Supreme Court today deliberates suit blocking Obama presidency
(UPDATE: The Supreme Court had issued no statement on its discussions by the close of business Friday.)
It may come as something of a shock to those millions planning trips to Washington for the Jan. 20 inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama that he isn't really legally capable of taking the oath.
It's the birth certificate thing. And we have a tendentious video below to show the kind of claims being made that he is not a "native-born" American.
That's because he was born in Kenya to an alien father and isn't a natural-born American as the Constitution requires and the copy of his Hawaii birth certificate looks fake to many and the state won't release the original, which makes everything that much more suspicious.
This controversy has been brewing for many months online with few taking it seriously. The Ticket wrote about it last June and again in August.
We published a birth certificate provided by the Oba
ma presidential campaign, which has caused hundreds of commenters to argue back and forth over its authenticity, especially in recent weeks.
And we'll publish it again right here.
Crackpot controversy, you say. He's been accepted as a U.S. citizen.
But here's the thing: The United States Supreme Court officially takes up the issue of whether to ponder whether Obama can become president in formal discussions today in Washington.
What? Yup! A similar case was thrown out earlier this fall, but Justice Clarence Thomas distributed the legal papers in Donofrio vs. Wells to his court colleagues for legal conference today.
Hardly anyone thinks the case has a serious chance of ...
... succeeding, given the court's distaste for hanging chads and public disfavor for its involvement in settling the Al Gore-George W. Bush presidential contest over Florida in 2000.
Similar conspiracy efforts were mounted over John McCain having been born in a U.S. naval hospital in the Panama Canal Zone, where his father was stationed. They too might well have proceeded had the Arizonan won on Nov. 4.
But just think what would happen if the court did consider blocking Obama's inauguration, with the world already having congratulated him and Obama's Cabinet half-formed, not to mention him already having resigned from the Senate. Oops.
You'll note that Sens. Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton have not yet taken that irreversible step. Just saying.
Our blogging colleague Frank James over at the Swamp has pulled together considerable material on the controversy:
The suit originally sought to stay the election, and was filed on behalf of Leo Donofrio against New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells.
Legal records show it is only the tip of an iceberg of nationwide efforts seeking to derail Obama's election over accusations that he either wasn't born a U.S. citizen or that he later renounced his citizenship in Indonesia.
In one of those delicious ironies that makes life so interesting, the justice who distributed the case to his colleagues was none other than Thomas, only the second African American to sit on the high court. One presumes the justices saw some legal issue to mull.
A recent Tribune story wrote: "The most famous case questioning Obama's citizenship was filed in Pennsylvania in August on behalf of Philip J. Berg and sought to enjoin the Democratic National Committee from nominating Obama.
"The U.S. Supreme Court declined to accept the case. Earlier, a federal judge rejected it for "lack of standing" -- ruling that Berg had no legal right to sue. In cases like this, judges sometimes believe the matter is best left to political institutions, such as the Electoral College or Congress, according to legal scholar Eugene Volokh of the University of California at Los Angeles."
The remaining case with the highest profile is Donofrio vs. Wells. Because it was distributed by Justice Thomas to other justices, it gained undue importance for people unschooled in how the court works, Volokh said.
But it was. Now come the court's discussions. And presumably some decision on deciding.
James has more on this much-ignored story over here.
--Andrew Malcolm
Speaking of the Obama Cabinet and inauguration, we'll have full Ticket coverage. To get cellphone alerts on each new item, register here. RSS feeds are also available here.
Photo credit: Family via Associated Press









THe "birth certificate" the times and the rest of the pro Obama media produce all the time is not a birth certificate at all. It is an abstract. Obama has not produced a real long form birth certificate. This is the rub. Why? I am well into my 40's and I found an abstract I requested in my 20's and my long form birth certificate in about 20 minutes.
Why won't Obama produce his?
Posted by: john Smart | December 06, 2008 at 07:49 PM
I am shocked and disappointed by the reactions posted by some Obama supporters. Name calling, such as "racist, "nazi", "lunatic fringe", and casting of unproven and unjustified dispersions upon President Bush and his administration just does't cut it. The race card was played out during the O.J. murder trial, and although he was aquitted, many people still believe justice was not served in the manner the trial was conducted, the jury was selected, and the verdict rendered ! Furthermore, from the evidence of the actual postings on this blog, many people feel in their hearts that Obama, even though receiving the great majority of popular votes, is still required to comply with the election laws on the books at the time of the election, and should not be given extraordinary privileges due to his race, political popularity, or perceived leadership ability. After all, Obama's first responsibilty as president elect is, according to Obama himself, to obtain the confidence of the U.S. citizenry, whether or not they voted for the Obama-Biden ticket. Going back in recent history, we can observe the divisive and damaging effects of secrecy and coverups regarding the U.S. Presidency! Have we learned the lessons of Watergate, and the Clinton Impeachment proceedings, or are we doomed to repeat them in the 21st century, through negligence, in failing to address in a timely manner impropriety and illegality in regard to Presidential election laws???
Posted by: Charles Rappaport | December 06, 2008 at 08:09 PM
This is all you need to know:
There are two documents.
The document displayed her is a "certificate of live birth" which is basically a printout on state stationary. It is not the birth certificate signed by the doctor (with the little foot prints).
There are two documents. The one everyone wants to see and the one displayed here which in a defensive move (chess) was sent to Annenburg's FactCheck.org, a website set up to defend Democrats from "swift boat" attacks.
So the Obama camp has chosen to let this matter go to the Supreme court (which installed Georg Bush) rather than just release his birth certificate. Again, the one displayed here is a computer printout of the information in the database on official state paper and is probably a month old.
Get it now? Two documents, the real one and the computer print out. Try to see through all of the lawyer generated noise. Its really simple. Obama shows birth certificate (with the foot prints) and all of this goes away.
And I'm a Democrat who voted for the Green Party this around and I approve this message.
Posted by: Edward Rynearson | December 06, 2008 at 09:06 PM
Doncha just love the "get over it" crowd, presumably the same as the MorOn.org crowd, who just want to get on with our lives? These are the same clowns who've done nothing but squeal like Ned Beatty about the last 8 years, their colossal failures in 00 & o4 etc. over the last several months.
When it comes to holding liberals to any standards, we're all supposed to ignore it and "get on with our lives".
Posted by: Rob S. | December 06, 2008 at 09:36 PM
The best thing the Supreme Court could do for the country would be to address this case, and those related, on its merits, which are nonexistent except in the fertile imaginations of a bunch of right-wing nutjobs. The only real question is whether the Court has the power to address the merits of the case, given the obvious Constitutional merits as to standing, etc.
Posted by: tom | December 06, 2008 at 10:14 PM
To the Wise One and Paul: Hawaii accepts registration of births in other states and foreign countries. If you read the official press release by the officials of Hawaii all they assert is they have seen Obama's original birth certificate and they have it on file. They did not state where he was born or assert that he was native born. The press and Obama's operatives misstated what the state of Hawaii said to make it sound as if the state confirmed he was born in Hawaii. The state did not and has not confirmed where he was born.
Posted by: mike | December 06, 2008 at 10:24 PM
To Hawkeyeted: Berg put the DNC on notice before the convention of his concerns that Obama was not a natural born American. Berg is a life long democrat and former chairman of the Montgomery Co democratic party. The DNC ignored him. Berg then file suit. Instead of disclosing Obama's original birth certificate, DNC and Obama attorneys fought Berg in federal court arguing he did not have standing to sue Obama for not being a natural born citizen. Odd behavior for someone who claims he is a natural born citizen. Why fight on procedural issues? Why fight at all? It would have been easier to show his original birth certificate, if he was born in Hawaii.
To others: Fact Check.org and Snopes proved nothing other than a total lack of objectivity.
I personally hope Obama was born in Hawaii, but I also hope the Supreme Curt takes up Berg's case so the facts can be determined. If he's not a natural born citizen, the leaders of the DNC and Obama should be held accountable for the massive fraud the have perpetrated upon the American people. What an insult to the memory of those who have given their lives in defense of the constitution a fraud of this nature would be. If he is natural born, it will be easy enough for Obama to prove. All he has to do is produce his original birth certificate showing he is a natural citizen. Unfortunately, my gut instincts tell me he can't produce one because he isn't a natural born citizen of the USA.
If we ignore the constitutional requirements for election to the country's highest office, what part of the constitution will we ignore next, the bill of rights?
Posted by: mike | December 06, 2008 at 10:54 PM
Why doesn't the FBI or CIA investigate this matter? Are you saying that they too are in the coverup?
Posted by: nicha | December 07, 2008 at 04:42 AM
The truth can be easily verified by looking at Obama's mother's passport.
If Obama was born in Kenya, he would have been added to his mother's passport in order for him to have been brought in to the U.S.
Posted by: No Yb | December 07, 2008 at 06:50 AM
Leo Denofrio, who's case is now in front of SCOTUS has challenged the legality of three candidates that appeared on the New Jersey ballot for U.S. president: Democrat Barack Obama, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers Party candidate Roger Calero.
You think a person must of already been vetting to even be on the ballot?...... that there are checks and balances?
Roger Calero was born in Nicaragua, and NOT even a citizen; he is here on green card. Yet he shows up on the ballot in 5 states.....
The SCOTUS will hear this case mark my words if no other reason than the fraud of the constitution of Calero being on the ballot. If one party named has to produce documents then all the parties named will have to produce......
BO has ADMITTED dual citizenship until he was 21..... that equals not qualified.
Think this should of came out sooner?...... blame the media. We have been emailing, posting, trying to have this brought to light BEFORE the election.
Posted by: Jack | December 07, 2008 at 08:20 AM
The certificate shown was computer generated and refers to race as "African American". At the time of his birth that term was NOT used. It would have stated "Black". Too many discrepencies to just accept. I would love to hear Obama deposed under oath. Now that would be a real circus.
Posted by: Onslow | December 07, 2008 at 09:03 AM
Tom, I guess I am what you call a right wing nut job because I do not want to risk the chaos that will ensue if a Constitutionally ineligible individual perjures himself upon the taking of the oath of office. Because Obama has three law firms fighting the lawsuits demanding he produce his vault copy long form birth certificate, rather than simply producing it, one reasonably concludes he is NOT eligible. No reasonable man would go to such lengths to avoid showing the proof of what he himself has asserted.
Posted by: Stan | December 07, 2008 at 10:24 AM
To Tom: I agree with you. the best thing the Court could do is hear the case so doubt as to his eligibility to be president can be eliminated, if he is eligible. Berg raises some good arguments that were put forth to the court in the Gore Bush fiasco to give him standing. Regardless, Alan Keyes certainly has standing. His case is currently wending its way through the court system to, I am sure, the Supreme Court. He points to the same evidence that Berg puts forth in his suit. If the Court doesn't hear Berg's case based solely on standing, they will hear it later based on standing.
The Supreme Court isn't required to accept any case for hearing. But I can't imagine any case that has clearer constitutional issues of as great a national importance than this one.
I pray the Court grants writ of certiorari in Berg v. Obama to maintain the integrity of our constitution. We must never allow our constitution to be trivialized.
Posted by: mike | December 07, 2008 at 11:57 AM
Thanks, Andrew, for making sure we'll see THIS paragraph credited to the "LA Times" for years to come and cited as "proof" that Obama is not a citizen:
"That's because he was born in Kenya to an alien father and isn't a natural-born American as the Constitution requires and the copy of his Hawaii birth certificate looks fake to many and the state won't release the original, which makes everything that much more suspicious."
Good job, pal.Good job.
Posted by: KS2 Problema | December 07, 2008 at 12:29 PM
Bush has been wiping his feet on the Constitution for 8 years, and the right wing nutjobs haven't let our a peep. Suddenly they're strict Constitutionalists waving the Constitution and screaming about things they didn't care about when it was Panama John on the line. How stupid, how bizarre, how ignorant...how Republican.
Posted by: laraine | December 07, 2008 at 12:34 PM
This is in reference to charles townsends comment that barack obama has more moral charcter and fiber that this country has seen...Mr. Townsed, with all due respect, you are an idiot!!! With the overwhelming evidence that obama has displayed in refusing to produce his original birth certificate should be evidence enough to any logical rational human being that obama is not only a liar and a thief, he has displayed the poorest character and a total lack of genuine fiber inasmuch that no thinking american could ever have an ounce of believability or trust in this man..Obviously u have been fooled by the con!!!!
Posted by: william olson | December 07, 2008 at 12:38 PM
I am so glad to see a few newspaper articles following this court case.
Of course the anchor on msnbc couldn't keep a straight face while telling it.
To the author above who asked the question regarding on parent being a US citizen.
In this case at the time of his birth she would have been 18 years old. The law at the time stated she needed to be 14 years old plus 5 years to be considered a citizen. She did not meet the qualification that is why this whole case is taking place.
Also when he was in Indonisia his papers stated he was a citizen of that country in order to go to school. There have been no follow up documents supporting the fact that he changed his citizenship to a US citizen.
He traveled abroad on a passport to a country that the US was allowing no US citizens to travel to.
The man reeks of dishonesty.
He could have laid this whole thing to rest in one swift move of producing the original live birth record.
Who in their right mind spends over 1 mil. to keep theirbirth records a secret??????????????? No one but a liar.
Just my opinion.
Posted by: Bev | December 07, 2008 at 01:36 PM
Claims that the US Constitution does not recognize a person born with dual citizenship as a "natural born citizen" are unfounded. The US Constitution does not say anything whatsoever on this issue.
It does state “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President”.
The reason for the distinction between natural born citizens and those who were citizens of the US at the time of the adoption of the constitution was NOT because the framers had dual citizenship at the time of their birth. They were British citizens/subjects at the time of their birth. The US did not exist at the time of their birth, thus neither did US soil, and thus no one born in America prior to the formation of the United States could be considered a natural born US citizen.
Posted by: SteveC | December 07, 2008 at 02:04 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Any person could be brought into the United States after being born in another Country, family having lived in Hawaii would be eligible to register for a COLB issuance showing birth in Hawaii even if it was KENYA. Why no one in State, Federal or any Agency did a background investigation on then Senator Barack Hussein Obama is an ERROR which must be addressed immediately and the ability to FOOL 66 MILLION PEOPLE AS VOTER'S should be stopped forever.
America MAY INDEED FIND ITSELF UNDER ATTACK December 8, 2008 if the U.S. Supreme Court fails to do anything and Congress FAILS TO CHALLENGE OBAMA BEFORE THE ELECTORIAL COLLEGE IN TIME TO PREVENT OBAMA BEING SWORN IN IF HE INDEED WAS BORN IN KENYA. Once this swearing in is DONE then apparently there is no ability to REVERSE THE DECISION.
Who besides me have sent signed letters and e-mails plus faxes to the Members of Congress, DOJ, FBI, Secret Service, President and other Government Officials calling for a FULL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION AND ARREST AND PROTECTIVE CUSTODY FOR THE OBAMA FAMILY until this matter is confirmed one way or the other ???
Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr.
backflow.prevention@verizon.net
Posted by: Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr. A Decorated American Veteran | December 07, 2008 at 08:31 PM
For those who say this is ridiculous, I ask one question. Where is our much far left media when a major story like this breaks? My God it is in the Supreme Courts hands right now and NONE of the media channels including FOX have picked up this story. What are they afraid of and why are so many people saying to leave it alone. If he doesn't qualify he doesn't qualify. Are we not done with the entitlement mentality in this country yet? I don't care who riots over this, we better uphold the US Constitution or else our Presidents can do what ever they want. Thats right Clinton already purged himself and never served a single day in jail.
Posted by: Walter Jerome | December 07, 2008 at 09:30 PM
There are two documents. I think that's what is causing so much confusion.
The document Obama provided is displayed above. It is the "certification of live birth". It is a print out of data on state stationery. It is "printed" out. It is simply the data stored in the state database printed out on official state stationery. The document Philip Berg and others are fighting to see is the "certificate of live birth" which is the document filled out and signed by the doctor when Obama was born. The Obama camp is fighting release of the later tooth and nail.
View both docs here:
http://www.radiodujour.com/people/berg_philip
There are also two cases at the supreme court. I'm more familiar with Philip Berg's case.
Posted by: R Dujour | December 07, 2008 at 10:26 PM
How sad are you people? First of all you say you shouldn't be called racist for being against him. But, how do you explain why this is such a big deal to you? The Bush government ignored and walked over the cons. plenty of times were ya'll crying then? Why do ya'll lovee with all your hearts now? Why aren't you on anti-bush blogs pointing out evertime he vailated it? Because it scares you, it scares you to death that you now have a black president. Don't worry he doesn't have a evil plan to destroy white america. He's not her for that, he just wants to help change this country for the better. And, the only reason Thomas Clearence is doing this is because ho owes President Bush.
Posted by: Shay | December 08, 2008 at 01:51 AM
I had a few hours recently of free time to review comments in the news and by readers.
Why does no one have anything good to say about Obama's side?? Most write "go back under the rock you came from" or the like, not too intelligent, but I assume this is written by unthinking Democrats or others who believe Farrakhan that Obama is anointed by God.
Others quote factcheck and snopes. Do people not know that factcheck is connected to Obama, run by the Annenberg Organization of infamy? Snopes basically just blindly relies on factcheck and Obama, not addressing the concerns of Obama's accusers.
If you BELIEVE that Obama is honestly eligible to be President, as a matter of faith, and you also think you are an honest and rational person, I'd suggest that you read up on the issue from sources like worldnetdaily and obamacrimes or search on Google for Obama birth certificate.
What bothers me is the coverup of the media and the failure of Obama to be straight-forward.
Posted by: Sam | December 08, 2008 at 06:13 AM
If there IS something in the constitution that conflicts with Obama's eligibility, it is some obsure and vague statement that carries little weight. This can easily be remedied. Obama came take a cue from McCain and have the pesky thing amended to eliminate the problem and we can all forget about it and move on. There you have it.
Posted by: sweetwater | December 08, 2008 at 06:44 AM
The "Certification of Live Birth" was all that was legally required by the 50 state election boards. Why should Obama keep jumping through a never ending series of hoops now (post election) for his political enemies extreme fringe? They will never be satisfied anyway.
Also to buy into this scam you'd have to beleive that we hold primaries in 50 states, hold elections in 50 states, spend a billion dollars and only THEN check the candidates qualifications.
This whole thing is nothing more than an excuse for bigots to oppose the POTUS for the next 4 years and still claim to be patriots.
Posted by: Mario | December 08, 2008 at 07:21 AM
The right-wing lunatic fringe is at it again with its delusional, la-la land theories. The lunatic fringe argues that Obama is not a "natural born citizen" (as art. II, sect 1 of the Constitution requires to be eligible for President) because his father allegedly had a dual citizenship. The correct response: irrelevant.
The constitution is often written with a broad-brush, as is the case here. Congress has filled in many of the details about "citizenship" in Title 8 of the U.S. Code. In particular, section 1401 of Title 8 (8 U.S.C. 1401) provides the legal definition of "Nationals and citizens of United States at birth: (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; " http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-.html
Folks, this section is the beginning and end of this ridiculous "controversy": Obama was indisputably born in the United States and therefore qualifies under section 1401(a) as a "citizens of United States at birth" and satisfies the requirements of Article II, sect. 1.
End of story. The Supreme Court will therefore deny the petition for cert.
Posted by: Ken | December 08, 2008 at 07:24 AM
Wow! It's harder for me to get Dish Network & a driver's license than it is for someone to run for president.
Posted by: jimb | December 08, 2008 at 07:37 AM
I have got to believe that Anne Dunham gave Barak a copy of his birth certificate when he went to High School in Honolulu or at the latest when he went to college....most moms do this, don't they?
All he has to do is get the birth certificate and give it to the Chairman of the Democrat party or to the court or both.
What is the big fuss?
Posted by: theolesarge | December 08, 2008 at 10:01 AM
Hawaiians applying for their state's "Home Lands" program are strongly encouraged by the Hawaiian government to submit the "original Certificate of Live Birth" instead of the "computer-generated Certification of Live Birth."The computer-generated form -- the same document President-elect Obama is using to defend his status as a natural born citizen -- is not sufficient for the Home Lands program. Quoting their website: "Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL."
It seems reasonable that the documentary requirements to substantiate holding the office of the President of the United States should be at least as stringent as the requirements for Hawaii's "Home Lands" program. Maybe Obama is not hiding anything. Maybe he is a natural born citizen. Maybe there is nothing embarrassing on the original Certificate of Live Birth. But that's precisely the point. If there is nothing out of order, produce the document. Why fight in court to keep the document in the dark?
Posted by: transparency needed | December 08, 2008 at 10:38 AM
The President of the United States, an Article II Legislative
position, is an appointed position by the President of the United
States of America. The President of the United States of America is
an Article VI President, an Executive position, an Electoral College
elected position. The President of the Article of Confederation, over
the United States of America, and over the United States is an
Electoral College elected position. There are actually three
Presidential positions.
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CONTROVERSEY HIDES GOVERNMENT SECRET
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, PRESIDENTS
Several lawsuits have been brought to prove that President Barack
Obama is not qualified to be President. The attorneys who have
brought these lawsuits have managed only to show how poorly they
understand presidential history and how the government actually works.
George Washington was not qualified to fill the Office of President
when he was elected on February 4, 1789, because he had not been a
resident within the United States for fourteen Years. Washington's
secret solution to the problem was to take the Office of President of
the United States because that Office had no requirements or term of
office.
Every President Elect has followed the precedent set by George
Washington and yet no one has figured out the impact on the
government. Nothing will prevent President Elect Barack Obama from
taking the oath of Office of President of the United States at noon
on January 20, 2009.
The bigger government secret will begin to slowly emerge from
America's shadowy past. There is no Constitution to bind the
President of the United States or the President of the United States
of America.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
www.edrivera.com
Posted by: Axenicet | December 08, 2008 at 12:25 PM
If a baseball player hits a homerun, 40,000 people leap for joy. If he missed touching first base, the catcher can throw him out. Ask George Brett of the KC Royals who had a hit in a playoff game, but was ruled out because he had too much pine tar on his bat.
How many times have we read where millions cheered a gold medalist in the Olympics only to learn later they cheated and had the gold medal taken away.
Just because millions cheered O, doesn't mean it is OK to break the rules (i.e the Constitution of the USA). This precident can lead to a bad president. The ends DO NOT justify the means.
The law still matters.
Posted by: No Free Lunch | December 08, 2008 at 02:16 PM
The first court in Virginia made the similar use of words to exclude black people born in America and thus began the institution of slavery in our country.
1670 Virginia Court ruling on the first slave in America.
"... was a negro, and by consequence an alien, and for that cause..." was not entitled to the right to own land or to be free from slavery.
Your words
That's because he was born in Kenya to an alien father and isn't a natural-born American as the Constitution requires.
It is obvious to me that there is more than a similarity of words in your passion here to prevent Obama from becoming president.
I am currently wondering where that passion for Constitutional integrity was when Bush trampled on it about half a dozen times. Where are the lawsuits you pushed preserving Habeus Corpus, or against the warrantless wiretap aspects of the Patriot Act, or the egregarious overreaching activitis of the vice president?
Natural-Born citizen means just that "naturally born" in the USA. He has at least one American parent and that is enough.
I love how anti-black ultra white ring... er right-wingers love to send the country into a path of destruction over a principle not worth pushing, BUT when principles requiring the INTEGRITY of our nation are at stake, these same yahoos will give us a "come on give me a break" attitude when those principles make conservatives merely inconvenienced financially. YOu know "come on, support our president anyway even though he lied and there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
You use the same terminology.
Posted by: David VeLar | December 08, 2008 at 04:39 PM
The Supreme court has ruled as have the lower courts in Pennsylvania and Washington .
The courts are satisfied with the birth certificate. The courts are satisfied with the affidavits of Hawaiian officials related to this matter.
Obama will be sworn in as president of the United States of America.
If you don't like it, too bad!
I haven't been happy about having George Bush as president. But that was how the American people voted, so that's how it was.
Now the tables have turned. Once again the American people have spoken. This time, the American people did not choose a republican to lead this country. The American people chose Obama. The Supreme court is upholding what the American people voted for.
All you conspiracy theorists can go and crawl back under your rocks and leave the rest of us to deal with the realities of every day living.
Posted by: Christella | December 09, 2008 at 03:08 AM
TO ALL OBAMA SUPPORTERS: today in Illinoios our Gov Rod Blagojevich was arrested on corruption charges. This is one of the charges that are claimed by the FBI, not tin hat nutcases.
--Senate Candidate 1: An adviser to president-elect Barack Obama whom Blagojevich thought was Obama's choice to replace him in the U.S. Senate, a description consistent with senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett. Blagojevich talked about getting a cabinet position or ambassadorship in exchange for naming this person to the post. Jarrett took herself out of the running in mid-November.
Who hands out cabinet positions? You might want to rethink your support for Obama. Remember all this was also a big conspiracy as well in the beginning but not any more because the FBI has it on tape. Is Obama involved? I guess we will find out cause these boys are gonna squeal like pigs when they see how much jail time they are going to get.
Posted by: John Wilson | December 09, 2008 at 04:40 PM
There were signs the continuing investigation could still involve Obama.
Taken straight from the posted story.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081210/ap_on_go_pr_wh/illinois_governor_analysis
Posted by: John Wilson | December 10, 2008 at 11:23 AM
I am no nutcase,if Obamas' Hawian Birth Certificate were genuine it would have a seal,, No seal not real..
His own family says he was born in Africa..
HE is the "Beast from the East" & will send us into the pits of Hades....
Posted by: Sharon | December 11, 2008 at 03:38 AM
just ignoring the facts and not comming forward with the info asked for ,causes me to believe that obamma is lieing.All of you keep saying ,get over it ,he won.Yes he did win .That is for sure,BUT,if he is illegal,he must drop out .If he ran for this election under fraudulent pretent he must be punished.JUST SHOW EVERY ONE THE PROOF.
NO ONE HIDES THE TRUTH UNLESS HES GUILTY!
Posted by: gaetano | December 12, 2008 at 02:58 AM
Obama fans, don't want to shock you but when Obama was running for his Senate senate, I was stationed in Hawaii. A friend, she was excited about this new senator candidate, told me he was born in Hawaii. During my visit at the hospital he claim he was born at, I did in fact looked up his mothers public record for birth in that period and could not find any. So I went to the second hospital and still could not find any record of his birth. Now I know you Obama fans are not going to believe this, but I know for a 'FACT' he was not born in Hawaii, because there was no "birth recordings" of his birth at any of these hospitals. Therefore unless he gets someone inside these hospitals to "develop" a birth recording then he has no proof of his birth in Hawaii. By the way if any of the "Obama Teams" staff try to contact me with threats, forget it, my affadavit along with my voice analyst is locked in a safe place. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DON'T BELIEVE ME, ESPECIALLY IF YOU LIVE IN HAWAII, I STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU LOOK YOURSELF. However, be careful because now there is a security group that is preventing any review now!! GOOD LUCK!!
Posted by: Vic | December 12, 2008 at 01:35 PM
Consider the date of the presented birth certificate. It is printed upon a 2001 revised edition. Therefore, where is the original application for the print copy. This is required for individuals to join the military, at least it was in 1983. Secondly, take what the constitution states into account. Do not make it state what it does not!
Therefore, your answer is evident.
Respectfully,
TLEE STEPHENS
Posted by: TLEE Stephens | December 12, 2008 at 04:42 PM
Here's an unexplored way to settle the dispute over Obama's birthplace and citizenship: Look through Stanley Ann Dunham's (Obama's deceased mother) personal effects to find her passport that covered 1961. (You do keep your old, expired passports don't you?). This passport would prove conclusively whether Stanley Ann Dunham was on Kenyan or American soil during August 4, 1961.
But why go through this trouble when Obama should be able to EASILY produce a bona fide birth certificate that names the Hawaiian hospital he was born at, thus PROVING CONCLUSIVELY that he was born in Hawaii -- on American soil -- as he steadfastly claimed? WHAT COULD BE SIMPLER?
Still, what if this passport cannot be found? Would suspicions arise that Obama had previously arranged to make this passport disappear? Guess who could easily stop these suspicions from arising in the first place?
I like to remind everyone that this issue concerning Obama's citizenship is NOT about Obama, but about the U. S. Constitution. And I don't care what he tells Oprah!
Posted by: Zinc_Hat_Wearer | December 19, 2008 at 01:01 AM
Zinc_Hat_Wearer wrote: "I like to remind everyone that this issue concerning Obama's citizenship is NOT about Obama, but about the U. S. Constitution."
I disagree. Just look at the blogs of the people who have created their own unique definition for "natural born citizen". It is ALL about Obama, and his supposed ties to radicals and his supposed plan to make the country socialist and how he MUST BE STOPPED. There have always been some racists and anti-immigrant groups who don't like the idea of the children of foreigners being citizens (heaven help us if one became president), but that is not what has turned a fringe smoldering wick into a forest fire.
The people pushing this issue would not be active if McCain (who has a more tenuous claim to being natural born than Obama) had won.
Posted by: Kevin | December 24, 2008 at 12:47 AM
The only reason dumb people think dumb things like this is B.S. is because they are dumb. If Hawaii said he was born there, then why not release his original birth certificate. He was born in Kenya. He is not eligible to be president and he is not qualified anyways. He was in the Senate for what three years, most of which he spent campaigning for president. Him being elected is like me going out for my CEO job at my company after working at an entry level job for two years. Just because I am part of the company, that doesn't mean I can run the whole thing. Get it?
Posted by: Steven Baldassari | December 29, 2008 at 12:11 PM
It seems like such a trivial little thing...a constitutional requirement? Hey....let's pretend like it just doesn't exist. Follow rules....? How dare you attempt to interrupt the Obama orgasm.
Posted by: John Mavis | January 12, 2009 at 08:26 PM
The bottom line is this - IF there is even the slightest question about one's citizenship in relation to any public office but certainly that of the Presidency, the Supreme Court should be doing everything in it's power to prove it one way or the other. If we start ignoring the Constitution now, on an issue as big as THIS, can you imagine what's next?
Posted by: Zeke | January 14, 2009 at 09:44 AM
Get over youself. The election is OVER.
This won't go anywhere and you know it.
Oh, yeah, Obama successfully frustrated
the COnsitution to win the Election and make
a mockeryi of it. Deversity put him over the topl
That if the will of a majority cannot be trusted
where there are diversified and conflicting
interests, it can be trusted nowhere.
Phyllis Kunz
Posted by: Phyllis Kunz | January 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM
If he is not a citizen he should not be our president. the same questions were asked about McCain and he produced his original birth certificate showing he was born to a military father on a military base (he is a citizen) end of story!...but Obama refuses to produce his original birth certificate..the Hawai certificate is not his original birth certificate...so what is he hiding...he could end this speculation by producing the certificate...I personally think all canidate should produce this before running for president...its a requirement to get a passport why not when wanting to control the whole country????
Posted by: Lily | January 27, 2009 at 10:48 PM
This man is spending millions of our childrens dollars. This bill is a fraud unles he produces the necessary documention to prove he is a Natural Born Citizen. Every day he is telling you how he is going to CHANGE things. But folks, God knows that this is a lie. He is changing things, for you and me and our country. He is taking away our freedom, our money our country. Please don;'t let him.
Posted by: Sherry | February 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM
if a baby born in USA from one usa citzen before one year of a birth already a usa citzen that child have the write to be consider usa natural born citzen and another parent a us national a green card holder under usa jurisfication
Posted by: DIANA | July 16, 2009 at 03:31 PM
I am fascinated by the wild imaginations on display here! The consensus seems to be that Obama was born in Kenya, while his mother was still in Hawaii . . . .
Any child born in the USA is entitled to be a US Citizen. Even the children of illegal aliens!
Posted by: Bianca | July 27, 2009 at 07:30 PM
What is Obama still doing in the presidential seat; I thought he would be impeached today and needs to be; NOW. He is despicable and we need to dump his whole crew. He is taking down America and we're just sitting here letting him do it....why???
Norm and Gae Thiel
Posted by: Norm and Gae Thiel | January 28, 2010 at 08:44 PM