Obama goes for broker, sets politics summit with Boehner, McConnell, Reid and Pelosi

Because his 8,000-word, 56-minute news conference Wednesday may have been insufficient to drive home the point that he gets the voters' point about jobs and working with Republicans for a change, President Obama took another eight minutes and 1,100 words Thursday to expand on those thoughts, after devoting much of a Cabinet meeting to telling members the same thing, in case they hadn't been paying attention.

The news of the event is that in mid-November, during the lame-duck session of Congress, before all these newly-elected Republicans join the federal payroll to cut spending, he's inviting Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to meet with him in the White House along with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell and newly elected House Speaker John Boehner.

The real point of these events is for the president to begin positioning himself in the public's mind for the next year or so as A) a guy who's listening to them better and, B) the middle man, trying the best he possibly can to broker some kind of cooperation between these rebellious Republicans and these dutiful Democrats, who've actually been doing his exact bidding all along but now he wants to appear separate because that looks more centrist than where he has been.

Obama can't do a Slurpee Summit earlier in November because he's heading off ...

... to Asia for some reason on a long trip that he has already postponed twice. And, who knows, maybe all the TV coverage of him in exotic locales, including his childhood homeland of Indonesia, will change the prime topic in the American public's mind off of Tuesday's historically embarrassing election debacle for his Democrats.

Check back here regularly as we'll be publishing numerous full transcripts so you can see for yourself how both sides try to position themselves for these next 735 days until you-know-what. See other related items below.

-- Andrew Malcolm

Speaking of duty, do yours by clicking here to follow The Ticket via Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. Our Facebook Like page is over here. We're also available here on Kindle now.

RELATED:

In his own words: Obama's regrets and lessons at the halfway point

Obama doesn't recommend midterm 'shellackings' to other presidents -- Full news conference transcript

Look what the GOP also pulled off at the state level

President Obama's remarks after a Cabinet meeting, as provided by the White House

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, everybody. I just want to make a few quick remarks to expand on some things that I said yesterday.  Obviously Tuesday was a big election. I congratulated the Republicans and consoled some of our Democratic friends about the results, and I think it’s clear that the voters sent a message, which is they want us to focus on the economy and jobs and moving this country forward. They’re concerned about making sure that taxpayer money is not wasted, and they want to change the tone here in Washington, where the two parties are coming together and focusing on the people’s business as opposed to scoring political points.
 
I just had a meeting with my Cabinet and key staff to let them know that we have to take that message to heart and make a sincere and consistent effort to try to change how Washington operates. And the folks around this table have done extraordinary work in their agencies. They have cooperated consistently with Congress. I think they are interested in bipartisan ideas. And so they are going to be integral in helping me to root out waste in government, make our agencies more efficient, and generate more ideas so that we can put the American people back to work.

Now, at the same time, obviously what’s going to be critically important over the coming months is creating a better working relationship between this White House and the congressional leadership that’s coming in, as well as the congressional leadership that carries over from the previous Congress. And so I want everybody to know that I have already called Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to invite them to a meeting here at the White House in the first week of the lame duck on November 18th. 

This is going to be a meeting in which I’ll want us to talk substantively about how we can move the American people’s agenda forward. It’s not just going to be a photo op. Hopefully -- it may spill over into dinner. And the immediate focus is going to be what we need to get done during the lame-duck session.

I mentioned yesterday we have to act in order to assure that middle-class families don’t see a big tax spike because of how the Bush tax cuts have been structured. It is very important that we extend those middle-class tax provisions to hold middle-class families harmless. 

But there are a whole range of other economic issues that have to be addressed:  unemployment insurance for folks who are still out there looking for work; business extenders, which are essentially provisions to encourage businesses to invest here in the United States, and if we don’t have those, we’re losing a very important tool for us to be able to increase business investment and increase job growth over the coming year.

We’ve got to provide businesses some certainty about what their tax landscape is going to look like, and we’ve got to provide families certainty. That’s critical to maintain our recovery.

I should mention that in addition to those economic issues, there are some things during the lame duck that relate to foreign policy that are going to be very important for us to deal with, and I’ll make mention of one in particular, and that’s the START treaty.  We have negotiated with the Russians significant reductions in our nuclear arms.  This is something that traditionally has received strong bipartisan support.  We’ve got people like George Shultz, who helped to organize arms control treaties with the Russians back when it was the Soviet Union who have come out forcefully in favor of this. 

This is not a traditionally Democratic or Republican issue but rather a issue of American national security. And I am hopeful that we can get that done before we leave and send a strong signal to Russia that we are serious about reducing nuclear arsenals, but also sending a signal to the world that we’re serious about nonproliferation.  We’ve made great progress when it comes to sending a message to Iran that they are isolated internationally, in part because people have seen that we are serious about taking our responsibilities when it comes to nonproliferation, and that has to continue.

So there is going to be a whole range of work that needs to get done in a relatively short period of time, and I’m looking forward to having a conversation with the leadership about some agenda items that they may be concerned about.

Last point I’ll make is that I’ve also invited the newly elected Democratic and Republican governors here to the White House on December 2nd because I think it’s a terrific opportunity to hear from them, folks who are working at the state and local levels, about what they’re seeing, what ideas they think Washington needs to be paying more attention to. 

A lot of times things are a little less ideological when you get governors together because they’ve got very practical problems that they’ve got to solve in terms of how do they make sure that roads and bridges are funded and how do they make sure that schools stay open and teachers stay on the job.  That kind of nuts and bolts stuff I think oftentimes yields the kind of common-sense approach that the American people I think are looking for right now.

So, in sum, we’ve got a lot of work to do. People are still catching their breath from the election. The dust is still settling. But the one thing I’m absolutely certain of is that the American people don’t want us just standing still and they don’t want us engaged in gridlock. They want us to do the people’s business, partly because they understand that the world is not standing still. 

I’m going to be leaving tomorrow for India, and the primary purpose is to take a bunch of U.S. companies and open up markets so that we can sell in Asia, in some of the fastest-growing markets in the world, and we can create jobs here in the United States of America. And my hope is, is that we’ve got some specific announcements that show the connection between what we’re doing overseas and what happens here at home when it comes to job growth and economic growth.

But the bottom line is, is that all around the world, countries are moving. They are serious about competing. They are serious about competing with us not just on manufacturing but on services. They’re competing with us when it comes to educational attainment, when it comes to scientific discovery. 

And so we can’t afford two years of just squabbling.  What we need to do is make sure that everybody is pulling together, Democrats and Republicans and independents, folks at the federal level and the state levels, private sector with the public sector, to make sure that America retains its competitiveness, retains its leadership in the world. And that’s something that I’m very much looking forward to helping to be a part of. So, thank you very much, everybody.   

####

Photo credits: (top) Yuri Gripas / Bloomberg News

(bottom) Charles Dharapak / Associated Press

Comments

[La]

The only one who's been squabbling the past two years is Barack Hussein Obama, with both the Repubs and the majority of Americans. This politics summit called by Obama, is nothing but another photo for the voters to view him in a positive setting. He's a wolf in sheep clothing.

[solipsism]

Are you special. The Party of NO said no even before the President was sworn in. When the GOP wouldn't vote for bills that they co-wrote, just to spite the Obama, I guess that was him squabbling, right? Have you forgotten who tanked the economy in 07'.

The only one who's been squabbling the past two years is Barack Hussein Obama, with both the Repubs and the majority of Americans. This politics summit called by Obama, is nothing but another photo for the voters to view him in a positive setting. He's a wolf in sheep clothing.
Posted by: La | November 04, 2010 at 03:57 PM

[SBonnet]

"The only one who's been squabbling the past two years is ..."

Do not feed the trolls.

[Stu]

"Have you forgotten who tanked the economy in 07'?"

What is "The 2006-2008 Democrat-controlled Congress."

Let's close out this category: Facts vs. Liberal Mythology for $1000, Alex.

[Long Beach Mark]

Senator McConnell, Congressman Boehner and the GOP/Tea Party just kicked some Donkey "as*" all over the country with more to come in 2 years. It is not the time for "peace talks".

To quote Obama at an earlier "bi-partisan" post-election meeting..."We Won". That is the sort of bi-partisanship this President deserves in return now that the shoe is on the other foot. We look forward to Act 2 of feckless Senator Reid's white hot angry partisanship to come. That will help us again in 2012. Speaker Pelosi "serving" the country again as minority leader? What more can conservatives hope for?....Another White House Intern?

"Replace (done), Repeal (pending) and Repeat in 2012"

[JB]

"I guess that was him squabbling, right? Have you forgotten who tanked the economy in 07'."

The Democrats held majorities in both houses.

[Phil Bowermaster]

>>because he's heading off....
>>...to India and Asia for some reason

Okay, now please listen very carefully. As hard as this may be to believe, India is actually IN Asia. I understand that it's difficult since the PC cops took the words "orient" and "oriental" away from us, but can you please try a little harder?

If you mean China, say "China." And if you mean China, Japan, and Korea... those are all really good, descriptive names. But this business of using "Asia" to mean a subset of the real Asia, and using the term "Asian" to mean a subset of the people who are actually Asian is a habit you Californians really need to drop. It's kind of insulting to the Asians who always get excluded (Indians, Indonesians, Thais, Malays, and others), plus it's insulting to the intelligence of the rest of us, at least those of us capable of reading a map.

[mbecker908]

Under no circumstances should the Republicans tolerate "2 years of squabbling". They should declare two years of all out war. Hopefully the next two years will make the last two look like the dictionary definition of "bipartisanship".

Hey BO! You lost.

[cbinflux]

Broker indeed -- MORE broke. Obama's main focus is, and has been, advancing Cloward-Piven (Socialism)

[Tom]

Indeed, "squabbling" is what's been going on for the past two years because the Dems controlled the WH, Senate and House, and could (theoretically) do whatever they wanted. All the GOP could do was squabble. And somehow it (mostly) worked.

Don't worry, Mr. President, the squabbling is over. You had your chance, for two years, with an opposition that had little to no power to stop you. And you wasted it.

Trust me, we're done "squabbling." But we've only just begun to fight.