Southern California -- this just in

« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »

Brown backs away from plan to protect bullet train from lawsuits

June 20, 2012 |  3:11 pm

Gov. Jerry Brown

After encountering criticism from environmental groups, Gov. Jerry Brown signaled Wednesday that he plans to withdraw his controversial proposal to protect the California bullet train project from injunctions sought by environmental lawsuits.

Brown’s staff told key environmental groups that he would no longer include modifications to the California Environmental Quality Act in a package of legislation this month asking for $6 billion to start construction of the high-speed rail project.

The move was confirmed by staff in the state Senate. A spokesman for the governor did not have an immediate response.

The Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council raised objections to Brown’s proposal, saying it was part of a pattern to water down one of the most important pieces of environmental law in history. Critics of the bullet train, meanwhile, said it appeared that Brown wanted to protect his pet project, while leaving other businesses in the state to bear the full brunt of the law.

It appeared that the proposal was jeopardizing support for the rail protect from the environmental movement, a stalwart supporter of high-speed rail, along with labor unions and big engineering firms.

Dan Richard, chairman of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, had first raised the possibility of some legal protections from lawsuits in a Senate hearing, saying he would rather be able to respond to future lawsuits by mitigating problems than having his project stopped with an injunction.

Brown endorsed that idea soon after, sending proposed language to the Legislature that set a high bar for environmental suits and making the revisions retroactive to the start of this year. That measure could have affected the one suit that has already been filed by the farm bureaus of Merced and Madera counties, Madera County and others. The lawsuit contends that the environmental review of the project’s segment from Merced to Fresno was inadequate.

Farmers up and down the Central Valley have said the project is destroying valuable farmland and will disrupt operations, destroy irrigation systems and puncture processing plants. In his first term in office three decades ago, Brown had his first battle with the agriculture industry, sustaining a painful political loss over a key water project. In addition to the farmers, the railroad industry has warned that the project is violating its property rights.

Kathryn Phillips, director of Sierra Club California, said the rail project was exactly the type of major construction that the environmental laws were intended to address. And she said there was little risk to the project that an injunction would stop construction.

Phillips said it would now be appropriate for the Sierra Club to support the appropriations for starting constructions, since the group was a backer of the original bond proposal that was passed by voters in 2008. Even so, the project has a number of environmental obstacles to clear, including proving that it can mitigate air quality impacts during construction in the Central Valley. She said the Sierra Club supports the idea of full mitigation, so that the use of diesel-powered contruction equipment does not add to the already poor air quality in the eight counties regulated by the San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District.


Parents planted drugs on PTA president, police say

Zoloft defendant: 'I can’t imagine doing this to another person'

In deal, taggers don't have to pay L.A. millions for graffiti cleanup

-- Ralph Vartabedian

Photo: Gov. Jerry Brown discusses his proposed state tax initiative at a Sacramento event in May. Credit: Rich Pedroncelli / AP Photo