Barack Obama and the Abraham Lincoln comparison
It was bound to happen.
The new man in the Oval Office, the first African American president in American history, came to office just weeks before the 200th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln, whose Emancipation Proclamation freed blacks from slavery. So many in the media, academia and political world have been drawing parallels.
In celebrations throughout this Presidents Day weekend, President Obama acknowledged that the 44th president owes something to the 16th. As Obama said Thursday night in Springfield, Ill.:
It's a humbling task, marking the bicentennial of our 16th president's birth -- humbling for me in particular because it's fair to say that the presidency of this singular figure who we celebrate in so many ways made my own story possible.
There are, in fact, some parallels. Both had distant fathers and were raised in families of few means. Both had curiosity, devouring studies. Both became lawyers and settled in Illinois. Both got their start in Illinois state politics, served only a short time in Congress and upset political giants in their long-shot bids for the presidency. Lincoln narrowly bested William H. Seward and Obama, well, remember Hillary Rodham Clinton? Funny thing is, both Seward and Clinton were U.S. senators from New York.
Of course for many, the singular comparison is that both Lincoln and Obama are marvelous orators, given to soaring rhetoric that can lift a nation at a time of war and economic hardship.
So CNN might be forgiven for morphing their faces, the six-degree-of-separation thing. Take a look.
And it was probably inevitable that some reporter would ask White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs whether the CNN photo meld was stretching the parallels too far.
MR. GIBBS: I'd love editorial control of one of the cable networks, if that's -- (laughter.) No, look, I -- look, I think as the president said today, we're all -- we all each day live with -- in a society because of many of the tough and courageous decisions that President Lincoln had to make a long time ago. But this president isn't seeking to compare himself with I think what many believe is one of the two or three greatest presidents that this country has ever had. There are decisions and stresses that President Lincoln faced that I think many would hope aren't faced by many of our presidents as we go forward.
I mean, there are parallels I think that make it hard for some to ignore: the Illinois factor, spending roughly the same amount of time in Springfield and the same amount of time in Congress. But I don't -- I think the parallels don't go a whole lot beyond that.
Gibbs also disclosed that Obama gave him "this spiffy new penny," a commemorative coin showing Lincoln's log cabin. Gibbs said his 5-year-old son Ethan is "fairly obsessed now" with studying the presidents.
When we walked into the Oval Office when he was in the White House about a week and a half ago, we were looking into the president's study and he says, "Dad, that's John Quincy Adams." And I said, "Are you sure?" And he says, "Dad, he was the sixth president of the United States." So he's ahead of me on the presidents stuff.
Read the text of Obama's speech on Lincoln at the Capitol below.
-- Johanna Neuman
Register here for Twitter alerts on each new Ticket item. RSS feeds are available over here. And we're now on Kindle as well.
Photo credit: Craig Harman / Associated Press
February 12, 2009
Remarks of President Barack Obama, Lincoln Bicentennial Celebration, United States Capitol
It is an honor to be here -- a place where Lincoln served, was inaugurated, and where the nation he saved bid him a last farewell. As we mark the bicentennial of our 16th President’s birth, I cannot claim to know as much about his life and works as many of those who are also speaking today, but I can say that I feel a special gratitude to this singular figure who in so many ways made by own story possible -- and who in so many ways made America’s story possible.
It is fitting that we are holding this celebration here at the Capitol. For the life of this building is bound ever so closely to the times of this immortal President. Built by artisans and craftsmen, immigrants and slaves – it was here, in the rotunda, that union soldiers received help from a makeshift hospital; it was downstairs, in the basement, that they were baked bread to give them strength; and it was in the Senate and House chambers, where they slept at night, and spent some of their days.
What those soldiers saw when they looked on this building was a very different sight than the one we see today. For it remained unfinished until the end of the war. The laborers who built the dome came to work wondering whether each day would be their last; whether the metal they were using for its frame would be requisitioned for the war and melted down into bullets. But each day went by without any orders to halt construction, and so they kept on working and kept on building.
When President Lincoln was finally told of all the metal being used here, his response was short and clear: that is as it should be. The American people needed to be reminded, he believed, that even in a time of war, the work would go on; that even when the nation itself was in doubt, its future was being secured; and that on that distant day, when the guns fell silent, a national capitol would stand, with a statue of freedom at its peak, as a symbol of unity in a land still mending its divisions.
It is this sense of unity, this ability to plan for a shared future even at a moment our nation was torn apart, that I reflect on today. And while there are any number of moments that reveal that particular side of this extraordinary man -- that particular aspect of his leadership -- there is one I’d like to share with you today.
In the war’s final weeks, aboard Grant’s flagship, the River Queen, President Lincoln was asked what was to be done with the rebel armies once General Lee surrendered. With victory at hand, Lincoln could have sought revenge. He could have forced the South to pay a steep price for their rebellion. But despite all the bloodshed and all the misery that each side had exacted upon the other, no Confederate soldier was to be punished, Lincoln ordered.
They were to be treated, as he put it, “liberally all round.” All Lincoln wanted was for Confederate troops to go back home and return to work on their farms and in their shops. He was even willing, he said, to “let them have their horses to plow with and … their guns to shoot crows with.”
That was the only way, Lincoln knew, to repair the rifts that had torn this country apart. It was the only way to begin the healing that our nation so desperately needed. For what Lincoln never forgot, not even in the midst of civil war, was that despite all that divided us -- north and south, black and white -- we were, at heart, one nation and one people, sharing a bond as Americans that could not break.
And so even as we meet here today, at a moment when we are far less divided than in Lincoln’s day, but when we are once again debating the critical issues of our time -- and debating them fiercely -- let us remember that we are doing so as servants to the same flag, as representatives of the same people, and as stakeholders in a common future.
That is the most fitting tribute we can pay -- and the most lasting monument we can build -- to that most remarkable of men, Abraham Lincoln. Thank you. ###




How and why are comparrisons being made between Lincoln and Obama? Lincoln united this country during very difficult times while Obama has only promised to unite. If he is able yo unite us (legally; without trampling further on our rights) then make the comparisons at such time; until then it is both a dis-service to Mr. Lincoln and a further embarressment to the biased media to be doing so
Posted by: Russ Miller, Ft. Worth, Tx. | February 13, 2009 at 08:12 AM
Obama has done nothing yet as President to compare him to Lincoln or any US President for that matter. Lets hope that Obama's skills as a war-time President are not tested to the level of severity as was Lincoln's.
Posted by: BubbaRight | February 13, 2009 at 08:12 AM
How would Obama and his band of delusionists like the comparison if they knew enough about history to understand that Lincoln was the original proponent of sending blacks back to Africa?
I guess time does heal all wounds.
Posted by: CWS | February 13, 2009 at 08:31 AM
Most commentators miss a significant contrast: Lincoln was driven by an idea that functioned as a north star in his decision making. The idea was not pragmatically arrived at. It was a deduction from his understanding of what was really real. "The truth that all men are created equal" held him on course through the greatest troubles in our history. President Obama often scoffs at ideologies, often promises to do what is pragmatic here and now. Pragmatic ideas aren't big enough for hard times. They are too open to compromise at the critical moments.
Posted by: Robert Overgaard | February 13, 2009 at 08:33 AM
OK, now I'm freaked!
The Press Secretary says " I'd love editorial control of one of the cable networks, " after the Prisident singles out a talk show host for criticism.
I know the First Amendment protects the media, but the blatant stated desire to not just shape, but state the news so early in an Administration is chilling. I know every President, including Lincoln, has had the same secret desires, but the folks running the White House now are right out front about it.
They are smart, driven leaders and I can't figure out why they are jeapardizing their credibility like this. If you want to win over the 47% that didn't vote for you, wouldn't you think you'd give witty, factual answers to hostile questions rather than obviously silencing those queries?
Posted by: Tom Mariner | February 13, 2009 at 08:36 AM
Comparing Obama to Lincoln is a gratuitous exercise is leftist fawning. It makes me want to puke.
I can only hope that Obama doesn't emulate Lincoln's killing or severly maiming a million people to keep the Union together when the inevitable split between ascending Euro-social-democracy is confronted by those of us who demand liberty over kum ba yah collectivism.
Posted by: R U Kidding | February 13, 2009 at 08:39 AM
You got to be kidding, there is no comparison.
Posted by: WTF | February 13, 2009 at 08:44 AM
Comparing Obama to Lincoln is premature, despite any number of superficial parallels -- but we can always hope.
When is the last time that greatness inhabited the White House? Was it Reagan, whose "supply side" idea was the first act of Bush's economic tragedy? Was it Kennedy, whose too-short tenure nonetheless set the stage for the Vietnam tragedy? Arguably FDR was great, though the right still reviles him as communist.
Meanwhile, America has become obese in body and mind: litigioius, selfish, thin-skinned, insecure, risk-averse and full of roid-rage ruthlessness and righteousness.
So it is time -- past time -- for a truly great leader to return to America its true self, its true values and virtues. Barack Obama may be that leader; he may not be -- but we had better hope that he is, for it is late in the day and time is short.
Posted by: Griffin Anderson | February 13, 2009 at 09:05 AM
Obama cannot be more UNLIKE Abe Lincoln! Dear lord, the irony of how DISSIMILAR they are is astounding. Lincoln much more resembles Bush in terms of what he did and how unpopular he was in his own time. In fact, he was considered a war monger for the Civil War, and those most against him were the outspoken "Peace Democrats" or "Copperheads" (look it up on Wikipedia) who virulently opposed him in the media, which they largely controlled. These copperheads were northerners who wanted to appease the southerners who wanted their "freedom." (The freedom to own slaves, that is). Bush, I mean Lincoln, did not allow the terrorists, I mean southerners - their FREEDOM. Instead, he did what was rather unpopular, but what also what was right. If Obama was a white man back then, believe me - he would have been a Copperhead.
Posted by: Copperhead | February 13, 2009 at 10:25 AM
The Emancipation Proclamation did NOT free blacks from slavery; this is a common myth about Saint Lincoln. The Proclamation merely purported to free slaves in territories in rebellion and specifically excluded sections of Louisiana and other Confederate states which were then under Union control. The Emancipation Proclamation was a publicity stunt, a sop to the abolitionists, nothing more.
Posted by: logicprobe | February 13, 2009 at 10:38 AM
No contest.
No way.
Not even fair.
Obama wins the 'Barack vs. Honest Abe Showdown' hands down.
How many Time magazine covers did Lincoln rack up during his lifetime? ZERO!
Who's logged more miles? THAT'S RIGHT! (Heck, Lincoln wouldn't know a '4-door' from "four score ...")
Michelle vs Mary Todd? COME ON -- NO COMPETITION! (Michelle = Vogue; Mary Todd = Popular Mechanics.)
Finally, who would you put your money on if they squared off on a basketball court? Barack would hit the fool with a cross-over, drive low, throw a 'bow, and go facial on him. WHO'S YOUR DADDY ... BOO-YA!!!
Get ready. President Obama is taking on all challengers.
Bring it.
Come on.
We're talking to you Jefferson ... you to Washington ... hey, Roosevelt, get up out of that chair and strap 'em on ... it's 'go' time.
Posted by: siddhartha | February 13, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Lincoln was a great leader and a man of noble character! We have yet to know what kind of man Barrack Obama is!!!!!
Stop the comparison, let history decide this one!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: steve rodriguez | February 13, 2009 at 08:29 PM
The Blacks of Lincoln's day loved and respected him!!!
It would be 100 years before anyone even came close to impacting Black America like Lincoln did!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: steve rodriguez | February 13, 2009 at 08:32 PM
Let's not confuse what's going on in the White House right now with the great Statesman Abraham Lincoln. Never would Lincoln offer up such a sophomoric schoolyard phrase like "We won." as an answer to a serious dilemma. Lincoln was a true Statesman - know the difference.
Posted by: Superpower | February 14, 2009 at 01:28 PM