Top of the Ticket

Political commentary from Andrew Malcolm

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Sotomayor hearings: Jon Kyl presses the Supreme Court nominee on judicial precedent

Kyl

Sonia Sotomayor’s fourth day before the Senate Judiciary Committee has begun, and the New York judge and a Republican senator quickly were at loggerheads over the well-known case of white firefighters who accused the city of New Haven, Conn., of discrimination.

Before he began his pointed questioning, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) joked about the balky heating-cooling system in the hearing room at the Hart Senate Office Building.

Apparently, it’s too cold back in the press gallery — coincidence? -- and too toasty at the witness table, where Sotomayor has been sitting for four days. If there are any questions about Sotomayor’s stamina in a very hot room, Kyl said, that’s been answered.

He then proceeded — politely -- to raise the temperature himself.

Kyl took up Ricci vs. New Haven, a case in which Sotomayor, as part of a three-judge panel, ruled against the white firefighters who alleged discrimination because they were denied promotions even though they had higher test scores than African American colleagues. The Supreme Court recently overruled that decision.

Sotomayor has said repeatedly that her decision was based on judicial precedent. Kyl said the high court’s 5-4 majority said there was no such precedent, either from the Supreme Court or from the 2nd Circuit Court, where Sotomayor is a judge. He pressed her to cite the precedent.

Her roundabout and technical answers — she never quite got to a firm conclusion — left him unsatisfied, and Kyl pressed her again and again:

“Judge, I have to interrupt you there ... ”

“Fine and dandy, but answer my question ... ”

“I’m still baffled on what precedent you’re speaking of ... ”

In essence, her explanation was this: The Supreme Court was addressing an issue raised by lawyers that was different from the one the appellate panel considered.

Thus, the different views on precedent.

She got a more welcoming reception from the second senator to question her today, Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California. Feinstein called her a “walking, talking example” of what’s best about America.

Over the last two days, each senator has had 30 minutes to question President Obama’s first nominee to the Supreme Court. The senators now have up to 20 minutes for additional questions. It’s expected that the questioning of Sotomayor will end today and that witnesses — both pro and con — will begin testifying before the committee.

-- Steve Padilla

Photo: Senator Jon Kyl, a Republican from Arizona, questions Sonia Sotomayor at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C. Credit: Brendan Smialowski / Bloomberg

The Ticket goes inside politics several times a day. Click here for Twitter alerts. Or follow us    @latimestot

 
Comments () | Archives (5)

The comments to this entry are closed.

I think many of us know why SM stumbled so ineptly on Kyl's questioning, but do we have the collective moxie to say so outright? Yeah, I think we do and we better start bellowing it from the high heavens...

Politicians, cut the theatrical. She's getting confirmed regardless of her racist ties. You are all in on it.

Judge Sotomayor is masking nothing -- but the Republicans are indeed masking their racism in general and their bias and prejudice against Hispanics in particular.

She's not masking much, people are refusing to see her because she is of a sacred class of person, a female "Latina." I saw a man on TV who served many years in jail for a crime that he could prove he didn't commit. She refused to hear his evidence because it was four days late. Cases come late to the appelate level all the time and are often forgiven for being late. Many irretrievable years of a man life were thus thrown away.
That seems unmerciful to the extent of a tyrant.

It's as racist to dislike SotoMayor as it is anti-semetic to dislike Bernie Madoff.


Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

About the Columnist
A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Andrew Malcolm has served on the L.A. Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four. Read more.
President Obama
Republican Politics
Democratic Politics


Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: