Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Friday scandal update: From Spitzer to Ensign to Sanford to Edwards

October 2, 2009 |  5:12 pm

You have to give Democratic ex-N.Y. Gov. Eliot Spitzer credit for understanding a simple fact: The American public’s attention span is about as long as a TV commercial. If it's short and zippy.

When Spitzer got busted for hiring prostitutes in 2008, he immediately resigned. Now “the hooker-happy Democrat,” as the New York Post dubbed him, is contemplating a somewhat-plausible comeback.

Other politicians caught in flagrante delicto have taken a markedly different route: They haven’t stepped down. So how’s that working out for Republicans South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford and Nevada Sen. John Ensign?

Critics say the Republicans, whose rise and fall have eerie parallels (voting for Democrat President Clinton’s impeachment over his sex scandal among them, have been rendered ineffective by their decisions to stay in office. As long as they’re public figures, the argument goes, someone will be poking around for new details of their scandals.

So in South Carolina, even Republicans are throwing around the word “impeachment” in regard to a governor who reportedly used state funds while turning “hiking the Appalachian Trail” into a double entendre.

Now, this week, Ensign – who has been in hibernation for much of the last four months – got pummeled by a newspaper story that detailed his herculean efforts to try to silence his mistress' husband. (Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma didn't come out looking so good, either.)

Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell declined to defend Ensign today, and ethics experts speculated that Ensign's actions might have crossed into criminal behavior. 

Even if they didn’t, the latest round of publicity surely will help push along a Senate ethics inquiry.

So, hmm, with all this talk of infidelity, which path do you think America's favorite baby-daddy, ex-Democratic senator and presidential candidate John Edwards, would have chosen had he been elected president?

-- Ashley Powers

Click here for Twitter alerts of each Ticket item click here. Or follow us  @latimestot  Also on Facebook here.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

They are all adulterers; the only difference? The republicans preach "family values" and claim they are the party of "family values"; the republicans claim they are "God-loving" and are "conservative". Well, it certainly looks like they do NOT practice what they preach to the rest of America! Their actions are then recognized as those of hypocrites and they are, indeed, hypocrites. Sanford and Ensign MUST resign their posts immediately, much as they hate to give up their pensions. They are only further dragging their party down...and the party is already really down to begin with! Edwards would have never gotten elected as President; he wasn't believable even before "he got caught" in his affair. I really do not believe Edwards is "America's favorate baby-daddy". Elizabeth would do better to leave him and ENJOY her life to the fullest!



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives