a good story and we'll continue to write about the movement when it seems warranted. Keep me posted on anything you hear. You and anyone can leave us tips via Comments and just say not for publication. Good to see you back. See you soon.)

[Tim]

"...but we do still encourage all effort to gain the maximum number of votes and delegates in all the remaining primaries..."

While it may not be a primary focus for him, it doesn't sound like he'll be dropping out. I still plan on voting for him in May.

[David]

Thanks for concisely summing up the course of Ron Paul's campaign. It would have been nice if all of your reporting on Ron Paul had been as unbiased as this one. I do have to give you acolades for not just saying, "I told you so."

Although some of his ideas were a bit too radical for many, you do have to admit that he is the only person who ran for President who was being honest with the American people. He's talking about the economy and how the Federal Reserve causes inflation. He's talking about the war and how the cost of the war is causing economic problems. He's talking about terrorism and how it comes as a result of our foreign policy where we prop up oppressive, brutal reigmes simply because they give us access to "cheap" oil so that we can continue our society of over consumption. Just because McCain won the nomination and a Democrat is probably going to win the Presidency does not mean that those issues are going to go away. They will be there, and they will be dealt with by a person who thinks it is politically expedient to not talk about them.

[Abul Kalam]

Dear Don Frederick and Andrew Malcolm, I am one of your neighbors from the Caltrans building. I do not normally get involved in American politics or comment on blogs about it. I grew up in a Muslim country in South Asia and a Muslim by birth. Came to this country as a student and graduated as a Summa Cum Laude. Then I went back to my home country and started a manufacturing industry and had to travel to Korea frequently, and during this time I learnt fluent Korean. The business did not go well, so I came back and started work in Caltrans. I had the opportunity to grow up in a "thirld world" country, get education in the US and then work in international business where I got to see how a country pulled itself up from poverty to wealth, which is S. Korea. From this life experience of seeing, experiencing and working in three different world very intimately, I developed a unique world perspective.

From this perspective, I will give you my analysis of the Ron Paul phenomenon, which is so often misunderstood.

In every country or society or segment of society there are around 5-10% of the population who has the intelligence or the resources to be truly aware and awake and the rest are usually the sleeping or fooled/misled majority. Ron Paul's importance is in the fact that he was able to inspire this segment of US population in my opinion.

Some may accuse me that I am biased as a Muslim in my position of supporting or defending Ron Paul because his stands are anti-noecon and non-interventionist, while this could be partly true, I would argue that even if I was not from a Muslim background, I would still support him. But these are moot points, as none in this world can truly separate themselves from their background and be totally unbiased, as human beings we have not reached that level of evolution yet.

Ron Paul is not perfect, he is only human. His strong support from the white-nationalist and anti-war fringe communities were PR nightmares and his lack of conciliatory and practical bridge building effort with black and hispanic community on welfare/affirmative action and immigration issues, were short-comings and I believe more work is needed in these areas.

But overall, his ideas are based on sound principles which have been proven in the past:

- small government
- sound money
- non-interventionism

No other politician had the courage to say "They are over here because we have been over there"

No other politicians from the left, right or any of the parties came close in terms of presenting a long term solution to problems that ails this country. As a dispassionate and somewhat aloof observer, I must say that you should thank Ron Paul for running his campaign, because with this campaign he was able to energize the positive and intelligent segment of the US population and show to the world that the US still have some life and leadership left to it and it has not become totally doomed as it appears to the rest of the world now. In fact, this positive image of hope is the reason why Ron Paul is the most popular US candidate internationally, among the net-savvy international community who are aware of what is going in the world and care about the future of the world.

That Ron Paul's campaign was not going to win the nomination, considering what he was up against, was known to many Ron Paul supporters like me from the start, but the nomination was not really the goal, it was just the first launching pad. We will continue to work with this movement because personally it gives me hope that someday this movement will grow and make the US a better country than what we have now for its own sake and for the rest of the world. So please do not write off the Ron Paul Movement, I am committed to it for life like millions of others in this country, because I believe it is good for our collective future. Until we get something better to replace it with, this is all we have, a hope for a better future.

[AAAAANDRE]

Ahhh, "Cut & Paste" journalism at it's finest...

ABC gets it wrong and everyone else follows their lead and spreads the lie because it's what they want to hear.

[Fact Checker]

You will likely have to print a retraction. A simple fact checking phone call directly to the campaign will confirm for you that Ron Paul has not left the race. Your article is unfortunately way off the mark.

(Well, be sure to let us know the time and place for his next presidential campaign appearance. If it's not in the next day or so, we'll know what he really meant.)

[sean truitt]

boing!

c'mon people! watch the video. let's get busy. all ron paul supporters, get together with your meetup groups and become active in the republican party. let's take it back from the evangelicals and neocons. i hope to see you in washington dc jun 21. (you too andrew)

[jamaku]

Just in: Mc Cain hit by a truck: intensive care, situation uncertain.... :)

(To John007--

Obviously, as you must have known, we can't print your lengthy comment.
I would suggest, John, that you have an awful lot of anger and hate inside. And it would be good for you to get some serious professional help as soon as possible.)

[Pauly]

REMEMEMBER HERBERT HUMPHRY IN 1968....
He did not win or compete in ONE primary...
think about that!!!!!!

(It was Hubert Humphrey. He was a sitting vice president. And Richard Nixon beat him badly.)

[Ryan]

I am a HUGE Ron Paul supporter and have given much of my energy and money to his campaign...

Everyone who ever believed that Ron Paul would be America's "savior" was sadly mistaken....just as Obamaphiles are even more mistaken to believe he is going to be America's savior. No one person can save us.
BUT Note this - Paul becoming president would help shift the course of history in favor of individualism and true liberty.

Does anyone realize how monumental Ron Paul's campaign has been to date!? It is like tons of dynamite for freedom blowing up at the base of the new world order MOUNTAIN.
It is not the time to concede!
Everyone needs to embrace their own personal power and realize we don't need a single leader to "save us" and America!
We have each other...and the great opportunity to awaken the masses thanks to Paul....and hundreds of thousands have opened their eyes.
No one could have ever expected that YouTube videos like "Ron Paul Slams Fed Chairman" would have been some of the top viewed and rated videos!
Since when does a congressional meeting compete with the latest Britney Spears drama!

If you think that Ron Paul was the singular hope of the U.S., then you are like all of the other sheep who consume and regurgitate the message of the mainstream media.

The globalist who seek the dissolution of America's sovereignty have been rocked...
Ron Paul has not quit fighting for freedom and
NEITHER SHOULD YOU.
Double your efforts...not necessarily for Paul...but towards taking back the power centers of America...ONE BY ONE.
Peace

[Robyn]

Ron Paul quits to go on a book tour

[Patrick]

I liked your article. It was mostly factual. However, i can say that I have not met any obnoxious, or "loony", Ron Paul supporters. Nor have I seen any of them use all caps. And if there were, they were probably imps and trolls from the other candidates camps. I have seen others attacking Ron Paul supporters, calling them names, and what not... You yourself use ad hominem to marginalize. It seems to be a new trend in the old media. While your newspaper did cover the amazing freedom movement (sort of), it was with a condescending attitude which came across very sophomoric. Consider how you in the media crowned Rudy Giuliani the "national front runner" when he was far from it... If you would have given freedom and liberty the same fair coverage, we wouldn't be in this mess we are now. Trillions of debt notes in debt. Illegal war out of control. Economy tanking. We all should be begging Dr. Paul to be our President. Seems his "nutty" forecasts of our current financial crisis was right on the money. You in the press will finally get it when you can only print what your corporate owners dictate to you. Or do they already?

[Keith]

Ah, the fade away has begun in earnest, thank the gods.

No hard feelings toward anyone or any journalist.

I was elected Precinct Chair in my voting precinct. I have 6 delegates available with 3 Ron Paul supporters elected as delegates and 3 alternates.

We have work to do over the next two years.

I'll be training other Ron Paul supporters on how to run for office and making my precinct aware of the real issues with well researched and factual information.

Future voters may not agree with us totally, but they will very much be aware of the financial and freedom issues the MSM kept from them - starting in April 2008.

If I do my job right, more people will begin to call and write their elected officials to ask clarifying questions and demand answers.

Having a profession in financial services, I'm watching the increasing volatility in the global markets and am waiting for the next phase of destabilization.

Bloomberg.com has interviews with European invstment bankers who say the Dollar will Experience a "Death Lunge" in 2008 and that the Euro will have problems; the same European expert forecasts gold at about $2,000 an ounce within 24 months.

Other Bloomberg.com interviews of high level financial experts often make comments that seem to support what Ron Paul has been saying - but the average, everyday person w