Top of the Ticket

Political commentary from Andrew Malcolm

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Robert Gibbs seems to save the day for media on Obama's India trip

Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs argues with Indian official over US reporters access to witness a meeting

A revealing apparent confrontation accidentally not-behind-the-scenes in India during President Obama's non-bowing state visit there:

Usually the public only sees the immaculately uniformed, perfectly-orchestrated ceremonial part,  as is the plan and as we described here earlier today.

These presidential trips, like those back home, are planned even months in advance down to which door is used and who's allowed to go through it. Overseas, the planning is complicated by varying cultural views, protocols and political priorities.

Indian officials, for instance, do not care that a visiting American dignitary got his political clock cleaned last Tuesday and that the American's staff wants to change the subject back ...

... home and have their boss seen in the best possible big-shot light abroad. And different societies have differing views of the rowdy media and its role and/or rights.

From a political communications point of view, what's the point of an American president acting on a world stage if fewer people back home see it? Without the right range of media witnesses to independently see and transmit the message, in effect, the event might as well not happen in terms of strategic communications?

Part of the ceremonial doo-dah of these things is that at the start or end of diplomatic meetings, a certain representative pool contingent of home and visiting media are allowed to witness small talk, handshakes, a stiff joke or two. It gives them smiley photos, video and some notes to fill out their stories and those of other absent journalists.

In the advance negotiations for today's bilateral meeting between Obama and India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, everyone agreed that eight Americans would be allowed in the press pool. But when it came time for the appointed eight to file into the brief staged setting, some Indian official decided five was enough.Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs argues successfully with Indian official over press access to an official meeting 11-8-10

Fortunately for the U.S. media, Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs was nearby. And he was much more of an in-your-face Chicago pol than calm Southern gentleman.

Americans usually see Gibbs or any White House spokesman verbally dodging and weaving and making the best possible public spin case for their boss before an annoyingly persistent media poking and prodding for conflict, hypocrisy, policy differences, etc. It's a very tricky job.

What isn't seen often -- but was today -- is the press secretary's internal advocacy for the press and its access. If most politicians and government folks had their way, no outsider would see or hear anything about their doings until days later in a stale, canned news release.

If a press secretary has a strong link to the president, he or she can be a much more effective media advocate and, therefore, positively shape the way their boss is ultimately seen.

Aides with other responsibilities are not usually happy with an internal advocate for those ignorant media clowns always trying to make trouble. But without that trust and link, often forged during the demanding, bonding days of a political campaign, the press secretary becomes a mere public parrot.

Today's India incident was worthy of a political novel. Gibbs stepped into the disagreement and made it a confrontation. In no uncertain terms he informed the Indian official that the eight U.S. media reps were going into that meeting or Gibbs was going to pull President Obama out of the session.

Now, that would create an international embarrassment, detract from the host's own political goals and hospitality and would rebound on that Indian functionary in a not-good way -- as in, how would you like to work in a distant provincial sewage plant starting tomorrow?

At one point, Gibbs even inserted his foot to stop a closing door and repeated his pullout threat with increased volume.

Whether Gibbs actually could have created such a presidential exit or would have ignited such a scene, doesn't really matter. The Indians worried that he would. So, the strategy worked this time.

All eight entered. They stood there. Saw the long wooden table beneath a lone chandelier. Saw the president and PM across from each other. Aides seated along either side. Heard not one word. And were ushered out 60 seconds later.

So, it didn't matter.

Except it did.

Invisibly, the often-maligned Gibbs earned some valuable, if silent, human props in the minds of his daily media antagonists. No one will ever be able to spot any benefits to Gibbs and Obama. But they'll be there.

-- Andrew Malcolm

To get your daily dose of late-night jokes before broadcast, click here to follow The Ticket via Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. Our Facebook Like page is over here. We're also available on Kindle now. Use the ReTweet buttons below to share this item with friends.

Photo credits: (top) Jason Reed / Reuters; (bottom) Charles Dharapak / Associated Press

 
Comments () | Archives (13)

The comments to this entry are closed.

U.S. media, Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs nearly created an International incident. If an Indian person would have acted the way he did, it would have been called immature worse. Homeland security would have escorted them out for creating a scene? How should guests behave is a matter of upbringing! For Pete's sake learn International sensitivities and benefit from them, not create issues. We already have enough that is why the President of our country is going around trying to sort them out.

IF ONLY HE AND HIS BOSS WOULD STAY OUT OF MY BACK POCKET WITH THE SAME TENACITY

This is not what the Indians are saying. Apparently Gibbs insisted on taking eight reporters in, though the original plan was for five on each side (India and US).

Well done Mr. Gibbs. He has clearly shown the american power. Indians can never treat their guests well as comapred to Middle Eastern countries. I don't even know why President went to India which is taking 100s of jobs away from americans. I always see them friends of communist during Cold War era. Hate to see our tax payers money goes there.

Indian news organisations claim that the agreement was only for 5 pool reporters and not 8 as claimed in your piece.

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/us-officials-tiff-with-security-men-over-access-to-venue-65140

If that is true then Gibbs is not the angel you think him to be.

One reason why Barack Obama won over some Indian hearts is because he was humble in bearing, and didn't act like the the typical arrogant, and white-skinned American. Robert Gibbs is unfortunately a vestige of the past, a reflection of graceless American power. You are a guest, and even if the Indians had promised eight and not five as they claim, be graceful, discuss it with your host, and not threaten a small-time security official with such a ridiculous threat at that. Americans still need to know to behave, which will become more important as their power is waning. Would Gibbs try this with the Chinese ? No Indians are seen as pliant (incidentally that has been the strength of the small brown man).

"and would rebound on that Indian functionary in a not-good way -- as in, how would you like to work in a distant provincial sewage plant starting tomorrow?'

I don't think this happens in India. It sounds more like China.

Gibbs 'Saved the Day' or Misbehaved in a Guest Country??? I think the latter. Your article title is very misleading. I think the Indians were calm and Gibbs was a pumped up for nothing cowboy!!! Come on Americans... stop giving us a bad name outside the USofA! More multi-culturalism classes are needed even in 2010. Gee!

Deja vu, the Ugly American.

Joshua: "One reason why Barack Obama won over some Indian hearts is because he was humble in bearing". Obama. Humble. Yeah, right.

Dear Andrew Malcolm,

You write that "In the advance negotiations for today's bilateral meeting between Obama and India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, everyone agreed that eight Americans would be allowed in the press pool."

That is not what some body spoke (you have not quoted it). Therefore, it is your own research. Do you have documents/ any sort of evidence to back it up, or did it come out of thin air?


If the Indian security personnel had not agreed to send 8 media persons in, would Rober Gibbs have stopped the meet? An Indian security personnel is capable to making Americans stop President and Prime Minister press meet. Great.

5 each was agreed upon, get your facts straight


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

About the Columnist
A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Andrew Malcolm has served on the L.A. Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four. Read more.
President Obama
Republican Politics
Democratic Politics


Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: