Norma McCorvey, the Jane Roe of Roe vs. Wade fame, is among antiabortion protesters tossed at Sotomayor hearing

One of the antiabortion protesters tossed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor today was none other than Norma McCorvey, the Texas woman whose pregnancy led to the court's landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported earlier this evening.

At least three times during Monday's hearing, antiabortion protesters interrupted the proceedings by yelling. Each time, they were quicky escorted out of the hearing room.

Abortion is not expected to be a focus of senators' questions Tuesday, and Sotomayor's feelings about the issue are not well known. In her only known ruling on an abortion-related issue, she upheld a ban on federal money going to foreign groups that provide abortion services -- the so-called Mexico City rule.

As for McCorvey, after she lent her name to the case that had an immediate and drastic effect on the choices available to pregnant women, she had a change of heart, and has campaigned against Roe vs. Wade.

Earlier in the day outside the Hart Senate Office Building, she told the Journal Sentinel, "I'm here to overturn Roe and defeat Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court. She's unworthy of the position. She’s Catholic. She’s even unworthy of taking communion because of her pro-abortion stance."

The Supreme Court's decision in Roe vs. Wade came too late to affect McCorvey's 1970 pregnancy. By the time justices ruled 7 to 2 in her favor, she had long since given birth.

-- Robin Abcarian

AP file photo of Norma McCorvey from 1995 by Nick Ut

The Ticket goes inside politics several times a day. Click here for Twitter alerts on each new item. Or follow us    @latimestot

Comments

[Steve]

Norma originally said she was raped (thus the pregnancy that started Roe v. Wade), then later said that was a lie. She also says she was a lesbian then, but is no longer since she was baptised. In other words... the girl ain't mentally stable. Who would be after having so much attention focused on you over such a controversial issue?

Don't believe me? Look it up for yourself, it's all verifiable fact...

[Stephen H.]

Try looking up the facts without presupposing that your opinion will be verified. You might find you'll go deeper. Being a lesbian and having been raped made her a perfect poster-girl for a PRO-abortion appeal... And by her own account there just might have been a little pressure to lie. The lies were in favor of abortion, not on the other side; which side of this issue has more lies in it's promotion? Also, look up the similar testimony of Jane Roe, of Roe V Wade. That is, if you're willing to briefly believe in the possibility that anyone who's anti-abortion might NOT be a crazy.
P.S. Roe didn't have the abortion.

[Jordan]

Poor Stephen H., tells others to check their research before actually doing so. Not only did McCorvey lie and say she was used as a "pawn" by her two lawyers, but she also lied when trying to appeal to the courts, saying the procedure of abortion caused harm to women. Norma McCorvey is a rabble-rouser who's sole tactic for attention is yelling and making noise in congress. McCorvey is a complete and utter loon. I WILL however agree that the odds of an anti-abortion protestor NOT being crazy are slim indeed. To say that the pro-choice concept has more lies in it's promotion is absurd, as the lies are told by Mrs. McCorvey, and she lies on BOTH sides of the field.