24 Frames

Movies: Past, present and future

« Previous | 24 Frames Home | Next »

Should studios continue bringing back the '80s?

June 14, 2010 |  7:00 am


If this movie-going summer was to yield nothing else, it was at least bring us this: clarity about Hollywood's investment in reviving the 1980s.

And no weekend would throw more light on that question than this one, with its unlikely coincidence of two major '80s properties hitting the screen at the same time. All we needed to feel more like we were back in Reaganville were Billy Joel and Madonna solving a Rubik's Cube while "Knight Rider" and "The Cosby Show" played in the background.

And yet as the weekend wound down, we were left with little clarity at all. The verdict was as split as opinions on "Twin Peaks" -- one movie, "The Karate Kid," overachieved at the box office, and the other, "The A-Team," sputtered behind it ($30 million behind it).

That would seem to give no indication of anything, except for maybe Hollywood's go-to trope: The movie has to deliver, regardless of its era of origin. Conceived under the hand of could-his-stock-drop-any-faster Joe Carnahan, "The A-Team" was a fusillade of nonsensical noise, and audiences saw right through it. On the other hand, "The Karate Kid," while hardly representing a breakthrough in cinematic accomplishment (or a narrative or emotional triumph over the original), did what Hollywood arguably does best: produce a competent entertainment that offers few surprises but succeeds completely as a crowd-pleaser.

That all would seem to suggest little about what we can expect from future remakes, or yield any guidance about how much Hollywood should continue down its '80's path (with a new "Beverly Hills Cop,"  "Wall Street," etc.) But there is a lesson nestled beneath the split decision.

By chance, we happened to catch on cable this weekend two truly great pop classics from the '80s, "Field of Dreams" and "Back to the Future." (It's almost as if cable programmers, aware of how the '80s were being tortured on the big screen, decided to slip in a little reminder of how it's really done).

Obviously the Me Decade had more than its share of stinkers and mass-marketed schlock too. But what struck us from watching these two films, which existed not in the art house ghetto but as broad hits at the multiplex, is how different they feel from the current crop in one key respect: their fundamental grasp of storytelling, which in both films came off as effortless and intuitive in a way that few movies do these days. (We didn't watch the original "Karate Kid" again, but we saw that a few weeks ago too, and you can certainly add that to the list.)

Maybe in this sense the forces behind the new "Karate Kid" understood more than they appeared to. It's hard, they reasoned, to come up with a movie that contains true storytelling chops, let alone to get that movie green-lighted. So the least we could do, they said, is imitate a movie that had them. At least subconsciously, the remake craze may be partly about good narrative, not just easy marketing. 

Of course, the better approach would be not to copy great storytelling but to come up with some new ones. (Right now, "Inception" director Chris Nolan seem to be the only filmmaker with the vision and clout to realize this.) But then, in a storytelling climate that's so barren, a few drops of rain are welcome, even if it's the rain of 25 years ago.

-- Steven Zeitchik


Photo: Ray Liotta and Kevin Costner in "Field of Dreams." Credit: Universal Pictures

Clicking on Green Links will take you to a third-party e-commerce site. These sites are not operated by the Los Angeles Times. The Times Editorial staff is not involved in any way with Green Links or with these third-party sites.

Comments () | Archives (9)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Oh so YES!!!

The 80's rock man...

Here's some Karate Kid awesomeness trivia:


What do you guys think??

i agree with the writer that people don't want to watch simply retreads of 80's films. they will see movies that offer something new. in the case of the karate kid, it's combining the exotic travelogue of part 2 and the origin/underdog story of part 1. i'll offer though that if you have all the elements of the karate kid movie such as the stars - jackie chan, will smith's kid - and the producers and that sort of story, it wouldnt have had to be based on anything prior to be a hit. an original story wouldve succeeded nearly just as well. i think they went with an established property because it gives them some cushion in case the movie flops but so did the makers of the a-team and the losers which was based on a comic. bottomline: make a good movie and market it well and you'll have a hit, regardless of established property or not.

Boycott Hollywood when it comes to these remakes. If they don't make money,they won't make them anymore. They will be forced to take chances on filmmakers like Nolan. I'm pretty jaded when it comes to movies because I've been watching them for over three decades. I'm not a big Leo or Nolan fan, however the preview for their movie peak my interest.

I read a book written fifteen years ago called A Distant Crossing that would make a great movie. It's premise is a monetary meltdown, and what happens to regular folks and all the assumptions we make. We are living the plot right now. We don't need another Rocky 15.

I have a great original screenplay if anyone is interested. It's about a teenager who gets this mysterious little creature from his dad, but it comes with three rules: no water, no food after midnight, and no bright lights. Needless to say the kid breaks all the rules when his parents leave him at home alone for a week. I call it 'Risky Business'.

The 70's was the "Me" decade.

They'll keep doing it until they bleed the 80's completely dry. Even ISHTAR isn't safe. Then it's off to the 90's. A MATRIX reboot is likely closer than anyone wants to think.

A lot of nonsense! It's all marketing and corporate laziness. These movies or TV shows become remakes, usually at much greater cost, because they have the Holy Grail of brand recognition. Studios would rather make the same movie over and over than have to do something hard like develop a nice exciting and perhaps dare I say, meaningful movie. Prepare for "Hello, Larry" the movie and Iron Man 14 -- "Rust Never Sleeps".

"They'll keep doing it until they bleed the 80's completely dry. Even ISHTAR isn't safe. Then it's off to the 90's. A MATRIX reboot is likely closer than anyone wants to think."

Posted by: The Real Randy | 06/15/2010 at 09:57 PM

I watch ISHTAR and it is better than most of the stuff the Big studios are pushing these days.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...




Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: