| Main |

Obama, McCain campaigns: Starkly different first reactions to bailout bill's failure

As the financial rescue plan went down in flames in the House and the big drop in the stock market accelerated, the initial reactions from the two presidential campaigns were dramatically different in tone and tenor.

Barack Obama delayed a rally in Westminster, Colo., to make calls to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.

The Times' Maeve Reston was with the campaign, and she reports that when Obama eventually took the stage, he appealed for calm -- and sought to underscore his point with an analogy his audience might appreciate.

"There are going to be some bumps and trials and tribulations and ups and downs before we get this regulation package done," he said. "It’s important for the American public and for the markets to stay calm, because things are never smooth in Congress, and to understand that it will get done -- that we are going to make sure an emergency package is going to get put together because it is required for us to stabilize the markets."

After calling for Democrats and Republicans to "step up to the plate, get it done," he added: "It’s sort of like flying into Denver, you know you’re going to land, but it’s not always fun going over these mountains."

John McCain was traveling from an appearance in Ohio to one in Iowa as the bailout bill went down the tubes in the House. He'll be commenting soon, but Douglas Holtz-Eakin, his senior policy adviser, issued the following statement:

From the minute John McCain suspended his campaign and arrived in Washington to address this crisis, he was attacked by the Democratic leadership: Sens. Obama and [Harry] Reid, Speaker Pelosi and others.

Their partisan attacks were an effort to gain political advantage during a national economic crisis. By doing so, they put at risk the homes, livelihoods and savings of millions of American families.

Barack Obama failed to lead, phoned it in, attacked John McCain, and refused to even say if he supported the final bill.

Just before the vote, when the outcome was still in doubt, Speaker Pelosi gave a strongly worded partisan speech and poisoned the outcome.

This bill failed because Barack Obama and the Democrats put politics ahead of country.

-- Don Frederick

To keep up with this flood of breaking political news, register for free instant updates of all Ticket items flashed directly to your cell via Twitter.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef010534dd0c8c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Obama, McCain campaigns: Starkly different first reactions to bailout bill's failure:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

McCain has added a new twist to his campaign statement: Country First!

When his campaign starts to tank, he lets the US economy go down first!

If I was an American, just based on these responses, I'd vote for Obama.

The Reps are all about the blame. WHAT HAPPEN TO "COUNTRY FIRST!?

Republicans could not deliver the vote!

Now McCain said: let us find somebody to blame this for. Oh, how about Democrats?
Republicans go again with the same old game of failing and blaming.
Who is President Bush? Republicans. Under whose leadership did the market fail? Bush-McCain's. But, it is the Democrats failure, Republicans would say. But, did they really say that? Yes.

Has John McCain's campaign remained in suspension? If not, will he suspend it to head back to Washington to solve this mess?

Honestly, as soon as I heard on CNN that the vote was against, I was absolutely certain that Grandpa was gonna blame it on The Black Guy.

Sigh...

"Country First - We'll ruin the other economies later"

lemme see if I have this straight....Obama makes a speech telling everyone to get it right and McCcain PHONES IN HIS SPEECH. Hmmm....

Are you people stupid? How is McCain to blame for this? Over 40% of the House DEMOCRATS didn't vote for this bill--that's what killed it.

The DEMOCRATS have enough votes to win a majority on ANY bill in the House.

Huh - One guy has class, calm, and the ability to show leadership. The other guys has a handful of muddy crap to fling.

Nancy Pelosi should be flogged for her crass (however true) last minute partisan diatribe.

Did you see the vote against?
The vote against the measure was 228 to 205, with 133 Republicans joining 95 Democrats in opposition.
MCCain really doesn't get it, his own party defeated it. AND good riddence

To the authors here, I don't always agree with both of you, but you were very effective by just putting each candidates response by itself and letting it stand. How provocative.

No pundit comments.

The Democrats hold a commanding majority in the House, and could have passed this measure without a single Republican vote. Yet 40% of Dems voted no. They have no one to blame but themselves.

So it's the democrats fault, but the republicans who didn't pass the bill becuase they were mad over a speech by a democrat attacking Bush....
wow...what a strong line of argument.
He should have let Palin get up and talk some more "Hot Chick" gibberish instead of goin out like this....

AS usuall the worst Congress in our history continues to scew up this country, All those who voted NO, You have lost homes , jobs and now the respect of your OWN people. Shame on the NO's, you are No statesmen or women. Just loosers

And in all of this crisis the 'inexperienced' former state legislator from Illinois remains calm, cool and collective. The 26 year 'experienced' Senate veteran and war hero launches into partisan attacks and more erratic campaigning. Just who is acting more presidential now?

Democrats control the House of Representatives. 95 Democrats voted against the bill. it wasn't just republicans that didn't like giving $700 billion to one man.

So, Don, what's your point? Ask another way. What did you expect from McCain with all that egg on his face?

Why should not they blame it on Santa Instead? Santa caused all this financial meltdown and swooped in to sabotage this agreement too. You see, RepubliCONs, who directly caused this with relentless deregulation, refused to enforce the laws in the books and allowed one major merger after another with outrageous golden brochettes for their friends are now blaming Dems on this! Have they gone insane? Helleva job Bushie.

Bush is the lamest of lame ducks, with a minuscule approval rating and no clout or political protection left to offer. Bush and Vice President Cheney were reportedly making calls to wavering Republicans right to the end; obviously that didn't do the trick.

I know how people feel about the bailout drubbing. Every week I find out the lottery did not come through for me. The next day I go to work, pay my bills and curb my spending. What a downer. But, that's life.

Could the McCain camp BE more irresponsible?? This economic rescue still needs to happen and here's the McCain camp making all sorts of heated charges and covering their butts. Plain and simple: Congress heard a lot of anger from common folks about this "bailout" because they were rushing to vote without EXPLAINING it well to the public, or reassuring average Americans that their interests were protected. So, Repubs fearing about ruining their reelection chances then refused to back the plan because, hey, they were worried about keeping their jobs.

Now that the stock market TANKED, the average folks with IRAs and mortgages may go, "Oh...wait a minute...we have to do something!" and the Congress will put out a new and improved rescue plan (hopefully not calling next attempt a "bailout" -- sheesh!) to pass in a couple of days. Hope it won't be too late, but that's what's going on. Barack, the voice of good sense, is going to be shown, again, to be right.

Doesn't the McCain camp realize that the global economic stability is at risk here? It's not about him, or his poll numbers. Somebody PLEASE give those McCain guys some perspective!!!

How is this Obama's problem - or McCain's (other than they are Senators?)

Neither of them are on the finance committee; neither of them really have much business stepping in now.

Let's hope the committee members can find their butts with both hands, shall we?

Among Democrats, 140 voted yes and 95 no. Among Republicans, 65 voted yes and 133 voted no.

Frank remarked on the numerical "coincidence" that the number of "deeply offended Republicans" who voted no equalled exactly the number needed to reach the 218 votes in favor to pass the bill.

There's plenty of blame to go around, that's not the point. Big problems like this can't get solved by either party alone. It means everyone has to work together.

We can see pretty clearly from these reactions who is really sincere about that - Obama - and who wants to continue the "blame game" - McCain. Or Maybe McBlame.

The Democrats don't need the Republicans in the House. They have a majority. Why can't they pass it? I guess they blame the Republicans because they can't get their own on board. That sounds about right. Blame McCain for the Democrats failing to pass the bill with their own majority.

How much gold the U.S. dollar buys shows any country's economic strength. In 2000 before Bush came to power it was around 250/oz today it's over 900/oz in a month his mark on america will be over...the dollar is losing value, the world is seeing through the veil and all the turkeys in washington can do is point fingers...obama, mcain...both turkey...RON PAUL will talk about real issues that these controlled puppets will NEVER!!

Return the GOLD STANDARD understand the real history behind the federal reserve, restore GOLD, restore the republic for the people.

The bailout plan failed because the majority of Americans and economic experts are against it. Why bailout rich guys who made mistakes and now wants handouts from uncle Sam. Why not bailout the ordinary folks who struggle from day to day. Congress members who voted against the bill were just listening to their constituencies. Voting for this bill almost like voting for the Iraq war - you know it is a mistake.

Ahead of economy.

There's a difference.

McCain has put his own TANKING campaign first - and America LAST !

Why would America REWARD complete Republican failure ?

We wont.

Bush is as good as gone.

John McCain can't even lead his own party to a vote

And House Republicans backed out of the deal they had to have.

The Republican Party is officially out of control.

95 democrats and 133 reublicans. That makes for a whole lot of congress peole against this bill on both sides. When your spending the publics money to this extent I personally want second thoughts on whats best. There are prominent Harvard educated economist that say we should pay the price now, borrowing from the future guarantees future economic failure. Fannie and Freddie still haven't changed there mortgage guidlines for mortgages allowing borrowers to float mortgages that are 60 % of their gross income, sure to fail home owners. Let's be honest about where this roblems roots are form. Pull the roots and start a new garden.

REAP THE WHIRLWIND, Oh Ye Wail Street Pigs.

(Hey Cheer Up! - Now, you can STILL pay $$Billions to your piggish CEO's...)

Don Frederick has no credibility left after his ridiculous comments. It is obvious McCain/Palin are the ones using this for political gain. The Republicans have their racist heads in the sand. They had there chance and you see what has happened. Democrats are only a little better.

The bill failed because the Democrats didn't like it either. They wouldn't take a stand on their own because they weren't sure it would work; they wanted the Republicans to sink with them. Those 95 Democrats could've passed the bill and they could've taken all the credit themselves. But apparently they weren't assured there would be any credit at all.

The bill stinks. There has to be a better way; one that protects us taxpayers; one that tells the real estate industry that they can't hose each other and have us pay for it.

wow, now thats change. talk about being calm. after your side blew things up with partisanship. then blamed the OTHER side for being partisan. thats real change. the cool thing about all this: obama is seen as just another poitician. pretty ineffectual, as he has done absolutely -0-. and mccain, after being bashed for making a 'political stunt' will probably end up doing what he has been doing for years: actually DOING something to bring the sides together. and obama will claim he is a uniter. truly amazing.

Obama consistantly shows leadership and prudent choices facing crisis with calm. McCain flips out, start suspending appearances and campaigns, flying all over the country to dine at expensive restaurants and then blames the other party. McCain is a fool. Obama is a leader.

My comment is to Mr. No - It seems like McCain was taking credit for 'swooping in' and forcing a compromise on this bill. However, now that it's failed, should he take the blame for the failure too? A true leader would stand up for his actions/decisions and not only tout those actions that were politically convenient and beneficial. Sounds to me like McCain is putting WINNING first, country second.

Also, what does this say about his leadership and ability to 'bring both sides together' if he either a) can't reign his part in to do the right thing, or b) is so delusional about what their true intentions at the vote were, he was just flat out wrong on this bill passing today? Doesn't sit too well with me...

Just a note to those who are prepared to blame democrats for this failure to pass - this is President Bush's bill and he had less support from his own party than from the democrats - who is being partisan exactly?

One more thing McCain keeps up his partisan babble by accusing Obama of being partisan - I really hope that we learn this time - lets send the republicans a message we won't go for the fear mongering and lies this time - there is simply too much at stake.

McCain is throwing Maverick dung all over this country. Transparent. Sadly he seems to take pleasure in stooping to the lowest levels to win. Oh wait, that's elitist!

The McCain campaign is so full of #@&*!!! All they can do is accuse, accuse, accuse....and they are accusing Obama for what McCain himself did not do...which was formally support the bailout! He has fully taken advantage and politicized his useless intervention. which he had pledged to NOT politicize, and has continued to trash complete lies on Obama, which only makes him appear dirtier and dirtier. What a load of BS

This is a nice contrast in reactions. A reinforcement of what we've seen in the 1st debate: Obama is the adult in the room.

How is it "Republicans could not deliver the vote!" when the **democrats** have the **majority** of the house?

More like
(1) Pelosi can't manage her party
(2) the ultra-lib Dems won't vote for the un-porked (no ACORN, etc.) bill
(3) that nice little speech by Pelosi was quite the touch, eh? Nothing like a partisan rant by the freaking speaker of the house to get the vote off to a good start...

John McCain has been telling us for a week that his personal touch was needed in Washington to get this done, but he couldn't deliver even 1/3 of the House Republicans - he's some leader!

Who are the whiners now??? Waaaah, Waaaaaaah, Waaaaaaah the democrats hurt our feelings so we had to vote against this bill. WHAT!??????!!!!

Calm assertion to both parties compared to partisan red-faced glibness.

hionestly, was it not McCain and the Repub's who just said the he was the reason the bill was going to pass. He after all susp. his campaign just to round up the Repubs and get them on board... I guess he is not as well a leader as he himself thinks!

How incredibly surprising - Obama says something about the matter at hand, and McCain makes it a partisan attack, and inaccurate to boot. Blame it on Chelsea, John!

McCain fails to perform and blames Obama!

Douglas Holtz-Eakin does not = John McCain any more than Reverend Wright or Plouffe = Barack Obama. Stop the double standard already. If Democrats wanted the bill they could have passed it without the Republicans. They have no spine.

playing presidential politics with this bill is ridiculous. This bill was horrible. It was a bad idea and should have never come to a vote. I personally phone my democrat rep and told him to vote no. I would have done the same if he were a republican. The bill was bad so it failed. end of story.

First it was welfare mothers and liberals, then it was immigrants and liberals, now its bankers and liberals.

At what point will the people see that the Republicans have been in charge for 30 years, and it was there "oversight" when allowing for deregulations and free-market freedoms that created this mess.

And now they don't want to be blamed for fixing it?

1 2 3 Next »
Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







Follow us on ... »

Follow @latimestot for political news and backgrounders sent direct to your Twitter page or mobile device.
Our Bloggers

Andrew MalcolmAndrew Malcolm's immigrant parents repeatedly stressed the importance of active participation in a democracy. Early lessons included learning the alphabetical list of states by watching televised roll calls of national political conventions. That childhood exposure led to a lifelong fascination with politics, including 40-plus years of covering them and a brief stint practicing them as press secretary to Laura Bush in 1999-2000. A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Malcolm served on the Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four.

Johanna NeumanJohanna Neuman is a veteran Washington correspondent for both The Los Angeles Times and USA Today, having covered presidents and politics as far back as Ronald Reagan. A former president of the White House Correspondents Assn., she authored a book on media and foreign policy, “Lights, Camera, Wars.” Most recently she was co-author of the Countdown to Crawford blog here at The Times.
The daily destination for breaking news from The Times and other top political sources on the Web.
Political blog from the Chicago Tribune.

All L.A. Times Blogs

All The Rage
American Idol Tracker
Angels Unplugged
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Booster Shots
California Consumer
Comments Blog
Company Town
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Dodger Thoughts
Fabulous Forum
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. at Home
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pop & Hiss
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Technology
Ticket to Vancouver
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Categories