Moscow Monster predated Montauk Monster by two years!
New information is surfacing that the famed "Montauk Monster," the dangerous, weird-looking and still-unidentified creature that washed ashore in the Hamptons this summer, may be only the latest in a longer line of weird unidentified monsters washing ashore around the globe.
In 2006, a little-noticed entry was posted to EnglishRussia.com, a blog that catalogs strange and interesting photos from our neighbor that you can see from Alaska. That photo essay showed the carcass of a strange, reptilian creature that some "Russian soldiers" had found on a beach on the island of Sakhalin. But just what kind of creature is impossible to say.
"According to the bones and teeth -- it is not a fish," wrote the fellow who posted the photos. "According to its skeleton -- it’s not a crocodile or alligator. It has a skin with hair or fur."
Well, where is the specimen, then, so the rest of us, including maybe some scientists, can look at it?
"It has been said that it was taken by Russian special services for in-depth studies."
Drat! Those Russian special services guys have had this thing for over two years, and no results? Is this creature really that super-secret? When will we know the real story of this Moscow Monster*, and is there any connection to the Montauk Monster, either evolutionary or familial -- or perhaps between the people who made each of them up?
I've contacted the documentarians at EnglishRussia.com and am awaiting a response.
*Moscow is thousands of miles away from Sakhalin but it seems possible that the monster could have migrated from there, like to die or something.
— David Sarno
| Bookmark it: |
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef0105352fd5aa970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Moscow Monster predated Montauk Monster by two years!:
The Montauk Monster is Zuul from the Ghost Busters.
"There is no Dana, only Zuul!!"
Posted by: Scandalous Candice | October 03, 2008 at 06:13 PM
The word monster is used by the uneducated to identify something unknown.
What this looks like to me (from this low res photo) is some kind of land animal. It looks like the teeth are more vegetarian than carnivore and the apparent hoof to the left of the head would indicate that it walked on land. It was probably frozen in ice and due to global warming appeared on the beach. Could be a new species though.
Posted by: Truth Seeker | October 04, 2008 at 07:52 AM
Oh, please, this was debunked at the time.
It's a whale, probably an Orca.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Orca_Schaedel_Senckenberg.jpg
Why repeat this stuff? Let's use plain old logic, what sort of large animal regularly washes up on beaches?
And it wasn't little noticed, it was on BoingBoing and lots of cryptid sites.
Seriously? Moscow Monster? Sakhalin Island is in the Pacific.
Posted by: cybele | October 04, 2008 at 11:14 AM
Can't wait till these things start attacking swimmers. Until then, I will have to say "fake".
Posted by: Jason | October 04, 2008 at 11:26 AM
Jesus Christmas cakes ya'll, it's a damn dolphin...this is so old...
Posted by: stew | October 04, 2008 at 11:27 AM
the hamptons "monster" episode was a bit used to amp up a movie that's in the works, there were tons of articles on the stunt on google and digg.....
Posted by: rikitikitavi | October 04, 2008 at 11:42 AM
I know it looks like a Dolphin Skeleton, Stew....but that isnt the head of a Dolphin or the teeth of a Dolphin.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chanmelmel/2805449290/
The body is spot on, but unless Dolphins have molars and stopped having a "beak like" snout, that is no dolphin.
Posted by: Konrad | October 04, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I''m disappointed to see the once respected "Los Angeles Times" name attached to this ridiculous "story".
Posted by: Greg | October 04, 2008 at 12:40 PM
http://amir97522.blogspot.com/2008/10/shiraz-fish-market.html
Shiraz, Iran fish market photo
Posted by: AmirHossein | October 04, 2008 at 01:19 PM
looks like a leopard seal to me.
Posted by: john | October 04, 2008 at 01:33 PM
A Skegsis from the Dark Crystal perhaps?
Posted by: Glenn | October 04, 2008 at 02:24 PM
A whale with fur? Where's your logic now?
Posted by: @cybele | October 04, 2008 at 03:13 PM
I wonder if Sarah Palin has seen one of these since she can see Russia from her house. She probably knows all about it.
Posted by: rick | October 06, 2008 at 01:12 AM
There you go: http://www.skullsunlimited.com/beluga_whale_skull.html
Posted by: Inp | October 06, 2008 at 02:41 AM
@cybele: There is no fur on that skeleton.
Posted by: Inp | October 06, 2008 at 02:43 AM
To those who have mentioned the fur thing ... go look at a rotting creature on the seashore sometime and tell me that doesn't look like fur.
When you see hoofprints think horses, not zebras.
Posted by: cybele | October 06, 2008 at 02:31 PM
dont you think that maybe it is prehistoric and now with the ice shelves melting, maybe they were frozen in there.
Posted by: laurie | October 09, 2008 at 10:13 AM
looks very similar to the images on http://www.stuffididlastnight.com
anyone else think so?
Posted by: amazing | October 09, 2008 at 03:41 PM
it definitely looks like this beluga whale skeleton.
http://www.skullsunlimited.com/beluga_whale_skull.html
Posted by: Jared Carson | October 29, 2008 at 11:48 AM