California voters don't just say No; They say NO way!
Well, he may have had a grand day in D.C. schmoozing with the Democratic president and exchanging warm words of mutual praise about car exhausts, but Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger got a different kind of message tonight from California voters.
Not that many came out to vote in local races and on six statewide propositions, as we reported earlier Tuesday. But the ones who did were resoundingly defeating the governor's budget proposals, as opinion polls had predicted.
Which is probably why the Budgetnator was far away in Washington during the day, instead of being photographed voting locally and then sitting on a hotel room couch watching results roll in during a Sacramento photo op.
Of the day's six fiscal propositions -- the rainy day fund, education funding, lottery modernization, children's services funding and temporary reallocation of mental health funding -- all went down -- and hard. The results were roughly 60-40 against.
The only proposition to sail through was one preventing pay increases to top elected state officials during years of budget deficits. That one was being approved about 76-23. Take that! (That doesn't affect Arnold, of course, because he's never taken a state salary.)
The propositions are all explained over here. The county-by-county results on each proposition are available over here. And the results of local races and propositions are over here.
So now comes all the public talking and cutting and the hard realities. Two hours after the polls closed, a Schwarzenegger statement said he accepted the results, while warning now of a deficit north of $21 billion.
"Tonight," the governor said, "we have heard from the voters and I respect the will of the people who are frustrated with the dysfunction in our budget system." He called on members of both parties to work together to "prevent a fiscal disaster." And scheduled a budget meeting with legislative leaders for Wednesday afternoon on his return from Washington.
Although the entire country shares the difficult economic times, all of this continuing political turmoil over a budget is, for now, confined to the once-rich, presently-populous Golden State. And numerous Americans are sure to gloat over the glamorous state's predicament.
However, if as often seems to happen in American political trends, California is again coming first in this resistance to more taxes, threats and budget deficit games, then next year's midterm national elections, historically bad news for the party controlling the White House anyway, might mean some hard slogging for congressional Democrats who're so quickly and overwhelmingly approving the current deficit spending.
-- Andrew Malcolm
Statistical results also show that 100% of those clicking here can get automatic Twitter alerts of each new Ticket item. Or follow us @latimestot
Photo: Peter Grigsby / Governor's Office



We need to cut spending and regulations and be more like the southern states who are the ones producing jobs.
Posted by: txdave | May 20, 2009 at 07:09 AM
The problem is Gerrymandered election districts. It all comes down to that. People identify by political party and the districts are drawn to assure that one party always wins that district. Democracy becomes a joke and the special interests raid our budget.
Posted by: Gonzo | May 20, 2009 at 01:04 PM
I had to laugh, after reading this post about voter frustration with our bloated state government, to see that the governor has a personal photographer (an aide so important that he apparently travels with the governor on state business). How much are we paying for THAT?
Posted by: Blenheim | May 20, 2009 at 02:14 PM
Bwahahahaha! Silly liberals -- tax and spend, tax and spend. Here's the hard slap of reality: you spend too much. Cut spending. When you cut spending -- no, when you GUT spending -- come back and we'll talk.
And Obama's far worse than the Sacramento thieves. He's due for a pimp slap of his own.
Posted by: Alan | May 20, 2009 at 02:27 PM
It's the spending, stupid.
The state has increased spending by about 90% in the last decade.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzhbBbZJVN4&feature=channel_page
-jcr
Posted by: John C. Randolph | May 20, 2009 at 02:37 PM
This wasn't just a defeat for Schwarzenegger, as the liberal media would style it, it was a resounding defeat for the Democrats who have complete control of the legislature and have brought the state to ruin.
It's an open question, whether their gerrymandering will protect them from the voters wrath. If they continue to place the interests of their union cronies ahead of the interests of the people, eventually they'll be forced from power.
Posted by: Che is dead | May 20, 2009 at 05:09 PM
Enough of this! Off with their heads!
Let them eat cupcakes! etc.
Posted by: Concerned Citizen | May 20, 2009 at 05:16 PM
"California voters don't just say No; They say NO way!"
That should have read:
"California voters don't just say No; They say HELL NO!"
Posted by: Ken | May 20, 2009 at 06:38 PM
Might be time to figure out what the founding fathers thought the roll of the government is, and then follow it.
Posted by: Shane | May 21, 2009 at 03:15 PM
welcome to the entitlement state of california. Now just go home, we're done. We have nothing to give anymore. We're Bankrupt
Posted by: bob z | May 24, 2009 at 07:49 PM