24 Frames

Movies: Past, present and future

« Previous | 24 Frames Home | Next »

And the winner for the best acceptance speech goes to ... Christoph Waltz

February 8, 2010 |  5:36 pm

If you are among the vast constituency who believes what almost every guru of gold within reach of a laptop has been proclaiming since last summer, then you know: “Inglourious Basterds’ ” Christoph Waltz has the supporting actor statuette all but locked up.

Cw With almost mind-numbing constancy, the Austrian actor has been heralded as a front-runner after bursting into consciousness as sadistic Nazi Col. Hans Landa -- “the Jew hunter” in Quentin Tarantino’s history-rewriting Spaghetti western-cum-World War II drama.

Presuming Waltz’s win is a foregone conclusion, his Oscar appearance on March 7 leaves only one X-factor: What will the notoriously magniloquent actor say at the podium?

Waltz -- who speaks fluent English and French in addition to his native German -- has been on an awards tear since May, walking away with trophies at the Cannes Film Festival and various film critics association accolades as well as a Hollywood Film Award, among others. Moreover, he has elevated the quotidian task of delivering an acceptance speech into a kind of baroque performance art -- delivered with the same kind of Teutonic eye-twinkle that makes his Landa such a charming sociopath.

In Waltz's most memorable appearances, he can be relied upon to take some operating principle of the award he’s being given and then craft an oratory around a central metaphor – extending the metaphor beyond any reasonable expectation, wringing every last bit of poetry from it and leaving no cliché unspoken.

To wit: For his Golden Globes win, Waltz seized upon a motif of celestial inter-connectivity and outer space imagery that would have made Darth Vader blush.

“A year and a half ago, I was exposed to the gravitational forces of Quentin Tarantino,” Waltz said at the Globes podium in January. “He took my modest little world -- my globe -- and with the power of his talent and his words and his vision, he flung it into his orbit -- a dizzying experience.”

Waltz capped off the speech by calling “Basterds” a “big bang of a movie,” adding: “I wouldn’t have dared to dream that my little world, my globe, would be part of that constellation. And now you’ve made it golden.” [Emphasis added by 24 Frames.]

Collecting his Screen Actors Guild Award for supporting actor last month, meanwhile, Waltz leaned heavily on certain presumed distinctions between movie stars and stage-worthy thespians -- all while giving a shout-out to an unsung hero of the projected entertainment medium.

“A stage actor acts on a stage,” Waltz said. “But a screen actor doesn’t act on the screen. The stage actor just walks on by himself, but the screen actor is put on there by a projectionist.

“We work towards what can only be hoped for in utmost secrecy. This is what I was granted by working with Quentin Tarantino on ‘Inglourious Basterds.’ For this I’m indebted and grateful to all of you, for this as well.”

Waltz paused before bringing the velvet hammer down on his chosen leitmotif. “To all of you including the projectionist.”

And at this year's Critics Choice Awards, Waltz sadistically tortured the notion of choice-making in his acceptance speech.

"When Quentin invited me to join the cast, my choice assumed a completely different dimension," the actor said. "Did I want to be an actor or not? This Critics Choice Award is an approval of all the choices prior to this."

The Academy Awards will no doubt present Waltz with a number of tantalizing metaphorical possibilities. Rest assured his acceptance speech will likely be downright academic.

-- Chris Lee

[Updated: 2/10/10]

Photo: Christoph Waltz. Credit: Los Angeles Times.

Comments () | Archives (3)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Haven't liked any of his speeches. Call me crazy, but I kinda like off the cuff. Too much thought, man. Just enjoy it all.

I too thought Christoph Waltz was a shoo in for the Oscar until I saw "The Last Station." As the aging Leo Tolstoy, Christopher Plummer gives a stellar performance. It is a rather quiet performance where Plummer has captured the intellect, the passion, and the experience of the great Russian novelist into the eyes. Despite the power of co-star Helen Mirren, I found it challenging to look at anyone on screen but Plummer when he appeared. The few moments of Tolstoy's emotion permitted in the film are riveting. As with Jim Broadbent did a few years ago, I suspect the Academy will recognize this superlative performance in a small film.

I have followed the Oscars for 30 years. Seldom have I seen a perfomance so mesmerizing as that given by Waltz. He's a shoo-in because he deserves it. All the nuances he brings to the character elevated the role beyond what I believe any other actor could have accomplished. Yes, I also loved Christopher Plummer in his understated performance, but Waltz gives his character the special worthiness that makes it one of Oscar's best EVER ---no small task.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...




Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: