Next, Michelle Obama's health reform plan for the nation's restaurant menus and families dining out
First Lady Michelle Obama, who has been unable to convince the Smoker-in-Chief to give up that dreadful habit, now has some health suggestions for other American families and for restaurant menus across the country. The goal is to eat healthier, although that might hurt restaurant sales and cause disappointed children.
Obama, who has made combating childhood obesity and inactivity her favored causes, addressed the National Restaurant Assn. (See the text below, along with photos of her husband not eating arugula.) She, of course, has her own personal chef brought in from Chicago and took full parental responsibility for guiding her daughters' diets because parents are crucial habit-formers and role models, even in food choices.
But Obama would like to see more healthy choices for Americans dining out, even if it means a restaurant deleting a best-selling menu item.
The Democrat suggested that Americans are "programmed" by taste and advertising to eat many things that the government and health professionals know are not healthy for their bodies. So she wants to facilitate a nationwide re-programming of personal tastes by having restaurants start serving less of what customers ignorantly want and more of what they should have.
One idea Mrs. Obama had is to serve apple slices as the default side dish with, say, hamburgers, instead of French fries, which she confessed to liking.
Also she'd like less butter and cream in restaurant dinners, not enough to....
Her other suggestions: Substitute whole wheat pasta for white. Smaller portions (presumably for smaller prices). Less mac and cheese, chicken fingers and cheeseburgers on kids' menus. More carrots.
Mrs. Obama expressed concern that Americans are now spending more money on food purchased and/or eaten outside the home, which many in her audience of restaurant business owners likely think is a pretty good thing.
The first lady doesn't mind ordinary families eating out on special occasions. But, she claimed, restaurant efforts to reduce calories and fats have been insufficient. And too slow. "We just don't have the time to waste," Mrs. Obama added.
"As humans, we are programmed to crave sugary, fatty, salty foods," Mrs. Obama told the group.
"And as people who work to meet those needs, I know it’s tempting to respond by creating products that are sweeter, richer and saltier than ever before. But here’s the catch. See, feeding those cravings doesn't just respond to people’s natural desires, it actually helps shape them. The more of these foods people eat, the more they're accustomed to that taste, and after a while, those unhealthy foods become a permanent part of their eating habits."
She said she understood that healthy meals sell less, which is not a good thing for any business. But she said the problem of obesity is so great, it must be addressed urgently by all means.
She said it's also important to change these national eating habits because they end up costing billions in additional healthcare costs.
Grab some cauliflower and savor her full remarks below.
-- Andrew Malcolm
For your own health, join the 52,600-plus salad-loving global readers who follow The Ticket with low-cal Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot. Our Facebook Like page is over here. We're also available here on Kindle now. No saturated fats are used in the creation of any Ticket blog items.
MRS. OBAMA: Thanks so much. (Applause.) Well, good morning. Let me start by thanking Michael for his work and for that kind introduction.
And I want to also thank Dawn Sweeny and everyone at the National Restaurant Association for having me here. It is a pleasure for me to be with you all.
So today I’m going to talk about food, which is something that all of you here today know a little bit about.
Together, you represent 40 percent of the nearly one million restaurants in the United States, from the biggest chains to the smallest diners. You know what Americans like to eat and what they don’t. You’ve seen how the ingredients we put in our bodies affect the way we feel and the way we feel about ourselves. And you also understand the unique role that food, and restaurants especially, play in our own lives and in the life of our nation.
Restaurants have always been places to celebrate a special occasion or mark an important milestone, to bond with new friends and grow closer as a family. They provide a service to our communities unlike any other. And even as tastes and customs have changed over time, restaurants remain an incredibly dynamic part of our American story.
And today, one out of every two dollars spent on food in this country goes towards meals outside the home -– and that’s double what it was just 50 years ago.
And one-third of all meals today are eaten in restaurants.
So it’s clear that eating out has become part of our American way of life.
And while restaurants are still places where we go to mark a special occasion -– to celebrate a good report card, an anniversary, a job well done –- restaurants aren’t just for those who can afford to splurge anymore.
Instead, they’ve grown to fit every lifestyle and every budget.
And our eating habits have evolved over time as well -– both in restaurants and at home -– but not always in ways that are good for our health.
And that’s another reason I wanted to talk to you today –- about an issue that is near and dear to my heart not just as First Lady, but as a mother -– and that is the epidemic of childhood obesity in America today.
Now, I know you’re all familiar with the statistics: how one in three children in this country is overweight or obese. And you know the consequences for their health –- from hypertension and diabetes to heart disease and even cancer.
And I know you’re all aware of the economic impact: the billions of dollars we spend every year treating obesity-related conditions -– costs that you pay in the form of rising health insurance premiums.
So it’s clear that we’re facing a problem that is really big. And it’s also clear that this problem has a whole range of different causes.
Our kids are spending less time outside and more time on the couch in front of the TV, video games, the Internet. At school, gym classes, recess, they’ve been eliminated or shortened. Portion sizes in this country have ballooned.
In some areas, families are having a tougher time getting regular access to fresh produce. And kids these days are consuming more calories and eating more fat and sugar than ever before.
And that’s why, earlier this year, we launched “Let’s Move!” This is a nationwide campaign with a simple but ambitious goal: We want to solve the problem of childhood obesity in a generation, so that kids born today can reach adulthood at a healthy weight.
And “Let’s Move!” is about attacking this problem from all different angles. It’s about giving parents the information and the resources they need to make healthy decisions for their families.
It’s about giving grocery stores -- helping them to locate in underserved areas, so that every community has access to fresh and nutritious food. It’s about getting healthier food into our schools. It’s about helping our kids become more active, not just in school but at home.
But here’s the thing. Even if we give parents all the information they need and we improve school meals and build brand new supermarkets on every corner, none of that matters if when families step into a restaurant, they can’t make a healthy choice.
And the truth is that while restaurants are offering more options and families take advantage of them more often, they aren’t always the healthiest choices.
Research has shown that kids consume more saturated fat and less fiber and calcium when they eat out. And the meals they eat at restaurants have twice as many calories as the ones they eat at home.
Now, as parents we know that many of our kids aren’t as healthy and active as they should be. And we desperately want to do things differently. But when stores and restaurants don't offer healthy options, or when parents don't have the information to make the best choices for their families, that's easier said than done.
And as America’s restaurant owners, you’re responsible for one-third of the calories our kids get on a daily basis. The choices you make determine what’s listed on the menus, what’s advertised on billboards, and what’s served on our plates.
And your decisions about how a dish is prepared, what goes into it and where is it placed on the menu, that can have a real impact on the way people eat.
And that's why we need your help. And we need your help now, because when you see research showing that obese toddlers already display some warning signs for heart disease, it’s clear that we just don't have the time to waste.
And that's why I’ve been so pleased to hear about what some of you are doing already both in working with us and on your own.
Here at the NRA, you’ve developed the Food and Healthy Living Initiative to give restaurants a strong foundation for making healthy changes. You’ve launched a website, Healthydiningfinder.com, to help consumers identify healthy menu options in their area.
You're keeping your members up to date with the latest information and statistics about efforts to address childhood obesity. And you’re working with other groups in the industry to meet the goal of doubling the amount of produce used in the food industry over the next 10 years.
And across the country, individual restaurants and chains are also focusing on our children’s health -- not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it also makes sense for their bottom line.
Right now, many restaurants are making a point to offer fresh produce and healthy choices aimed at kids and adults. Others are serving more low-fat dishes, whole grain breads, fruit on the side. Some are even offering kid-size portions of the meals they serve on the main menu. And chefs across the country are partnering with local schools to help them make healthy choices.
But as positive as these examples are, the reality is it’s just not enough. Together we have to do more. We have to go further. And we need your help to lead this effort.
Now, what I do know is that in the restaurant industry creativity is your lifeblood. It’s what sets you apart from the competition, and it keeps customers coming back for more.
And today I am asking you to use that creativity to rethink the food you offer, especially dishes aimed at young people, and to help us make the healthier choice the easier choice.
First, it’s important to reduce the number of empty calories that our families are consuming, calories that have no nutritional benefit whatsoever. And believe me, I know this is easier said than done.
After all, we as humans, we are programmed to crave sugary, fatty, salty foods. And as people who work to meet those needs, I know it’s tempting to respond by creating products that are sweeter, richer and saltier than ever before.
But here’s the catch. See, feeding those cravings does just respond to people’s natural desires, it actually helps shape them. The more of these foods people eat, the more they're accustomed to that taste, and after a while, those unhealthy foods become a permanent part of their eating habits.
But here’s the good news: It can work the other way around just as easily. Just as we can shape our children’s preferences for high-calorie, low-nutrient foods, with a little persistence and creativity we can also turn them on to higher quality, healthier foods.
It starts with offering healthier options designed specifically for kids. And today, no matter what kind of restaurant you visit -- whether it’s Italian, French, Mexican, American -- most kids’ menus look pretty much the same. And trust me, we’ve seen a lot of them.
One local survey found that 90 percent of those menus includes mac and cheese -- our children’s favorite; 80 percent includes chicken fingers; 60 includes burgers or cheeseburgers.
Some options weigh in at over 1,000 calories, and that’s close to the recommended amount that a child should have for the entire day. And I think -- and I know you all think -- that our kids deserve better than that.
That’s why I want to challenge every restaurant to offer healthy menu options and then provide them up front so that parents don’t have to hunt around and read the small print to find an appropriately sized portion that doesn’t contain levels -- high levels of fat, salt and sugar.
These choices have to be easy to make and they have to give parents the confidence to know that they can go into any restaurant in this country and choose a genuinely healthy meal for their kids.
Now, again, I know it’s easier said than done. It’s not easy to come up with choices that are both healthy and palatable for kids. And it may mean putting in some real effort and creativity to make this happen.
But what it doesn’t mean is providing just one token healthy option on the menu, or taking out one problematic ingredient and replacing it with another. And it is not about finding creative ways to market unhealthy food products as healthy.
Instead, it’s about producing products that actually are healthy; products that can help our children get into the habits that will last them a lifetime.
This philosophy also needs to apply to the rest of the food that you offer, because just as we eat out as a family, we also should be able to eat well as a family.
And as a mother of two soon-to-be teenagers, I know that many kids, especially tweens and teens, eat off the same menu that their parents do.
I'm not asking any of you to make drastic changes to every single one of your recipes or to totally change the way you do business. But what I am asking is that you consider reformulating your menu in pragmatic and incremental ways to create healthier versions of the foods that we all love.
That could mean substituting wheat pasta for white pasta in your regular recipes, or taking out an existing -- taking an existing dish and cutting the amount of butter or cream -- not enough to sacrifice flavor -- we all like flavor -- but just enough to make a meaningful difference in the amount of calories and fat.
It could mean serving 1 percent or skim milk. Or you could make healthy sides like apple slices or carrots the default choice in a menu and make fries something customers have to request -- which would hurt me deeply. (Laughter.) I'm a fry lover.
And no matter what you do, it’s also important, truly important, to keep portion sizes in check, because we all know that the size of a meal is just as important as the ingredients it’s made of.
But your role in helping address childhood obesity isn’t limited to what you put on your menus and how you label them for parents. It’s also about how you market those products to our kids.
Our kids don’t learn about the latest fast-food creations on their own. They hear about them on TV, advertisements, in the Internet, video games, and many other places. And as any parent knows, this marketing is highly effective.
As a mom, I know it is my responsibility, and no one else’s, to raise my kids. But we have to ask ourselves, what does it mean when so many parents are finding their best efforts undermined by an avalanche of advertisements aimed at our kids.
A study last year found that only a small percentage of advertising aimed at kids promoted healthy foods, while most promoted foods with a low nutritional value. And let’s be clear: It’s not enough just to limit ads for foods that aren’t healthy. It’s also going to be critical to increase marketing for foods that are healthy.
And if there’s anyone who can sell healthy food to our kids, it’s all of you, because you know what gets their attention. You know what makes a lasting impression. You certainly know what gets them to drive their poor parents crazy because they just have to have something.
So I'm here today to ask you to use that knowledge and that power to our kids’ advantage. I'm asking you to actively promote healthy foods and healthy habits to our kids.
Again, I know many of you have said that you would offer and promote healthy options in a heartbeat if they were as popular as the healthy -- unhealthy options, because that’s how business works, and I understand that.
But I’ve yet to meet a single parent who doesn’t understand the threat of childhood obesity. I’ve yet to meet a single parent who’s not eager to buy healthier products. They just need more information. They need easier access to those products.
And I’ve heard from more companies over the year that the market is starting to move in a healthier direction. Folks are beginning to ask for more fruits and vegetables and for smaller portions. So when it comes right down to it, this is also about protecting your bottom lines and meeting the demands of your customers -- customers who I know you want to keep coming back again and again.
That’s why we’re committed to helping increase that demand and making it easier for you to do what’s right. And we’ve started by requiring chain restaurants to provide calorie counts on their menus and menu boards. And I am grateful for the support we’ve received from the NRA to get this done. And I want to encourage restaurants that aren’t providing calorie counts to join us in this effort.
And because so many of the calories our kids consume come from school, we’re also working to get more nutritious food into our lunchrooms and our vending machines. And, again, the NRA has been playing an important role in these efforts as well.
As part of “Let’s Move,” we’re setting a goal of doubling the number of schools that participate in the Healthier US Schools Challenge by next year. And we’re working with schools and food suppliers to offer more fruits and vegetables and to cut down on that fat, sugar and salt.
And, finally, we’re working with mayors and other local officials to make our cities and towns healthier and to highlight restaurants that agree to serve smaller portions and promote more nutritious options.
So I hope that all of you will join with us in these efforts. Together, we can help make sure that every family that walks into a restaurant can make an easy, healthy choice.
We can make a commitment to promote vegetables and fruits and whole grains on every part of every menu. We can make portion sizes smaller and emphasize quality over quantity. And we can help create a culture -- imagine this -- where our kids ask for healthy options instead of resisting them.
See, after all, that’s one of the core ideals this industry was founded on. I recently learned that the term “restaurant” actually comes from the French word for “restore.” And when the idea of the restaurant business spread across the ocean, some of the first true restaurants in this country emphasized their ability to make people healthier and to cure what ailed them.
So today, you are all the heirs to that legacy. And you face a similar opportunity both as business owners -- but also as parents, not just to fulfill your obligations to shareholders, but to fulfill the obligation we all have to the next generation.
So I hope that each of you will do your part to give our kids the future that we all know they deserve. And I want to truly thank you for what you have done, because you have done so much, and for what you’re going to do.
I look forward to working with you all in the months and years ahead. Good luck to you all and God bless you and your families. Take care. Thank you. (Applause.) ####
Photos: J. Scott Applewhite / Associated Press (Michelle Obama speaking to restaurant owners); Charles Dharapak / Associated Press (napkin, chicken wings, pancakes); CBS News (Philly cheesesteak); Getty Images (eating kringle in Wisconsin); Associated Press (hot dog, waffles, fried chicken, shaved ice, pizza); Charles Dharapak / Associated Press (cheeseburgers with Joe Biden); Associated Press (sandwich, beer).








Michelle shows her true politics and I quote : "The Democrat suggested that Americans are "programmed" by taste and advertising to eat many things that the government and health professionals know are not healthy for their bodies. So she wants to facilitate a nationwide re-programming of personal tastes by having restaurants start serving less of what customers ignorantly want and more of what they should have".
"That the GOVERNMENT knows is bad" ? And "...serving less of what customers IGNORANTLY want" ? And"...serving more of what we SHOULD HAVE? " Thats right in line with the socialist/liberal agenda...we're too stupid to make our own decisions...we must have the govt do that for us. They will take care of us.
Michelle, haven't you figured it out yet ? We don't want your socialistic agenda in this Country . Starting this November, you socialists are going to start getting extinct. Move to Europe or some other socialist country. You and Hussein can go the hell.
Posted by: BRUCE JOHNS | September 14, 2010 at 08:11 AM
Sure Michelle, I’ll change my diet to suit you, but first:
YOU stop jamming ice cream, shrimp and lobster down your gullet, and
your silver tongued DEVIL husband stops poking cigarettes in his pie hole between photo ops.
Me, I'll have some fried chicken and purple drank!
Posted by: Flannigan | September 14, 2010 at 08:12 AM
Do as I say, not as I do?? Who thinks this fat bitch cares about anything except her lobster dinners and her "fabulocity" (sic) There are people starving to death around the planet and for the sake of our "health" we can't enjoy the fruit of our labors. Who wants to live forever in the taupe and bland world of these "experts"? If I'm sick, then I die; it's called "natural selection" and we have become too pompous about the sanctity of human life. There are some creatures not meant to live long and are predisposed to conditions which limit lifespan; humans are at about 75~80 years now. I think I'll enjoy the transfats, where I can find them, the salt, the sugar, and screw your artificial/chemical food tastes for the real. YES, I do eat raw apples and salads, and also apple pie. BUT, I will never give up what I love to experience in culinary delights for some promised land of longevity. I have made it to 55 so far without seeing doctors and am living a full robust life. In the years to come, even the US will face food shortages and exorbitant food costs, sending many of you into the streets looking for anything to eat. Then, what will you have, "healthy" food, or something that fills your body and provides energy. Being Russian I do understand starvation. The first lady will survive a famine, BO wouldn't.
Posted by: Fred Shmerglitz | September 14, 2010 at 08:13 AM
Of course...yes...whatever you say, Your Worshipfulness...
Really, please stop yammering in such a transparently pathetic attempt to be our universal Super Mom from Double Mother Land. What I eat and how is none of your business.
While your at it, try to pry your husband away from the home fries and pass 'em over...
Posted by: MDWhite | September 14, 2010 at 08:14 AM
Leave it to the Times to worry about the profits of its advertisers than the health of Americans. Obama is not talking about a revolution. Just eating healthier and eating less junk food. This is just common sense. Unfortunately, we live in a country that thinks we can do anything that is not illegal or will not get us sued.
Posted by: Vincent DiCarlo | September 14, 2010 at 08:16 AM
This is nothing more than Michelle Marie Antoinette Obama, wife of the Imam in Chief, prepping for her next move.. a run for office somewhere. She'll surely deny it but you know it's coming; a.k.a. Hilly Baby and her move to New York. The more exposure, while not on her vacations form all her hard work doing whatever (they have maids, butlers, cooks, cleaners, nannies, and chauffeurs leaving her so very much to do), the better her name recognition for that run.
Posted by: Thomas | September 14, 2010 at 08:16 AM
GET OUT OF MY LIFE YOU FAT PIG!!!
Posted by: Nick in Virginia | September 14, 2010 at 08:16 AM
Nice jab at the president by pasting unflattering pictures of him eating not-so-healthy food. Great job cherry picking those photos to support your weak story.
Posted by: Jason Braun | September 14, 2010 at 08:18 AM
if Michelle were For The People, she would be squashing the tyrannical "food safety act" bill S.510 which is the most shocking police state tactic to come down the pike. Happened in Russia, the people were forced to purchase Government sanctioned food. Mansanto will rule!
Say Michelle, how about the high fructose corn syrup and MSG in about all commercial foods? huh? Dr. Mercola and naturalnews .com tell the story on how the two CAUSE obesity.
This effort is all about control over the masses.
Control the food, control the people.
The restauranteurs do not need this crapola in this crack down, tax 'em to death, headed to a deeper depression gig.
Honey, go on another mega thousands of dollars trip. Leave us to decide our own diets. Get fluoride out of the water also, ok? It's poison, duh.
Posted by: garrett | September 14, 2010 at 08:20 AM
Did you ever see the back end of the first lady/advisor to us all? MAYBE follow some of her own advice?
Posted by: Imadoctor | September 14, 2010 at 08:21 AM
MAC AND CHEESE IS GOOD FOR YOU - and cheap too!
After all, it just pasta, with very little fat from the cheesy flavor and any added margarine. Using water you get about 260 callories per seving with only 20-25 calories from fat and about three servings per small box.
http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/meals-entrees-and-sidedishes/5964/2
One serving
Complex carbohydrates 50 grams 190 calories
Proteins 9 grams 45 calories
Fat 3-4 grams 25 calories.
My local El-Cheapo store sells a generic version three boxes per dollar. The three boxes provide about 2,300 calories total. For ONE dollar. A one pound loaf of cracked wheat bread has about 1,000 calories total.
http://www.dietbites.com/calories/calories-in-bread.html
Posted by: drapalyea | September 14, 2010 at 08:22 AM
Dear Josephine:
Stay out of our lives; take your reform efforts back to Chicago.
Thank you.
PW
Posted by: P. Watch | September 14, 2010 at 08:23 AM
The First Lady is an obnoxious, intrusive haughty busybody trying to pretend she doesn't live in the shadow of another obnoxious, intrusive busybody who will be on the way out in 2012. Hillary Clinton, redux. Shame on every single nitwit who voted for this pair of scary, fascistic pair of power hungry idiots.
Posted by: rik | September 14, 2010 at 08:26 AM
LOL.....who really thinks that if restaurants made their portions smaller, they would lower their prices??? Look around at other things we buy. Bread slices are smaller, and fewer of them in most slices, but the price has gone up. Toilet paper squares are smaller, price has gone up. Graham crackers used to have four sleeves of crackers per box, now there are three, but the price is the same (for less product). Ice cream doesn't come in half-gallons anymore, but the price goes up. M&M's used to be a pound bag, now it's 12 ounces, price is the same for less product. The only thing retailers are interested in is profit, certainly not our health. It's very, very difficult to feed a family 'healthy' foods because the cost of those foods is prohibitive. Someone needs a reality check here. If you want us to eat healthy, do something to lower the cost of healthy foods.
Posted by: Linda | September 14, 2010 at 08:27 AM
This woman is nuts. Do as I say, not as I do. I'm so sick of hearing about how we should all change our diets and our wasteful spending habits (e.g., eating out) while the Obamas continuously gorge themselves on exquisite cuisine, fatty fast foods and ice cream at every opportunity... ON OUR DIME!
Posted by: rick | September 14, 2010 at 08:28 AM
How about giving people a choice? "Here's the thing"---restaurants can set a salt substitute on the table for customers to use---if they choose to do so. "Here's the thing"---restaurants can add a "Healthy Food Section" to their menus---and people can choose if they want this? I basically think these are great ideas (as a restaurant owner myself), but there should be NO NEED to "wreck" your menu at your restaurant. Just "ADD" healthy things to your existing menu, without FORCING people to eat what someone else thinks they should eat!
Posted by: DixT | September 14, 2010 at 08:29 AM
RACIST!! She dosn't like salt because it is white.
Posted by: Brian | September 14, 2010 at 08:29 AM
You could start with the food stamp program. At present, any "food" that has a Nutritional Facts label is eligible for purchase. Twinkies, candy bars, ice cream, cake, etc. Would it be too unreasonable to make what Mrs. Obama deems healthy the only foods to be allowed for purchase with food stamps?
Posted by: null300 | September 14, 2010 at 08:31 AM
Please, can't someone tell her to shut up? Nobody cares what you think Mrs Obama
Posted by: ann | September 14, 2010 at 08:31 AM
I wonder which one wears the pants in the WH, the amazon woman of the girly man child.
Michelle you ain't my mama!
Both of them make me puke.
Posted by: Tom | September 14, 2010 at 08:32 AM
Hey Michelle, start your War Against Obesity with your ass. Leave our food choices to us, thank you very much. You are one pushy nosy piece of hypocritical work!
Posted by: Elaine | September 14, 2010 at 08:33 AM
Ya know I don't really care that even her own husband ignores this witch, he just turns his head when she begins a boring tiraid again and again. If she, as the first witch, should want to do something helpful, maybe she can get him to smoke something other than cigarettes. Maybe he'll be dizzy enough to finally do something helpful for the country instead of just continually trashing it.
So what is it Mich? Get your own man in line or screw up 300,000,000 other Americans with your drivel.
Posted by: RDavid | September 14, 2010 at 08:34 AM
I don't remember Michelle being on the presidential ticket.
Barry says he is going to lower food stamps in order to mitigate the expense of Michelle's obesity program.Due to Obama's incompetency in dealing with the economy and creating jobs the number people that depend on food stamps to feed their families has skyrocketed.
Michelle has went to congress and demanded millions of dollars for her program that will add more government regulations for resturaunts and fast food outlets.
She should do all americans a favor and go work in the garden that was grown for a photo op and actually eat some vegetables from it.
Posted by: John | September 14, 2010 at 08:34 AM
So big hips wants me to give up salt.
Not in this life time and she can take that to the bank
Posted by: Uncle Bob | September 14, 2010 at 08:37 AM
I have an idea, substitute a conservative for a liberal come November 2nd. Problem solved. Has the government waged war on the people? Take your big booty back to Chicago, if they will have you...if not, there is a mud hut in Kenya with your name on it!
Posted by: Forest Wilson | September 14, 2010 at 08:37 AM
Dear Ms. Obama;
You and the rest of the Food Nazis are not welcome in my life, nor are you invited to offer instruction on what my family and I should eat; either in our home or when we dine out.
In short, Ms. Obama, pound sand.
Posted by: jim Coles | September 14, 2010 at 08:39 AM
When people are hungry, they aren't worried about how much salt is in their food...more stupidity!!!
Posted by: Cathy Turner | September 14, 2010 at 08:39 AM
Do as I say, not as I do...
Love the pictures of Obama porking out! Michelle must be ticked off seeing those, huh? Nope. She just wants to make sure he eats and we don't. I get it.
Posted by: Sue S, Kenosha, WI | September 14, 2010 at 08:44 AM
The whole story is told in pictures. Thanks LA Times. Scroll down, look at the pictures while making a Nom Nom Nom Nom sound!
Posted by: Ben_Dover4Obama | September 14, 2010 at 08:45 AM
Can't do that,the electrical chemical process of life,itself,depends on salt,that is all.Next...
Posted by: Htos1 | September 14, 2010 at 08:47 AM
What a load. Michelle Obama is now the national nutritionist? It's not rocket science. Whole wheat pasta for white? Are you kidding? She obviously hasn't a clue about what makes a good meal. Italians and Chinese, some of the biggest noodle eaters in the world haven't our fat problem. Spanish, who have the lowest obesity rate in Europe also eat more pork per capita than any other nation. The Japanese who are rail thin pretty much ignore brown rice for white (and eat loads of it). And the French eat loads of cheese, drink tons of wine, all the while keeping slim. So why are all these people thinner without following the absurd guidelines put forth by our not so slim First Lady? My guess is more physical activity, better quality food and smaller portions. If the food is good quality and tastes good, you tend to eat less. Also, missing from her analysis is food compared to income in America is dirt cheap. How do I know that? Unlike 3rd world countries where the poor are skinny or starving, the poor folk in America tend to be fat.
Posted by: Tim Naylor | September 14, 2010 at 08:49 AM
She needs to practice what she preaches with her own family and herself. With the size of her butt being what it is, it could provide shade for most 3rd wold countries.
Posted by: w_r_ranch | September 14, 2010 at 08:49 AM
Has the fat lady sung?
Posted by: Charles Strahan | September 14, 2010 at 08:50 AM
give teh fat M (for Michelle, not fort monkey) a banana and she'll shut up.
Posted by: eddieblue | September 14, 2010 at 08:50 AM
All this, while she and her family pig out on lobster!! She just needs to go back to the White House and shut her face!!!
Posted by: rckmom | September 14, 2010 at 08:50 AM
I suggest she mind her own business. Resturants operate for customers, not some loon in the White House telling people what to eat. Resturants following her ideas will end up in bankruptcy or have a few progressives as cusomers. Now there is a frightening thought!
Posted by: Andy K | September 14, 2010 at 08:52 AM
Before you police the American people and tell us what to eat, police your husband. What I choose to eat is none of your business!
Posted by: ET | September 14, 2010 at 08:52 AM
Why do we need ms thunder thighes telling us how to live. If people are too stupid to eat properly then let the Darwin theory take its toll. We will be better off and feel better by natural selection rather than by nanny state dictates.
Posted by: joe, farmington,NH | September 14, 2010 at 08:57 AM
Now they are going to tell me what eat? I thought that was Mayor Bloomberg's job. I like salt. I am not overweight, and my blood pressure is fine. So leave me alone!!!
Posted by: Ed Thesled | September 14, 2010 at 08:58 AM
Really? Every time I see this ditz she has an ice cream cone shoved in her face. Stay out of my life! I didn't vote for you and could care less what you think. Mind your own house and stay out of ours, idiot.
Posted by: Jim | September 14, 2010 at 09:00 AM
GET OUT OF MY LIFE!!! I am 71 years old with no health problems. I have great blood pressure and cholesterol. I've managed to be healthy without her, or any government official, telling me how to live my life. BUG OUT!!
Posted by: MaggieLyn | September 14, 2010 at 09:02 AM
Once again the first gardener, Moochelle Antionette Obama wants the fed to control even more of our lives. She is a joke as is King Louie Obama. See the royals do not understand that us common folk cannot afford a private chef to fix every meal-----except when the royals and their kids stuff their mouths full of "unhealthy" food while on vacas. --which is most of the time-------
Posted by: BillyBob117 | September 14, 2010 at 09:02 AM
Smoking is still an incredible health problem in this country. I would remind smokers even the Presidential variety that the role modeling responsibility of a leader is always present. Salt reduction as important as it is in fighting cholesterol, obesity and high blood pressure does not compare with the millions of our fellow Americans who are currently unemployed, filled with stress and anxiety, often confined to consuming a diet high in carbohydrates that is cheap and rarely nutritional food. Michelle, it still takes a job and income to provide the nutritional food you consume at the White House. Personally, I will not eat the Kobe beef and the other foods often served at the White House until all Americans have access to good food.
Dr. Phillips
Bloomington, IL
Posted by: Dr. Alan Phillips | September 14, 2010 at 09:03 AM
Someone stick a hook in that mouth. Eating health cost more and her poser husband has pretty much done away with families disposable income.
Posted by: nceeno | September 14, 2010 at 09:05 AM
Anyone else get the impression she doesn't even totally buy her own message here?
People will eat what they want to eat, for whatever their personal motivation might be. Flavor, economic, or dietary. I am fairly certain that there will not be very many people out there that will change their eating habits because a woman whose greatest accomplishment was winning the wedding lottery needs a cause with which to fill the space between vacations.
It's bad enough to get lectured by Mr. Obama, I don't think the country needs his wife wagging her finger as well.
Posted by: El_Lurch | September 14, 2010 at 09:05 AM
Do as I say not as I do
Posted by: rob | September 14, 2010 at 09:07 AM
I would like to see the Obama's keep a closer eye on the boarder's,spending,jobs and more important issues,and keep their eyes off of my plate. I don't tell the Obama's how to eat.
Posted by: John | September 14, 2010 at 09:07 AM
What a hypocrite!...Has she not looked at her huge back side in the mirror? Maybe she has a small mirror?
Posted by: Tim | September 14, 2010 at 09:07 AM
I will reach out and give my kids anything I feel they should have to eat. It is none of her business, and I don't think she could care less about "the" children. If this woman cared about America, she and her "smoker-in-chief" ice cream eating husband would leave us all alone, go back to Chicago, and allow Americans to be free. We are not a Socialist country, where a dictator can tell us what to eat or feed our children, not YET anyway.. Did Saul Alinksy include a chapter in his books on "take their food away" and they will submit? Maybe the restaurant industry should pull all their support from this president, otherwise they may not like the food he allows them to prepare. Oops, here comes some more hope and change...better start changing those menus!..I hope you can make money after " the Obamas change your menus!
Posted by: Becky | September 14, 2010 at 09:10 AM
The photos of the soon to be lame duck president says it all. What a bunch of hypocrits!!!! The sooner they are voted out the better.
Posted by: Gerry | September 14, 2010 at 09:11 AM