Hillary Clinton's campaign photo album's got something missing
For those of you who still can't quite accept the fact that Hillary Clinton is gone, finished, beaten, defeated as a Democratic presidential candidate, her campaign has just posted an online photo album.
For a walk down memory lane, go here. But FIRST, be warned: She's gonna hit you up for money on every page. There's that $2
0-million-plus campaign debt to pay off.
It seems like only two weeks ago today that the gritty, determined candidate who went farther than any other serious female candidate declined to concede and appeared to be ready to fight on for some time.
But then the next morning the Three Democratic Musketeers -- Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid -- launched their preplanned pre-dawn publicity offensive giving party superdelegates two whole days to make up their mind on their favorite candidate, Clinton or Barack Obama, knowing full well the latter already had it in the bag, delegate-wise.
They headed Hillary off at the pass. And after moving through her five stages of grief Clinton gave her gracious surrender/endorsement speech the following Saturday. With those secret signs of friendship buried within.
Since then -- poof! -- she's disappeared. Seems like there's a hole in our life after 17 months of Hillary Clinton all day most days, nothing. Suddenly. Nada.
Some polls seem to show her followers, namely older women, falling in line behind Obama, although our comment board sure doesn't show that.
Anyway, for a little trip down memory lane complete with photos of Hillary and Chelsea and, oops, wait, no Bill photos. Not one little snapshot to commemorate his angry outbursts. No head about to explode after another primary defeat for his spouse. Not one hubby pic in the whole book. Hmmm.
Wonder what that's about? We'll have to wait and see what the National Enquirer can make out of that.
--Andrew Malcolm
Photo credit: AP








It won't take long fore more people to wake up to the fact that Obama was helped to his selection as the nominee by the Republicans. That is one of the reasons he has running low on cash. Thats why he does not care to see the people anymore he just wants the money.
Posted by: Joe Smith | June 17, 2008 at 03:37 AM
The Clintons made well over 100 million dollars in the ten-years following the presidency of Bill Clinton. It was her choice to stake her campaign with over 10 million dollars (a luxury few could afford) and run up another 10 or so million in debt to vendors. The Clintons should pay their own bills just like the working middle class she claimed to identify with! They would still have 10s of millions left over afterwards; hardly a case for bankruptcy!
Hillary, the Queen of Spin and a Legend in Her Own Mind!
http://klintons.com
Posted by: Bob | June 17, 2008 at 03:43 AM
Why do we need the National Enquirer when you folks seem to be doing such a thorough job?
Posted by: Thomas | June 17, 2008 at 03:56 AM
Obama's running low on cash??? Obama does not care to see the people anymore, just wants the money? Huh? Obama has plenty of money from my $5 here and there and others $20 whenever they can amounting to millions in small real people donations.
Hillary is an amazing public servant who remembered too late the people she is really serving. Obama has sparked a movement that is deep, powerful, and will create lasting change because it's from the grassroots up with an amazing once in a lifetime leader. Wake up, Joe Smith or is it time to get a good night's sleep.
Posted by: Marirose | June 17, 2008 at 04:02 AM
When is the news media going to stop talking about the Clinton's and concentrate on real news. I want to know how McCain intends to staff the war that he has said he will continue if elected. Is he going to bring back the draft or send back the National Guard for the 10th time?
Posted by: John Blixx | June 17, 2008 at 04:02 AM
ABSOLUTELY, Joe. Not a day goes by I don't get e-mail from the DNC BEGGING for money now that Rove has completley cut off the GOP spigot to Obama's straw campaign and they're dependent on the real 20% of his DNC supporters.
And thank you Andrew for admitting that the mainstream media is full of nothing but lies with their skewed polls of Obama supporters, compared to the real sentiment on the message boards. The Nobama/PUMA movement is adding/finding thousands of followers per day, and if the DNC wants to win, it had better do a 180 and choose the only candidate that CAN win against McCain, because 95% of Hillary's voters ARE voting McCain in November.
Hillary or McCain!
Nobama '08
Posted by: xbjllb | June 17, 2008 at 04:03 AM
What are you talking about? He has lots of money, Clinton was the one that was 20 million in debt. He broke the records for the most money ever raised in the history of America.
Posted by: sam jones | June 17, 2008 at 04:04 AM
Joe Smith wrote:
"It won't take long fore more people to wake up to the fact that Obama was helped to his selection as the nominee by the Republicans. That is one of the reasons he has running low on cash. Thats why he does not care to see the people anymore he just wants the money."
Wow. Just wow. What world are you living in? The republicans working *against* Obama and *for* Hillary (did you never hear of "Project Chaos"?) He's raised more money than any other presidential candidate in history up to this point, AND he's been holding more small, "get to see the people" campaign events since clinching the nomination.
Congratulations, you managed to be wrong with every single sentence in your post. My only guess is that you did that intentionally as a troll. Noone could be that dense.
Posted by: McCain is a Panderer | June 17, 2008 at 04:06 AM
Wow, to be a reporter that is supposed to be unbiased you are a real jerk. Hillary won the popular vote and the DNC decided they knew better than the people! That is why so many of us are crossing party lines, not that we particularly like McCain, but anything is better than Obama! Obama is the elitest choice and the people in his consituency whose statements I have read are not supporting him, I have read him being described as corrupt and having not accomplished anything he promised. I am not surprised! He wasn't elected Senator tot he US until 2004, so he didn't get to vote on the Iraq war, did he? And if he had of had the opportunity he probably would have voted 'present' like the other 130 times on hard issues!! AND why shouldn't she take a break? THe photo album is about 6 or 8 photos, and it is her with the people who voted for her!!! There is one pic with Chelsea at a rally! Grow up, this is the best reporting you could do? So report this, Most Obama supporters immediately call a person not in favor of Obama a racist even if one tries to discuss issues and can specifically name issues and policies they disagree with. Why are these Obama supporters trying to strong arm America into voting for Obama? Why should we be victims of Chicago style corruption and pressure? He won't get my vote or my husbands. We are now independents, we disagree with the DNC and how the states of Florida and Michigan were handled. Cheating is wrong. Period. So they lost our votes.
(NEWS FLASH! We're not reporters. This isn't a newspaper. it's an online political blog. Have your say. So will we.)
Posted by: Rachel | June 17, 2008 at 04:11 AM
Why, oh Why, won't this woman GET OFF THE STAGE! Hands out for $$, who would have thought! Since leaving the whitehouse, this trailer trash wench who never owned a home has raked in millions from her favors from the whitehouse. Let them pay off their own bills, or give up the trips to Switzerland for face work. Just go away.............
Posted by: Monica L. | June 17, 2008 at 04:12 AM
It is an enigma to me. I have NEVER respected nor liked Hillary Clinton...far from it. Between Hillary and Bill, I would have chosen Bill any day, and I detested his all-encompassing, philandering ways. How frightening to me that Barack Obama has "almost" made a Hillary fan of me. How then, must true Hillary admirers/supporters feel?
Posted by: Dee G | June 17, 2008 at 04:13 AM
How is Obama low on cash when he is crashing McCain in fund-raisers (joe smith). Obama took out the Clinton machine, in a party that heavily supported her. He comes in to the main race three months behind McCain and now leads him by 6 points in the polls. Lets all be real about Obama his campaign is light years ahead of everyone else's, thats why Clintion lost.
Posted by: King | June 17, 2008 at 04:25 AM
Just think where Hillary would be if wiriters like you supported her instead of Obama. The Obama celebrity drama is no way to elect a president. I'm not star struck. I'm voting for the real deal. Hillary's got my vote even if I have to write in her name on the ballot.
Posted by: Cynthia Groya | June 17, 2008 at 05:23 AM
Joe Smith, you have got it backwards. Its the Clinton campaign that is in debt; the Obama campaign is flush with money: they can raise millions in online contributions from small donations. And you have it backwards about the Republicans supporting Obama: they supported Clinton because they knew she would be the easier to beat in the fall. They have been collecting dirty Clinton laundry for years. Remember "Operation Chaos?" It was organized by reactionaries like Rush Limbaugh to support Clinton and boast her over Obama. The Republicans are afraid of Obama, very afraid, because they know he will win.
Posted by: lorax | June 17, 2008 at 05:27 AM
Andrew Malcolm why are you still so rude and insulting toward Hillary Clinton? (rhetorical question) Wow, some of you men just can't help yourselves. I wonder how many of your readers are women...and you are insulting many of them too!
Posted by: Eliz NY | June 17, 2008 at 05:43 AM
Hi Joe Smith. I'm just wondering where in the world did you get that from and where have you been? Better yet, where are you now. So misinformed.........
Posted by: T P | June 17, 2008 at 05:43 AM
Joe...sounds like you have more than caffeine in your early morning coffee.
Republicans placed all of their hopes on the fact that Hillary would win the Democratic nomination. They've had years to formulate thousands of offensive and defensive plays against the well-established Clinton play book.
Rush Limbaugh and other right wing radio nuts actively encouraged Republicans to vote for Hillary to derail Obama in many of the final primaries.
Hillary failed because she adopted a 15-state strategy that hinged on her sweeping the "Super Tuesday" primaries. The arrogant strategy of an assumed coronation of the heir apparent failed miserably.
Perhaps, if Hillary had considered ALL 50 STATES to be important and if she had spent less time posturing as the inevitable nominee for a year, she would have righted her course long before late-April. She didn't.
And, yes,apparently it is possible for a black man to compete and win in primarily white states, especially Iowa...something else that Hillary and her aging baby boomers apparently never thought possible.
Your generation had a dream; we are that dream.
Welcome to the future.
Posted by: Yawp | June 17, 2008 at 05:51 AM
I miss Hillary...please don't be rude to her anymore...enough!
Oh and by the way, her "followers" ARE NOT flocking to BO...don't believe those polls you hear about.
Posted by: Eliz NY | June 17, 2008 at 05:58 AM
@Joe Smith
What on earth is that even supposed to mean? What you said makes absolutely no sense at all. Obama has been raising TONS of cash from more than 1.5 million Americans. He's raised more than $250 million in this way, while McCain has raised only about $80 million. The RNC's fundraising is the only reason McCain has the money to run his campaign for President. Even Clinton raised less, about $180 million or so.
Maybe you should think before you type.
Posted by: Jason Kirst | June 17, 2008 at 06:01 AM
*
Heck even rats band together when the going gets tough... not the Clintons though, they're a lower species all together.
Gad...but wouldn't it be a better world without them?
*Bert
Posted by: BERT CONVY | June 17, 2008 at 06:22 AM
Ari Fleischer on CNN during I believe Super Tuesday:
"Every night when Republicans go to bed, they pray that Hillary Clinton becomes the nominee"
It's common sense that Hillary's "old", "rural", and "white" voters would go with the old white republican man over Hillary Clinton, or any other democratic woman. Her only real "supporters" is the hugely vocal minority of mostly feminist women who desperately wanted a woman-- any woman, to become president. Now they're just being sore losers, playing dumb about her attempts to steal Michigan and Florida, because they can't get over the fact that they lost. You don't see the latino base, who voted more against the blacks, rather than as a bunch of Hillary Clinton supporters, or the old rural and white people, who barely pay enough attention to know what is really going on, and voted base largely on skin color preferences, coming out complaining constantly about her loss. They don't care. In the end the latter will probably come out for the republicans anyways. The right will use "guns, immigration and religion" to keep these intelligent people in line. No, it's a small group of woman driven by their hurt feminist pride that just won't shut up and go away. Younger women under 50 will continue to be who you see cry and moan that she didn't get the nomination. And the number is nowhere near 18 million. The number of real supporters who are actually still thinking about it all, and caring enough to write a letter, or post on a message board, or actually protest or even change their vote, is well, well under 1 million.
Posted by: Chris | June 17, 2008 at 06:36 AM
Senator Clinton is not defeated nor beaten.
Didn't your mother ever tell you, Mr. Malcolm, that the strength and courage needed to do the right thing is part of Women's genetic make up? No?
Well, it's never too late to learn.
Posted by: magdalen | June 17, 2008 at 06:37 AM
George Soros has hi-jacked the Democratic Party this year and ruined Hilary's chances against Obama. I am not sure what to make of Bill, but I can tell you that Howard Deane worked with Soros 527s to eliminate Hilary.
Posted by: DrKrbyLuv | June 17, 2008 at 07:00 AM
Joe Smith, what are you smoking? A frustrated 'Billary' supporter no doubt. The Republicans crossed party lines in order to vote for Hillary. Not the other way around, Dufus.
Posted by: Dan M. | June 17, 2008 at 07:23 AM
Helped by Republicans (who by all accounts consider HC the weaker candidate due to her high negative ratings)?
Low on cash (despite setting records for small donations fund raising)?
Seriously. Did you even watch the primaries?
Posted by: Seriously Joe | June 17, 2008 at 07:39 AM
It won't take long fore more people to wake up to the fact that Obama was helped to his selection as the nominee by the Republicans. That is one of the reasons he has running low on cash. Thats why he does not care to see the people anymore he just wants the money.
Posted by: Joe Smith | June 17, 2008 at 03:37 AM
Negative - The Republican spoilers that crossed over to confuse the Dem process were voting to keep HRC in the race. As for cash, BO running low? Que? He's got lots of it.
Posted by: keith | June 17, 2008 at 07:41 AM
Thanks to the Three Democratic Musketeers I mailed my Republican Party application to Robin Carnahan Secretary of State of Missouri.
No chances I or the other "bitter" 4.9 million women will "get in line, get behind, fall (doesn't that denote losing one's baring?) in line behind the Three Democratic Musketeers Manchurian Candidate BO.
God, I am going to miss the party, oh well, the GOP was the party of Lincoln so I guess I am going home.
McCain '08!!!!
Posted by: Informed Democrat | June 17, 2008 at 07:45 AM
Hey Joe Smith:
Yeah, I agree that Obama is probably toast in the general election, but you can't blame the republicans for that.
What do you mean he's running low on cash? The rumor is he's raising $100 million in june alone. It will be interesting to see how many campaign financing snafus hit the light of day leading up to the election. There's no way for anyone to raise that much money without at least a little funny business, even if the candidate is "not aware" of it.
Kind of like he wasn't aware of Rev. Wright saying controversial things. And he wasn't aware you were supposed to put your hand over your heart during the national anthem. And he wasn't aware that bombing an ally like Pakistan might be bad. Well, you get the picture. Yeah he's toast. Hillary could not bring up any of these things without getting hammered on the far left, but the republican 527 groups will not be as merciful. Obama will not know what hit him. The buyer's remorse will start about 48 hours after the democratic convention. There is a chance this could be a mondale-like defeat for the dems in a year that they should have walked away with it.
Posted by: Peter D. | June 17, 2008 at 07:54 AM
Well said, well written. Ah, revenge, sweet revenge. I hope Hillary finds a way to nail the lowlifes who spit in her eye. I wish she would find a way to sabotage jomama and leave a flatulence-like odor in the noses of his ovine-like creature base. I'ld savor every detail of it. Yes, I wouldl!
Posted by: serveituphillary | June 17, 2008 at 07:59 AM
Obama is the stalking horse for Howard Dean and the netroots to take over the party from the Clintons. Problem is, Obama is inexperienced and still unknown, and Hillary still owns the middle. Her supporters are not going to vote for him. Dean miscalculated how much they identify with her, how much they resent her historic candidacy being dismissed.
Before Denver, the Dems are going to conclude they'll lose. Hillary is the only way they're going to win in November. How do they un-railroad her then without alienating his supporters? Or is Dean willing to lose in order not to give the party back to Hillary and Bill?
The endgame is going to be interesting indeed.
Posted by: Harry Haller | June 17, 2008 at 08:10 AM
@Joe Smith -- Yes, but little did you know that the Democrats also selected John McCain as the nominee. Hate to break it to you.
Posted by: Joe Smith Jr. | June 17, 2008 at 08:11 AM
Why don't you just leave the lady alone? Leave her alone!. It is none of your business what pictures she chooses to release.
Posted by: John Paul Telhomme | June 17, 2008 at 08:19 AM
Why don't you just leave the lady alone? Leave her alone!. It is none of your business what pictures she chooses to release.
Posted by: John Paul Telhomme | June 17, 2008 at 08:20 AM
I think the album is great!! There are many Hillary supporters who will be writting her name in when voting
in Nov. Obama will not get all the women's vote. We
are strong and still angry over the way Hillary was treated and still treated by the media and the Democratic party.
Obama slapped Hillary again with the hiring of Patti Solis Doyle. This just makes us madder!!!!
Posted by: benda russell | June 17, 2008 at 08:29 AM
"It won't take long fore more people to wake up to the fact that Obama was helped to his selection as the nominee by the Republicans. That is one of the reasons he has running low on cash. Thats why he does not care to see the people anymore he just wants the money."
Posted by: Joe Smith | June 17, 2008 at 03:37 AM
----------------------------------------------
...What the heck is this guy talking about? Obama isn't low on cash and hasn't been- and if he was being "helped" by the Republicans- why would he be low on cash?
Posted by: Bill | June 17, 2008 at 08:29 AM
It doesn't seem like Obama has gotten that much of a boost in the polls with women. All the polls I have seen show him only gaining 3% with women. Sure, McCain's numbers dropped with women at the same time, but that just means there are more undecided women right now; not that Obama has us in the bag.
He needs to reach out to Clinton voters, and he has not done this yet. McCain on the other hand has been reaching out to us and showing us some respect. It will be a huge mistake on his part if he thinks we are going to just fall in line. He needs to earn our votes.
Country before party.
Posted by: Jenna | June 17, 2008 at 08:34 AM
I don't think Hillary Clinton's endorsement speech was all that "gracious" unless you read it, like a deposition, instead of watch it on TV. Where were the familiar self affirming head nods when she uttered "yes we can," the ones she usually uses to cue the crowd that it's time to applaud. Instead she looked like she was fighting back acid reflux. The longer she keeps up "Operation Passive Agressive" the sillier she is going to seem at the Convention. When she did nothing as headlines announced a few days ago that McCain was courting her constituents, Obama had to do something, like appoint Patti Solis Doyle V.P. chief of staff. And now her well paid staffers who are probably still waiting for their final check say they think Clinton should be offended. Obama was my second choice. And I think Clinton supporters for whom Obama was their second choice should be offended that she is not living up to her promise to support the nominee. If she could send out a little press release about Tim Russert, she could have sent one out to her supporters, reminding them of what's at stake in terms of the Supreme Court if McCain is elected, when he tried garner the support of her followers.
Posted by: Kerry | June 17, 2008 at 09:18 AM
Geee. It's Andrew again. He's so funny. Real witty too. . . and that biting sarcasm. . . so original and such a display of political insight, right up there with playground taunting.
Hey Andrew, what do you expect Hillary to do? Keep campaigning? Or maybe show up at Obama rallies like a stalker or a Norma Desmond waiting for just one more closeup? Would you be happier if she just couldn't let go?
Your gig is over Andrew. You can now focus all your energies on campaigning for your heeeeero, the righteous Obama.
I have only recently been hearing about something called a "man crush" which I never knew was such an issue. I think, however, that it is a symptom of Obama mania.
Posted by: kat | June 17, 2008 at 09:19 AM
Why should she not be gone from the nasty articles like yours? The batter Hillary Clinton days are over. She is a winner in so many ways, but most men don't get it about this resiliant spirit.
You clamored for change? Just wait...
YOU STILL DON'T GET IT THAT IT WAS NOT ABOUT BILL CLINTON!!!!!!!!!
Your moronic attitude is what got this country in trouble to begin with. When you don't stand up for what is wrong in this country, you will never get what is right.
The media in general seems to enjoy dancing with two left feet. Oh, well.
Olga
Austin, Texas
Posted by: Olga Pina | June 17, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Andrew Malcolm should retire long time ago, but he is still here writing little blogs about nothing.
Posted by: NWru | June 17, 2008 at 09:33 AM
Well Obama, as the presumptive nominee, just made his first error in judgement, when he hired Solis to be chief-of-staff for the not yet named VP.
This is a signal to Hillary supporters that he does not intend to pick her as his VP... which is fine by us! We didn't want to be strong-armed into voting for Barack anyway, even with Clinton as VP. It would still be a VOTE for Barack, not Hillary.
CLEARLY, he misjudges his strength. He will soon find out, that Hillary supporters WILL NOT fall in line to vote for him. If Al Gore is the best endorsement they have been saving, then I have sad news for the DNC. It has no impact whatsoever.
Obama's intention to visit Irag & Afghanistan before the general election is good news too! He will strut in there thinking "I'm all that" and expect them to fall in line for him. He's in for a rude awakening, and a few stumbles that will seal his inability to be elected. Hope he does it before August.
Hillary still has chance to be the nominee... when Barack loses the confidence of his backers before the convention.
Either way... It's Hillary or McCain!!!
PUMA
Posted by: BJ | June 17, 2008 at 09:37 AM
I am surprised that there has not been more coverage of the fact that many if not most of these supposedly die-hard Clintonistas are Republican/Limbaugh agents provocateur. That's your difference in commenting versus polling, coupled to the fact that only the most motivated and extreme actually post on these comments sites.
Posted by: Bart | June 17, 2008 at 10:27 AM
If you are under 13 years of age you you probably wrote this article. I’ve read better journalism in a high school
Posted by: Michael Reed | June 17, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Hillary was pushed out of the race by Nancy Pelosi (traitor to feminists everywhere) and the other two musketeers. I am very unhappy with our choice now. Vote Republican (which I have never done in my life) or vote for the most liberal Dem ever. I may just sit this one out.
Posted by: Ilene | June 17, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Why can't we leave people alone? Hillary Clinton ran a wonderful campaign, she would have been the best President. Obama has won the nomination due to the superdelegates (whoever they are?) I wonder why the people vote certainly not to elect their choice as President that is left to the Super Delegates!! Come November when they want people to vote I think I will pass. Who elects the President in the race between the Republicans and the Democrats? It's certainly not the people in the Primaries. Please leave Hillary alone. Keep your nasty comments to yourself. I think the process is disgusting, The People do not choose their nominee the Super Delegates are the ones who need to vote not the people.
Posted by: Sherry | June 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Hahahahahaha xbjllb!!
WoW it never ceases to amaze me how some people have really lost it. Nobama 08'??? A straight GOP ticket and you think this is the solution???
I hope somebody gives you your pills back
Posted by: Jesse | June 17, 2008 at 01:15 PM
I hope President Barrack Obama will transform the American Economy so that people energetically create and contribute rather than feeling victimized with regards to money. He certainly did wonders in financing and running his campaign!
Posted by: Adnora, in California | June 17, 2008 at 01:17 PM
I hope President Barrack Obama will transform the American Economy so that people energetically create and contribute rather than feeling victimized with regards to money. He certainly did wonders in financing and running his campaign!
Posted by: Adnora, in California | June 17, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Rachel you are a lunatic.
You disagree with how Michigan and Florida were handled? You think it's CHEATING they were left out??? Wow. Do you know WHY those states were disallowed and that Hillary agreed to leaving them out initially?
Please, oh please, keep you and your husbands votes to yourself. There is ONE thing right about your post, cheating is wrong, and I'm glad Hillary didn't prosper from it.
Posted by: Jesse | June 17, 2008 at 01:20 PM
Yawn.
Posted by: N.E. BodybutHillary | June 17, 2008 at 01:30 PM