Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

Category: President Bush

Top Democrat warns Afghanistan will bankrupt domestic programs, threatens war surtax if Obama sends more troops

November 23, 2009 |  8:06 am

Wisconsin Democrat Dave Obey

David Obey came to Congress in 1969, a young Democratic congressman from Wisconsin, opposed to the Vietnam War and mindful of the funding it was draining from Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs.

Thirty years later, he is chairman of the House Appropriations Committee and adamant that Afghanistan is a similar quagmire that could bankrupt President Obama's domestic agenda.

"There ain't going to be no money for nothing if we pour it all into Afghanistan," House Appropriations Chairman David Obey told ABC News. "If they ask for an increased troop commitment in Afghanistan, I am going to ask them to pay for it."

Comparing Afghanistan to Vietnam, Obey said that both were long-standing civil wars and that, in each case, the United States found itself with an unreliable partner on the ground.

"On the merits, I think it is a mistake to deepen our involvement," Obey said. "But if we are going to do that, then at least we ought to pay for it. Because if we don't, if we don't pay for it, the cost of the Afghan war will wipe out every initiative we have to rebuild our own economy."

"If we have to pay for the healthcare bill, we should pay for the war as well," Obey said, "by having a war surtax."

Obey's comments come just as Washington is starting to acknowledge the huge debt laid at its doorstep by recent programs -- including the massive drug-prescription bill and Iraq war costs enacted under the Bush administration as well as the healthcare overhaul and stimulus plans ginned up under Obama.

The current national debt is $12 trillion, and the White House estimates that, by 2019, interest from the debt will top $700 billion a year. As one analyst, Pimco's William Gross, told the New York Times, “What a good country or a good squirrel should be doing is stashing away nuts for the winter. The United States is not only not saving nuts, it’s eating the ones left over from the last winter.”

-- Johanna Neuman

Photo: David Obey. Credit: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.


Huckabee: Republican attacks on Obama 'deplorable'

November 20, 2009 |  7:55 am

He could go down as the first Republican to spar with conservative icon Rush Limbaugh and live to talk about it.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee told the Hudson Union Society some weeks ago that Republican attacks on President Obama for everything from visiting Dover Air Force Base to opening the White House to local trick-or-treaters on Halloween are hurting the country.

Now, his comments are circulating on the net, posing a direct counter to Limbaugh, who has criticized Obama's Dover visit as a photo op.

Said Huckabee:

When he was at Dover the other day, and went there to pay respect for soldiers, I heard a lot of people on the right say, "Aw, that's just a cheap photo-op." No, I think it was the commander-in-chief of our military paying respect to a dead soldier, and I'm grateful that he did that, and I was proud of him for doing that. And I think we all -- as Americans -- should give him credit for doing that.

Perhaps cognizant of public opinion polls that show Obama personally popular with most Americans, even those who disagree with his policies, Huckabee added: "When he and Michele hosted the trick-or-treaters on Halloween, quit finding something wrong with that. Say. 'Good, I'm glad that he and the first lady are treating children to an experience at the White House.' And I just find it deplorable that some people on my end of the aisle want to find everything wrong and nothing right about the man as a man."

Finally, recalling that liberals regularly reviled George W. Bush no matter what he did, Huckabee, a former pastor, pleaded for comity.

I hated it when people did that to George Bush. They couldn't even laugh at the man's jokes. They found something wrong with everything and if we do that to Barack Obama, then shame on us, shame on us. No wonder our country is so divided when that happens.

Huckabee made the comments while on book tour for "A Simple Christmas." Republican insiders, mindful of all the attention focused on former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's "Going Rogue," are calling Huckabee's "the other book tour."

-- Johanna Neuman

 Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.


New George W. Bush Presidential Center will include -- surprise! -- some Texas style

November 19, 2009 |  4:04 pm

Bush Presidential Center 
Much like the man who inspires it, the new George W. Bush Presidential Center will be a combination of Texas style and East Coast tradition. That’s the word on the renderings of the 225-square-foot, $250-million center.Laura Bush

The plans for the center, to be built at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, were released Wednesday and, in the words of Times architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne, “carry no hint of the swagger, bravado or taste for confrontation that Bush was known for as president.” Among the Texas touches will be pecan wood paneling and, outside, wildflowers, bluebonnets and prairie.

On The Times’ Culture Monster blog, Hawthorne writes:

Designed by New York’s Robert A.M. Stern, arguably the country’s leading historicist architect, the library is a handsome, contextual piece of architecture wrapped in Texas limestone (which may sound like a euphemism, like "Texas tea," but isn’t) and red brick. Though on its main facades it uses classical themes in a mostly abstract way, rather than literally, it is very much meant to complement SMU’s predominantly Georgian-style landmarks.

A statement released by the center sums up the blend of styles this way:

The light-filled building is both presidential and welcoming, includes elements that evoke both Texas and Washington, and will house the three components of the George W. Bush Presidential Center: an Archive, a Museum and a policy Institute.

Check out Hawthorne’s full article for more on the center, plus more renderings of the buildings and site.

We can’t help wondering if the center will include an exhibit on weapons of mass destruction. It could even be interactive -- visitors could wander the complex and never find the WMD. Just a thought. 

-- Steve Padilla

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.

Upper photo: Artist rendering of the Bush Presidential Center. Credit: Robert A.M. Stern

Lower photo: Former First Lady Laura Bush at news conference Wednesday announcing plans for the new center. Credit: Associated Press 


Atty. Gen. Eric Holder on hot seat about sending 9/11 trials to NYC: 'We need not cower in the face of this enemy'

November 18, 2009 | 10:09 am

Atty. Gen. Eric Holder defends decision to hold 9_11 trials in New York City
It was a hearing in which both sides gave as good as they got.

The ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Alabama's Jeff Sessions, criticized Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. for deciding to hold the trials of alleged 9/11 plotters in New York City, calling the move "dangerous, misguided and unnecessary" because it would put the city at greater risk and give Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind behind the attacks, a platform.

But Holder, noting the long and successful record of New York prosecutors in managing terrorism trials, scoffed at that, insisting that the defendants' "hateful ideologies" will be no louder in civilian court than before a military commission. Noting that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Chief Ray Kelly think the city can be protected during the trial, Holder said:

I have every confidence that the presiding judge will ensure appropriate decorum. And if Khalid Shaikh Mohammed makes the same statements he made in his military commission proceedings, I have every confidence the nation and the world will see him for the coward he is. I'm not scared of what Khalid Shaikh Mohammed will have to say at trial, and no one else needs to be either. 

The attorney general also took a swipe at the George W. Bush administration, saying, "For eight years justice has been delayed for the 9/11 attacks. No more delay. It is time; it is past time to finally act." 

In short, said the attorney general, "we need not cower in the face of this enemy."

 -- Johanna Neuman

Photo: Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Credit: Alex Wong / Getty Images

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.

Related:

Eric Holder defends decision to try 9/11 terrorists in federal court


Obama angry about leaks on Afghan policy, 'absolutely' a firing offense

November 18, 2009 |  7:57 am

In a round of interviews before he left China, President Obama made clear that he was not happy with sources within his administration who had leaked details about his deliberations on Afghanistan.

"For people to be releasing information during the course of deliberations, where we haven't made final decisions yet, I think is not appropriate," he said.

CBS' Chip Reid asked the president if he was as angry as Defense Secretary Robert Gates about the leaks.

"I think I'm angrier than Bob Gates about it," he replied. "We have deliberations in the situation room for a reason; we're making life-and-death decisions that affect how our troops are able to operate in a theater of war. For people to be releasing info in the course of deliberations is not appropriate."

"A firing offense?" Reid inquired.

"Absolutely," Mr. Obama responded. 

And, in an interview with CNN, Obama promised to end the war in Afghanistan before he leaves office. 

"My preference would be not to hand off anything to the next president," he said. Perhaps thinking of the full plate that was left to him by President Bush, Obama added, "One of the things I'd like is the next president to be able to come in and say I've got a clean slate." 

Pledging to announce his decision with transparency, Obama said, "The American people will have a lot of clarity about what we're doing, how we're going to succeed, how much this thing is going to cost, what kind of burden does this place on our young men and women in uniform and, most importantly, what's the endgame on this thing." 

 -- Johanna Neuman

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.


Who is a failure? Obama, if you do a Google search

November 13, 2009 | 12:24 pm

Who-is-failure


Who is failure? If you trust Google's top search result to point you to the right answer, it's President Obama.

The culprit is not a politically charged search engine but rather a Google Bomb.

Such tricks have plagued the White House for some time. Nefarious bloggers exploit the way Google's algorithm surfaces relevant information by linking a word or group of words -- in this case, "who is failure" -- to a central Web page -- Barack Obama's White House profile page.

During President Bush's term, George W. Bush's profile frequently showed up on searches including "failure," "miserable failure" and "who is failure." Obama had inherited those "failures" when he took office and his profile was placed online.

For a while, Google seemed to have fixed the problem. But, as Search Engine Land's Danny Sullivan writes, the game is back on.

Until it's fixed, you can type in "who is failure" into a Google search box and, for a laugh, watch where it goes.

-- Mark Milian

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.


Obama rebuts Cheney's 'dithering' charge, vows 'no open-ended commitment' on Afghanistan

November 13, 2009 |  8:02 am

President Obama convenes meeting of his National Security team on Afghanistan

For weeks, critics have been complaining that President Obama is taking too long to make a decision on whether to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan. Former Vice President Dick Cheney accused him of "dithering."

Today he answered them.

"I recognize that there have been critics of the process," he said. "They tend not to be folks who I think are directly involved in what's happening in Afghanistan. Those who are recognize the gravity of the situation and recognize the importance of us getting this right."

In a news conference in Japan, the first stop on an eight-day trip through Asia, Obama also made clear that the reason he keeps sending military planners back to the drawing board on Afghanistan is that he wants to see a sharper outline of the purpose -- and exit strategy -- for U.S. troops in the region:

It's a matter of making certain that when I send young men and women into war, and I devote billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money, that it's making us safer, and that the strategies that are placed not just on the military side but also on the civilian side are coordinated and effective in our primary goal, which is to make sure that the United States is not subject to attack and its allies are not subject to attack by terrorist networks, and that there is a stability in the region that helps to facilitate that larger goal.

Promising to make the decision soon, Obama said that after eight meetings with his National Security Council, he was pleased with the process. "It has been not a academic exercise, but a necessary process in order to make sure that we're making the best possible decisions," he said.

You can read the full transcript of Obama's joint news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama below, as provided by the White House. Obama pledged to address Japanese concerns about the presence of U.S. military bases in large urban areas, and Hatoyama pledged $5 billion over five years to civilian projects in Afghanistan.

-- Johanna Neuman

Photo: President Obama meets with his national security team on Afghanistan. Credit: White House

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AND PRIME MINISTER YUKIO HATOYAMA OF JAPAN

RIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  (As translated.)  President Obama, I would like to welcome you to Japan.  I'd like to express my heartfelt welcome to you.  It is very hard -- despite the tragedy of the mass shooting in your country, that you have taken time out of a busy schedule to come and join us here today.  We're very thankful to you.

        And today we have had a 90-minute, very intensive discussion.  I'm very happy to have had this opportunity to.... ... hold this discussion.

        Well, we have come to call each other Barack and Yukio.  I think I've grown quite accustomed to calling each other by our names.  And we did cover a lot of ground today.  First, for Japan's diplomacy, the U.S.-Japan alliance is the cornerstone. And this is one thing I've stressed.  But as time changes and as the international environment changes, there is a need for us to further develop and deepen the U.S.-Japan alliance to make it even more constructive and future-oriented alliance.  This was what I proposed today.

        And the U.S.-Japan alliance -- well, actually it so happens that next year marks the 50th anniversary of the revision of the U.S.-Japan security treaty.  And starting from today we'll be starting a year to start a new process of deliberation.  And I have made this proposal, and President Obama has given his consent and support towards this idea.

        Now, the U.S.-Japan alliance, looking at it from the security front, naturally we have to cooperate in proliferation deterrence, on information protection, missile defense, and the use of other states amongst others.  We need to consider these new systems for issuing security.  And this is my thinking.

But the U.S.-Japan alliance is not just focused on security -- for example, disaster prevention, or health, education.  We had many levels -- and also environmental issues, as well.  We need to cooperate in all these areas so as to cooperate in the Asia Pacific and others so that we can further deepen our bilateral alliance.  I believe that we have reached an agreement on these points.

        Now, turning our eyes to the global situation, again there are different topics that we've covered.  From our side, I've  talked about Afghanistan and our support to Afghanistan.  On to Afghanistan; we will not be taking part in the refueling, but instead providing civil assistance, and we are planning to mainly provide civil assistance of 5 billion yen in five years for agriculture, building of infrastructures, schools.  So this is the type of assistance we want to provide.  And also to improve security, we want to support the police force in Afghanistan.  Furthermore, for the former soldiers, we want to provide vocational training.  These are the types of things that we want to conduct.

        I have communicated this to the President, and towards this new assistance package, President Obama in principle has stated his gratitude, appreciation for this assistance.  And furthermore, when it comes to assistance to Afghanistan, it's important that we try to directly talk with one another as to the assistance to be provided.

        Now, in the area of climate change, again, we have talked on this subject.  By 2015, we have set out this goal of an 80 percent reduction.  And both Japan and U.S. have agreed on this, and we want to make COP-15 a success, and we agreed to cooperate towards this end.

And including China and others, there are other issues that need to be resolved.  And therefore we need to collaborate to address these challenges.

        Now, in regards to nuclear disarmament, again, we have agreed to cooperate with one another.  Now, in regards to nuclear issues and also climate change, we have issued a joint statement. And I do believe that this is quite innovative in itself, and the fact that we can take up these issues as core issues at the summit meeting is something of vital importance.

        Now, on the economic front, well, the economy was not a major issue this time, but again, this might reflect the times in which we're living.  And over dinner, maybe, we hope to be able to discuss the issue of the economy.

        Now, in relation to nuclear issues, North Korea, Iran was also discussed from President Obama.  And again, we have agreed to closely cooperate with one another.  And Special Representative Bosworth will be visiting North Korea -- or may be visiting North Korea shortly.  But this is on the premise of the six-party talks.  And I do endorse this thinking and have stated so to the President.

        And in regards to Iran, again, we have to support -- we would like to support the approach to Iran.  On the one hand, we want to emphasize our historic relationship, but also, at the same time, I promise to strengthen our alliance vis-à-vis Iran.

        And also, again, in Asia, President Obama has stated that we have some -- we do have a vital role to play, especially in East Asia.  I have set out the concept of East Asian community, and this is because I believe that there is this alliance as the cornerstone on which we can rely.

And in Asia, the fact that the U.S. presence increases is something that has great extension towards at various levels in Asia and East Asia, and Asia on the whole.  Both Japan and the United States should deepen, and as a result, in East Asia we hope to bring about peace, stability, and economic prosperity in this region.  This is something that we have pledged.

        I don't want to take up all the time myself, and therefore I'd like to conclude.  But I do think that this summit meeting was extremely meaningful.  And on this note, I'd like to once again say that I am very grateful to Barack, President Obama, to take time to join us here at Japan.  And also, I'm thankful that he's chosen Japan as his first leg to his visit to Asia.  And as Prime Minister, representing the Japanese people, I'd like to express my gratitude.  Thank you.

        And next, President Obama, please.

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, good evening.  It is a great honor to be making my first trip to Japan as President of the United States.  I have fond memories of visiting Japan in my youth.  I've been looking forward to this trip for some time.  I'm only sorry that Michelle and the girls could not join us.  The girls have been studying Japan in school, and so they have a great interest in Japanese culture.  And hopefully I'll be able to bring them next time.

        I want to thank the warm welcome that Prime Minister Hatoyama and the Japanese people have extended.  I appreciate the graciousness with which you understood the delay that took place as a consequence of the tragedy at Fort Hood, Texas.

        Japan is my first stop as President in Asia.  I began my trip here in Tokyo because the alliance between the United States and Japan is a foundation for security and prosperity not just for our two countries but for the Asia Pacific region.  In a few months we'll be marking the 50th anniversary of our alliance, which is founded on shared values and shared interests that has served our people so well and has provided peace and security for the region in an unprecedented way.

        That anniversary, as Prime Minister Hatoyama pointed out, represents an important opportunity to step back and reflect on what we've achieved, celebrate our friendship, but also find ways to renew this alliance and refresh it for the 21st century.  Both Yukio and I were elected on the promise of change, but there should be no doubt, as we move our nations in a new direction, our alliance will endure and our efforts will be focused on revitalizing that friendship so that it's even stronger and more successful in meeting the challenges of the 21st century.  It's essential for the United States, it's essential for Japan, and it's essential for the Asia Pacific region.

        Throughout my trip and throughout my presidency, I intend to make clear that the United States is a Pacific nation, and we will be deepening our engagement in this part of the world.  As I said to Prime Minister Hatoyama, the United States will strengthen our alliances, build new partnerships, and we will be part of multilateral efforts and regional institutions that advance regional security and prosperity.

        We have to understand that the future of the United States and Asia is inextricably linked.  The issues that matter most to our people -- issues of economic growth and job creation, non-proliferation, clean energy -- these are all issues that have to be part of a joint agenda.  And we had very productive discussions about these issues this evening.

        It's true that because of the strength of our economic ties, that was not the first item on our agenda, but we are fortunately going to have the opportunity to spend a lot of time discussing that in Singapore in the coming days.  As the world's two leading economies, we have spent a lot of time working together in the G20 to help bring the world back from the brink of financial crisis, and we're going to continue to work to strengthen our efforts so that we can expand job growth in the future.  And we will be discussing with our APEC partners how to rebalance our deep economic cooperation with this region to strengthen our recovery.

        The Prime Minister and I discussed our cooperation on Afghanistan and Pakistan.  And I did thank the people of Japan and the Prime Minister for the powerful commitment of a $5 billion over the next five years to support our shared civilian efforts in Afghanistan, as well as the commitment of a billion dollars to Pakistan.

        This underscores Japan's prominent role within a broad international coalition that is advancing the cause of stability and opportunity in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  And I shared with the Prime Minister our efforts in refining our approach to make it more successful in the coming year.

        We discussed our shared commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and ultimately seeking a world without them.  Since I laid out a comprehensive agenda in Prague to pursue these goals Japan has been an outstanding partner in those efforts.  And together we passed a historic resolution in the Security Council last September.  We are building a new international consensus to secure loose nuclear materials and strengthen the nonproliferation regime.

        And to that end, we discussed both North Korea and the situation in Iran, recognizing that it's absolutely vital that both countries meet their international obligations.  If they do, then they can open the door to a better future.  If not, we will remain united in implementing U.N. resolutions that are in place and continuing to work in an international context to move towards an agenda of nonproliferation.

        Finally, we discussed our partnership on energy issues and climate change.  The United States and Japan share a commitment to developing the clean energy of the future and we're focused on combating the threat of climate change.  This is an important priority for us; I know it's an important priority for the people of Japan.  And we discussed how we can work together to pave the way for a successful outcome in Copenhagen next month.

        So I believe that we are off to a very successful start.  I'm looking forward to continuing the conversation during dinner, as well as as we both travel to Singapore.  And I am confident that we will continue to strengthen the U.S.-Japan alliance so that it serves future generations. Thank you very much.

        PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  Thank you very much.  Now I'd like to proceed to questions.  I will appoint the person, and once you are appointed, please come to the microphone, state your name and affiliation, and also to whom -- please state to whom you want to pose your question.

        On behalf of the Japanese press, please.

        Q       Fuji Television.  Matsuyama is my name.  I'd like to ask both leaders -- first to Prime Minister Hatoyama.  You have stated that you would like to see Japan enjoy a more equal relationship with the United States in talks about Afghanistan and also the ending of the refueling operations and global warming and nuclear disarmament.  Do you think that you're able to talk as equal partners and gain understanding on this point, especially on the Futenma relocation?  There is the observation that this will be a difficult issue to resolve, but how did you explain about how to resolve the timeline for resolving this issue?

        And to President Obama, you are a proponent of a nuclear-free world, and you've stated, first of all, you would like to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki while in office.  Do you have this desire?  And what is your understanding of the historical meaning of the A-bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?  Do you think that it was the right decision?

        And also considering the North Korean situation, how do you think the U.S.-Japan alliance should be strengthened, and how should both countries cooperate in the field of nuclear disarmament?

        And also on the Futenma relocation issue, by when do you think the issue needs to be resolved?  And should it be that Japan carry over the discussion -- decision to next year, or decide on something outside of what is being discussed?  How would you respond?

        PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  Let me start.  I was asked a great deal of questions to -- especially President Obama, but I'd like to talk about the equal relationship.  But before I state so, the President himself has said naturally that we are equal partners and should be equal partners.  So in this context we have talked about the assistance to Afghanistan, climate change, and furthermore, nuclear abolishment.  And I think you can ask him, but I do believe that he has regarded us, Japan, as an equal partner.  I have raised a number of issues on my side, and I think this is proof of our equal partnership.

On the issue of the relocation of the Futenma air station, in regards to this issue, well, to give you the conclusion, there is the high-level working group -- we've set up this group so as to be able to resolve the issue as early as possible.  And we stated this and my commitment was also expressed during our talks.

        But before that, I have explained why we have this discussion, and under the previous government, the U.S.-Japan agreement needs to be regarded seriously.  During the election campaign, especially to the Okinawans, I've stated that we would consider relocation outside of Okinawa and outside of the country.  It is a fact that we did campaign on this issue, and the Okinawans do have high expectations.

        It will be a very difficult issue for sure, but as time goes by, I think it will become even more difficult to resolve the issue.  Especially the residents in the Futenma district will find it even more difficult to resolve the issue as time goes by.

So we do understand we need to resolve the issue as soon as possible, and we'll make every effort to resolve the issue as quickly as possible within the working group.

        And we hope that this will lead the way to strengthening our alliance, and I sincerely hope that such discussions will take place within the working group.  And this is something I have communicated to the President.

        President, please.

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first of all, I am impressed that the Japanese journalists use the same strategy as American journalists -- (laughter) -- in asking multiple questions.

        Let me, first of all, insist that the United States and Japan are equal partners.  We have been and we will continue to be.  Each country brings specific assets and strengths to the relationship, but we proceed based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and that will continue.

        That's reflected in the Japan-U.S. alliance.  It will be reflected in the resolution of the base realignment issues related to Futenma.  As the Prime Minister indicated, we discussed this.  The United States and Japan have set up a high-level working group that will focus on implementation of the agreement that our two governments reached with respect to the restructuring of U.S. forces in Okinawa, and we hope to complete this work expeditiously.

        Our goal remains the same, and that's to provide for the defense of Japan with minimal intrusion on the lives of the people who share this space.  And I have to say that I am extraordinarily proud and grateful for the men and women in uniform from the United States who help us to honor our obligations to the alliance and our treaties.

        With respect to nuclear weapons and the issues of non-proliferation, this is an area where Prime Minister Hatoyama and I have discussed repeatedly in our meetings.  We share, I think, a vision of a world without nuclear weapons.  We recognize, though, that this is a distant goal, and we have to take specific steps in the interim to meet this goal.  It will take time.  It will not be reached probably even in our own lifetimes.  But in seeking this goal we can stop the spread of nuclear weapons; we can secure loose nuclear weapons; we can strengthen the non-proliferation regime.

        As long as nuclear weapons exist, we will retain our deterrent for our people and our allies, but we are already taking steps to bring down our nuclear stockpiles and -- in cooperation with the Russian government -- and we want to continue to work on the non-proliferation issues.

        Now, obviously Japan has unique perspective on the issue of nuclear weapons as a consequence of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  And that I'm sure helps to motivate the Prime Minister's deep interest in this issue.  I certainly would be honored, it would be meaningful for me to visit those two cities in the future.  I don't have immediate travel plans, but it's something that would be meaningful to me.

        You had one more question, and I'm not sure I remember it.  Was it North Korea?

        Q       Whether or not you believe that the U.S. dropped a nuclear weapon on Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- it was right?

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  No, there were three sets of questions, right?  You asked about North Korea?

        Q       I have North Korea as well, yes.

        PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Yes.  With respect to North Korea, we had a extensive discussion about how we should proceed with Pyongyang.  Obviously we were disturbed by the testing that took place, some of the belligerent actions that had taken place in an earlier period of this year.  We have continued to say that our goal is a non-nuclear Korean Peninsula.  That's vital for the security of East Asia.

And the United States and Japan, with the other members of the six-party talks, will continue to work to show North Korea that there is a pathway, a door, for them to rejoin the international community that would serve their people well and I believe enhance their security over the long term.  They have to walk through that door.  In the meantime, we will continue to implement the sanctions that have already been put in place, and we will continue to coordinate closely with Japan and the other six-party members in helping to shape a strategy that meets our security needs and convinces Pyongyang to move in a better direction.

        MR. GIBBS:  Jennifer Loven with AP -- questions fewer in number.  (Laughter.)

        Q       Thank you, Mr. President, Mr. Prime Minister.  President Obama, how can you assure the American people that a trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, now that your administration has now decided will take place in a civilian court in New York, will be safe and secure, but also not result in an innocent verdict for him?

And on Afghanistan, if I might, can you explain to people watching and criticizing your deliberations what piece of information you're still lacking to make that call?

And if I could add one to the Prime Minister, please.  Can you explain your country decided not to continue refueling ships going to Afghanistan?

PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  Mr. President?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  With respect to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, I believe that the Attorney General is going to be making an announcement this morning in the United States, this evening here.  I don't want to preempt his news conference.  This is a prosecutorial decision as well as a national security decision.

Here's the thing that I will say.  I am absolutely convinced that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will be subject to the most exacting demands of justice.  The American people will insist on it and my administration will insist on it.  And I'm sure we'll have additional things to say after the Attorney General's press conference.

With respect to Afghanistan, Jennifer, I don't think this is a matter of some datum of information that I'm waiting on.  It's a matter of making certain that when I send young men and women into war, and I devote billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money, that it's making us safer, and that the strategies that are placed not just on the military side but also on the civilian side are coordinated and effective in our primary goal, which is to make sure that the United States is not subject to attack and its allies are not subject to attack by terrorist networks, and that there is a stability in the region that helps to facilitate that larger goal.

        And I recognize that there have been critics of the process. They tend not to be folks who I think are directly involved in what's happening in Afghanistan.  Those who are recognize the gravity of the situation and recognize the importance of us getting this right.

        And the decision will be made soon.  It will be one that is fully transparent so that the American people understand exactly what we're doing and why we're doing it and what it will entail. It will also I think send a clear message that our goal here ultimately has to be for the Afghan people to be able to be in a position to provide their own security, and that the United States cannot be engaged in an open-ended commitment.

So I am very pleased with how the process has proceeded.  And those who participated I think would acknowledge that it has been not a academic exercise, but a necessary process in order to make sure that we're making the best possible decisions.

        PRIME MINISTER HATOYAMA:  I thank you for keeping it to just one question, having come all the way to Japan.  Now, your question was about why we ended the refueling in the Indian Ocean.  And we believe that Japan's assistance to Afghanistan will -- in the larger context, terms should be considered.  And as for antiterrorism, in order to eradicate terrorism, there is a need to take certain measures, but we have to consider what Japan should be doing in terms of antiterrorism.  I think that it's important that we extend civilian support so as to eliminate terrorism from its roots.  And I do believe that this is appropriate for Japan, and this is the first point that I want to communicate to you.

And also, the refueling support, I've looked at the activities.  Compared to the beginning recently, the refueling support is declining.  Last month, in one month, there was only one -- refueling for one ship.  And we wonder how much effect we are bringing about.  And so I think that we have to consider the meaning of this logistic support, and we've come to think that there is another type of assistance that is more appropriate for Japan.

        We understand that the Afghans are suffering from poverty and we have to save them from poverty.  Also security is something of a challenge, and we need to take new activities.  And also, to the former soldiers, we have to provide vocational training so that they do not have to rely on their guns; they can lay down their guns and seek a more fulfilling life.

        And I believe that for Japan it is more appropriate, desirable, that we provide such civilian assistance.  And as a result, conclusion, we have decided that instead of providing refueling, we provide an alternative package.

        MODERATOR:  Thank you very much.  With this, we would like to conclude the joint news conference.  And reporters please stay in your seats while the leaders leave the room.  We thank you for your cooperation.    ###

                                             


George W. Bush warns about too much government without naming gee-who-could-it-possibly-be?

November 13, 2009 |  2:22 am

BushGWClooseFAceGrimabc

Speaking of politicians' books, it looks like we'll have to wait for next fall to discover what exactly former President George W. Bush meant Thursday when he spoke, seemingly regretfully, about the $700-billion Wall Street bailout decision he made near the end of his term. He said:

I went against my free-market instincts and approved a temporary government intervention to unfreeze the credit markets so that we could avoid a major global depression.

Bush was speaking in Dallas at the formal unveiling of plans for a $300-million presidential library and think tank at Southern Methodist University, his wife's alma mater. Sources said fundraisers have already assembled more than $200 million in donations to begin construction next year.

Besides housing his presidential archives and memorabilia such as the bullhorn the 43rd president used atop the World Trade Center rubble after 9/11, the presidential center will focus, he said, on four policy areas: education, global health, political freedoms and economic growth.

Appearing refreshed and energized before a friendly crowd of about 1,000, the 63-year-old said he was retired, not tired. He covered a broad array of subjects in his remarks.

But Bush kept to his promise from earlier this year not to comment on specific policies or decisions of his successor, something his former vice president, Dick Cheney, has not felt obliged to do. Oh, and he's writing a book too. Who isn't these days?

In fact, Bush did not mention Barack Obama's name, nor the Democrat's policy moves into the banking, financial, automobile, healthcare and insurance industries.

But some might interpret an oblique warning when Bush said:

The role of government is not to create wealth but to create the conditions that allow entrepreneurs and innovators to thrive.

As the world recovers, we will face a temptation to replace the risk-and-reward model of the private sector with the blunt instruments of government spending and control. History shows that the greater threat to prosperity is not too little government involvement, but too much.

Whomever could he possibly be talking about?

-- Andrew Malcolm

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.

Photo credit: ABC News


Obama communications director steps down -- another win for Fox News?

November 11, 2009 |  7:51 am

Obama political guru David Axelrod with Communications Director Anita Dunn

First, Van Jones resigned as the Obama administration's green jobs czar after taking a pounding from Fox News' Glenn Beck. The charge: Jones signed a petition seeking an inquiry into whether the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Now comes word that Anita Dunn, under fire from Beck for saying in a speech to high schoolers that Mao Tse-tung and Mother Teresa were two of her favorite political philosophers, is leaving her post as communications director.

Dunn, handing over the reins to her assistant, Dan Pfeiffer, has led the White House charge against Fox, saying the network is not a news organization but essentially part of the Republican Party. She also said her remarks to the high school students were meant as irony.

Insiders insist Dunn is not a casualty of the Beck offensive, noting that she had never planned to stay in the role permanently, and will remain at the White House as a consultant.

Some bloggers have their doubts. Niall O'Dowd writes in Irish Central that Dunn's departure is "a victory for Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly and Fox News."

But Michelle Malkin thinks that the story is much ado about nothing. As she put it, "Don’t get excited: Anita Dunn is not being thrown under the bus."

-- Johanna Neuman

Photo: Obama political guru David Axelrod confers with Dunn at a White House swearing-in ceremony May 1. Credit: Getty Images

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. And we're also over here on Facebook.


George W. Bush makes secret visit to mourning families at Fort Hood; Laura Bush goes too

November 7, 2009 |  4:28 pm

Then president George W Bush visits with US troops in Qatar 2003

Last night former President George W. Bush and his wife Laura made a secret visit to the devastated military families at Fort Hood.

The Bushes instructed the commander of the mourning military base that they wanted no publicity. With their Secret Service detail, Bush and his wife made the 30 mile trip unannounced from their ranch near Crawford, Texas Friday evening.

Fox News broke news of the visit this afternoon. Other sources said the former first couple spent about two hours meeting with the wounded, family and soldiers, talking quietly and at times hugging them as they did in private at other times of crisis such as post-9/11.

Most presidents come to feel a genuine respect and affection for the people they lead as commander-in-chief and sometimes the affection is reciprocated.

Many base workers and residents on Fort Hood are still reeling from the shooting this week by Major Nidal Malik Hasan that killed 13 people and wounded dozens of others. (See video below.)

The White House announced today the Obamas plan to attend a memorial service there on Tuesday. Some foreign news reporters have begun to write unflattering comparisons of the emotional Bush vs the ever-cool, possibly cold Obama.

-- Andrew Malcolm

No secret about this. Clicking here gets you free Twitter alerts of each Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot.  Also on Facebook here.

Photo: Associated Press, 2003.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives