Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

Category: Vice President Cheney

Now, Democrats join Dick Cheney's critique of Obama

November 24, 2009 |  2:24 am

US Democrat president Bareack bows to China's premier Wen Jiabao 11-18-09

President Obama is set to grant a blanket pardon shortly to this year's White House turkeys. 

But while Obama advised his cabinet Monday to take a little time off this week, presumably to give thanks and watch Detroit lose to Green Bay again, there's a real challenge for the 44th president to discern today: exactly what he should be thankful for. Never mind his slow, steady fade in the polls, matching the slow, steady rise in unemployment.

Although he's not in any election for nearly three more years, Obama's reputation, congressional clout and ability to accomplish pretty much anything is in serious jeopardy come next November's midterms, if not before. Former VP Dick Cheney, who single-handedly reinvented the wonderful Wyoming word "dithering" in recent weeks, is at Obama again (see video below) in no uncertain terms.

Which some might find predictable. But would they expect Arianna Huffington to be openly worrying that the Obama administration just doesn't get it about the economy and jobs? Or how about Leslie Gelb, former New York Times columnist, State and Defense Department official and now president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations?

He's calling Obama's recent Asia trip an unproductive waste of precious presidential time under the headline: "Amateur Hour at the White House."

What's going on here for The One chosen barely a year ago with such widespread hope and....

Continue reading »

Obama rebuts Cheney's 'dithering' charge, vows 'no open-ended commitment' on Afghanistan

November 13, 2009 |  8:02 am

President Obama convenes meeting of his National Security team on Afghanistan

For weeks, critics have been complaining that President Obama is taking too long to make a decision on whether to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan. Former Vice President Dick Cheney accused him of "dithering."

Today he answered them.

"I recognize that there have been critics of the process," he said. "They tend not to be folks who I think are directly involved in what's happening in Afghanistan. Those who are recognize the gravity of the situation and recognize the importance of us getting this right."

In a news conference in Japan, the first stop on an eight-day trip through Asia, Obama also made clear that the reason he keeps sending military planners back to the drawing board on Afghanistan is that he wants to see a sharper outline of the purpose -- and exit strategy -- for U.S. troops in the region:

It's a matter of making certain that when I send young men and women into war, and I devote billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money, that it's making us safer, and that the strategies that are placed not just on the military side but also on the civilian side are coordinated and effective in our primary goal, which is to make sure that the United States is not subject to attack and its allies are not subject to attack by terrorist networks, and that there is a stability in the region that helps to facilitate that larger goal.

Promising to make the decision soon, Obama said that after eight meetings with his National Security Council, he was pleased with the process. "It has been not a academic exercise, but a necessary process in order to make sure that we're making the best possible decisions," he said.

You can read the full transcript of Obama's joint news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama below, as provided by the White House. Obama pledged to address Japanese concerns about the presence of U.S. military bases in large urban areas, and Hatoyama pledged $5 billion over five years to civilian projects in Afghanistan.

-- Johanna Neuman

Photo: President Obama meets with his national security team on Afghanistan. Credit: White House

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AND PRIME MINISTER YUKIO HATOYAMA OF JAPAN

RIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  (As translated.)  President Obama, I would like to welcome you to Japan.  I'd like to express my heartfelt welcome to you.  It is very hard -- despite the tragedy of the mass shooting in your country, that you have taken time out of a busy schedule to come and join us here today.  We're very thankful to you.

        And today we have had a 90-minute, very intensive discussion.  I'm very happy to have had this opportunity to.... ... hold this discussion.

        Well, we have come to call each other Barack and Yukio.  I think I've grown quite accustomed to calling each other by our names.  And we did cover a lot of ground today.  First, for Japan's diplomacy, the U.S.-Japan alliance is the cornerstone. And this is one thing I've stressed.  But as time changes and as the international environment changes, there is a need for us to further develop and deepen the U.S.-Japan alliance to make it even more constructive and future-oriented alliance.  This was what I proposed today.

        And the U.S.-Japan alliance -- well, actually it so happens that next year marks the 50th anniversary of the revision of the U.S.-Japan security treaty.  And starting from today we'll be starting a year to start a new process of deliberation.  And I have made this proposal, and President Obama has given his consent and support towards this idea.

        Now, the U.S.-Japan alliance, looking at it from the security front, naturally we have to cooperate in proliferation deterrence, on information protection, missile defense, and the use of other states amongst others.  We need to consider these new systems for issuing security.  And this is my thinking.

But the U.S.-Japan alliance is not just focused on security -- for example, disaster prevention, or health, education.  We had many levels -- and also environmental issues, as well.  We need to cooperate in all these areas so as to cooperate in the Asia Pacific and others so that we can further deepen our bilateral alliance.  I believe that we have reached an agreement on these points.

        Now, turning our eyes to the global situation, again there are different topics that we've covered.  From our side, I've  talked about Afghanistan and our support to Afghanistan.  On to Afghanistan; we will not be taking part in the refueling, but instead providing civil assistance, and we are planning to mainly provide civil assistance of 5 billion yen in five years for agriculture, building of infrastructures, schools.  So this is the type of assistance we want to provide.  And also to improve security, we want to support the police force in Afghanistan.  Furthermore, for the former soldiers, we want to provide vocational training.  These are the types of things that we want to conduct.

        I have communicated this to the President, and towards this new assistance package, President Obama in principle has stated his gratitude, appreciation for this assistance.  And furthermore, when it comes to assistance to Afghanistan, it's important that we try to directly talk with one another as to the assistance to be provided.

        Now, in the area of climate change, again, we have talked on this subject.  By 2015, we have set out this goal of an 80 percent reduction.  And both Japan and U.S. have agreed on this, and we want to make COP-15 a success, and we agreed to cooperate towards this end.

And including China and others, there are other issues that need to be resolved.  And therefore we need to collaborate to address these challenges.

        Now, in regards to nuclear disarmament, again, we have agreed to cooperate with one another.  Now, in regards to nuclear issues and also climate change, we have issued a joint statement. And I do believe that this is quite innovative in itself, and the fact that we can take up these issues as core issues at the summit meeting is something of vital importance.

        Now, on the economic front, well, the economy was not a major issue this time, but again, this might reflect the times in which we're living.  And over dinner, maybe, we hope to be able to discuss the issue of the economy.

        Now, in relation to nuclear issues, North Korea, Iran was also discussed from President Obama.  And again, we have agreed to closely cooperate with one another.  And Special Representative Bosworth will be visiting North Korea -- or may be visiting North Korea shortly.  But this is on the premise of the six-party talks.  And I do endorse this thinking and have stated so to the President.

        And in regards to Iran, again, we have to support -- we would like to support the approach to Iran.  On the one hand, we want to emphasize our historic relationship, but also, at the same time, I promise to strengthen our alliance vis-à-vis Iran.

        And also, again, in Asia, President Obama has stated that we have some -- we do have a vital role to play, especially in East Asia.  I have set out the concept of East Asian community, and this is because I believe that there is this alliance as the cornerstone on which we can rely.

And in Asia, the fact that the U.S. presence increases is something that has great extension towards at various levels in Asia and East Asia, and Asia on the whole.  Both Japan and the United States should deepen, and as a result, in East Asia we hope to bring about peace, stability, and economic prosperity in this region.  This is something that we have pledged.

        I don't want to take up all the time myself, and therefore I'd like to conclude.  But I do think that this summit meeting was extremely meaningful.  And on this note, I'd like to once again say that I am very grateful to Barack, President Obama, to take time to join us here at Japan.  And also, I'm thankful that he's chosen Japan as his first leg to his visit to Asia.  And as Prime Minister, representing the Japanese people, I'd like to express my gratitude.  Thank you.

        And next, President Obama, please.

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, good evening.  It is a great honor to be making my first trip to Japan as President of the United States.  I have fond memories of visiting Japan in my youth.  I've been looking forward to this trip for some time.  I'm only sorry that Michelle and the girls could not join us.  The girls have been studying Japan in school, and so they have a great interest in Japanese culture.  And hopefully I'll be able to bring them next time.

        I want to thank the warm welcome that Prime Minister Hatoyama and the Japanese people have extended.  I appreciate the graciousness with which you understood the delay that took place as a consequence of the tragedy at Fort Hood, Texas.

        Japan is my first stop as President in Asia.  I began my trip here in Tokyo because the alliance between the United States and Japan is a foundation for security and prosperity not just for our two countries but for the Asia Pacific region.  In a few months we'll be marking the 50th anniversary of our alliance, which is founded on shared values and shared interests that has served our people so well and has provided peace and security for the region in an unprecedented way.

        That anniversary, as Prime Minister Hatoyama pointed out, represents an important opportunity to step back and reflect on what we've achieved, celebrate our friendship, but also find ways to renew this alliance and refresh it for the 21st century.  Both Yukio and I were elected on the promise of change, but there should be no doubt, as we move our nations in a new direction, our alliance will endure and our efforts will be focused on revitalizing that friendship so that it's even stronger and more successful in meeting the challenges of the 21st century.  It's essential for the United States, it's essential for Japan, and it's essential for the Asia Pacific region.

        Throughout my trip and throughout my presidency, I intend to make clear that the United States is a Pacific nation, and we will be deepening our engagement in this part of the world.  As I said to Prime Minister Hatoyama, the United States will strengthen our alliances, build new partnerships, and we will be part of multilateral efforts and regional institutions that advance regional security and prosperity.

        We have to understand that the future of the United States and Asia is inextricably linked.  The issues that matter most to our people -- issues of economic growth and job creation, non-proliferation, clean energy -- these are all issues that have to be part of a joint agenda.  And we had very productive discussions about these issues this evening.

        It's true that because of the strength of our economic ties, that was not the first item on our agenda, but we are fortunately going to have the opportunity to spend a lot of time discussing that in Singapore in the coming days.  As the world's two leading economies, we have spent a lot of time working together in the G20 to help bring the world back from the brink of financial crisis, and we're going to continue to work to strengthen our efforts so that we can expand job growth in the future.  And we will be discussing with our APEC partners how to rebalance our deep economic cooperation with this region to strengthen our recovery.

        The Prime Minister and I discussed our cooperation on Afghanistan and Pakistan.  And I did thank the people of Japan and the Prime Minister for the powerful commitment of a $5 billion over the next five years to support our shared civilian efforts in Afghanistan, as well as the commitment of a billion dollars to Pakistan.

        This underscores Japan's prominent role within a broad international coalition that is advancing the cause of stability and opportunity in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  And I shared with the Prime Minister our efforts in refining our approach to make it more successful in the coming year.

        We discussed our shared commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and ultimately seeking a world without them.  Since I laid out a comprehensive agenda in Prague to pursue these goals Japan has been an outstanding partner in those efforts.  And together we passed a historic resolution in the Security Council last September.  We are building a new international consensus to secure loose nuclear materials and strengthen the nonproliferation regime.

        And to that end, we discussed both North Korea and the situation in Iran, recognizing that it's absolutely vital that both countries meet their international obligations.  If they do, then they can open the door to a better future.  If not, we will remain united in implementing U.N. resolutions that are in place and continuing to work in an international context to move towards an agenda of nonproliferation.

        Finally, we discussed our partnership on energy issues and climate change.  The United States and Japan share a commitment to developing the clean energy of the future and we're focused on combating the threat of climate change.  This is an important priority for us; I know it's an important priority for the people of Japan.  And we discussed how we can work together to pave the way for a successful outcome in Copenhagen next month.

        So I believe that we are off to a very successful start.  I'm looking forward to continuing the conversation during dinner, as well as as we both travel to Singapore.  And I am confident that we will continue to strengthen the U.S.-Japan alliance so that it serves future generations. Thank you very much.

        PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  Thank you very much.  Now I'd like to proceed to questions.  I will appoint the person, and once you are appointed, please come to the microphone, state your name and affiliation, and also to whom -- please state to whom you want to pose your question.

        On behalf of the Japanese press, please.

        Q       Fuji Television.  Matsuyama is my name.  I'd like to ask both leaders -- first to Prime Minister Hatoyama.  You have stated that you would like to see Japan enjoy a more equal relationship with the United States in talks about Afghanistan and also the ending of the refueling operations and global warming and nuclear disarmament.  Do you think that you're able to talk as equal partners and gain understanding on this point, especially on the Futenma relocation?  There is the observation that this will be a difficult issue to resolve, but how did you explain about how to resolve the timeline for resolving this issue?

        And to President Obama, you are a proponent of a nuclear-free world, and you've stated, first of all, you would like to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki while in office.  Do you have this desire?  And what is your understanding of the historical meaning of the A-bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?  Do you think that it was the right decision?

        And also considering the North Korean situation, how do you think the U.S.-Japan alliance should be strengthened, and how should both countries cooperate in the field of nuclear disarmament?

        And also on the Futenma relocation issue, by when do you think the issue needs to be resolved?  And should it be that Japan carry over the discussion -- decision to next year, or decide on something outside of what is being discussed?  How would you respond?

        PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  Let me start.  I was asked a great deal of questions to -- especially President Obama, but I'd like to talk about the equal relationship.  But before I state so, the President himself has said naturally that we are equal partners and should be equal partners.  So in this context we have talked about the assistance to Afghanistan, climate change, and furthermore, nuclear abolishment.  And I think you can ask him, but I do believe that he has regarded us, Japan, as an equal partner.  I have raised a number of issues on my side, and I think this is proof of our equal partnership.

On the issue of the relocation of the Futenma air station, in regards to this issue, well, to give you the conclusion, there is the high-level working group -- we've set up this group so as to be able to resolve the issue as early as possible.  And we stated this and my commitment was also expressed during our talks.

        But before that, I have explained why we have this discussion, and under the previous government, the U.S.-Japan agreement needs to be regarded seriously.  During the election campaign, especially to the Okinawans, I've stated that we would consider relocation outside of Okinawa and outside of the country.  It is a fact that we did campaign on this issue, and the Okinawans do have high expectations.

        It will be a very difficult issue for sure, but as time goes by, I think it will become even more difficult to resolve the issue.  Especially the residents in the Futenma district will find it even more difficult to resolve the issue as time goes by.

So we do understand we need to resolve the issue as soon as possible, and we'll make every effort to resolve the issue as quickly as possible within the working group.

        And we hope that this will lead the way to strengthening our alliance, and I sincerely hope that such discussions will take place within the working group.  And this is something I have communicated to the President.

        President, please.

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first of all, I am impressed that the Japanese journalists use the same strategy as American journalists -- (laughter) -- in asking multiple questions.

        Let me, first of all, insist that the United States and Japan are equal partners.  We have been and we will continue to be.  Each country brings specific assets and strengths to the relationship, but we proceed based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and that will continue.

        That's reflected in the Japan-U.S. alliance.  It will be reflected in the resolution of the base realignment issues related to Futenma.  As the Prime Minister indicated, we discussed this.  The United States and Japan have set up a high-level working group that will focus on implementation of the agreement that our two governments reached with respect to the restructuring of U.S. forces in Okinawa, and we hope to complete this work expeditiously.

        Our goal remains the same, and that's to provide for the defense of Japan with minimal intrusion on the lives of the people who share this space.  And I have to say that I am extraordinarily proud and grateful for the men and women in uniform from the United States who help us to honor our obligations to the alliance and our treaties.

        With respect to nuclear weapons and the issues of non-proliferation, this is an area where Prime Minister Hatoyama and I have discussed repeatedly in our meetings.  We share, I think, a vision of a world without nuclear weapons.  We recognize, though, that this is a distant goal, and we have to take specific steps in the interim to meet this goal.  It will take time.  It will not be reached probably even in our own lifetimes.  But in seeking this goal we can stop the spread of nuclear weapons; we can secure loose nuclear weapons; we can strengthen the non-proliferation regime.

        As long as nuclear weapons exist, we will retain our deterrent for our people and our allies, but we are already taking steps to bring down our nuclear stockpiles and -- in cooperation with the Russian government -- and we want to continue to work on the non-proliferation issues.

        Now, obviously Japan has unique perspective on the issue of nuclear weapons as a consequence of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  And that I'm sure helps to motivate the Prime Minister's deep interest in this issue.  I certainly would be honored, it would be meaningful for me to visit those two cities in the future.  I don't have immediate travel plans, but it's something that would be meaningful to me.

        You had one more question, and I'm not sure I remember it.  Was it North Korea?

        Q       Whether or not you believe that the U.S. dropped a nuclear weapon on Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- it was right?

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  No, there were three sets of questions, right?  You asked about North Korea?

        Q       I have North Korea as well, yes.

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Yes.  With respect to North Korea, we had a extensive discussion about how we should proceed with Pyongyang.  Obviously we were disturbed by the testing that took place, some of the belligerent actions that had taken place in an earlier period of this year.  We have continued to say that our goal is a non-nuclear Korean Peninsula.  That's vital for the security of East Asia.

And the United States and Japan, with the other members of the six-party talks, will continue to work to show North Korea that there is a pathway, a door, for them to rejoin the international community that would serve their people well and I believe enhance their security over the long term.  They have to walk through that door.  In the meantime, we will continue to implement the sanctions that have already been put in place, and we will continue to coordinate closely with Japan and the other six-party members in helping to shape a strategy that meets our security needs and convinces Pyongyang to move in a better direction.

        MR. GIBBS:  Jennifer Loven with AP -- questions fewer in number.  (Laughter.)

        Q       Thank you, Mr. President, Mr. Prime Minister.  President Obama, how can you assure the American people that a trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, now that your administration has now decided will take place in a civilian court in New York, will be safe and secure, but also not result in an innocent verdict for him?

And on Afghanistan, if I might, can you explain to people watching and criticizing your deliberations what piece of information you're still lacking to make that call?

And if I could add one to the Prime Minister, please.  Can you explain your country decided not to continue refueling ships going to Afghanistan?

PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  Mr. President?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  With respect to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, I believe that the Attorney General is going to be making an announcement this morning in the United States, this evening here.  I don't want to preempt his news conference.  This is a prosecutorial decision as well as a national security decision.

Here's the thing that I will say.  I am absolutely convinced that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will be subject to the most exacting demands of justice.  The American people will insist on it and my administration will insist on it.  And I'm sure we'll have additional things to say after the Attorney General's press conference.

With respect to Afghanistan, Jennifer, I don't think this is a matter of some datum of information that I'm waiting on.  It's a matter of making certain that when I send young men and women into war, and I devote billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money, that it's making us safer, and that the strategies that are placed not just on the military side but also on the civilian side are coordinated and effective in our primary goal, which is to make sure that the United States is not subject to attack and its allies are not subject to attack by terrorist networks, and that there is a stability in the region that helps to facilitate that larger goal.

        And I recognize that there have been critics of the process. They tend not to be folks who I think are directly involved in what's happening in Afghanistan.  Those who are recognize the gravity of the situation and recognize the importance of us getting this right.

        And the decision will be made soon.  It will be one that is fully transparent so that the American people understand exactly what we're doing and why we're doing it and what it will entail. It will also I think send a clear message that our goal here ultimately has to be for the Afghan people to be able to be in a position to provide their own security, and that the United States cannot be engaged in an open-ended commitment.

So I am very pleased with how the process has proceeded.  And those who participated I think would acknowledge that it has been not a academic exercise, but a necessary process in order to make sure that we're making the best possible decisions.

        PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  I thank you for keeping it to just one question, having come all the way to Japan.  Now, your question was about why we ended the refueling in the Indian Ocean.  And we believe that Japan's assistance to Afghanistan will -- in the larger context, terms should be considered.  And as for antiterrorism, in order to eradicate terrorism, there is a need to take certain measures, but we have to consider what Japan should be doing in terms of antiterrorism.  I think that it's important that we extend civilian support so as to eliminate terrorism from its roots.  And I do believe that this is appropriate for Japan, and this is the first point that I want to communicate to you.

And also, the refueling support, I've looked at the activities.  Compared to the beginning recently, the refueling support is declining.  Last month, in one month, there was only one -- refueling for one ship.  And we wonder how much effect we are bringing about.  And so I think that we have to consider the meaning of this logistic support, and we've come to think that there is another type of assistance that is more appropriate for Japan.

        We understand that the Afghans are suffering from poverty and we have to save them from poverty.  Also security is something of a challenge, and we need to take new activities.  And also, to the former soldiers, we have to provide vocational training so that they do not have to rely on their guns; they can lay down their guns and seek a more fulfilling life.

        And I believe that for Japan it is more appropriate, desirable, that we provide such civilian assistance.  And as a result, conclusion, we have decided that instead of providing refueling, we provide an alternative package.

        MODERATOR:  Thank you very much.  With this, we would like to conclude the joint news conference.  And reporters please stay in your seats while the leaders leave the room.  We thank you for your cooperation.    ###

                                             


Biden, the Dems' best closer? NY-23 thinks so. Sarah Palin not so much.

November 4, 2009 |  8:31 am

The day before the election, Vice President Joe Biden was in Watertown, N.Y., a rural town in a community of military families in an upstate New York congressional district that had been in Republican hands since the 19th century.

Campaigning for Democrat Bill Owens just as polls showed his opponent, conservative Doug Hoffman, surging with momentum, Biden turned the election into a referendum on the right-wing agenda of the Bush administration, policies he said "brought this country to its economic knees."

Singling out former Vice President Dick Cheney and conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh, Biden criticized Republicans for deserting their own candidate in the race. State Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, was forced to withdraw after the Tea Party activists derailed her as too moderate. He even took a shot at former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, for her "simple" view that energy problems could be solved with a simple chant of "drill, baby, drill."

By contrast, Biden said, Owens was a "pragmatic and tough" candidate who is strong on national defense and tax relief. "They may not have more room for moderate views in upstate New York, but we have room, we have room," the vice president said.

He told the crowd, many Republicans who had backed Scozzafava, “We’re not asking you to switch your party. We’re just saying, join us in teaching a lesson to absolutists who come and tell us that no dissent is permitted within their own party.”

Voters did just that, giving Owens a 49%-45% victory over Hoffman. But Palin, who backed Hoffman over Scozzafava, predicted that Republicans would recapture the seat in 2010.

"The race for New York's 23rd District is not over, just postponed until 2010," she wrote on her Facebook page. "The issues of this election have always centered on the economy -- on the need for fiscal restraint, smaller government and policies that encourage jobs. In 2010, these issues will be even more crucial to the electorate."

-- Johanna Neuman

If you click here, you'll get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.


Cheney: 'I don't recall' leaking Valerie Plame's CIA cover to 'Scooter' Libby

November 2, 2009 |  9:21 am

Former Vice President Dick Cheney at Ford Foundation Journalism Awards June 1, 2009

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, sometimes referred to as the Darth Vader of American politics, has been valiant in his defense of his former chief of staff, I, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the only guy convicted of lying about his role in the leaking of CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity. Cheney pushed hard for a full pardon, reportedly furious when former President Bush only commuted Libby's sentence.

For years it was assumed that Cheney masterminded the leak in an effort to discredit Plame's husband, former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, whose reports out of Niger threw doubt on White House claims that Iraq was importing ingredients to make weapons of mass destruction. Now, in just-released documents, the FBI concludes that Cheney told Libby and his press secretary, Cathie Martin, about Plame's ID about a month before the news hit the papers.

But the amazing thing about the FBI documents describing Cheney's 2004 interviews with investigators is how often he employs the "I don't recall" line.

Cheney told the FBI he did not recall discussing Plame with Libby prior to her name being published in a column by Robert Novak in July 2003, and said he had no knowledge of Libby's meeting with New York Times reporter Judith Miller before Plame was identified in that paper.

Oh, and the former vice president didn't recall about two dozen other events he was involved in.

Oddly, though Cheney said he could not recall whether he discussed Plame with White House political guru Karl Rove, Libby and others, he was certain he did not discuss her with former Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage (the original source of the leak). Also, he was real sure that Wilson's report on Niger was weak, calling it "amateur hour" at the CIA.

"For years the American people have wondered what role Vice President Cheney played in outing former CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, which helped free the documents. Now, she said, "we're one step closer" to finding out.

During his closing argument at Libby’s trial, special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said a cloud remained over the vice president. Said Sloan: "Mr. Cheney's near total amnesia regarding his role in this monumental Washington scandal -- resulting in the conviction of his top aide -- shows why."

-- Johanna Neuman

Click here for Twitter alerts on each new Ticket item. Or follow us  @latimestot. We are also on Facebook.

 Photo credit: Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images North America.


Now, a Cheney surge: Blasts Obama for Afghan 'dithering,' delays and indecision

October 21, 2009 |  4:48 pm

Cheneyhandsoutap

With public support for the Afghan conflict melting and approval of the president's job as commander in chief waning, two top Barack Obama aides -- senior advisor David Axelrod and Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel -- went on the TV talk shows Sunday and used very similar words to explain their latest lengthy policy review as the fault of the long-gone Bush administration ignoring the needs of Afghanistan for years.

Tonight, as first reported by Fox News "Special Report," former Vice President Dick Cheney fires back in a candid, even blunt, retort:

Having announced his Afghanistan strategy last March, President Obama now seems afraid to make a decision, and unable to provide his commander on the ground with the troops he needs to complete his mission....

It’s time for President Obama to make good on his promise. The White House must stop dithering while America’s armed forces are in danger.

Make no mistake, signals of indecision out of Washington hurt our allies and embolden our adversaries. Waffling while our troops on the ground face an emboldened enemy endangers them and hurts our cause.

Now they seem to be pulling back and blaming others for their failure to implement the strategy they embraced. It’s time for President Obama to do what it takes to win a war he has repeatedly and rightly called a war of necessity.

Cheney's criticism of the succeeding Democratic administration is not new. However, he reveals tonight that the outgoing Bush administration handed a complete Afghan policy review to the Obama transition team, which asked the Republicans not to release it. The Bush team agreed and its recommendations formed much of the basis of Obama's announcement in March. But now Axelrod and Emanuel are stating that those review questions had not been asked for eight years.

Cheney also repeated tonight some familiar charges: that the Obama policies of pursuing intelligence interrogators -- Cheney called it "hounding" -- risk allowing future attacks on ...

Continue reading »

Cheneys launch new family consulting powerhouse

October 8, 2009 |  7:37 am

Ap

Forget the Clintons, the Bushes or even the Kennedys.

It seems the family of former Vice President Dick Cheney is planning not only to stay in Washington but also to headquarter a new political consulting firm in the area.

According to the Washington Post, Mary Cheney -- not Liz Cheney, cable TV's favorite Obama critic, but Mary, expecting her second child with partner Heather Poe -- is leaving her current PR shop to open her own firm. Speculation is that it will feature at least three Cheneys: the former veep and his two daughters. "She told me she is going to be starting a firm with her dad and sister," one friend of Mary's told the Post.

Mary Matalin, the Republican consultant who was a top aide to Cheney during the Bush administration, said the vice president is at the moment focusing on his much-anticipated memoirs, with help from Liz Cheney, a former State Department official.

After that's done, however, speculation is that Mary Cheney's new firm will expand into an all-family affair. Sort of like Kissinger Associates. Think lots of big-name right-wing foreign dictators, um, leaders. As critic newser.com put it, "Need advice on the ins and outs of waterboarding or invading a rogue nation? Look no further."

Some Republicans not friendly to Cheney told the Post that they wish he'd take up golf. But Matalin thinks the idea is brilliant.

"They have every expertise, they have contacts all over the world, they are deep into multiple subject areas," she said. "They know everything from energy to foreign policy to economics to homeland security. And the vice president and Liz are strategic thinkers, and they all have enormous communication skills, they know a lot people and they could pull it together quickly."

So, like a dynasty.

-- Johanna Neuman

Photo: From left, Mary, Liz and Dick Cheney. Credit: Ed Reinke / Associated Press

Click here for Twitter alerts of each Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. We're also on Facebook.


Cheney in 2012? Now there’s a real September surprise

September 1, 2009 |  9:52 am

Gettycheney

When George W. Bush selected Dick Cheney to be his running mate in 2000, some political observers thought it was a smart move.

After all, Cheney had cut his political teeth working for the candidate’s father and had already endured several heart attacks. So, the thinking went, the 60-year-old Cheney would not be a political rival to the new president, staging occasional rear-action insurrections, just a steadying veteran hand.

Right. In fact Cheney became the most powerful vice president in history, and Barton Gellman argues in his book "Angler" that Cheney did most of the steering in George W. Bush’s first term.

Now, nine years later, having survived heart seizures and eight years of the Bush administration, Cheney has emerged as an energizing force in Republican politics, becoming the most outspoken Bush-era critic of the Obama administration.

While the former president maintains a dignified public silence about his views, his former vice president has turned into a media pit bull -- accusing the new president of putting the country at risk by closing Guantanamo Bay and banning torture, accusing Atty. Gen. Eric Holder of politicizing the fight against terrorism by investigating CIA interrogators.

On Moday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs let him have it, accusing the former vice president of getting his facts wrong, of "the same song and dance we've heard almost from the first day."

Now comes James Taranto, a columnist for the Wall Street Journal, who is suggesting that Cheney would be a terrific presidential candidate in 2012. If national security emerges as the key issue in the election, he argues, “Republicans would be wise to nominate someone with both toughness and experience. Under such circumstances, it’s hard to think of a better candidate -- assuming, of course, that he could be persuaded to run -- than Richard B. Cheney.”

The calculus: If the Afghanistan war worsens, it will become Obama’s war. And if terrorists attack this country again, a fierce voice on national security might have a chance. Plus, Cheney is writing his memoirs, a sure route to the presidency.

-- Johanna Neuman

Photo: Dick Cheney speaks at the Gerald R. Ford Foundation's annual Journalism Awards ceremony on June 1. Credit: Getty Images

Click here for Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot

 


Sunday shows: Hatch, Cheneys, Kerry, Dodd (Update)

August 29, 2009 | 12:00 pm

(UPDATE: 5:20 p.m. An updated guest list has been added to the Meet the Press listing below.)

ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos: Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and John Kerry (D-Mass.) and a round table with Liz Cheney, Sam Donaldson and George Will of ABC and Gwen Ifill of PBS.

Bloomberg’s Political Capital with Al Hunt: Minnesota GOP Gov. Tim Pawlenty and historian Robert Dallek.Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah

CBS’ Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Hatch; Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.); and Georgetown University sociologist Michael Eric Dyson.

CNN’s GPS with Fareed Zakaria: Former Secretary of State/Treasury James Baker; and authors Christopher Hitchens, Fawaz Gerges, Bernard-Henri Levy and Asra Nomani; and Minxin Pei of the Carnegie Institute.

CNN’s State of the Union with John King: Hatch, CNN’s Mary Matalin and James Carville.

Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: Former Vice President Dick Cheney and a panel with Fox News Washington managing editor Bill Sammon and Fox News contributors Mara Liasson, Bill Kristol and Juan Williams.

NBC’s Meet the Press with David Gregory: (UPDATE: California First Lady Maria Shriver, niece to the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) are added guests), Kerry, Bob Shrum, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin.

-- Steve Padilla

Click here to subscribe to each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot

Photo: Hatch. Credit: Associated Press


Cheney, preparing his memoirs, unloads on Bush for bowing to public opinion

August 13, 2009 |  8:02 am

President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney

Former Vice President Dick Cheney is writing his memoirs. That in itself is something of a surprise, because Cheney has long -- and openly -- disparaged people who do. The presidency is owed loyalty, or anyway that was Cheney's view when folks like former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and former White House press secretary Scott McClellan told tales out of school.

But now, writing his own account of his eight years as George W. Bush's vice president, Cheney is telling friends that "the statute of limitations has expired" on tensions between them. As Time magazine reported last month, Cheney was furious at Bush for not pardoning Scooter Libby, the vice presidential aide who, in Cheney's words, "was asked to stick his neck in the meat grinder" by not disclosing all he knew about who leaked CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity to the press.

Writing his memoirs out in longhand on yellow legal pads, Cheney is apparently sharing his recollections with groups of friends and associates, sort of prepping them for the disclosures to come in his 2011 book.

And, some of those friends have been talking to the Washington Post. After one group session, one Cheney associate told the Post's Barton Gellman that the former vice president is mad at 43 for being "shackled" by public opinion:

In the second term, he felt Bush was moving away from him. He said Bush was shackled by the public reaction and the criticism he took. Bush was more malleable to that. The implication was that Bush had gone soft on him, or rather Bush had hardened against Cheney's advice. He'd showed an independence that Cheney didn't see coming. It was clear that Cheney's doctrine was cast-iron strength at all times -- never apologize, never explain -- and Bush moved toward the conciliatory.

Some conservatives rebut the argument, noting that Bush was nothing if not stubborn in the face of political and public opposition. Commenting on the story, Joe Scarborough pointed out on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" that Bush was defiant about the surge in Iraq despite the polls.

But apparently Cheney, sometimes called the Darth Vader of American politics, even disagrees with his old boss about what constitutes a good book.

Told in one session that Bush, in his own memoirs, hoped to explore his personal feelings, Cheney responded that he had no intention of doing that.

"He sort of spat the word 'personal,' " said one person in the room.

-- Johanna Neuman

Photo: Reuters

Twitter update: More than 30,000 of you have registered here for free Twitter alerts on each new Ticket item. Don't be left behind. Or follow us @latimestot


Joe Biden update: Lots of closed meetings, a poll number under Cheney

July 29, 2009 |  7:04 am

Democrat Vice president Joe Biden gets either on or off of Air Force Two

While the president hops down to North Carolina and back to Virginia today, selling more healthcare plans whose billions of dollars will absolutely positively not add one Chicago dime to the deficit, Vice President Joe Biden has another full day of secret closed meetings in Washington.

According to the Veepster's schedule, after taking Monday off to accompany his wife to the doctor, he'll have a closed briefing on whatever the Recovery Act is or is not doing. Then, for the remainder of the entire day, Biden will have hour after hour of meetings with unidentified people on unidentified subjects. Don't even ask.

In the evening, he'll return to his Delaware home to recover.

Also, some polling news for Biden buffs:

According to a new Washington Post survey, a clear majority of Americans (55%) approve of the job Biden's doing, perhaps because thanks to schedules like today's, they can't know much about what that job he's doing actually is.

Biden's numbers are tied closely to Americans' belief in the economic efficacy of President Obama's stimulus package. Those who think it'll work, like him; those who don't, don't.

Those Biden approval numbers still aren't quite as good as Dick Cheney's April approval of 64% from a 2001 Post poll. But then Cheney is Obama's cousin and talks way less than Biden, who used to call Cheney the most dangerous vice president in U.S. history.

Biden's approval numbers, however, are way better than House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's. Which actually isn't saying much because she and George W. Bush are both hovering around the lower 30s nowadays.

According to the Post, 79% of Democrats approve of Joe's job, 54% of independents and 24% of Republicans. Among white Catholics and whites without college degrees, Obama's actually doing better in approval ratings than the guy from Scranton, Pa., who was supposed to help him with that crowd. An ominous sign for a presidential helpmate.

-- Andrew Malcolm

Nothing secret about getting Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Just click here. Or follow us    @latimestot

Photo credit: Getty Images



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives