Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Sotomayor hearings: On Bush vs. Gore

July 14, 2009 |  8:10 am

Bushvgore  Sotomayor wouldn't say what she thought of Bush vs. Gore when Sen. Herb Kohl, a Wisconsin Democrat, lobbed a softball at her, asking her what she thought of the 2000 case that effectively made George W. Bush president. However, she took the moment to enthusiastically endorse the system that lead to it:

“That case took the attention of the nation, and there’s been so much discussion about what the court did or didn’t do. I look at the case and my reaction as a sitting judge is not to criticize it or to challenge it ... because I don’t take a position on it.

The court made the decision it did. The question for me as I look at the sui generis situation ... is that some good came from that discussion. There’s been and was enormous electoral-process changes in many states as a result of the flaws that were reflected in the process as it went on. That is a tribute to the greatness of our American system, which is whether you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court decision.

"All of the branches become involved in the conversation of how to approve things.”

-- Robin Abcarian

Don't miss any new Ticket item. Click here for free Twitter alerts. Or follow us   @latimestot

Photo: Former Vice President Al Gore and President Bush pose together at a ceremony in the Oval Office for  2007 Nobel Prize recipients on Nov. 26, 2007. Credit: Gerald Herbert / Associated Press


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Sonia Sotomayor is a liberal, racist and bias to her court decisions. She's qualified educationally, but not qualified for mental & emotional court decision making that led her to side with extreme lelt and liberal decisions. Therefore, the Senate should look at her prior records and vote NO for her confirmation hearings. NO FOR SONIA SOTOMAYOR.

The intervention of the Supreme Court in 2000 to stop the count in Florida was completely illegal.

The court has no constitutional right to intervene in the election process.

America lost its reliance on the essential foundation of law and rules of governance that fateful day.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives