U.S., allies girding for worst-case scenario with Syria’s WMD

This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

During a week that witnessed deadly artillery exchanges between Syria and Turkey and a tense showdown over a plane purportedly ferrying munitions from Russia, the arrival of 150 U.S. troops in Jordan was likely to be viewed as token support for an ally coping with a refugee influx from Syria’s civil war.

The deployment, though, may be a response to mounting concerns at the Pentagon and among European and Middle East allies that Syria’s stockpile of chemical weapons could fall into the hands of hostile forces if the embattled regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad is eventually toppled.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta disclosed little about the special-forces mission to Jordan when he confirmed it at a meeting of NATO defense ministers in Brussels on Wednesday. But he noted that the United States has been working closely with Jordan to keep track of Syria’s weapons of mass destruction as the 19-month-old rebellion grinds on.

Unlike a decade ago, when bad intelligence on Iraq’s alleged chemical and biological weapons spurred a clamor for U.S. military intervention, defense strategists appear to be approaching the suspected stockpiles of mustard and nerve gases in Syria with more collaboration and caution.

The resistance to preemptive action isn’t just a consequence of lessons learned in Iraq. Syria is believed to have one of the world’s largest chemical weapons arsenals, with commercial satellite surveillance and intelligence reports suggesting as many as 50 production and storage sites as well as missiles that could carry the deadly agents beyond its borders. Jane’s Intelligence Review reported in 2009 that Damascus had embarked on a major upgrade of its chemical weapons facilities, transforming its Safir site near Aleppo, now the scene of intense fighting, into a credible deterrent to any threat from nuclear-armed Israel.

The scope of the Syrian chemical weapons program and the international community’s failure to craft a cohesive plan to stop the fighting confront Western military strategists with the need to plan for a worst-case scenario rather than act to prevent it, analysts say. That means preparing allies in the region to launch a massive rapid-deployment operation after the Assad regime collapsed but before Al Qaeda-aligned fighters or rogue elements of the Syrian rebels could get their hands on the WMD.

The U.S. special forces sent to Amman are probably training Jordanian troops in containment techniques and checking their equipment and chemical-biological hazard protection and practices, said Steven Bucci, a former Army Green Beret officer and senior Pentagon official who is now a research fellow in defense and domestic security at the Heritage Foundation.

‘They will probably be running them through training procedures for dealing with this stuff to secure it and get it under control or to respond to it if it gets used’ in a calamitous last battle, said Bucci. ‘This is about the best use of our military we could have now, and hopefully we’re also helping out the Turks.’

Bucci testified to Congress in July that even a limited operation to secure Syria’s chemical weapons would require more than 75,000 troops -- and many more if launched amid the civil war now raging.

It is ‘not a viable option’ to commit masses of U.S. ground troops to such an operation, Bucci told the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation and Trade. Any effective force, he said, would have to involve troops from allied Muslim countries also at risk of attack with Syria’s chemical weapons.

That’s why, he said in an interview Thursday, it is essential for the United States to coordinate with Syria’s neighbors now to prepare a post-Assad operation that can prevent terrorist groups or smugglers from making off with the WMD.

Raymond Zilinskas, director of the chemical and biological weapons program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Monterey, points out that assessments of Syria’s chemical weapons program are largely unverified. But he, too, says the United States and its allies should be girding for the worst.

‘From what I understand, these depots are pretty well guarded by the Syrian regime’s forces, and they would probably be the last to give up their guarding duties,’ Zilinskas said. ‘But if there is a total collapse, there would of course be a threat of jihadists getting these weapons.’

Talk of airstrikes to remove the threat is nonsensical, Zilinskas said. Syria has formidable antiaircraft defenses built with Russian assistance, and the international community lacks crucial information on the precise locations, quantities and containment of the gases to be able to bomb them without risking spreading the deadly substances.

‘Sarin is pretty volatile. If all these other problems could be resolved, the sarin would probably be destroyed or would be so volatile that it would disappear quickly,’ Zilinskas said. ‘But that’s not necessarily the case with mustard gas. It’s much less deadly but much more persistent. And if the Syrians turn out to have VX, which is a persistent nerve gas, that could cause real problems. That is the worst-case scenario they have to prepare for.’

ALSO:

U.S. Embassy employee is killed in Yemen Syrian rebel group claims responsibility for Damascus blast

Hezbollah claims responsibility for drone shot down in Israel Follow Carol J. Williams at www.twitter.com/cjwilliamslat

Photo, top: A military training facility in Russeifeh, Jordan, where U.S. forces and a handful of British allies began training Jordanian commandos this week to respond in case of an attack with chemical weapons from neighboring Syria. Credit: Mohammad Hannon / Associated Press

Insert: A scene from U.S.-Jordanian military exercises in the Qatrana desert in June. Credit: Jamal Nasrallah /AFP/Getty Images