Top of the Ticket

Political commentary from Andrew Malcolm

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

A special message to Ticket readers from Rush Limbaugh

According to White House Democratic Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, the top conservative radio talk-show host, Rush Limbaugh, is now the de facto leader of the wandering Republican Party.

According to Rush, you're darned right. Rush -- or as his e-mail self-reverentially calls him, [email protected] -- is a selfless self-promoter. He never lets an opportunity pass to promote himself and his program -- and it works. Frequently to the advantage of some charity too.

Every week, somewhere upward of 20 million people tune into him on about 600 radio stations listed here or pay a little extra to watch him online and get special access through his well-traveled website, where he labels his ads "Obscene Profit Center."

Emanuel's feigned admiration for Limbaugh's political leadership is clearly driven by polls showing many Americans do not like him. Even if they've never listened to him. Which is dandy with Rush because, hey, if you want to attract a crowd anywhere, start a fight. Right?

The flag on Rush Limbaugh's website

A growing number of Democratic supporters are wondering now if this is really a good fight for the youthful Obama administration to have against a lowly, verbose broadcaster.

Not because it might lose a PR struggle. But because it's playing on Rush's homefield, distracting debate from more important issues and galvanizing many Republicans who don't otherwise yet have anyone else to coalesce around. Not to mention raising Democratic blood pressures. And introducing countless new potential listeners to Limbaugh.

Remember, Ronald Reagan's political dictum for a president was: "Always fight up. Never fight down."

Is Limbaugh pompous? Is Mt. Everest tall? He even tells jokes about it, as you'll see below. That infuriates his opponents, who can't grasp why that shouldn't disqualify him from popularity. And Limbaugh loves that. And so do his listeners. Fun political theater.

Many of us have seen on cable channels brief video clips of Rush's more pompous recent remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference, providing him two weeks of priceless publicity, capped by an outrageous debate challenge to the president himself. But what did Limbaugh really say in that speech? In total? How outrageous were his points? Are some worth thinking about, discussing, dismissing, ridiculing -- beyond cable's verbal foodfights?

So, as we often do here on The Ticket, we decided to print the whole thing, let Ticket readers see the full text and context and decide for themselves. It's a long speech. Very long, in fact. Hey, he fills hours every weekday talking. And for this speech Limbaugh actually had a live -- and enthusiastic -- audience that hasn't had much to applaud in recent weeks, egging him on.

We also invited Limbaugh to add an introduction, which he did.

Leave your own comments at the end, if you like. And don't forget to register here for Twitter alerts on all new Ticket items.Rush Limbaugh at work

-- Andrew Malcolm

Greetings, LATimes.com readers, 

You may not realize it, but you are actually doing something now that the Drive-By Media consistently fails to do. You are actually reading what I had to say -- in context no less --  before forming an opinion on it. 

Congratulations! 

And I want to give a special thanks to Top of the Ticket for making this happen (and you should too).

Rush Limbaugh

Now the opportunity here to address the nation, a serious one, it really is. And I want to take it seriously. I want to address something. I know that people are probably watching this who never have listened to my program and may not even really know what conservatism is. They think they do based on how they've been told -- the way we've been impugned and maligned and so forth. One of the things that is totally erroneous about me -- and I just want to get this up front -- is that I'm pompous. [Laughter]

And that I am arrogant. Neither of these things are remotely true. I can tell you a joke to illustrate this. Larry King passed away, goes to heaven. He's greeted by St. Peter at the gates. St. Peter says, "Welcome, Mr. King, it's great to have you here. I want to show you around, give you an idea of ....

... what's here, maybe you can pick a place that you'd like to reside." King says, "I just have one question:  Is Rush Limbaugh here?" 

"No, he's got a lot of time yet, Mr. King."  So St. Peter begins the tour. Larry King sees the various places and it's beyond anything we can imagine in terms of beauty. Finally, he gets to the biggest room of all, with this giant throne. And over the throne is a flashing beautiful angelic neon sign that says "Rush Limbaugh." [Laughter] And Larry King looks at St. Peter and says: "I thought you said he wasn't here." 

"He said, he's not, he's not. This is God's room. He just thinks he's Rush Limbaugh." [Laughter] [Applause] So, you see, I'm not pompous. [Laughter]

Now, seriously, for those of you watching on C-SPAN as well, and on Fox, I want to tell you who we all are in this room. I want to tell you who conservatives are. We conservatives have not done a good enough job of just laying out basically who we are because we make the mistake of assuming people know. What they know is largely incorrect based on the way we are portrayed in pop culture, in the Drive-By Media, by the Democrat Party.

Let me tell you who we conservatives are:  We love people. [Applause] When we look out over the United States of America, when we are anywhere, when we see a group of people, such as this or anywhere, we see Americans. We see human beings. We don't see groups. We don't see victims. We don't see people we want to exploit. What we see -- what we see is potential. We do not look out across the country and see the average American, the person that makes this country work. We do not see that person with contempt. We don't think that person doesn't have what it takes. We believe that person can be the best he or she wants to be if certain things are just removed from their path like onerous taxes, regulations and too much government. [Applause]

We want every American to be the best he or she chooses to be. We recognize that we are all individuals. We love and revere our founding documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. [Applause] We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause] Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you.

We don't want to tell anybody how to live. That's up to you. If you want to make the best of yourself, feel free. If you want to ruin your life, we'll try to stop it, but it's a waste. We look over the country as it is today, we see so much waste, human potential that's been destroyed by 50 years of a welfare state. By a failed war on poverty. [Applause]

We love the people of this country. And we want this to be the greatest country it can be, but we do understand, as people created and endowed by our creator, we're all individuals. We resist the effort to group us. We resist the effort to make us feel that we're all the same, that we're no different than anybody else. We're all different. There are no two things or people in this world who are created in a way that they end up with equal outcomes. That's up to them. They are created equal, given the chance - -[Applause]

We don't hate anybody. We don't -- I mean, the racism in this country, if you ask me, I know many people in this audience -- let me deal with this head on. You know what the cliche is, a conservative: racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe. Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen of America, if you were paying attention, I know you were, the racism in our culture was exclusively and fully on display in the Democrat primary last year. [Applause]

It was not us asking whether Barack Obama was authentic. What we were asking is: Is he wrong?  We concluded, yes. We still think so. But we didn't ask if he was authentically black. We didn't say, as some Southern Christian Leadership Conference leaders said:  Barack is not authentic, he's not got any slave blood. He's really not down fFlag of Rush Limbaugh's websiteor the struggle, but his wife is. So don't expect the race industry to go away. Southern Christian Leadership Conference -- you may not know this, because it wasn't reported in the Drive-By Media -- the racism, the sexism, the bigotry that we're all charged with, just so you across the United States of America know, and you'll see demonstrated here as the afternoon goes on, doesn't exist on our side. We want everybody to succeed. [Applause]

You know why?  We want the country to succeed, and for the country to succeed, its people -- its individuals -- must succeed. Everyone among us must be pursuing his ambition or her desire, whatever, with excellence. Trying to be the best they can be. Not told, as they are told by the Democrat Party:  You really can't do that, you don't have what it takes, besides you're a minority or you're a woman and there are too many people that want to discriminate against you. You can't get anywhere. You need to depend on us.

Well. Take a look, someone has to say this -- I am thrilled for the opportunity to say it in my first national address to the nation -- and I'm going to touch on this in more detail in a moment, but this is just to get you thinking -- take a look at all the constituency groups that for 50 years have been depending on the Democrat Party to improve their lives. And you tell me if you find any.

They're still complaining, still griping about the same problems. Their problems don't get fixed by government. And those lives have been poisoned. Those lives have been cut short by false promises, from government representatives who said don't worry about it, we'll take care of you. Just vote for us. [Applause]

For those of you just tuning in on the Fox News Channel or C-SPAN, I'm Rush Limbaugh and I want everyone in this room and every one of you around the country to succeed. I want anyone who believes in life, liberty, pursuit of happiness to succeed. And I want any force, any person, any element of an overarching Big Government that would stop your success, I want that organization, that element or that person to fail. I want you to succeed. [Applause]

Also, for those of you in the Drive-By Media watching, I have not needed a teleprompter for anything I've said. [Cheers and Applause]  And nor do any of us need a teleprompter, because our beliefs are not the result of calculations and contrivances. Our beliefs are not the result of a deranged psychology. Our beliefs are our core. Our beliefs are our hearts. We don't have to make notes about what we believe. We don't have to write down, oh do I believe it, do I believe that we can tell people what we believe off the top of our heads and we can do it with passion and we can do it with clarity, and we can do it persuasively. Some of us just haven't had the inspiration or motivation to do so in a number of years, but that's about to change. [Cheers and Applause]

For example, we gather here -- I understand that. I talked to David and Lisa in the super-exclusive private green room that nobody but about 55 people were allowed into, and they said that there's a sense of liberation here among all of you that are attending CPAC. I understand what the sense of liberation is about. But don't make the mistake at the same time of feeling liberated as thinking we're better and we can do better as a minority.

The flag on Rush Limbaugh's website

Because we're not a minority. And if you start thinking of yourselves as a minority, you're going to be defensive. And you'll allow the majority to set the agenda and the premise and you're responding to it. The American people may not all vote the way we wish them to, but more Americans than you know live their lives as conservatives in one degree or another. And they are waiting for leadership. We need conservative leadership. We can take this country back. All we need is to nominate the right candidate. It's no more complicated than that. [Applause]

Now, let me speak about President Obama for just a second. President Obama is one of the most gifted politicians, one of the most gifted men that I have ever witnessed. He has extraordinary talents. He has communication skills that hardly anyone can surpass. No, seriously. No, no, I'm being very serious about this. It just breaks my heart that he does not use these extraordinary talents and gifts to motivate and inspire the American people to be the best they can be. He's doing just the opposite. And it's a shame. [Applause]

President Obama has the ability -- he has the ability to inspire excellence in people's pursuits. He has the ability to do all this, yet he pursues a path, seeks a path that punishes achievement, that punishes earners and punishes -- and he speaks negatively of the country. Ronald Reagan used to speak of a shining city on a hill. Barack Obama portrays America as a soup kitchen in some dark night in a corner of America that's very obscure.

He's constantly telling the American people that bad times are ahead, worse times are ahead. And it's troubling, because this is the United States of America. Anybody ever ask -- I'm in awe of our country and I ask this question a lot as I've gotten older. We're less than 300 years old. We are younger than nations that have been on this planet for thousands of years. We, nevertheless, in less than 300 years -- by the way, we're no different than any other human beings around the world. Our DNA is no different. We're not better just because we're born in America. There's nothing that sets us apart.

How did this happen?  How did the United States of America become the world's lone super power, the world's economic engine, the most prosperous opportunity for an advanced lifestyle that humanity has ever known?  How did this happen?  And why, pray tell, does the president of the United States want to destroy it?  It saddens me.

The freedom we spoke of earlier is the freedom, it's the ambition, it's the desire, the wherewithal, the passions that people have that gave us the great entrepreneurial advances, the great inventions, the greatest food production, the human lifestyle advances in this country. Why shouldn't that be rewarded?  Why is that now the focus of punishment?  Why is that now the focus of blame?  Why doesn't -- Mayor Bloomberg the other day, ladies and gentlemen, resisting his governor's call for an increased tax on the rich in New York had some astounding numbers.

Eight million people live in New York. Forty thousand of those 8 million pay roughly 60 to 70% of New York's operating budget. He was afraid that if he raised taxes on those people some of them might leave. Mayor, one already has, by the way. [Applause] Stop and think of this, though. Stop and think of this. Forty thousand people out of 8 million. He's right, if 10,000 of them leave, or 5,000, they've got a huge problem. Because New York has its own welfare state inside the one the federal government's created.

They've got a dependency class that has grown up and been educated that their entitlement is to be fed and taken care of by these evil mean people who have more than they do. If New York City, New York State or Washington, D.C., were a business, these 40,000 people would be taken on golf tournament trips to Los Angeles, and they would be wined and dined and they would be thanked and they would be encouraged to keep it up. They wouldn't be told they're the problem. They wouldn't be told, except there's -- I pride my accuracy rating. There is one other business where the customer is always wrong and that's the media. Sorry about that. [Applause]

Have you ever called to complain about whatever they do?  They say, yes, sir, yes, sir, three bags full. They hang up and say you're too stupid to know how they're doing what they're doing. You can't get it. You're not sophisticated enough. So that's another business where the customer is always wrong. But, seriously, the people who have achieved great things, most of it is not inherited. Most wealth in this country is the result of entrepreneurial, just plain old hard work. There's no reason to punish it. There's no reason to raise taxes on these people. Barack Obama, the Democrat Party, have one responsibility, and that's to respect the oath they gave to protect, defend and follow the U.S. Constitution. [Applause]

They don't have the right to take money that's not theirs, from the back pockets of producers, and give it to groups like ACORN, which are going to advance the Democrat Party. If anybody but government were doing this, it would be a crime. And many of us think it's bordering on that as it exists now. [Applause]

President Obama is so busy trying to foment and create anger in a created atmosphere of crisis, he is so busy fueling the emotions of class envy that he's forgotten it's not his money that he's spending. [Applause] In fact, the money he's spending is not ours. He's spending wealth that has yet to be created. And that is not sustainable. It will not work. This has been tried around the world. And every time it's been tried, it's a failed disaster.

What's the longest war in American history?  Did somebody say the war on poverty?  Smart group. War on poverty. The war on poverty essentially started in the '30s as part of the New Deal, but it really ramped up in the '60s with Lyndon Johnson, part of the Great Society war on poverty. We have transferred something like 10 trillion, maybe close to 11 trillion, from producers and earners to nonproducers and nonearners since 1965. Yet, as I listen to the Democratic Party campaign, why, America is still a soup kitchen, the poor is still poor and they have no hope and they're poor for what reason? 

They're poor because of us, because we don't care, and because we've gotten rich by taking from them, that's what kids in school are taught today. That's what others have said to the media. You know why they're poor, you know why they remain poor?  Because their lives have been destroyed by the never-ending government hay that's designed to help them, but it destroys ambition. It destroys the education they might get to learn to be self-fulfilling. [Applause] And it breaks our heart. It breaks our heart. We lose track of numbers with all of the money, with all the money that's been transferred, redistributed, with all the charitable giving in this country.

Ladies and gentlemen, there ought not be any poverty except those who are genuinely ill equipped. But most of the people in poverty in this country are equipped for far much more. They've just been beaten down. They're told don't worry, we'll take care of you. There's nothing out there for you anyway; you'll be discriminated against. Breaks our heart to see this. We can't have a great country and a growing economy with more and more people being told they have a right, because of some injustice that's been done to them or some discrimination, that they have a right to the earnings of others.  And it's gotten so out of hand now that what worries me is that this administration, the Barack Obama administration, is actively seeking to expand the welfare state in this country because he wants to control it.

The flag on Rush Limbaugh's website

George Will once asked Dr. Friedrich Von Hayek, tremendous classical economist, great man, 1975, George Will, Dr. Von Hayek, why is it that intellectuals, supposed smartest people in the room, why is it that intellectuals can look right out their windows, their own homes and cars and look at their universities and not see the bounties and the growth and the greatness of capitalism? 

And Von Hayek said:  I've troubled over this for years and I've finally concluded that for intellectuals, pseudo-intellectuals, and all liberals, it's about control. It's not about raising revenue. You think Obama has any intention of paying for all this spending?  Folks, if he had any intention of paying for it, he wouldn't do 90% of it because we don't have the money. [Applause]

They don't care about paying for it. All that's just words. All that's just rhetoric paying for it because he knows you have to worry about paying for it. He knows we all have to be concerned -- oh, except, wrong again. Except the words of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd who were given homes that everybody knew they could never pay for, and now Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, the architects along with Bill Clinton of the policy that gave us the whole subprime mortgage crisis, get to sit around and act as innocent spectators to investigate what went on when they largely had the biggest role in causing it. [Applause]

Congressman Frank's definition of affordable housing is you get a house you don't have to pay for that everybody else in the neighborhood will pay for. Why?  Because it's unfair that some people can have a house and some people can't. Geez, it's just unfair. So here we have two systems. We have socialism, collectivism, Stalin, whatever you want to call it, versus capitalism. Admittedly over on the right side capitalism there will be unequal outcomes because we're all different. And some of us care more and have more passion and we know what we want to do and others are still struggling for it.

Some people are just going to work harder than others. OK. You get what you work for. Those who have a genuine inability for whatever reason are taken care of. We're compassionate people. On the left side when you get into this collectivism socialism stuff, these people on the left, the Democrats and liberals today claim that they are pained by the inequities and the inequalities in our society. And they believe that these inequities and inequalities descend from the selfishness and the greed of the achievers. And so they tell the people who are on different income quintiles, whatever lists, they say it's not that you're not working hard enough, you could have what they have, perhaps, if you applied it. They're stealing it from you.

So what liberals do, and I say this again to the -- another thing, I know people in the country are watching. I was watching a focus group after some event this week. Might have been after Obama's State of the Union show. [Laughter] And they had -- it was a typical, you know, Drive-By Media focus group. They round up losers -- [Laughter] -- who hear Obama speak and think that the next day their gas tanks are going to be filled up and get a new house and a new kitchen and a new car. And so this one guy said -- oh, it was some guy responding to Bobby Jindal. Oh, by the way did you hear about Joe Biden?  Joe Biden was mystified how Bobby Jindal got his shift off at 7-Eleven that night to make the speech. 

Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Time out. Suspend speech for explanation. People watching at home. I'm glad this happened. Glad this happened. You think I just made a joke, an ethnic joke about Bobby Jindal, don't you?  I didn't. I made a joke about the bigotry of the vice president of the United States, Joe Biden.  It was Joe Biden while walking through the train station he knows so well because he's such a real guy, that he made a comment that you can't go into a 7-Eleven without seeing some Indian guy behind the counter. They're all over the place.

Now, let a conservative say something like that and he's brought up before John Conyers' committee with Pat Leahy wanting at you next. Many people think I lose my place in these speeches because -- by the way what time is it?  We have plenty of time. We have to be out of here by -- [Applause] We have to be out of here by 6:00 -- OK, depends on how you behave. I'll decide as we go on. What liberalism -- Democrats, for those of you in the country, I really want you to believe this because it's the truth. I'm not saying it just because I believe it. This is a core.

I want the best country we can have. We want the most prosperous people. We want to be growing. We want to lead the world. We want everybody to come here legally. We want this country to be so damn great and we just cringe to watch it -- basically capitalism be assaulted and our culture be reoriented to where the people that make it work are the enemy. That's not the United States of America. The people that make this country work, the people who pay on their mortgages, the people getting up and going to work, striving in this recession to not participate in it, they're not the enemy.

They're the people that hire you. They're the people that are going to give you a job. They're the people that are going to give you a raise, the people that need you to do work for them. [Applause] President Obama, and take your pick of any Democrat, love to say we've tried it your way. Meaning Reaganism. We've tried it your way. We tried it your way in the '80s and it didn't work. We tried it your way eight years, the last eight years and it didn't work. Excuse me. Excuse me. Have you ever noticed those of you watching around the world in my first international address to the world, Fox is on some international satellites.  They're watching this in the U.K. right now going (cringing). When Obama talks about past economies, he somehow always leaves out the recession of the '80s as worse than this one. Why does he leave it out?  Because you know why he leaves it out, America?  He leaves it out because we got out of that recession with tax cuts. [Applause] For those of you watching at home, I'm not nervous, it's just really hot in here. These people are wired. We got out of the 1980s recession with tax cuts.

Do you know that President Obama, in six weeks of his administration, has proposed more spending than from the founding of the country to his inauguration? 

Now, this is not prosperity. It is not going to engender prosperity. It's not going to create prosperity and it's also not going to advance or promote freedom. It's going to be just the opposite. There are going to be more controls over what you can and can't do, how you can and can't do it, what you can and can't drive, what you can and can't say, where you can and can't say it. All of these things are coming down the pike, because it's not about revenue generation to them, it's about control. They do believe that they have compassion. They do believe they care. But, see, we never are allowed to look at the results of their plans, we are told we must only look at their good intentions, their big hearts. The fact that they have destroyed poor families by breaking up those families by offering welfare checks to women to keep having babies, no more father needed, he's out doing something, the government's the father, they destroy the family.

We're not supposed to analyze that. We're not supposed to talk about that. We're supposed to talk about their good intentions. They destroy people's futures. The future is not Big Government. Self-serving politicians. PowFlag of Rush Limbaugh's websiteerful bureaucrats. This has been tried, tested throughout history. The result has always been disaster.

President Obama, your agenda is not new. It's not change, and it's not hope. [Applause] Spending a nation into generational debt is not an act of compassion. All politicians, including President Obama, are temporary stewards of this nation. It is not their task to remake the founding of this country. It is not their task to tear it apart and rebuild it in their image. (Crowd chanting "USA")

It is not their task, it is not their right to remake this nation to accommodate their psychology. I sometimes wonder if liberalism is not just a psychosis or a psychology, not an ideology. It's so much about feelings, and the predominant feeling that liberalism is about is about feeling good about themselves and they do that by telling themselves they have all this compassion. You know, if you really want to unhinge a liberal it's hard to do because they're so unhinged now anyway, even after -- but all you have to do is say you know that the things you people do, the things you people believe in are cruel. That's the last way they look at themselves. They are the best people on the -- they're the good people. You tell them that their ideas and that their policies are cruel and the eggs start scrambling.

I have learned how to tweak liberals everywhere. I do it instinctively now. Tweak them in the media. And no reason to be afraid of these people. Why in the world would you be afraid of the deranged?  There really is no reason to be afraid of them. And there's no reason to assume they're the minority. And there's no reason to let them set all the premises and all the agendas to which we respond to. I'm getting a little bit ahead of myself here but everybody asks me and I'm sure it's been a focal point of your convention:  What do we do as conservatives?  What do we do?  How do we overcome this?

Well, the one thing, and there are many, but one thing that we can all do is stop assuming that the way to beat them is with better policy ideas right now. I don't want to name any names. It's not the point. But I talk to people about the Obama budget or the Obama Porkulus bill or whatever else TARP 2 whatever it's going to be, and they start talking to me in the terms of process and policy.  I say stop it. What do you mean?  Who is setting the process or policy?  They are. You want to tweak it?  No. This is philosophy, folks. This guy, I forgot -- the guy in the focus group after Bobby Jindal said, I didn't want to hear him talk, he said:  Republicans and Democrats. Republicans and Democrats. Ladies and gentlemen of the United States of America, that's exactly what your future is about, who wins, Republicans or Democrats, conservatives versus liberals.

The notion of partisanship, false premise. Let me define bipartisanship for you. Bipartisanship -- everybody seems to go orgasmic over the concept of bipartisanship. Don't worry, I checked with Fox, that word's OK. [Laughter] [Applause]

Remember, they covered the Lewinsky thing, so that's my -- bipartisanship occurs only after one other result, and that is victory. In other words, let's say as conservatives liberals demand that we be bipartisan with them in Congress. What they mean is:  We check our core principles at the door, come in, let them run the show and agree with them. That's bipartisanship to them. To us, bipartisanship is them being forced to agree with us after we politically have cleaned their clocks and beaten them. And that has to be what we're focused on. [Applause] Why would any of us in this room who hold the core beliefs we believe, somebody tell me where is the compromise on all of this spending?  Where is the compromise on all this punishment of the achievers. I don't know. [Laughter] [Applause]

Where is the compromise between good and evil?  Should Jesus have cut a different deal?  Serious. From the standpoint of what we have to do, folks, this is not about taking a policy or a process that the Democrats have put forward and fighting around the edges. If we're going to convince the minds and hearts of the American people that what's about to happen to them is as disastrous as anything in their lives in peacetime, we're going to have to discuss philosophy with them.

We are going to have to talk about principles, because our principles are not present in what's happening here. So where the hell do we go to compromise what we believe in when our principles are not their principles, they're just the opposite of what's happening?  [Applause]

The American people -- it's a tough challenge. I admit -- I admit it's a tough challenge, but it's worth it. It's worth it. The way I just defined bipartisanship you could turn it around and liberals will define bipartisanship when we surrender and say OK, we give. We're not quitting. We are not giving up. The country is too important. [Applause] There are certain realities. We don't have the votes in Capitol Hill to stop what's going to happen. What we can do is slow it down, procedure, parliamentary procedures, slow it down and do the best we can to inform the American people of what's really on the horizon. I know it's going to be tough.

At some points, I don't think it can happen even right now. This is still the honeymoon period, and there's a lot of devotion to the Obama administration. It doesn't have anything to do with intellectual thinking, it's feelings. It's going to take some time for this to play out. But I spoke to David Keene, interviewing him for my newsletter. I asked him about this. He said they're going to overreach. Wouldn't you say they have? [Laughter].

They're going to overreach. At some point, at some point people have got to realize none of this is possible. You can't have people living in homes they don't pay for. You can't have people driving cars they don't pay for. I mean, you can for a while. But after a while the people paying for it -- screw this. We're not putting up with it. And you're going to see -- you're already starting to see evidence of these. All the tea parties that are starting to bubble up out there. Those are great. Fabulous. [Applause]

The flag on Rush Limbaugh's website

And here's the big question. Here's the big question. And I ask this again in the context of my first address to the nation. [Laughter] You don't know how I love saying that, how excited I am about this. Aside from the bastardization of the Constitution that the Obama plans are, that TARP is, it's not constitutional. Aside from that, where is the evidence that the people offering all of this have ever succeeded in any similar plans before?  There's none. There is no evidence it works. [Applause]

So you say how is he getting it done?  Dumb down public education. Emotions. And the ongoing -- this is why I think it's such a waste for a man as gifted as President Obama with the communications skills, you know he could wipe out the Republican Party. He can wipe out the Republican Party if he would inspire this country to be the best it could be, but we don't have to worry about that because that's not what he wants. He wants people in fear, angst and crisis, fearing the worst each and every day because that clears the decks for President Obama and his pals to come in with the answers, which are abject failures, historically shown and demonstrated. Doesn't matter.

They'll have control of it when it's all over. And that's what they want. Because they think they can do it better. They see these inequalities, these inequities that capitalism produces. How do they fix it?  Do they try to elevate those at the bottom?  No! They try to tear down the people at the bottom. It's not fair you're up there. So they whack us. That's not what made the country great.[Applause] And no evidence of it is in play here.

John Kerry [Boos], who served in Vietnam. [Laughter] Think about this, and, by the way, Barney Frank got involved with this too. Northern Trust, a bank in Chicago -- by the way, which holds the mortgage to the Messiah's house, purchased by Tony Rezko, Northern Trust holds the mortgage. Northern Trust was forced, like Wells Fargo was forced, to take TARP money. The Wells Fargo CEO said they were taken into Paulson's room and they were given until 5:00 to sign it. They weren't getting out until they did. They wanted it spread all over the banking business. Northern Trust was in there. They didn't want it. They took $1.6 billion. As you know, they went out and they sponsored the L.A. Riveria Open two weeks ago that Phil Mickelson barely hung on and won. [Applause]

And we find out they hired some liberals to entertain, but it still wasn't good enough. They hired Sheryl Crow. And they hired the rock crooner group Chicago, but they had the audacity, Northern Trust did, to entertain their clients, to try to reward their best customers, to get new customers, banking is in trouble, Northern Trust is trying to do what they always do, what all businesses do, and that is mine for new clients and reward existing good customers.  Not since they took $1.6 billion, I guess. The haughty John Kerry wrote a piece of legislation [that] said:  He's getting sick and tired, sick and tired of these CEOs using taxpayer money to throw all these lavish parties. And I'm saying where do you get yours, Senator?  [Applause]

Sad thing, sad thing is it works. They've created class envy in so many average Americans that they love hearing that. Yeah, you get even with those bank guys. How is it going to improve here?  Let me ask a question for those of you watching my first national address. Take the favorite villain you've got, maybe it's John Thain at Merrill Lynch, because he used his own money, his company's own money, his company's own money, to redecorate a bathroom in an office for $1.2 million. By the way, to do that he had to hire a contractor. They got paid. Had to hire a designer and buy furniture, that's called stimulus. And he did it.

But all of a sudden John Thain's thrown out. John Thain is thrown out. He's humiliated and embarrassed; how dare he?  He did it a year before they took the TARP money. And all these congressmen are standing up saying this is not going to happen. We are not going to watch these people capping executive pay while Obama tries to live like one. You know, he's trying to emulate the lifestyle he is attacking. That's what liberals do. Two sets of rules:  One for them; one for everybody else. But it's coming. See, if you think that John Thain or the Northern Trust CEO, if you love them getting attacked, if you love them being ripped, ask yourself the next day, do you have any more money in your pocket?  Is your life any better because that guy got taken out or down by some haughty senator from Massachusetts?   


If you ask yourself this, you'll realize your life is no better off. That the Democrats and Obama are asking you to feel better simply on the basis that they're going to get revenge for you, but your life isn't going to improve, somebody else's is just going to be destroyed and they want you to be happy over that. That's sick. And that is not the United States of America. [Applause] Besides, as far as John Kerry is concerned, if it wasn't for his varicose veins, he would be totally colorless. [Laughter]

Now let's talk about the conservative movement as it were. We, ladies and gentlemen, have challenges that are part and parcel of a movement that feels it has just suffered a humiliating defeat when it's not humiliating. This wasn't a landslide victory, 52 to, what, 46. Fifty-eight million people voted against Obama. There would have been more if we would have had a conservative nominee. [Applause] I don't mean that -- I mean that in an instructive way, as a lead-in to what I'm talking about here. No humiliating defeat here. I can't -- sometimes I get livid and angry.

We do have an organizational problem. We have a challenge. We've got factions now within our own movement seeking power to dominate it, and worst of all to redefine it.  WeConservative radio broadcaster Rush Limbaughll, the Constitution doesn't need to be redefined. Conservative intellectuals, the Declaration of Independence does not need to be redefined and neither does conservatism. Conservatism is what it is and it is forever. It's not something you can bend and shape and flake and form. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you.

For the purposes of this occasion, I'm not going to mention any names, I bet with you I won't have to. People watching my first address to the nation might be curious what I'm talking about.

They'll find out in due course, trust me on this. I cringed -- it might have been 2007, late 2007 or sometime during 2008, but a couple of prominent conservative but Beltway establishment media types began to write on the concept that the era of Reagan is over. [Crowd Booing]

And that we needed to adapt our appeal, because, after all, what's important in politics is winning elections. And so we have to understand that the American people, they want Big Government. We just have to find a way to tell them we're no longer opposed to that. We will come up with our own version of it that is wiser and smarter, but we've got to go get the Wal-Mart voter, and we've got to get the Hispanic voter, and we've got to get the recalcitrant independent women. And I'm listening to this and I am just apoplectic:  The era of Reagan is over? 

When the hell do you hear a Democrat say the era of FDR is over?  You never hear it. Not only that, the president of the United States today thinks he's FDR, thinks he's Abraham Lincoln, and sometimes, Tuesday night, thinks he's Ronald Reagan. Our own movement has members trying to throw Reagan out while the Democrats know they can't accomplish what they want unless they appeal to Reagan voters. We have got to stamp this out within this movement, because it will tear us apart. It will guarantee we lose elections. [Applause]

We have to. You see, to me it's a no-brainer. It's not even something to me:  How do you get rid of Reagan from conservatism?  The blueprint -- the blueprint for landslide conservative victory is right there. Why in the hell do the smartest people in our room want to chuck it?  I know why. I know exactly why. It's because they're embarrassed of some of the people who call themselves conservatives. These people in New York and Washington, cocktail elitists, they get made fun of when the next NASCAR race is on TV and their cocktail buds come up to them, those people are in your party?  How do you put up with this? 

It would be easy to throw them overboard, so as to maintain these cocktail party/Beltway/New York City/inside-the-Beltway media relationships. But I tell you:  This notion that Reaganism is dead, conservatism needs to be refined, let's take a look at this. We've got to go get the Wal-Mart voter. I opened my remarks tonight by telling the people watching on Fox who we conservatives are. When I look out at you in this audience, I don't see a Wal-Mart voter. And I don't see a black, and I don't see a woman, and I don't see a Hispanic. I see human beings who happen to be fortunate enough to be the luckiest people on Earth since you are Americans. [Applause]

Conservatism -- for us to make the decision that we've got to figure out policies, to get the Wal-Mart voter -- psst, we've got most of them already, is the bottom line. Conservatism is a universal set of core principles. You don't check principles at the door. This is a battle that we're going to have. And there are egos involved here too. When the situation like ours exists, there are people who want to lead it. They want to redefine it. Their egos are such that they want to be the next X, whoever it is. So there will be different factions lining up to try to define what conservatism is.

And beware of those different factions who seek as part of their attempt to redefine conservatism, as making sure the liberals like us, making sure that the media likes us. They never will, as long as we remain conservatives. They can't possibly like us; they're our enemy. In a political arena of ideas, they're our enemy. They think we need to be defeated. Why do you think -- you all in this room know this. For those of you watching at home, my first address to the nation -- [Laughter] -- I'm sure you paid close enough attention, that you knew at one time Sen. McCain was the favorite Republican of all the cable news networks and the Sunday shows.

And they would just -- I mean their tongues would be on the floor. The media people (panting) when they knew McCain was coming. And they would treat McCain as the greatest guy in the world. Did you wonder why?  You were told he was moderate. He was not strict. He was not an authoritarian, he was able to walk to the other side of the aisle, able to get along with the enemy. And everybody wants love and bipartisanship.

That's not why they invited Sen. McCain. They invited Sen. McCain because he happened to be the loudest at criticizing his own president and his own party and that's what they want, is people from our side -- and there will be factions in our movement, folks, who are going to make an effort to say we have to grow, we can't stay stale, I think I heard the term used the other day. Nothing stale about freedom. There's nothing stale about liberty. There's nothing stale about fighting for it. Nothing stale whatsoever. [Applause]

Freedom. Are you getting tired of standing up, I don't blame you. By the way for those watching on TV you think the standing -- people are just tired. They've been up and out of their chairs 100 times here. [Applause] Thank you. Flag of Rush Limbaugh's websiteFreedom -- freedom is the natural yearning of the human spirit as we were endowed by our creator. And the United States of America is the place in the world where that yearning flourishes, where freedom is expected because it's part of the way we're created.

I loved it when the Soviet Union went down and the wall went down and the liberals in our country said you know they may not be ready for freedom over there. They've been oppressed -- yes, liberals will gladly tell you who can have freedom and who can't. And that's what the pieces of legislation are all about, folks, freedom, liberty, economic prosperity, they're all entwined here.

We'll have to as a conservative movement understand that our job, after we come to an agreement among ourselves, which shouldn't be hard but it's going to be difficult because the people that think they're smarter than everybody else are going to be out there forging alliances with people that try to make themselves look like new power brokers, and they will become the spokesmen, by the way.

By the way, explain that to you. This is a funny story. Show you how I can hijack a news cycle even by doing anything. The Tuesday before the inauguration, President Bush invited me to the Oval Office for lunch. And it was on and off the record, some of the conversations. And he brought out, interesting, at the end of it -- my birthday had been the day before. He brought out a chocolate birthday cake, a microphone, and stood beside me with Ed Gillespie and sang happy birthday. Photographers taking pictures.

I wish my parents were alive. My parents wouldn't believe my life. They came out of the Great Depression. They didn't think it was possible for somebody who did not go to college -- and even for people who did -- they didn't think this was possible. Life has changed so much for the better in this country. That's why I cringe when I see what is in store.

So as I'm flying home from lunch, I'm watching television and I see that the word has leaked out that Obama is hosting a dinner with conservative media pundits at the home of George Will. I said:  I wonder who these people are?  [Laughter] In the media, one of them is going to have to leak it. Sure as heck, one did. Now, we all know who were there. And let's see -- I can't remember all the names, so I won't mention any. But let me tell you Obama's purpose. Does anybody really think that Barack Obama had dinner with a bunch of conservatives hoping they would change his mind? 

CROWD:  No! 

RUSH:  Hell, no. His purpose -- and his purpose really wasn't to change theirs -- his purpose was to anoint them as conservative spokesmen. These are the people that Obama's willing to break bread with. These happen -- some of the people there happen to be the people who think the era of Reagan is over, who believe that conservatism needs to be redefined. Of course Obama would try to lure them in. Well, all of a sudden I land. I get home about 5:00, and my e-mail is jammed with questions from reporters, are you, is that why you took the day off today?  Is that why you're not on the air?  Are you going to dinner with Obama? 

By the way, I left out a crucial part of the story. Was this a Monday, Kit?  It was a Tuesday. I had forgotten to tell my audience that I was going to miss the next day. I signed off the show saying I'll see you tomorrow. That's the last thing I said. The staff reminded me you're not going to be here tomorrow. I came up with a plan, that the guest host the next day would say that I was called out of town to Washington at midnight the night before. Just an innocent little trick on the radio audience. Everybody picked that up and thinks I'm invited to the Obama dinner. So those people that were invited to it got less coverage than I did and I didn't even know about it. [Laughter] It was fun. [Applause]

Conservatives are naturally happy. We seek happiness. We pursue it. It's part of who we are. So what can you do?  Live your life. I swear, folks, you do not know in just the everyday life that you live in your homes, your neighborhoods, the favorite word of this administration, your "communities." Remember the root word there is "commune." [Applause] Be happy, live your life according to your values and principles. Know you're going to fail, no human being is perfect, you're going to make mistakes, but live your life -- you'll be stunned at how many people you impress.

Don't be afraid to tell children that they're wrong. They don't know what you do. They simply haven't lived long enough. It's not their fault, but they're being fed a bunch of garbage in school and don't be afraid to tell them that they're wrong.

Don't go the Oprah route and say gotta be friends with my parents, my kids, first and foremost. Understand they're going to hate you for a while and they're going to rebel against you and someday they're going to think you're the smartest person they ever met. But you owe them the truth. You owe them the truth about things. You owe them the truth about morality. You owe them the truth about values. [Applause] You owe them the truth about politics.

Next thing, we've got to stop treating voters as children.  [Applause] SomebodThe flag on Rush Limbaugh's websitey says they want something that's bad for them, do you give it to them just to be nice?  Or do you tell them, regardless of their age, no, you shouldn't have that?  Well, it's none of your business. Maybe not. And then you back out of it. But you still have to have the ability to tell people what's right and wrong. And that's not authoritative. That's not authoritarian.

And it's not trying to deny somebody a good time. It's not trying to interrupt somebody's hedonism, pleasure, it's about all of us with shared values trying to make sure that people live the highest quality lives they can. Ultimately, it's their decision as to what they do.  But the point is, don't treat them -- especially voters -- as kids just -- they say they want it, OK, we'll come up with a plan to give it to you.

Have any of you seen the movie -- I'd never heard of it, but I happened to get a DVD the other day. Anybody see the movie "Swing Vote" with Kevin Costner?  You know, it's kind of a moronic movie like most things out of Hollywood are. But this is fascinating in the way -- tell you a short story, because a voter screwup in New Mexico there's one voter who is going to elect the president. His vote didn't count because his daughter voted for him. I won't give the whole story away. But New Mexico's electoral votes, New Mexico's electoral votes determined it. And they have a two-week period before this guy can vote again.

So the challenger and the president both relocate to where this guy lives in New Mexico and they end up like the Democrat played by Dennis Hopper stands for antiabortion. The Democrat candidate comes out with a commercial for life. The Republican candidate comes out, because this guy is an idiot and doesn't know what he believes, and every utterance that he makes these politicians react to it throwing their principles on the floor, just to get his vote.  Sadly, this is what some of the conservative intellectuals in our movement want to do, essentially. And that we cannot do. We've got to stand for what we believe and treat people as adults and understand they can learn.  [Applause] Go optimism.

Joe Biden, ladies and gentlemen, was watching CBS -- when did you start here?  Thursday. You might have seen this. The days run together. It might have been Wednesday, but Biden was on the CBS "Early Show." And he was asked -- the anchorette -- sorry. I'm trying to change my ways. I've been doing women summit programs so not to offend women. The anchor, Maggie Rodriguez, went out and got some man-on-the-street questions. And one guy, woman, I think question for Biden. What is in the stimulus package for small business? 

Biden was clearly stumped because there isn't anything in the stimulus package for small business.  So what Biden said, honest to God, what Biden said was:  Well, if there's a bridge to your small business, we're going to make sure that bridge stays open so that you can get to your small business and your customers -- honest. I kid you not.

Now, of course, the media today is a bunch of hacks, they're out there as PR agents; they're starting to get a little embarrassed. Maggie Rodriguez says, Sen. Biden, there's a website that answers all these questions. What is the name of the website, and Biden says I don't know. He looks off stage. "Does somebody have the website number?"  [Applause] I realize those of you watching at home during my first address to the nation, you have never heard liberal Democrats be made fun of in this way. Get used to it. [Applause]

Two other things and we'll get out of here contractually over time. The president's stimulus package, the TARP, the whatever, the budget, relies on one thing for its success. Well, aside from authoritarian government power. It relies on the complacency of the American people.  It relies on their belief that they can convince the American people that there's such a crisis that only government, the only entity that can fix it is government, as Obama has said. So they get complacent and they sit around and they wait. See, this is something liberals will never understand about the United States of America and it's right under their noses, right in front of their faces, we are a competitive people.

We strive, enough of us do, to be the best. We strive to win. We strive to avoid defeat. Enough of us still do. Don't believe otherwise. The liberals have made efforts to shut that aspect of our nature down. Wherever you live, I am certain that you, when you were a child or your kids today in youth sports are told not to keep score, because the losers, it's just not fair. They'd be humiliated, especially if one girl's basketball team can defeat another one 100 to nothing. And let's fire the coach who put that game together. It's so unfair.  So let's not keep score. Well, here's the dirty little secret. The kids are keeping score. [Applause]

You know they are. They don't want to lose. They know what winning and losing is. They're saying, well, why go out there and put on the pads and play football or T-Ball if the objective here is to not keep score. So they're keeping score. They get in the car with mom and dad and they tell mom and dad:  Yeah, we kicked their butts tonight. Wait a minute, I thought you weren't keeping score. They weren'tFlag of Rush Limbaugh's website officially. They keep score. We're competitive people. Adults are doing the same thing.

It didn't take long for people to get fired up when they figured out that they're going to be paying mortgages for people who should never have been lent money in the first place for the bogus excuse of maintaining property values in the neighborhood.  This is something that -- the complacency of the American people is something they're going to rely on along with their authoritarian efforts to control it. But they will not succeed at this. Because we're not quitters. We don't acquiesce. We're not going to give up the American dream and watch idly while it is restructured and transformed.
[Applause]

As I say, we want the best:  Happiness for everybody. Now, about my still-to-me mysteriously controversial comment that I hope President Obama fails. I was watching the Super Bowl. And as you know, I love the Pittsburgh Steelers. [Cheers and Applause] So they have this miraculous scoring drive that puts them up by four, 15 seconds left. Kurt Warner on the field for the Cardinals. And I sure as heck want you to know I hope he failed. I did not want the Cardinals to win. I wanted Warner to make the biggest fool of himself possible. I wanted a sack, I wanted anything. I wanted the Steelers to win. I wanted to win. I wanted the Cardinals to fail.

This notion that I want the president to fail, folks, this shows you a sign of the problem we've got. That's nothing more than common sense and to not be able to say it, why in the world do I want what we just described, rampant government growth indebtedness, wealth that's not even being created yet that is being spent, what is in this?  What possibly is in this that anybody of us wants to succeed?   Did the Democrats want the war on Iraq to fail! 

CROWD:  Yes! 

RUSH:  They certainly did. They not only wanted the war in Iraq to fail, they proclaimed it a failure. There's dingy Harry Reid waiving a white flag:  [Doing Harry Reid impression] "This war is lost. This war is" -- [Cheers and Applause] They called Gen. Petraeus a liar before he even testified. Mrs. Clinton -- [Crowd Booing] -- said she had to, willingly suspend disbelief in order to listen to Petraeus. We're in the process of winning the war.

The last thing they wanted was to win. They hoped George Bush failed. So what is so strange about being honest to say that I want Barack Obama to fail if his mission is to restructure and reform this country so that capitalism and individual liberty are not its foundation?  Why would I want that to succeed?  [Applause]

Let me add a caveat here. My friends, I know what's going on. I know what's going on. We're in the aspects here of a historic presidency. I know that. But let me be honest again. I got over the historical aspects of this in November. President Obama is our president. President Obama stands for certain things. I don't care, he could be a Martian. He could be from Michigan, I don't know -- just kidding. Doesn't matter to me what his race is. It doesn't matter.

He's liberal is what matters to me. And his articulated -- his articulated plans scare me.  Now, I understand we can't say we want the president to fail, Mr. Limbaugh. That's like saying -- this is the voice of the New Castrati, by the way, guys who have lost their guts. You can't say Mr. Limbaugh that you want the president to fail because that's like saying you want the country to fail. It's the opposite. I want the country to survive. I want the country to succeed. [Cheers and Applause] [Crowd Chanting "USA" ]

I want the country to survive as we have known it, as you and I were raised in it, is what I mean. Now, I have been called -- and I can take it. Pioneers take the arrows, I don't mind what anybody says about me, any time ever. I don't have time for it. I don't give other people the power to offend me. And you shouldn't either, by the wasted time being offended. [Applause]

I mean, there's some people you can't say you want the president to fail. Ladies and gentlemen of the United States, the Democrat Party has actively not just sought the failure of Republican presidents and policies and now wars for the first time, the Democrat Party doesn't stop at failure. Talk to Judge Robert Bork or Justice Clarence Thomas about how they tried to destroy lives, reputations and character, and I'm supposed to say I don't want the president to fail?  [Applause]

We're in for a real battle. We are talking about the United States of America -- and there will always be an America, don't misunderstand me -- we're talking about it remaining the country we were all born into and reared and grown into. And it's under assault. It's always under assault. But it's never been under assault like this from within before. And it's a serious, serious battle.

So as you leave here, as you leave here optimism, confidence, not guilt, it's not worth it. There's nothing to be guilty about. Don't treat people as children. Respect their intelligence. Realize that there's a way to persuade people. Sometimes the worst way is to get in their face and point a finger. Set up a set of circumstances where the conclusion is obvious. Let them think they came up with the idea themselves. They'll think they're smart that they figured it out. Who cares how you persuade them, the fact they can be persuaded is factually correct, it's possible.

But the main thing to do here is stop thinking that we are a minority. Stop thinking that it is being in the minority that liberates you. It is your beliefs. It is your core principles, it is your confidence that liberates you. It's not being in the minority.

In fact, for those of you watching my first national address and still hanging in there, we really are not that happy about being a minority and we're out to change it. [Applause] So I have -- I've gone over my allotted time by an hour. [Applause] I want to thank all of you so much for everything that you have meant to me and my family in my life.

CROWD:  Thank you.

RUSH:  I understand it's mutual. And I hear people -- you have made my heart grow so much that it barely fits in my chest cavity here tonight. But the things that by virtue of your listening to my radio show and being active in this movement that we all cherish and love, you have meant more to me, my family and my life than whatever it is I might mean to you, even though I know that's considerable. [Applause]

You still can't outdo the absolute joy and awe and thanks I feel for all of you. I've been doing this for 20 years and the numbers just keep growing. And I can't tell you how appreciative I am and proud to be in a movement with the same passions, desires and core beliefs that all of you have, because we know that it's right for the country, and we know it's right for people. It's not something that has to be forced on them. It's not something that has to be authoritatively pressed on them.

We are what is, and that's why we are an enemy because we're effective. The people that do want control look at us as the enemy. We're always going to be -- don't ever measure your success by how many Drive-By Media reports you see that are fair to us. Never going to happen. Don't measure your success by how many people like you. Just worry about how they vote. And then at the end of the day how they live, but that's really none of your business once they close the doors. Thank you all very much. It's been great. 

Photo: RushLimbaugh.com

 
Comments () | Archives (127)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Bravo to Top of the Ticket for running the whole speech. I watched it and it was as brilliant an explanation of conservatism as I've ever heard.

Why are you printing the rantings and delusional rationalizations of a drug addicted amoral narcissist?

I didn't know that's what conservatism was. This is the way I believe for the most part that we should choose and we are responsible not a governmental person. Thank you LAT for posting this. I'm emailing to all of my friends. This might start a revolution and an alternative to Mr. Obama's changes. Maybe Rush is correct.

I call that a rambling diatribe.

His voice is the cornucopia of self-importance.

I sense that in due time, he might actually convince himself that he is God's right-hand man.

The President and all his men demean themselves by picking a fight with Rush. I never listened to him until this argument and guess what HE MAKES SENSE! I wil be one of those new people who check out what he has to say. I should think the President has more pressing issue's ie: my money than going after a radio personality HOWEVER if he feels that is a better use of his time so be it! OBTW Mr. President could you put your eye back on the ball I have lost 3/4 of my 401K!

Have you gone nuts? Why have you started reporting?

Beware the Liberal, for they consume without creating.
Beware the Liberal, for they expect everything while doing nothing.
Beware the Liberal, for they belittle what they fail to understand.
Beware the Liberal, for they have no conception of the world around them.
Beware the Liberal, for they cast blame but never take responsibility.
Beware the Liberal, for they will always bite the hand that feeds them.
Beware the Liberal, for they will never be thankful for what they have.
Beware the Liberal, for they denigrate the country they live in, but reap all its rewards.
Beware the Liberal, for they will foul their own nest, move, and foul yours.

Thanks to the White House thousands of people who would never have read him in context. There will be a lot of Liberal Spam in the comments section but there will be a lot of people who actually read the speech and think.

It is even a better speech in print because it doesn't have to pause for the cheers.

Well done White House. Now about that Debate Rush offered the president, will you insist on a teleprompter?

I am a recent convert to Rush Limbaugh ditto-headedness. It all started as a result of having my intelligence insulted by the "drive by media" day after day. As a news junkie I listened a lot and I had to hear how despicable the Israelis are - I disagree vehemently - and how dumb and evil Bush and his administration were - I couldn't be a stronger Bush supporter if I were his own mother, so there. But despite my own biases, I never heard any balance at all in the drive by medias. Rush Limbaugh is the John Adams of our time. Go Rush!!

like I was ever going to listen to this guy much less read this manuscript?
This guy is as much a part of the GOP's demise as any one let him have the blame when the GOP ruptures.

Rush Limpdick, The Gas Bag Clown Royal!
He will end up chocking on chicken while stuffing his pork chop face.
Another con man bites the dust.

I never thought I would say this: Rush Limbaugh is right.

Awesome speech!!`

How much did this advertisement cost Mr Limbaugh?

At least our country's political left is starting to figure out that Obama and his team do not have the chops to run the country. At some point he becomes the problem. Blame Limbaugh all you want, the bottom line is our government needs to spend less and leave money in the pockets of its workers to succeed.

Wow, that was painful. I could really go for some Oxycotin after wading through that.

Is Limbaugh pompous? Its all tongue-in-cheek. Everything pompous he says is to get a rise. Instead of mock-humility he has turned it around: to mock-pomposity. If you don't get irony you won't get his sense of humor. Like when he says, "Talent on loan from God." 1) He's imitating televangelists in his tone. 2) The talent's not from him, its from God. 3) This is not ironic: Its a business ploy. Listen to this show, its good. Given the context, if you've broken through the media's talk-points-cheerleading, none of Limbaugh's points are "outrageous."

Team Obama would like us all to take our eye off the alleged stimulus package and focus on a schoolyard fight with Rush. Pay attention, people, your pockets are being picked and even Obama can't make prosperity trickle up. Not even if he uses his TelePrompter.

While it’s become politically incorrect, most of us remember the old story about the natives and missionaries. The missionaries invariably end up cooking in a Jacuzzi-sized stew pot atop a blazing fire as the natives set the table for dinner. Today, we have the leadership of the Republican Party sitting in a similar pot, only this time it isn’t hungry natives stirring up the stew. It’s Rush Limbaugh. Whether the base of the Republican Party realizes it or not, the well-fed Limbaugh is gleefully devouring his own kind. Because, as long as respected, influential Republicans cower in the corpulent talkshow host’s sizable shadow, the party is going to remain in disarray and no Republican is going to win another national election. In case they hadn’t noticed, voters in the last two elections have roundly rejected the strident ideology of the GOP, and Mr. Limbaugh is the archetypal right-wing ideologue. Belligerent, verbose, vitriolic and astonishingly arrogant, he is the de facto Chief of the conservative movement in this country and the epitome of everything that a growing majority of voters have reviled.

How bad are things for the Republican Party? The Wall Street Journal, not exactly an enemy of the RNC, printed the results of a recent and devastating survey of voters. Apparently, 26% of voters have a mildly positive opinion of the GOP, and only 7% are significantly positive about it. Now, add the porcine pariah of airwaves and you have a perfect storm of loathing.

If you’re a Democrat, the most ill-advised thing you could do is jump into that pot. But that’s what has been happening. Too many Democratic officials, including members of the Obama administration, have already put one leg into the boiling stew by making statements about Limbaugh, thereby enhancing his appeal to the Republican Party and validating his popularity with its base. In the process of doing this, they are creating even more friction in Congress, assuring increased obstructionism by a desperate political party with no responsible leadership. The latest example of Democrats jumping into the pot is this “I’m sorry, Rush” website, which is one of the most juvenile political gags in recent memory. The people who came up with that one are no better than the Republicans they’ve been criticizing. And every time Rush gets one of those e-apologies, he lights up another $100 cigar and swallows another jelly donut.

It’s time for politicians on both sides of the aisle to realize that this corpulent, strutting demagogue is exploiting them all for his own self-aggrandizement. Limbaugh has been at this for the last 35 years, having started out as extreme right-wing Wally George’s TV sidekick. He wants to be a celebrity. He desperately covets admiration and power– almost as much as he hankers for those jelly donuts. Why anybody, especially the DCCC, keeps focusing a big spotlight on this human caricature is short-sighted at best. Why do key Republicans allow this radio personality to keep his pudgy-fingered grip on their party and their platform, knowing that he is one of the most unpopular people in the country? Why do Democratic officials and pundits keep giving him free air-time, when they know that will only result in boosting his already bloated ratings?

Leave Rush Limbaugh alone. He can stir that big pot just fine all by himself and, by the time he’s finished, all that will be left of the Republican Party is a few sun-bleached elephant tusks. (From the look of him the other night at CPAC, he’s already swallowed a few congressmen). In the end, he will be like the character in Monty Python’s “The Meaning of Life”. He will nibble at that last “wafer-thin mint”, then explode, sending out lethal shrapnel of Big Macs, Whoppers, milkshakes and buffalo wings. Stand close to that pot at your own risk.

Rush's speech at the GOP gathering is NOT what started all this. In one of his regular radio programs he said, "If Obama's policies lead our country to Socialism, I hope Obama fails".

True to form, the White House operatives ONLY QUOTED the "I hope Obama fails"... and the grand diversion began.

This attack on Rush and the diversion was well planned. Obama's operatives know that every minute the news media (willingly) talks about Limbaugh, is a minute NOT talked about the collapsing economy and ineffective leadership of the Obama administration.

Count me as impressed...no, not with Rush, I've been impressed by his wit, intellect, and style for years. He is the radio John Galt.

I'm impressed that the L.A. Times decided to tell the rest of the story...no spin, no BS...and let people decide for themselves.

Most of the people who don't like Rush have made up their mind without listening to what he has to say. Can't tell you how many people I know, who finally listened to him for awhile, realized he's their voice. Yes, flamboyant, but he finances his alleged extravagant lifestyle with money he earns...andnot on the taxpayer's dime.

Wow....A thousand ships could set sail from this blowhard.

By reading this I am suppose to be impressed by his "au-thor-i-tay" on the subject of anything?
I've listen to Rush's radio programs before. To the way he twists truth into racial, non-factual, hateful tirades.
Rush,
Your own words will be your demise. No one else has to do it for you. Yes, you love attention now. But, I have the feeling the spotlight will illuminate more than you intended it to.

Well, I got about 2 1/2 paragraphs into it and realized it was a complete waste of time. Next!

The people relying on Limbaugh for justification of their flawed world view are weak sheep who need to step out of the way. America needs forward thinking energy not leave it to beaver anachronisms like Limbaugh. May he choke on a chicken bone.

Limbaugh is a cracker, racist, white trash pile of garbage. America has been completely led down the path to failure by the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, O'reilly and their sickening ilk. They are what's wrong with America. They were the main pipeline spewing Bush Administration lies for the past 8 years. They owe us a lot more than an apology.

Limbaugh, Fox News, Bill O'reilly, Slime Hannity and the rest of these money grubbing cowards are criminals guilty of treason for misleading the American people into wasting vast piles of tax dollars on Bush era garbage. The founding fathers would be gathering with torches and pitchforks.

Whoa! I've never listed to Rush, but his message is great! So, let me get this straight: Republicans are for less government control so I can earn more of my paycheck. Sign me up.

this is a low point for the times.

You know, I watched clips of Rush making his speech at the CPAC conference, and have read the commentary that makes him out to be a clown. Bt what y'all saw and what I saw were different. I saw a guy in a black shirt who everyone thinks is a blowhard clown and I thought, hey, that's exactly what they thought about Mussolini, another black-shirted blowhard clown who wound up leading a revolt of a disaffected middle class against a war-weary but broke Italian government. If you know your history, Mussolini's followers were much the same kind of people who now make up the Republican Party -- lower middle class folks who felt that their government had let them down. Even today, the right-wing parties are made up of disaffected northern Italians who resent the money spent on the Italian welfare state of the south. Sound familiar? While everybody is wondering whether Rush and Rahm are going to have a death match in a mud pit, there is the potential that something much more dangerous could be in the making. Rush is just the sort of over-inflated ego to think that he COULD lead a revolution.

There's simply no way that I'm going to waste one minute of my life reading or listening to Rush Limbaugh. I would have paid good money NOT to have been at the CPAC meeting where he delivered this speech.

I hope He Who Must Not Be Named paid the Los Angeles Times handsomely (in silver, perhaps) for this charming pile of steaming bovine feces. I now feel unclean. What can clean my eyes? If Louis Farrakhan had a "special message" for the L A Times, would you publish it? How about Kim Jong Il's "special message" or one from President Bashir of the Sudan or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or other equals of He Who Must Not Be Named?

Thanks for printing this. You are one of the few honest voices at the LAT. If the paper had been more balanced like this in the past, I and countless others would not have canceled.

As for Rush, I think he's entertaining and smart, and as a former Democrat find myself agreeing with him on principle more and more.

Why would you give this hate mongering , drug addict, traitor all of this space in your paper? He is nothing but a right wing nut who spews hate and prays for our nation to fail! He should be pulled off of the PUBLIC airwaves and put in jail for his illegal activities.
Shut up Rush! You sicken most Americans with your greed and hatred.

One of the most accomplished demagogues ever. Master of the straw man, ad hominem, etc., and propped up by a legitimately effective sense of humor. The better we are at thinking for ourselves, the less damage he can do...

I commend Rush for daring to speak his mind. Opposing Obama's socialism and destruction of wealth and capitalism is not unpatriotic. Rush dares to take the heat, and whether or not you agree with him, he should be heard and praised for his courage. Three to four years from now, (remember Madoff), the Dow stands at 1,000, all wealth and spirit of this country having been destroyed, once the people realizes that Obama gets nothing to show for the trillions and trillions of hand-out money to boost welfare and the unions (which are Obama's constituency), when the day of reckoning is due, high unemployment and sinking economy reign supreme, due to the total dependence on federal hand-outs, (remember Western Europe), then people will remember Rush who now dares to speak his mind by saying "I told you so." Bush's "War on Terror" has been replaced by the Obama's War on Capitalists. The war weary investors are leaving the market, because they don't buy the "hope and change" agenda of an Obama who is hell-bent on killing enterpreneurship, hard work and risk-taking by pandering to the culture of victimization and creating a permanent welfare class.

In your punchy and enjoyable introduction you said:
"Which is dandy with Rush because, hey, if you want to attract a crowd anywhere, start a fight. Right?"

I thought, as reported by other major news outlets, that President Obama and his team actually planned and launched the attack. Your sentence above clouds a pretty clear point.

That Limbaugh enjoys being targeted is not in doubt, the more interesting question (as you touch on) is why the White House chose to "attract a crowd...start a fight."

Was the speech in print 100% without distortions?

Does that windbag have to use the whole damn page? He is really into himself. By the way, I didn't read it. I just scrolled down to where I could respond. Why should I waste my time reading his useless garbage?

Obama is using Limbaugh as a shield to force other Republlicans to reject Limbaugh in favor of Obama to help provide cover. Once the economy is destroyed a couple of years from now, Obama can claim that it was a "bipartisan" effort. Perhaps the Obama administration knows what the market already knows, that its policies of redistributing wealth are destroying the economy, and is concerned about reckoning days two years from now. Mr. Limbaugh is the Madoff Whistleblower that Obama wants to shut off at any cost, since two years from now the populace that elected Mr. Obama will wake up from its slumber and face the end of federal stimulus with worse unemployment, rotten housing prices and trillions and trillions of money down the porkulus gutter - exactly what the radio host Limbaugh has been screaming all along. Hence the Obama paranoia against a purported fringe figure when wealth and entrepreneurship are destroyed, and the economy is sinking. Mr. Limbaugh has won the prize for Madoff whistleblowing.

blah blah blah blah... i thought there was something wrong with my comp as i was scrolling down through that mess, it kept repeating over and over and over.


"because we're effective."

Effective at what? Running up the national deficit, dividing the country with false wedge issues and lining the pockets of the defense industry with needless wars?

Oh yeah the GOP is good at all three of those.

You're such a disgusting Rush supporter. Typical old white man.

President Lincoln said, "Whether a nation can survive, half slave and half free."
President Johnson said, "Whether the nation can surive half slave and half freebie."
President Obama said, "Whether the nation can survive freebie."
The Nation is collapsing. Ameica is a "tax slave nation" where the government decides who is "deserving" of government alms and who must slave to pay..

Thanks Andrew for your non biased report, yeah right, NOT! I'm so sick of seeing obvious - shout it from the rooftop, I'm a Democrat - style of reporting. It's funny how the majority of our media is run by democrats. Even while Obama is destroying our country and fast, you still hang on every word he says and even more amazing, believe him!!!

Nothing new here -- just the same old bait and switch. We saw this game plan under Clinton. It works like this:

1.) Install in the White House an immoral, slightly left of center politician who is considered "a man of the people", but who in fact really works for the corporations and the wealthy ruling class.

2.) Have Rush Limbaugh raise a "Red Scare" and brand the newly installed President as a "Communist", a "Socialist", "pinko", etc. It doesn't even have to be true because this is about buzz words folks.

3.) After everyone is convinced that the newly installed President is a Communist threat, a lot of business-friendly legislation which benefits only the super wealthy is rolled out. No one even sees what's going on because they are so panicked about the Red Menace in the White House.

4.) The newly installed President signs pro-business, pro-wealthy legislation and the general populace still doesn't get it.

5.) Repeat.

This is exactly what happened under Clinton and it's happening again. And why? Because Americans are so primitive and tribal, and they love being in this fight of the right vs. the left. In fact, they're addicted to it, like a bunch of drunks who can't keep themselves from going back into the barroom.

I think Rush is great! If you listen to his show regularly you would know that the pompous comments are meant to be funny and that he actually is a humble, even self-conscience man who has a difficult time accepting compliments from callers. That said, there is nothing 'outrageous' about what Rush says in his speech. He is a conservative expressing those ideals very clearly. We conservatives can only wish that our elected officials who claim to be conservative would follow suit and stop apologizing for their beliefs. We need them now more than ever!

I'm a republican and I didn't vote for Obama. But I have to admit I'm selfish and I hope I can get one of the new govt sponsored refinancings. It's my own fault we didn't sell our house when the price was much higher, I also gambled away my line of credit (100k!). Now that the federal govt owns Fannie Mae, I might get a 2% loan. I know that taxpayers (me and my children included) will end up paying for my mistakes, but why shouldn't I get a free slice of the pie? Many others are too! I know in the long run its very bad for the country but I can't change that. Once I get my refi I will rent the house out and try to structure my financial life so I pay the very least amount of taxes possible- so many of Obamas advisers, including the Secretary of the Treasury, have avoided their personal taxes. This country's future is not bright and I need to protect myself and my family. Also I will buy some gold because of the inflation that is coming- so much money has been printed by the government we are going to have hyper-inflation just watch. Money will become worthless. All we be equal- equally poor.

Whatever else you might say or think about Rush Limbaugh the man is a populist straight out of the late 19th century. Think William Jennings Bryant and the Cross of Gold speech. What it really comes down to is a belief that the rights of the individual always trump the rights of the community of individuals. In the arena of ideas only Limbaugh's ideas are good and noble. Whether "liberal" or "conservative", any one person setting themselves as the sole arbiter of the worthiness of all ideas smacks of McCarthyism. Conservatism needs a better spokesman

Wow. As if the LAT wasn't in bad enough financial straights, the server bill from publishing this moron's epic rant will surely sink this paper once and for all.

 
1 2 3 | »

Connect

Recommended on Facebook


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

About the Columnist
A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Andrew Malcolm has served on the L.A. Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four. Read more.
President Obama
Republican Politics
Democratic Politics


Categories


Archives
 



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists: