Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

The upside for Sarah Palin from her widely panned sit-down with Katie Couric

September 26, 2008 | 10:56 am

Sarah Palin received generally poor marks for her third interview with a major media type since becoming the Republican vice presidential nominee.

Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post called Palin's comment, during her Q & A with Katie Couric of CBS, that the U.S. had achieved "victory" in Iraq "an apparent misstep."

Our own James Rainey, in critiquing the entire interview that was aired in two parts Wednesday and Thursday nights, declared Palin "rambling, marginally responsive and even more adrift than during her network debut with ABC’s Charles Gibson."

Like many, Rainey was particularly struck by an exchange from the second segment, when Couric asked Palin about her claims that, as the governor of Alaska, the state's proximity to Russia gave her a foreign policy credential.

Rainey posits that it was "good news" for Palin that the nation's financial crisis and the uncertain status of tonight's John McCain-Barack Obama debate diverted what had been an unrelenting spotlight on her.

The analysts at MSNBC's political shop see it much the same way, saying in their daily "First Read" memo that "had it not been for it not been for McCain's debate gambit, Palin's near-disastrous two-part interview ... would be dominating the political discussion right now."

They identify another possible positive -- "she has moved her debate expectations to an all-time low."

Might Thursday's Palin-Joe Biden get-together outdraw tonight's McCain-Obama face-off (especially with so many Americans preoccupied with high school football and other start-of-the-weekend activities)?

Regardless, the VP debate promises great theater, given that -- as The Ticket recently noted -- Biden hasn't exactly been hitting the ball out of the park either.

-- Don Frederick


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I felt bad for Sarah in that interview. She has clearly lost her confidence and every word from her mouth drips with an internal battle between self consciousness and talking point.

The strategy to limit media access to her has left this candidate a muttering mess. I couldn't even understand what she was saying half the time. Maybe I should have watched more of her interview than seeing us get slapped around by Oregon St.

Fight on!

To those who do not get their news exclusively from television, it is all too obvious that Sarah Palin is even more qualified to be president of the United States than Obama is. She has more experience, her ideas are more in line with the pro-individualism basis of the US, she is not friends with terrorists, she is not disqualified from being president are virtue of holding a dual citizenship, she does not have multiple skeletons in her closet, she did not cheat in the primaries by means of coercion and fraud, her running mate has not been shown as being the recipient of illegal campaign contributions from Gaza--the list goes on and on and on. Just read the blogs on both sides of these issues, and think! If you imagine you are getting anything like the full story even by watching Fox, you are sadly, sadly mistaken.

If the Republican ticket were reversed from McCain/Palin to Palin/McCain, the choice would still be clear. Obama needs to be vetted now, and quickly, before this disaster proceeds any further.

By the way, I personally am an atheist. But I would support McCain/Palin as the closest thing to America's original principles of individualism and capitalism being offered to us today. One always has to ignore certain things and certain positions taken by politicians, and select the closest thing to one's own views. Twice during the Republican convention I heard the phrase "individual rights"--a rare and precious thing nowadays!

Use the Internet to look into the past that Obama is strenuously hiding, and you'll see that there can be no question of voting for him under any circumstances. Even if his opponent were Hillary Clinton. In fact, I would rather have Hillary as president right now, without an election, than for this election to go ahead and risk getting Obama elected.

She was much better in her interview with Hannity, which is the kind of interviews obama has gotten this whole campaign. I'd like to see how Obama does with a bunch of interviews where the interviewers are doing everything they can to make him look like a fool.

Watch her interviews with anyone who is not trying to make her look bad, like her interviews on CNBC with Larry Kudlow. She comes across as very knowledeable, articulate, and likable. She is obviously either very nervous or confused trying to remember all the things her handlers are instructing her to do.

Quote from 2T3MzooK (email: rr.rawlings@sympatico.ca) "To those who do not get their news exclusively from television, it is all too obvious that Sarah Palin is even more qualified to be president of the United States than Obama is."

Sadly, Palin's recently interview has proved that there is value to a presidental candidate who can actually can give a good speech. I will be thinking about Palin/McCain supporters as the Republican ship sinks on Nov. 5th. I wish the best for your evolution from walled-off oblivious conservatives to joining the ranks of a more balanced, and less blame-filled, worldview. Perhaps you should encourage your hero, Sarah Palin, to travel a little more as well with her brand new passport. Some of us have been traveling the world for years, and her viewpoints, sadly, are just the same old tired conservative rhetoric, delivered in awkward and unsteady fashion. The above quote solidified my opinion that Palin supporters are just as blind as she.

This is not even funny anymore. I am starting to feel bad for her.

Hey 2T3MzooK - are you for real? "Individual rights?"

How would the overturning of Roe Vs. Wade contribute to "individual rights?" The right for a woman to choose isn't one of those, eh?

And same sex couples not being allowed to marry or have civil unions - yeah, those aren't individual rights either.

How about the right to learn about how to protect yourself from AIDS - realistically, via safer sex since clearly TEENS HAVE SEX ANYWAY IF YOU LOOK AT OL' BRISTOL AND ALL THE HIGH STD TRANSMISSION RATES AMONGST YOUTH IN RURAL AREAS LIKE TEXAS - in public school? Where one should learn these details?

You're a tool.

Sarah Palin is an incredible, dynamo of intellectual prowess and depth of knowledge. This woman would leave the Founding Fathers scratching their heads. She is on a WHOLE OTHER LEVEL!!!

We should be so lucky that something untoward would happen to McCain after he becomes President and that she would become our Great Leader.

Sarah's snippets of fragmented thoughts were indicative and more too
The soft approach interview cast a shadow on an already
persona now being characterized by Rainey as profiting from crisis.

Is there such a word? you know.. Politica-babel

I am reading comments in the different websites about Sarah Palin interview. I am reminded of a study by a psychologist which shows that if you feel personally vested to a person, as do most Palin supporters to her, you will feel hostile to who ever is criticizing or making that person look bad. The connection of Palin supporter to her is organic; they can relate to her and feel she will fight for them With that kind of organic connection, they are not always amenable to plain rational reasoning. If this interview were conducted before Palin's support had gelled, I bet any reasonable person would have concluded that it was a disaster.

Anyway, let me leave aside psychoanalysis. Let me ask Palin supporters--think of a President Palin--indeed this is a good possibility with McCain's age and bouts with cancer. Suppose she takes us to war against all the "bad guys" in the world--besides bad guys in Iraq and Afghanistan, add Iran, Syria, North Korea and a Nuclear Russia--the latter because they are hounding our friend Georgia. Where is she going to get the troops? Believe me NATO allies are not going to fight the "bad guys". For an end-gamer, which is part of her religious belief, it may be OK because it is all God's will that the world should come to an end soon, but for the rest of us, it is a frightening prospect.

How gently does the right wing want the media to treat the Rep. candidates?

Obama has been mercilessly vetted by the media for almost two years. FOX ran the Rev Wright clip on an endless loop for a month and Obama still went toe-to-toe with Bill O'Reilly.

Why shouldn't we be concerned that McCain and Palin run and hide from any media that aren't deemed "deferential" enough to them?

Someone please remind Ms. Palin that Moscow is actually much closer geographically to Washington DC/East Coast than to Alaska.

Let's have Sarah debate Barrack, that would be a more fair and interesting debate!

No one needs to make Palin look like a fool. Face it people she is a liability, not qualified and nothing short of a political bafoon.

I think the reporters have been easy on her. The Couric interview was a good example. Asking for examples of her running mates record is not picking on her.

I'm on the right for most issues. The prospect of a President Palin is quite frankly the scariest what-if I could possible imagine.

The only thing funny about this situation is the partisan defenses of Palin...

This is getting sad...

Your moose hunter appears to be more of a deer in the headlights.

To Jake:
Would you consider Obama's interview with The O'reiley Factor a walk in the park?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_753sLQQ8q8

By comparison - Katie Couric could be mistaken as Sarah Palin's therapist. The look on Couric's face was a combination of disbelief and sorrow for Palin. She really could have been much harsher with the tone and questions - as O'reilly was with Obama.. but fact is she didn't need to be.. Palin did it all to herself.

I DO FEEL SORRY FOR HER.

This wasn't even funny: she is so disturbingly dumb...A heartbeat away from the presidency? Please, God, don't let it happen. She is a disaster!

Barack Obama has NO foreign policy experience. He has NO executive experience. Presumably Katie Couric will make an issue of this. Just take a look at this from Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPMTGIh6N6I
The man is clueless on foreign policy

Sarah does infinately better than Joe Biden who is know to make three collosal gaffes a day. No one interviews Obama like she has been grilled, except maybe Oreilly and that was recently. No one interprets what Obama or Biden says through the ridiculously negative lens they have for her. She does just fine a whole lot better than obama would have done two weeks out of the gate if he had actually ever been grilled by the press. I'm so tired of the cotcha questions being distorted btw? Depression, Holy War, these are words from the interviewer not Sarah. It's like asking someone do you deny beating your wife? It's tiresome from people who are supposed to be journalists.

ATTENTION REPUBLICANS:
RE: SARAH PALIN

Obviously there has been a HUGE mistake.....

Palin's Dribble, Weasel Wording, Mush-Mush, Ass-Backwards speak Cleary demonstrates who carries the Down Syndrome trait in her family, because of this we (the democrats) will allow you to send her back to Wacky-silla without prejudice and select another candidate.

For this consideration the Republicans agree to sell Alaska to Russia (with Palin) and never mention the State of Alaska or her again. PALLIN=DOWNS SYNDROME


The Democrats

What is patently evident is not that this woman is a buffoon, but she doesn't believe what she is saying.
And to be truthful the Neo Con line is incoherent, imposing Democracy (how do you impose a populist movement), how do you impose democracy by bombing people, what Paln believes is the following... you are responsible for your action... no bailout...
Russia is a neighbor of ours we share a waterway.. so I have some experience.. (forget the Georgia Neo Con nonsense)... Israel is a country we have close ties with due to a shared religious past, but they have to take care of their own stuff. Get the Lieberman, Pearl, Krystol loonies to leave this woman alone. And we might find out that she tyalks a lot of common sense

To 2T3MzooK: This is to congratulate you on your recovery from a two-year coma. "Obama needs to be vetted now"? Sorry you missed it. If we vetted Obama any more thoroughly we would need a CAT scan and a proctoscope. Vetting? It's not Obama the media have gone easy on. We saw endless hours of Obama's nutty church, but the mainstream media have not touched the video of Sarah Palin being proofed against witches, in church, by her pastor and two others. We heard details of Obama's wife's college paper, but we have not heard from the MSM that Sarah Palin needed six years to get through five very minimal colleges and that she was on the verge of flunking out of the University of Idaho when the school reinstated her after she made up courses at a community college. Nor that John McCain graduated #894 in his Annapolis class of 899. And can you can be sure that if Obama's daughter were ten years older and turned up pregnant, with a tough-talking boyfriend in tow, we would hear plenty about disgusting ghetto mores.

> She comes across as very knowledeable

Ahh, so THAT'S the word for it. I was wondering.

She should've stayed at a Holiday Inn Express that night.

I feel dumber just watching it

 


Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives