Laura Bush to W.: Don't beat up on gays. Plus she reports presidential poisoning, foreign policy goof (book excerpts)
Former First Lady Laura Bush, tactful and discreet during George W. Bush's eight-year presidency, has a lot to say. Tuesday, with publication of her memoir, "Spoken From the Heart," she does. And thanks to the New York Times and Politico, who found early copies, we can share them.
When she was in high school, Laura Welch hit a car after running a stop sign. Bush's confessions about her guilt -- and shaken faith -- after the driver of the car she hit died are gripping and evocative.
Her assertion that the U.S. presidential party attending the 2007 G-8 summit in Heiligendamm, Germany, might have been poisoned is also eyebrow-raising.In those awful seconds, the car door must have been flung open by the impact and my body rose in the air until gravity took over and I was pulled, hard and fast, back to earth. The whole time, I was praying that the person in the other car was alive. In my mind, I was calling "Please, God. Please, God. Please, God," over and over and over again.
I arrived and began my events, but by the afternoon of [June] seventh, I could barely stand up. Over the next day nearly a dozen members of our delegation were stricken, even George, who started to feel sick during an early morning staff briefing. … [O]ne of our military aides had difficulty walking and a White House staffer lost all hearing in one ear. Exceedingly alarmed, the Secret Service went on full alert, combing the resort for potential poisons. ... The overriding fear was that terrorists had gotten control of a dangerous substance and planted it at the resort. ... [O]ur military aide's gait has never returned to normal, nor has our senior staffer regained full hearing in that ear. The most concrete conclusion any doctors could reach was that we contracted a virus.
But the most astonishing passage to me is that involving the president and....
But in her book, Laura Bush acts as though she had no idea that the White House had been actively involved in this orchestration of an issue, describing her surprise that the issue came to dominate the campaign.
In 2004 the social question that animated the campaign was gay marriage. Before the election season had unfolded, I had talked to George about not making gay marriage a significant issue. We have, I reminded him, a number of close friends who are gay or whose children are gay. But at that moment I could never have imagined what path this issue would take and where it would lead.
Later she blames the media for making Mary Cheney's private life an issue -- even though his support for his daughter put Vice President Dick Cheney at odds with the Republican Party's position on gay marriage. In fact, she turns this complaint into a global verdict on how the media treats candidates' children.
When Bill and Hillary Clinton entered the White House, Saturday Night Live debuted a few particularly cruel skits aimed at their then twelve-year-old daughter, Chelsea. The Clintons took a hard line, and the press was shamed into leaving Chelsea alone. The press did largely the same for Barbara and Jenna, although reporters from the tabloids and from more mainstream publications frequently called their friends, trying to entice them to talk about the girls. None ever did. But a postscript to the 2004 campaign was that it changed, perhaps irrevocably, how the families, especially the children, of national candidates are treated. The strategy of making Mary Cheney’s private life an issue failed with the voters in November of 2004. But in the years since, it has become acceptable to mock candidates and their families, and other elected officeholders, in highly personal ways; David Letterman feels free to ridicule Sarah Palin’s teenager daughters, and the audience laughs. That is the legacy of the 2004 campaign.
All well and good, but when it comes to Mary Cheney, gay marriage and the 2004 election, maybe she should check with Rove, who acknowledges in his own memoir that he used the issue to effect. Apparently, exploiting gays to win reelection was less a case of media excess than yet another example of how George W. Bush ignored his wife's able advice and instead played gutter ball.
As for that State Department (or maybe it was National Security Council's fault) mistake, it was embarrassing.
On her first solo trip to the Middle East in the spring of 2005, Mrs. Bush describes “a series of landmines”:
For a first lady, there are moments of maximum political controversy, and they often strike without warning. Mine was to come, just after … I arrived at the Ittihadiyya Palace on the outskirts of Cairo to call on Suzanne Mubarak, first lady of Egypt. … I had arrived two days before a nationwide referendum on future presidential elections. I had known that elections were scheduled, but in weeks of staff meetings and in my National Security Council briefing for the trip, no one had mentioned that my visit would be so close to the referendum vote. Egypt is an important U.S. ally, but it also jails political opponents. I had walked, unprepared, into a potential minefield. In retrospect, it was probably one of the worst possible times for me to be in Egypt. Right away the Egyptian and American press asked me about the upcoming vote. And while I had reams of official talking points on educational programs and compliments about cultural sites … no one had thought to include a detailed briefing paper on current political issues in the country. I answered that holding elections was a ‘bold step’ toward democracy, but both the referendum and the actual presidential elections that followed were later criticized as insufficiently democratic for not allowing a full slate of opposition candidates to participate. Days after I left, protesters against the May referendum were beaten in the streets.
-- Johanna Neuman
Photo: 2005 inaugural ball. Credit: AFP/Getty Images
Click here to receive Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot or twitter.com/johannaneuman. And our Facebook FAN page is right here.








I personally favor gay marriage though I can see why others would not for reasons other than anti gay bigotry.
So I checked out the linked article where you said L. Bush should see that Rove used this issue to effect and thus her husband engaged in gutter ball.
The article has Rove disputing this conclusion 100%. It has Rove stating quite clearly, rather than gutter ball, the Prez defended the anti gay marriage position on principle and in a civil manor and did not seek to highlight it. Rove specifically says the accusation you make is false and that like the hyperventilating in this piece the left self inflicted the electoral damage from the issue by being hyperbolic and vitriolic. Indeed in this article Rove makes the case that the opposition to gay marriage wasn't the last word on the Prez's positions on gay rights; that the Prez was not anti gay at all("favoring supported same-sex partner rights such as hospital visits and health coverage.")
You may disagree with Rove's thesis but my point I guess is that the article contained no evidence of "playing gutter ball" or cynically using the issue. In fact your piece here provides no evidence of "gutter ball" at all. Rather it would seem, by implying that the piece you link to contradicts L Bush's account you are being disingenuous (though to your credit you do include the link that demonstrates this) and thus are playing gutter ball yourself. Ironically you seem to have proven Rove's point.
Posted by: Jeff Lewelling | April 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Poisoning eh?
From the linked article she's quoted as saying 'she could barely stand up,' which sounds just like the hyperbole people use everyday when they call in sick to work.
It seems more likely that she and her colleagues contracted some virus from a foreign land; a very common occurrence when you travel;) If I recall correctly, 2007 was a particularly heavy year for the norovirus, so there's one possibility.
However, logic would seem to debunk this one; i.e. if someone is taking the trouble to poison your food under such secure circumstances, then they're probably going to pick a substance that has an effect greater than an upset stomach...
Case in point, Alexander Litvinenko.
Posted by: johnnywalker | April 29, 2010 at 09:44 PM