Top of the Ticket

Political commentary from Andrew Malcolm

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

White House war against Fox, Wall Street, Chamber of Commerce: a new Nixonian enemy's list?

The war between the White House and Fox News keeps getting louder. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs on Tuesday continued the assault, even as some pundits and analysts voiced concern that the tactic could backfire by giving the already-popular FNC network more attention. “It serves to help Fox, not punish it, by driving up ratings," said Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus. "And it deprives the White House … of access to an audience that is, in fact, broader than hard-core Obama haters.”

Elsewhere on the White House radar, President Obama went into the heart of the lion's den Tuesday night to chastise Wall Streeters for fighting him on regulation of the financial sector -- a scolding for which they paid $15,200-a-ticket. And the White House has also dispatched its top lieutenants -- Valerie Jarrett and Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel -- to undercut the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, its most powerful opponent on climate change legislation, by meeting personally with top executives at the biggest companies in the country.

This morning, in a lengthy speech, Tennessee Republican Lamar Alexander offered a "friendly suggestion," warning the White House not to create a new "enemies list" as President Nixon famously did back in the day.

"An 'enemies list' only denigrates the presidency and the republic itself," Alexander said, adding that the White House tactics amount to "street brawling."

Alexander -- a former governor of Tennessee and former secretary of Education under the first President Bush -- should know. He worked for Bryce Harlow, Nixon's executive assistant, in 1969 when he was a "wet-behind-the-ears 29-year-old staff aide in the West Wing of the Nixon White House."

Politico argued this week that the White House tactics amount to a deliberate drive to marginalize the president's critics, modeled on the 2008 presidential campaign. As Politico noted, Gibbs has mocked radio conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh from the White House podium, and everyone from political guru David Axelrod has piled on Fox News by contending it’s not a legitimate news operation. "All of the techniques are harnessed to a larger purpose: to marginalize not only the individual person or organization but also some of the most important policy and publicity allies of the national Republican Party."

Read the full text of Alexander's remarks, as provided by the senator's office, are below.

-- Johanna Neuman

Click right here for Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us  @latimestot  And we are also now on Facebook over here

In 1969 and during the first half of 1970, I was a wet-behind-the-ears, 29-year-old staff aide in the West Wing of the Nixon White House. I was working for the wisest man in that White House, Bryce Harlow, who was a friend of President Johnson, as well as the favorite staff member of President Eisenhower, and President Nixon’s first appointee.

Based upon that experience and my forty years since then in and out of public life, I want to make what I hope will be taken as a friendly suggestion to President Obama and his White House: don’t create an enemies list.

As I was leaving the White House in 1970, Mr. Harlow was heading out on the campaign plane with Vice President Spiro Agnew whose job was to vilify Democrats and to help elect Republicans. The Vice President had the help of talented young speechwriters, the late Bill Safire and Pat Buchanan. In Memphis, he called Albert Gore, Sr., the “southern regional chairman of the eastern liberal establishment.” He labeled the increasingly critical news media, “nattering nabobs of negativism.”

Those phrases have become part of our political lore. They began playfully enough, in the back and forth of political election combat. After I had come home to Tennessee, they escalated into something more. They eventually emerged into the Nixon enemies list.

In 1971 Chuck Colson, who was then a member of President Nixon’s staff and today is admired for his decades of selfless work in prison reform, presented a list of what he called “persons known to be active in their opposition to our Administration.” He said he thought the administration should “maximize our incumbency . . . [or] to put it more bluntly, . . . use the available federal machinery to screw our political enemies.” On that list of 20 people were people like CBS correspondent Daniel Schorr, Washington Star columnist Mary McGrory, Leonard Woodcock, the head of the United Auto Workers, John Conyers, the Democratic Congressman from Michigan, Edwin Guthman, managing editor of the Los Angeles Times, and several prominent businessmen such as Howard Stein, of the Dreyfus Corporation and Arnold Picker, vice president of United Artists. The New York Times and the Washington Post were made out to be enemies of the Republic.

Now make no mistake, politics was not such a gentlemanly affair in those days either. After Barry Goldwater had won the Presidential nomination in 1964, Daniel Schorr had told CBS viewers that Goldwater had – quote – “travel[led] to Germany to join-up with the right wing there” and – quote “visit[ed] Hitler’s old stomping ground.” — unquote. Schorr later corrected that on the air.

What was different about Colson’s effort, though, was the open declaration of war upon anyone who seemed to disagree with administration policies. Colson later expanded his list to include hundreds of people, including Joe Namath, John Lennon, Carol Channing, Gregory Peck, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Congressional Black Caucus, Alabama Governor George Wallace. All this came out during the Watergate hearings. You could see an administration spiraling downwards. And, of course, we all know where that led.

Now the only reason I mention this is because I have an uneasy feeling, only ten months into this new administration, that we’re beginning to see symptoms of this same kind of animus developing in the Obama administration.

According to Politico, the White House plans to “neuter the United States Chamber of Commerce,” an organization with members in almost every major community in America. The Chamber had supported the President’s stimulus package and some of his early appointments, but has problems with his health care and climate change proposals.

The Department of Health and Human Services imposed a gag order on a large health care company, Humana, who had warned its Medicare Advantage customers that their benefits might be reduced in Democratic health care reform proposals—a piece of information that is perfectly true. This gag order was lifted only after the Republican leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said he would block any future nominees to the Department until the matter was righted.

The White House Communications director recently announced that the administration would treat a major television network, Fox News, as “part of the Opposition.” On Sunday White House officials were all over talk shows urging other news organizations to “boycott” Fox and not pick up any of its stories. Those stories, for example, would include the video that two amateur filmmakers made of ACORN representatives explaining how to open a brothel. That’s a story other media managed to ignore until almost a week later when Congress decided to cut ACORN’s funding.

The President has not stopped blaming banks and investment houses for the financial meltdown even as it has become clear that Congress played a huge role, too, by encouraging Americans to borrow money for houses they couldn’t afford.

He was “taking names” of bondholders who resisted the GM and Chrysler bailouts.

Insurance companies, once the allies of the Obama health care proposal, have suddenly become the source of all our health care problems—because they pointed out, again correctly, that if Congress taxes insurance premiums and restricts coverage to those who are sicker and older, the cost of premiums for millions of Americans is likely to go up instead of down.

Because of that insubordination, the President and his allies have threatened to take away the insurance companies antitrust exemption.

Even those of us in Congress have found ourselves in the crosshairs:

The assistant Republican leader, Sen. John Kyl of Arizona, said to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that the stimulus plan wasn’t working. The White House wrote the governor of Arizona and said, “If you don’t want the money, we won’t send it.” Sen. McCain said that this could be perceived as a threat to the people of Arizona.

Sen. Bennett of Utah and Sen. Collins and I as well as Democratic Senators Byrd and Feingold all have questioned the number and power of the 18 new White House czars who are not confirmed by the Senate and have suggested that is a threat to constitutional checks and balances. The White House refused to send anyone to testify at congressional hearings. Sen. Bennet and I found ourselves “called out” on the White House blog by the President’s communications director, Anita Dunn.

Even the president, in his address to Congress on health care, threatened to “call out” members of congress who disagreed with him.

This behavior is typical of street brawls and political campaign consultants. It is a mistake for the President of the United States and the White House staff.

If the President and his top aides treat people with different views as enemies instead of listening to what they have to say, they’re likely to end up with a narrow view and a feeling that the whole world is out to get them. And as those of use who served in the Nixon administration know, that can get you into a lot of trouble.

This administration is only ten months old. It’s not too late to take a different approach – both at the White House and here in the Congress.

Here is one opportunity. At the beginning of this year, shortly after the President’s inauguration, the Republican leader, Sen. McConnell, addressed the National Press Club. He proposed that he and the President work together to make social security solvent. He said that he would make sure the President got more support in that effort from Republicans than President George W. Bush got from Democrats when he tried to solve the same problem. President Obama held a summit on the dangers of the runaway costs of entitlements which I attended. Every expert there said making social security solvent was essential to our country’s fiscal stability. There is still time to get that done.

On clean energy, Republicans have put forward four ideas: build 100 nuclear plants in 20 years, electrify half our cars and trucks in 20 years, explore offshore for low-carbon natural gas and for oil, and double energy research and development for alternative fuels. The administration agrees with this on electric cars and research and development. We may not be far apart on offshore exploration. And, at his town meeting in New Orleans last week, the President said the United States would be “stupid” not to use nuclear power. He is right, since nuclear reactors produce 70% of our carbon free electricity. So why don’t we work together on this lower-cost way to address clean energy and climate change instead of enacting a national energy tax?

On health care, the White House idea of bipartisanship has been akin to that of a marksman at the state fair shooting gallery: hit one target and you win the prize. With such big Democratic congressional majorities, the White House figures all it needs to do is unify the Democrats and pick off one or two Republicans.

That strategy may win the prize but lose the country. Usually, on complex issues, the President needs bipartisan support in Congress to reassure and achieve broad and lasting support in the country. In 1968 I can remember when President Johnson, with bigger majorities in Congress than President Obama has today, arranged for the Civil Rights Bill to be written in open sessions over several weeks in the office of the Republican leader, Everett Dirksen. Dirksen got some of the credit; Johnson got the legislation he wanted; the country went along with it. Instead of comprehensive health care that raises premiums and increases the debt, why should the White House not work with Republicans step by step to reduce health care costs, and then, as we can afford it, reduce the number of Americans who don’t have access to health care?

The President and his Education Secretary Arne Duncan have been courageous— there is no better word for it— in advocating paying teachers more for teaching well and expanding the number of charter schools. These ideas are the Holy Grail for school reform. They are also ideas that are anathema to the labor unions who support the President. President Obama’s advocacy of master teachers and charter schools could be the domestic of equivalent of President Nixon going to China. I, among others, admire his advocacy and have been doing all I can help him.

Having once been there, I can understand how those in the White House feel oppressed by those with whom they disagree, how they feel besieged by some of the media. I hope the current White House occupants will understand that this is nothing new in American politics—all the way back to the days when John Adams and Thomas Jefferson exchanged insults. The only thing new is that there are today multiple media outlets reporting and encouraging the insults 24 hours a day.

As any veteran of the Nixon White House can attest, we’ve been down this road before and it won’t end well. An “enemies list” only denigrates the Presidency and the Republic itself.

Forty years ago, Bryce Harlow would say to me, “Now Lamar, remember that our job here is to push all the merely important issues out of the white house so the president can deal with the handful of issues that are truly presidential.” Then he would slip off for a private meeting in the Capitol with Democratic leaders who controlled the congress and usually find a way to enact the president proposals.

Most successful leaders have eventually seen the wisdom of Lord Palmerston, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom who said, “We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies.

The British writer Edward Dicey was once introduced to President Lincoln as “one of his enemies”. "I did not know I had any enemies,” was the Lincoln’s answer; And Dicey later wrote, “I can still feel, as I write, the grip of that great boney hand held out to me in token of friendship."

So here’s my point. These are unusually difficult times, with plenty of forces encouraging us to disagree. Let’s not start calling people out and compiling an enemies list. Let’s push the street-brawling out of the White House and work together on the truly presidential issues: creating jobs, reducing health care costs, reducing the debt, creating clean energy.
 
Comments () | Archives (6)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Just dumb storyline. Americans don't like Wallstreet or the chamber of commerce. In terms of FOX News. Most Americans believe that it is biased.

It's hard to take a plea to "push the street brawling out of the White House" seriously given the tactics often employed by the "ranter" faction of the Republican party. And it's wrong to compare the actions of the Obama White House with the corruption, paranoia and strong-arm tactics that defined the Nixon White House.

Today we aren't living in the same media environment that existed during the Nixon years. In the days of 3 major TV networks with little competition, fringe elements of either party remained in their often lonely role as outliers. But the seemingly unlimited voices available through cable TV and the Web has changed the game. Now, the process of citizens gathering information can more accurately be portrayed as people finding a voice that speaks to their own set of virtues and vices. The highly committed but minority"fringe" has been knitted together into an empowered constituency whose extreme message can often drown out a more moderate majority, such as today's Tea Party movement.

Unfortunately, it's no longer possible for an administration to govern without also advocating -- if only to offer the flip-side to the well-orchestrated and amplified campaigns of the opposition. Failing to respond to twisted and spun "facts" created by opinion-driven media only allows the kind of massive disinformation campaign such as the one that we've all seen targeted against healthcare reform to exist. But this process of wrestling with the downside of an age of unlimited media choices bears no resemblance to the paranoia that permeated the Nixon White House, causing them to compromise the country and subvert the Constitution in the process.

"... even as some pundits and analysts voiced concern that the tactic could backfire by giving the already-popular FNC network more attention."

This is telling. Isn't it odd that all these objective, independent journalists would warn President Obama not to do this ... *not* because it's a nasty, unethical thing to do, but because it might hurt his approval ratings?

Obviously Maritza has some special polling powers to know what "most Americans" like or believe. I for one, find the White Hosue tactic of attempting to marginalize those with whom it disagress symptomatic of its approach to paint enemies with a single brush. The same people who championed ACORN are now attacking Fox. I kind of like the idea of the FOX guarding the chicken poop.

The Obama Administration is looking a lot like the Nixon Admin. with all the corruption and cover-up! Raul Emmanuel is H.A. Holderman and David Axelrod is deep throat!!!!

The tempest in a teapot is the overreaction of the press concerning the White House's FOX "call out."
Criticized for his lack of gumption, among other things, Mr Obama has chosen to act by calling attention to the fact FOX lies, instead of answering every petty lie.
Now, that would take time and attention from matters of state.
Now let's see, Lamar Alexander is the voice of reason because he served in the Nixon White House? Hmmm, I haven't heard that as a positive recommendation for many a year.
And now, of course, he chooses to point out the GOP is ready to work with the WH on substantial issues...gosh, why didn't we see it before?
What a great bunch of folks...not obstructionists...not character assassins.
What a relief, they've been the loyal opposition all along.
I agree, we should leave the good/bad lists for Santa, but independents have to know FOX is on the other side...consistently and vehemently. That's the real message. No one is trying to shut FOX up, just out.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

About the Columnist
A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Andrew Malcolm has served on the L.A. Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four. Read more.
President Obama
Republican Politics
Democratic Politics


Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: