Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

President Bush, in his economy speech, steers clear of the D-word

September 24, 2008 |  8:47 pm

It was a somber President Bush who tonight appeared before the television camera -- many would argue belatedly -- to both explain how American plunged into its financial crisis and make his pitch for a $700-billion plan to right the fiscal ship.President Bush speaks about the economy in a nationwide address

As The Times' James Gerstenzang delineates, Bush did not try to downplay what has happened or discount the potential consequences.

His phrases included: "We're in the midst of a serious financial crisis;" "Our entire economy is in danger;" "America could slip into a financial panic."

Strong words. But we were struck by his avoidance of one particular noun that begins with a D and that no president wants associated with his name.

He came close to uttering it, saying that unless his bailout proposal or something close to it is quickly enacted, the nation "could experience a long and painful recession."

With use of the "long" and "painful" adjectives, that seems close to the description of a depression. But Bush, in his speech, avoided invoking that specter.

Intriguingly, the lower half of his party's presidential ticket did not.

Katie Couric of CBS, in an exclusive interview with Sarah Palin that somewhat got lost in the shuffle of the day's events, asked the Alaska governor if, in the absence of some sort of federal intervention, "there's a risk of another Great Depression?"

Palin replied, "Unfortunately, that is the road that America may find itself on. [Something] has to pass or we're going to find ourselves in another Great Depression."

-- Don Frederick

Photo credit: Associated Press


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I live in NC. Don't watch much TV, so I don't see a lot of political ads "live" (I see them all on the YouTube, because I watch my compy instead). Tonight, though, I watch the President's speech on a local network broadcast, and *immediately* afterward saw a McCain ad which attacked Obama for "wasteful government spending."

I thought he was "suspending his campaign" or something? The timing of the ad buy just seemed unlikely to be coincidental, especially given the tightness of the race here in the Tar Heel state.

"But we were struck by his avoidance of one particular noun that begins with a D and that no president wants associated with his name."

What noun? DEMOCRAT?

The market is not "frozen" for these securities. There is a price for them, but not one that is palatable to FOW (friends of W). Where did they come from? The answer is cheap money from the Fed to keep the economy juiced, else liquidity would have dried up long ago to to our suicidal balance of payments due to excessive imports.

If they are such a good deal, wouldn't you think that Hank Paulson would use some of his $700 million personal fortune to snatch some up?

Call me a cynic, but my sense of the President's speech was that if the public does not absorb this toxic paper to keep the empire going, he and his friends are going to break our legs.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives