Top of the Ticket

Political commentary from Andrew Malcolm

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Social media wrap: Sarah Palin, Facebook and the blogosphere get their freedoms in a bunch

  Palin-facebook-blogger

Sarah Palin, Facebook and a blogger this week were ensnarled in an unseemly spat over freedom-of-speech-vs.-tyranny-of-the-majority-vs.-freedom-of-the-press (kinda, sorta).

Palin, a prolific Facebooker with nearly 2 million followers, posted a lengthy protest against a plan to build a mosque at the site of the World Trade Center attacks in 2001. A blogger took exception to Palin’s call and urged his readers to report the post, leading to Facebook’s automated system removing it.

Upshot: After an apology to Palin, Facebook reinstated the post -- saying it was the result of a “technical glitch” -- while said blogger, Tumblr’s Moneyries, got his moment in the sun and a bit of national exposure. Nobody’s rights were infringed. Or were they?

Facebook, which is used by some 500 million people worldwide,  seemingly did nothing (legally) wrong. A spokesman for the social media site said the deletion of the post was well within its terms and conditions (which, at 5,830 words, are longer than the U.S. Constitution and specify the company's right to remove any post that is hateful or incites violence, or contains graphic content or nudity). Facebook did, however, apologize to Palin for the deleted post, and reinstated it Friday.

Moneyries certainly did nothing wrong by urging his followers to report Palin's post so many times that, in his own words, it led to a “refudiation” of the post (a play on Palin’s now famous made-up word in an earlier post, a term which shouldn’t come as any surprise to anyone who’s been following the former governor of Alaska and likely 2012 presidential challenger).

Palin, for her part, also did nothing wrong unless you consider her post railing against the mosque to be inflammatory hate speech (which legal authorities both local and nationally clearly do not). 

The brouhaha exploded in the blogosphere and led to further questions about Facebook’s policies and the effects of such a coordinated attack on a mainstream politician led from outside the mainstream media.

So is it a freedom-of-speech-vs.-tyranny-of-the-majority-vs.-freedom-of-the-press issue? Only if you believe Facebook is a democracy, and a functioning one at that.

-- Craig Howie

You don't need to delete or reinstate anything to click here for Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot or @craighowieLAT. Our Facebook Like page is over here. Also available on Kindle now with two-week free trial.

Graphic: Facebook

 
Comments () | Archives (2)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Maybe that is how it works. Facebook is the Administrator, they have all the rights to delete what they think is wrong. But it is the the fault nor of Palin of Facebook. Automated deletion in my opinion should not be maintained the facebook facility.

No, facebook is not a democracy, nor is it a free spech zone, but then under Obama, neither is the U.S.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

About the Columnist
A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Andrew Malcolm has served on the L.A. Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four. Read more.
President Obama
Republican Politics
Democratic Politics


Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: