McCain's 'Stop Sarah Palin' strategy working like a charm, polls show
Fresh evidence tonight that the brilliant McCain campaign strategy to lock away the political effervescence of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to stoke overconfidence among the nation's Democrats and set the stage for yet another improbable Arizona comeback is working exactly as planned.
For more than 10 days now the 44-year-old mother of five, who upset the ancient Republican establishment in Alaska two years ago by driving herself to campaign events and talking to pretty much any group that would h
ave her, has been cut off from normal Americans who watched her by the many millions give a spunky speech at the Republican National Convention and then overnight turned her name into seven of the top 10 search terms on Google.
But John McCain's strategists had a better idea than letting Palin be Palin. They set her up with TV reporters born to ask questions until they found some she couldn't answer.
No doubt the campaign's idea was to show the hockey mom was pretty much like any other American who couldn't recall Marbury vs. Madison if their cellphone depended on it.
Wait, come to think of it, the other vice presidential candidate didn't cite a famous Supreme Court case by name either. But never mind. We don't want to confuse the conventional Palin storyline.
So the pressure is even greater for Thursday night's sole vice presidential debate between Palin and Democrat Joe Biden, the senator from somewhere who wears his hair down pretty much all the time.
The Washington Post published a new poll this morning showing that six out of 10 Americans now see Palin's two years as governor of the largest state as insufficient experience to become president.
Almost half the voters polled expressed discomfort with McCain's age and, of those, 85% found Palin too inexperienced to take over. A third of those polled now say they're less likely to vote for McCain because of Palin. It's almost like a dream, it's working so well. A previous Times poll showed little Palin effect on female voters.
Our colleague Mark Silva over at the Swamp reports on a separate Pew Research Center poll that also shows this Hanoi strategy unfolding perfectly. Confidence in Palin's ability to lead has plummeted from 52% in early September before the imprisonment of Palin to 37% now.
It's not all good news though. The Pew poll finds 70% view Palin as down-to-earth, vs. only 55% for the gaffey guy who's been a yabbering senator with congressional perqs since Palin was eight years old.
Also discouraging for the McCain camp must be the finding of a new Marist Poll, described by the Swamp's same Silva. It reveals that while a plurality (45%) expect Biden to perform better in the debate and a majority (61%) expect him to show a greater understanding of issues, compared to Palin's 36% and 28%, nearly two out of three expect Palin to come across as more likeable, compared to Biden's measly 23% anticipated likeability.
To facilitate the latest McCain plunge into oblivion by Nov. 4, the hockey mom is clearly going to have to do something outrageous during the debate to drive down her likeability. Maybe talk innocently about hairplugs. Or let slip something about her home state being 279 times larger than, say, Delaware.
-- Andrew Malcolm
Don't forget to register at Twitter here to get instant alerts of all new Ticket items flashed straight to your cell.
Photo credit: Office of the Alaska Governor



It's a sad commentary on what conservative ideology has done to political discourse in this country when I can't be entirely sure if this article is from The Onion. But just in case Mr. Malcolm is serious, it's worth adding that the population of Delaware is 27% larger than that of Alaska (US Census Estimate for July 1, 2006). It's not all about size, sir. Unless you consider Gov. Palin to be 6 times more qualified as an executive than the Prime Minister of Britain, 3.7 times more qualified than Ronald Reagan when he was Governor of California, and over twice as qualified as Texas Governor George W. Bush. Though I could give you that last one, since zero doubled is still zero.
Posted by: JimAC | October 02, 2008 at 05:25 AM
Let's hope Mrs. Palin can effectively multitask between planning the wedding of her pregnant teen to another teen; finding the perfect shade of lipstick for tonight's debate; and balancing her VP position between faking her way through substantive issues and shooing all those peskie Russians from the White House lawn. Especially since she won't be in Alaska anymore keeping her eye north.
Posted by: JC | October 02, 2008 at 05:26 AM
I don't find Palin to be any less experienced than Obama. Why the media double-standard?
Oh yeah, I forgot. Most reporters, secretly or obviously, are pulling for an "historic" Obama win. Never mind that a Palin win would be equally historic -- no, no, we want the black man. He's higher on the affirmative action ladder.
Obama does have more experience at being condescending to women, many of whom are too stupid to see it. Others do, and they are voting for McCain.
Posted by: J Cline | October 02, 2008 at 05:28 AM
Interesting point about Alaska 'having 600,000 residents, less than a suburb of LA. What's so great about being a Governor of Alaska?' Seems the largest 20 U.S. cities have populations equal to or larger than the entire state of Alaska. I guess any of those fine mayoral executives are now officially 'presidential material.'
Posted by: check it out | October 02, 2008 at 05:30 AM
It is hard to see what McCain could have done that made Palin seem to be someone that she isn't. They have also tried to make McCain seem like an economic pundit, but that has flopped fairly spectacularly as well. When I look at the oddly pointed bald head of Steve Schmidt I find my mind wandering away from his campaign happy talk. The shape of a man's head should not matter, but when what he is saying is so relentlessly silly, one's attention just sort of wanders. And then Saturday Night Live weighed in. Now we learn that many of Tina Fey's lines were actually direct quotes from... Sarah Palin. And back in Alaska we learn from someone who did answer a subpoena that Palin's husband was following her former brother-in-law around trying to take incriminating pictures to prove he was not disabled. They got his disability blocked, but he later won an appeal and the state paid for a needed operation. Wonderful. Todd Palin, small-town vigilante, on the cusp of having enormous power to pursue future vendettas. Sound eerily like Dick Cheney to you?
Posted by: Arthur | October 02, 2008 at 05:31 AM
What is amazing to me is that Barack Obama who has spent only 143 days of 4 years "working" in the Senate is considered qualified to run the country. As a State Senator, he voted "present" most of the time. And of course he was a very mediocre community organizer. It shows me that even if you have no guts, you can still get the glory. It also teaches our kids that the top job is always available to an empty suit . Only in leftist America can sexism be selectively used to destroy a capable woman candidate. I guess we are in Orwellian times when a mediocrity like Obama is the best we can do.
Posted by: Hernan M Martinez | October 02, 2008 at 05:32 AM
one last thing... what everyone of you fail to realize, is that none of this matters. america will not elect obama, period. it dont matter what the right does. it just wont happen.
Posted by: trey_trey | October 02, 2008 at 05:33 AM
I love political dialogue. I enjoy debating politics, especially with those with whom I disagree. And I even appreciate the breezy wanton style of blogs. However, the only way a posting such as Mr. Malcolm`s makes sense to me is if either 1) he really believes such biased drivel 2) he is now or will be paid in money or favors by someone to write something that he knows is intellectually dishonest or 3) he wants to support the McCain bid by any means necessary, including undermining the journalistic standards that he presumably learned at some point in his career. I suppose the most charitable explanation would be that he really believes that Palin is somehow just as qualified as Biden to run this country. If that's the case, then Mr. Malcolm need not worry. For otherwise, it would be unfortunate if, when the time comes and all the benefits that accrued from such hack "journalism" have been long since spent, Mr. Malcolm would find himself left with nothing but a thin conscience for having spent so much time eroding the foundation of political discourse. I am glad for him, then, that he really believes it. Too bad for us that we have to read it.
Posted by: Michael Bishop | October 02, 2008 at 05:34 AM
The folks who complain about Palin's inexperience are missing one vital point. The Presidency is an executive position. None of the others - Obama, Biden or McCain have any executive experience. We should be electing somebody with 20 years of leadership experience, but don't fault Palin for having only 2 years supervising 24,000 state employees when the others have zip, zero, nada.
Oh, by the way - Obama's claim to fame is being a community organizer? That organization he worked for - ACORN - is under investigation in 12 states for criminal activity. Great resume....
Posted by: Steve Burleson | October 02, 2008 at 05:36 AM
Yes, Palin's done a wonderful job of appearing to be uninformed and out of touch.
Brilliant strategy.
Posted by: Mike L | October 02, 2008 at 05:42 AM
Vir: I think you mean America will be dumber for it. Now, I'm sure SOMEONE will get richer from a McCain/Palin win, but it certainly isn't America and it certainly isn't anyone making under "5 million a year".
After seeing the truth of this women, I have only one thing to say: Who knew that the movie Idiocracy was non-fiction??
Posted by: JustSomeGuy | October 02, 2008 at 05:43 AM
I see a couple of recent comments taking up the theme of media bias in this piece (Disappointed Reader, and Guardian) who feel that analyzing Palin's fall from grace is "making news rather than reporting it" and so on. You see this all the time now - angry citizens who think that the op-ed page is supposed to contain objective news and who cite any opinion that appears in any medium that is contrary to their own as evidence of bias. Thus, the rantings of Keith Olbermann count as 'bias' in their eyes, whereas the, um, information supplied to them by the ideological monoculture of chat radio is 'telling it like it is'. Or something. The effort to detect 'news bias' in a piece that is actually implying that McCain is mishandling a positive asset, and that Palin has been made to look bad by her campaign's fear of letting her be seen is just an effort to shove a square peg into a round hole. The Palin-loving readers aren't quite sure what the writer is saying, but they're pretty sure they don't like the sound of it, and that it must therefore be 'bias', or whatever other inappropriate slogan can be gummed onto it.
Posted by: bob wright | October 02, 2008 at 05:44 AM
Just another editorial from a newspaper that is in the tank for Obama, who is always bringing up what they would like to be considered as Sarah Palin's inexperience, and inaptitude, but they let Barack Obama slide on everything from HIS inexperience, and HIS inaptitude, which is obvious everytime he is not in front of a teleprompter, to his socialistic friends, to his racist, loud mouthed pastor, And wife, and everything in between. It is sickening, but it looks like 50% of Americans are falling for it. Oh well, if you don't care about your freedoms, then get prepared for the worst. Mark My Words, if Obama is elected president, then the worst WILL come.
Posted by: Marie | October 02, 2008 at 05:44 AM
In the new era of the blog, this is fascinating satire at it's best!
The "weaker" elements on both the consevative and liberal sides are exosed here. To paraphrase the movie the Six Sense - "AND THEY DON'T KNOW THEIR DEAD".
Posted by: JoeW | October 02, 2008 at 05:45 AM
McCain has already stated he doesn't understand economics, it's not his strong suit. But the top issue for almost every american has to be the financial melt down now underway due to eight years of massive banking industry deregulation.
McCain's chief financial advisor is Phil Gramm who pushed to eliminate the Glass Stegal act (GSA) with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. This eliminated the GSA restrictions against affiliations between commercial and investment banks. Phil Gramm is the same guy who recently described our condition as a "mental recession" and Americans as a "nation of whiners".
McCain doesn't need Sarah Palin to lose; he's lost the confidence of most American's already since he still argues for four more years of Bush deregulation, tax cuts for the rich and war without end.
Sam
Posted by: Sam Solsone | October 02, 2008 at 05:51 AM
Andrew,
You are more bracing than my first cup of Swedish brew! Ignore the disparaging remarks: I recognized the biting satire immediately, and chuckled all the way to breakfast!
Posted by: Krista Kurtz | October 02, 2008 at 05:52 AM
Laugh Out Loud ! ,, there shoud be something titled Obama's skeletons in the closet , perhaps there is none people just need to realize that he is the right man for the job wether you like him or not based on race or his middle name it just goes to show what americans will say / do in order to make someone look bad i mean come on they tried saying he was a musslim due to his middle name anything to turn the tables , also Mc Cain is no innosence in this election , WAKE UP PEOPLE voting for Mc Cain is like giving george bush another wack at it think about that GOD !
Posted by: Rachel | October 02, 2008 at 05:53 AM
TommyF, you are waaaaay too paranoid. If you listen to any right wing talk radio host, including those on TV like Sean Hannity and Glen Beck, you would realize that Obama is not exempt from scrutiny, and democrat-pointed satire is alive and kicking.
It's really not the dems fault that Sarah Palin is so dang newsworthy. I really don't think that the media is biased either way: They're just sharks looking for a good, gossipy story.
Posted by: Bipp | October 02, 2008 at 05:53 AM
Andrew,
You are more bracing than my first cup of Swedish brew! Ignore the disparaging remarks: I recognized the biting satire immediately, and chuckled all the way to breakfast!
Posted by: Krista Kurtz | October 02, 2008 at 05:53 AM
TommyF, you are waaaaay too paranoid. If you listen to any right wing talk radio host, including those on TV like Sean Hannity and Glen Beck, you would realize that Obama is not exempt from scrutiny, and democrat-pointed satire is alive and kicking.
It's really not the dems fault that Sarah Palin is so dang newsworthy. I really don't think that the media is biased either way: They're just sharks looking for a good, gossipy story.
Posted by: bipp | October 02, 2008 at 05:56 AM
"We can't expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism." ~ Nikita Krushchev
God help us if Obama wins. I will be living in communism twice in a lifetime. People like me can smell them a mile away and that is what Obama smells like.
Posted by: Sarah | October 02, 2008 at 05:58 AM
Obama/Biden 08
One word sums up probably the responsibility of any vice president, and that one word is to be prepared.
Dan Quayle
Posted by: RJ | October 02, 2008 at 06:01 AM
The elephants know that they own the voting machines.
Keep it close enough (12%) and they sleaze their way in again.
Posted by: Curious Orange | October 02, 2008 at 06:01 AM
Just what the country needs...a snake handling Pentecostal with an anti-witchcraft spell protecting her. As I understand it Pentecostals are NOT living for this life, they live for the next one (after life/heaven). I have yet to meet a Pentecostal that won't admit this. I don't want this persons finger on the button after old 'Johnny wet start' departs this mortal coil. Georgie Bush in my estimation is a "Pentecostal of convenience" who lives in THIS life (the real one). If this "Moose dresser" gets her hands on the football...go to ground! Come to think of it, maybe we should all invest our money in companies that build fallout shelters.
Posted by: mike burke | October 02, 2008 at 06:05 AM
When the world bad guys are knocking at our door, who do you want as your leader. McCain, or a person you don't really know anything about? Think hard and long, your life may depend on it. The liberal media refuses to really, question Obama, He can only do one thing, and that is talk, with a teleprompter. He has no experience on anything accept getting things for free. This election will really tell if the Americans, who vote, (most are slugs and will not).
Posted by: Thomas F. Burnickas | October 02, 2008 at 06:06 AM