Top of the Ticket

Political commentary from Andrew Malcolm

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Ralph Nader shakes up Virginia governor's race with charge that Terry McAuliffe once tried to bribe him

Clinton ally Terry McAuliffee campaigning for governor of Virginia with musician at his side May 11, 2009

Terry McAuliffe, the money man of the Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton presidential campaigns, is running for governor of Virginia. Yes the behind-the-scenes back-slapper is looking to move out front.

With two other competitive candidates in the Democratic primary, McAuliffe has borrowed a page from Barack Obama's playbook, organizing a massive grassroots effort, campaigning (as seen above) with backing from, stumping as an agent of change, someone who can "shake up" politics and business in the Old Dominion.

Now comes Ralph Nader, the bad boy of Democratic politics, to shake up McAuliffe.

A onetime car safety advocate and perennial presidential candidate, Nader is widely viewed as the spoiler who robbed Al Gore of the controversial 2000 election eventually decided for George W. Bush by drawing votes away from the Democratic vice president in Florida.

Now, Nader is telling reporters that in 2004, when McAuliffe was the Democratic National Committee chairman, he offered presidential candidate Nader an unspecified amount of money to spend in 31 states if he promised to stay out of 19 battleground states where he could potentially hurt Democrat John Kerry.

Although McAuliffe's staff has not denied the allegation, it's clearly are not happy about this.

"It looks like Ralph Nader misses seeing his name in the press," said spokeswoman Elisabeth Smith. "Terry's focused on talking with Virginians about jobs, not feeding Ralph Nader's ego."

Nader made the charge in an interview with the Washington Post, calling to verify the allegation, which was made in a recent book by Theresa Amato, who was Nader's national campaign manager in 2000 and 2004, called "Grand Illusion: The Myth of Voter Choice in a Two-Party Tyranny."

Nader not only confirmed it, he made clear he thinks the former DNC chairman and Syracuse, N.Y., native now running for Virginia's governor is unfit for office. Nader's actual words: “Terry McAuliffe is slipperier than an eel in olive oil.”

With the primary election on June 9, it's not clear how much such an allegation will hurt among the Democratic base, who regard Nader with all the warmth of a skunk at a family reunion.

-- Johanna Neuman

Click here to get Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot

Photo credit: Bill Tiernan / Associated Press

Comments () | Archives (4)

The comments to this entry are closed.

This article is so skewed. Another anti-Nader because Gore lost his own election in 2000. The vast majority of Dems and Repubs are all corrupt. That is what happens when giant corporate forces give you money.

Good thing I can ALWAYS trust that Nader won't play that game.

While I can't say much for his behavior in the past decade or so, saying that Ralph Nader was a "onetime car safety advocate" is like saying Rachel Carson was "a lady who didn't want her yard sprayed for ants." His work in the 1960s and 1970s set the foundation for citizen activism led by citizens, and not by government or political party.
Sure, he's running a bit off the tracks at this point, but maybe the characterization of pretty much being a crank and a gadfly is grossly off the mark. I don't like the guy, but I think he deserves a bit more than the snarky backhand here.

Widely viewed as the spoiler who robbed Al Gore of the 2000 presidential election?!?!?

Instead of repeating that kind of bigotry, as though major party candidates have a greater right to compete for our votes than minor party and independent candidates, Ms. Neuman would do well to exercise her capacity for critical thought before posting her next blog entry.

Here's an idea: start with an analysis of what the United States Constitution has to say about the notion of a "spoiler." (Hint, start at the First Amendment, proceed to the Fourteenth Amendment, and round out the discussion with some consideration of democratic principles generally.)

Calling Ralph Nader a spoiler in 2000 is kind of the same way racist and sexist people think. They see it from their view and are incapable of respecting others. The Democratic Party is full of slime like McAuliffe and that is why some people just won't vote for them.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

About the Columnist
A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Andrew Malcolm has served on the L.A. Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four. Read more.
President Obama
Republican Politics
Democratic Politics



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: