Top of the Ticket

Political commentary from Andrew Malcolm

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Kids selling lemonade fined $500 for not having permit on Thursday are allowed to sell again on Friday

Kids in Maryland were fined $500 for selling lemonade Thursday when a county inspector cited them for not having a permit. One of the parents is concerned that government has grown too large.

The location was unusual and the children were not from your typical family, which is why they were fined and perhaps why the fine was later revoked.

The cute little blond-haired kids were selling lemonade near the entrance to the golf club hosting the U.S Open tournament. The event is so popular that entrepreneurial families in the neighborhood have paid $300 for permits so they can have the pleasure of charging upwards of $60 a vehicle for visitors to park in their lush and spacious lawns.

The kids, who intended for the proceeds to go to charity, had no permits, so they were fined.

But two things happened. First the news was captured by journalists who quoted one of the mothers arguing with the inspector and finally telling the camera, "The message to kids is, there's no American dream."

The other thing that happened was it was discovered that the children were part of two D.C. power families: the Marriotts, known for the hotel chain, and the Augustines. Norman Augustine is the former head of Lockheed-Martin.

Call it coincidental, but according to WUSA in Washington, D.C., county permits director Jennifer Hughes on Friday waived the fine and instructed the families that if they moved their children's stand 100 feet from where they were originally, all would be well.

Although the matter is resolved, one of the mothers, Rene Augustine, complained: "This feels like a whole lot of government to me," WUSA reported.

ALSO:

Fear kidney stones? Drink lemonade

Opinion: Government regulation: Lemonade Day done wrong

-- Tony Pierce
twitter.com/busblog

 

 
Comments () | Archives (5)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Ah yes, good thing old-fashioned American values were upheld: No consequences for the rich and influential who don't have to follow the same rules as everyone else.

They only relented because of the bad press. It should never have gotten this far out of hand. The person citing them was thinking about the amount of money they were making. Paraphrasing: Kids stands make tens of dollars, you're making hundreds. He could have let them off with a warning or to relocated but he was being a idiot. The waived fine and the 100 ft relocation was just a face saving move by the director to cover his arrogance.

Being wealthy is SUCH hard work

Seems like there was a warning involved? Since the anchor stated prior to the story that, "refusing to move". I think that there are rules in place for a good reason, seems petty for kids, but I wonder how non-profit charitable gigs could fit in.

Kids selling lemonade is old as them riding a bicycle. There are FAR MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO BE CONCERNED about in any community. Drugs? Speeders?


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

About the Columnist
A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Andrew Malcolm has served on the L.A. Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four. Read more.
President Obama
Republican Politics
Democratic Politics


Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: