O.J. Simpson defense team blasts 'bloody glove' allegations
A member of the O.J. Simpson defense team said Monday the late Johnnie L. Cochran did not tamper with the "bloody glove" that proved so crucial to the celebrated case.
Last week, Simpson prosecutor Christopher A. Darden contended to a law school audience that Cochran had manupulated the glove.
During the trial in the stabbing deaths of Simpson's former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Lyle Goldman, Simpson tried on bloody gloves. He held up his hands in front of the jury box to let everyone see the leather bunched up around his broad palms and that they wouldn't fit. That demonstration became a powerful symbol for the defense, summed up by Cochran: “If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.”
Simpson was found not guilty.
During a panel discussion about the trial Thursday at Pace Law School in New York City, and later with an interview with Reuters, Darden suggested the gloves had been manipulated by the defense.
“I think Johnnie tore the lining. There were some additional tears in the lining so that O.J.'s fingers couldn't go all the way up,” he said.
On Monday, Cochran’s co-counsel on the Simpson case, Carl Douglas, expressed outage at the claim and slammed Darden.
“He lost and he should get over it and go on with his life. It is an insult to the dignity and integrity of one of the greatest lawyers in America to imply that he did anything unethical during that historic trial,” Douglas said.
Douglas said he was intimately involved in the glove testimony and said there is no evidence the defense tampered with the evidence.
“We were under the watchful eye of a sheriff’s deputy and court staff every moment the glove was being examined,” he added. “The very first time Mr. Simpson placed his hand inside the murder glove was when all of American saw that it did not fit his massive hand. I am offended for Mr. Darden to suggest otherwise.”
Another Simpson defense attorney, Shawn Holley, added: “Mr. Darden's self-serving assertion that Johnnie Cochran tampered with the glove -- or any piece of evidence -- is false, malicious and slanderous.... Almost 20 years later, it seems Mr. Darden is still trying to exculpate himself from one of the biggest blunders in the history of jurisprudence.”
Darden declined to comment further to The Times on Monday.
The glove incident was seen as a pivotal moment in the 1995 trial.
At the time, Darden tried to explain why the gloves would not fit Simpson by bringing in expert Richard Rubin, who “testified that moisture had caused the extra-large leather gloves to shrink nearly a full size and lose much of their elasticity,” according to a Times report. Rubin said “the gloves in their original condition would easily go onto the hand of someone of Mr. Simpson's size.”
Rubin testified that gloves can shrink up to 15% if they are drenched in moisture. Even if stretched, they could never return to more than 92% of their original size, he said.
“These gloves,” Rubin added, “will never return to their original size and shape.”
During the trial, prosecutors tried to prove the gloves were owned by Nicole Simpson and that O.J. Simpson used them in the murders.
The left-hand glove was found outside the townhouse of Nicole Simpson, a short distance from her body and that of Goldman. The right-hand glove was found on Simpson's estate. Both were smeared with blood, but the only DNA results came from the right-hand glove, which contained genetic material consistent with both victims and with O.J. Simpson. In both the civil and criminal trials, defense attorneys argued that former LAPD Det. Mark Fuhrman planted the glove at Simpson's house.
-- Andrew Blankstein