BREAKING NEWS: Dean, Pelosi, Reid set Friday deadline for superdelegates' choices, move to force end to Clinton bid
With the final primary concluded barely hours before, top Democratic Party leaders in Washington early this morning ratcheted up the pressure to force all remaining uncommitted superdelegates to make their choice of candidate known by Friday -- and thus end the now hopeless, onetime front-running campaign of New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.
The joint statement was obviously pre-planned and timed for issue shortly after Clinton refused to concede the presidential nomination victory to Barack Obama, who's gained sufficient delegates to clinch the party's nomination.
Howard Dean, right, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin, chairman of the Democratic Governors Assn., issued the brief statement for unity just minutes ago:
"The voters have spoken," they said, adding later, "Democrats must now turn our full attention to the general election. To that end, we are urging all remaining uncommitted superdelegates to make their decisions known by Friday of this week, so that our party can stand united."
The carefully worded statement, which does not urge the superdelegates to go one way or the other, is a clear step to force an end to the effort by Clinton, who said Tuesday she would take a few days to consider her options and protect the voices of the nearly 18 million voters who cast ballots for her in recent months. Her hand is now being forced by the Friday deadline.
The move is also a sly one politically, since it leaves Obama free of any appearance of forcing Clinton to quit and thus alienating her millions of supporters, whom the Illinois senator will badly need in the general election come Nov. 4.
In exit polls throughout the just-concluded primary season, an unusually high number of Clinton voters indicated they were likely to reject Obama and vote for the Republican Party's presumptive nominee, Sen. John McCain of Arizona.
A complete text of the Democratic Party leaders' joint statement is available by clicking the "read more" line below.
--Andrew Malcolm
Photo Credit: Associated Press / Manuel Bolce Ceneta
Joint Statement by Democratic Leaders on the End of the Presidential Primary Process
"We have come to the end of an exciting primary and caucus process -- the voters have spoken. As the Democratic leaders of the Senate, House of Representatives, the Governors and the Democratic National Committee we commend all of the participants of the 2008 primary process, especially Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, for making this such a transformational election.
"Because of the enthusiasm our candidates have inspired, our party has brought record numbers of voters to the polls, gained millions of newly registered Democrats and now has advantages in states many thought were difficult to win. We are grateful to the millions of Independents and Republicans who have crossed over to vote for a Democratic candidate for President.
"Democrats must now turn our full attention to the general election. To that end, we are urging all remaining uncommitted superdelegates to make their decisions known by Friday of this week so that our party can stand united and begin our march toward reversing the eight years of failed Bush/McCain policies that have weakened our country.
"We once again congratulate all of the candidates for their leadership and dedication to providing this country with a New Direction. We look forward to working with them and with all Democrats to win the White House, congressional seats and state capitals so we can deliver the change the American people deserve and demand."

Johanna Neuman is a veteran Washington correspondent for both The Los Angeles Times and USA Today, having covered presidents and politics as far back as Ronald Reagan. A former president of the White House Correspondents Assn., she authored a book on media and foreign policy, “Lights, Camera, Wars.” Most recently she was co-author of the
Obama has won on all counts, the only one that matters - delegates - but popular vote as well when you count all states.
There is no excuse left for HRC to not end this now, help bring the party together and move forward. The longer she delays to gain some negotiation advantage the more marginalized she becomes. She lost a great opportunity last night. Let's hope she stops the narcissistic grandstanding and quickly wraps this up - for her sake as well as the party's.
Posted by: thinkresults | June 04, 2008 at 04:48 AM
I once backed Hillary and now I am more than pleased to know why my choice to switch has been validated. She is stuck on stupid and yet she says she is wanting to do what is best for the party. Honestly, if the shoe was on the other foot, this would not even be in the news (the issue of conceding). And to any other Hillary lovers, if they care that much to vote for the opposition, then that itself is just as dumb concidering our economy and the changes that are so needed. She is even more stupid than those that follow her for not taking advantage of an opportunity last night and for not doing at least some damage control for those that are die hard for her to prevent another Republican victory in November.
Posted by: Enigma | June 04, 2008 at 04:55 AM
she's psycho, and clearly thinks only of herself.
thus she's more of the same. get her out of there. the mainstream press is too controlled by big biz to tell it like it is. she's despicable. obama barack is an angel compared to her lowly self. divider, conniving wrench. leave the country now hillary. we don't want you anymore. you've shown your true colors.
Posted by: sofia | June 04, 2008 at 04:57 AM
THIS IS CLASSIC CLINTON- ENTITELED, AND DEFIANT, WHAT A SORE LOOSER, IF SHE IS REALLY MOTIVATED TO THE CAUSE OF DEMOCRATS- BOW OUT WITH GRACE, ACCEPT THAT YOU LOST THE BID, BE GRACIOUS, AND THE NOMINEEE DO WHAT HE DEEMS FIT, AND FOR ONCE PUT THE COUNTRY/PARTY AHEAD OF HER OWN POLITICAL ASPIRATION, SHE LOST- FAIR AND SQUARE, AND ACCEPT IT.
YOUR BRAND OF THE POLITICS HAS BEEN REJECTED, AND IF YOU REALLY HAVE GUTS- RESIGN FROM THE SENATE, AND WORK FOR EMPOWERING THE 18 MILLOIN OR SO VOTERS, YOU CLAIM TO HAVE BACKING OF.
YOU HAVE LIVED OFF TAX PAYERS EXPENSE, ALL YOUR LIFE, GIVE SOME BACK, BE A VOLUNTEER FOR UNITED WAY, AND NEVER CONTEST ANY ELECTION- YOU HAVE BEEN REJECTED-ACCEPT IT.
Posted by: LSC | June 04, 2008 at 04:58 AM
Please arrange deportation of Bill Clinton to Afganistan for 8 years
Posted by: Richard | June 04, 2008 at 04:59 AM
Howard Dean is a failure and a DNC chairman, Nancy Pelosi is a failure as the Speaker of the House after having high hopes for a strong leadership, she caved into to G.W. and Harry Reid may have been an amateur boxer and is an amateur senator who can't get anything done. Where do they come off telling Hillary Clinton who is tougher than all three of them put together? Hillary will be a factor in this election and she's earned it. If the DNC stiff arms her I'll vote for McCain even if it's not what I want to do and it would be bad for the country.
Posted by: Ed | June 04, 2008 at 05:00 AM
Great selection for President this time, a liberal and an socialist. Another Jimma Carter result, God help us.
Posted by: Joe | June 04, 2008 at 05:00 AM
Thank you. Reel her in and let's move forward.
Hillary Clinton, has really shown her true colors. Never in my 65 years of living on this planet...have I experienced such a selfish, self-centered, insensitive, cold, hard, callous, draconian, minipulative (I could go on and on with the adjectives). woman! Has she no SHAME?
Vice President. NOT! She is destructive.
What the Clintons fail to realize is...there is a mightier, more powerful force than them. Whatever, they did/do, they cannot penetrate the wall the Almighty has placed around him. Perhaps, they should open their hearts and ask for forgiveness and be shown a new and better direction in their lives. They both need an intervention...and a tad of therapy.
...it is time for the "Clinton Dynasty," to accept the HISTORICAL event which has come to fruition. They should come out of the denial mode...began the "grieving process," and move on...with dignity.
A Concerned Black Senior
Posted by: MOJO3 | June 04, 2008 at 05:06 AM
It about time..... Clinton has been given enough time .... she needs to get out ... She is pressuring Obama to choose her as his VP ..... And with that comes all her baggage and Bill's..... She lost now she needs to go...
Posted by: LC | June 04, 2008 at 05:06 AM
I am very much AGAINST the sentiment that Senator Clinton be on the Democratic ticket as Vice President. There are many reasons:
1) It undercuts the message of change in Washington. Hillary is part of the establishment and part of the problem.
2) The Obama campaign can win the hispanic vote WITHOUT senator Clinton. Bill Richardson is a better advocate to help win the hispanic vote than Clinton.
3)Senator Clinton showed poor managerial talent in the process of her campaign. Her campaign was wracked with internal turmoil and poor money management.
4) Senator Clinton feels entitled to a position of power. She ran a poor campaign because she assumed she was the inevitable winner. What kind of leader does that? She brazenly spent contributor's money on unneccessaries and lavished herself rather than run a positive and thorough campaign. Her campaign style is evident of her personal view of her role in politics. We have no room for Royalty in washington.
5) Including Senator Clinton on the ticket shows weakness and a willingness to cave to the establishment. If you can't stand up to the powers that be now how can you in the Whitehouse? Including Clinton on the ticket looks like capitulation. SHE DOESN'T DESERVE to be rewarded for running such a shameless campaign.
6) Having the Clinton machine (Bill Included) present in the Whitehouse would undercut and cause difficulties for your presidency (big egos don't play well in little spaces). Senator Clinton and former President Clinton would likely take advantage of every opportunity to upstage you as possible (probably even create some).
7) Clinton may try to have him assassinated (or at the very least scandalized out of office). What would be better than being vice president? How about 12 years as president (serving out the remainder of Obama’s term, plus an additional 2 terms of her own)? I don't trust her and neither should you.
8) He does not need Senator Clinton to win the "big" states. As we all know Democrats turned out in numbers dwarfing the Republican support during this campaign season. Senator Obama WILL win the Democratic strongholds. Senator Clinton is far from welcome in NY, don't make the assumption that she's a necessity to carry any specific constituency.
9) No one person will mobilize the conservative right-wing more than Hillary Clinton. As it stands Bob Barr will put Georgia in play, Ron Paul’s supporters may cause him to be the Ralph Nader of 2008. The electoral map will be far different with Obama vs. McCain. Include Clinton and it will be the same political map as always. The Republicans who support Obama won't likely support an Obama-Clinton ticket.
10) Her behavior is indicative of her narcissism. No matter what she says this election has never been about the American people. It’s been about her. Even now she refuses to concede the nomination. She doesn’t outwardly congratulate Senator Obama on this historic victory. She’s stubborn, conceited and petulant. She’s just like George W. Bush. Hillary Clinton DOES NOT belong on the democratic ticket
I believe that there are better Vice Presidential candidates available for Senator Obama to choose from. I feel that Senator Joe Biden and Governor Bill Richardson make much better Vice Presidential choices. Each of these two men ran much more positive campaigns and exhibit much more integrity than Senator Clinton.
The Democratic "Dream-ticket" is exactly that. A dream; but more like a NIGHTMARE than anything. Please continue the message of Change, Hope, Integrity, Vision, Judgment and Leadership that your campaign has so valiantly advocated.
Senator Obama, please DO NOT choose Hillary Clinton as your running-mate.
Posted by: Eric | June 04, 2008 at 05:09 AM
I think it's great that Obama got the "presumptive" nominee.
But if the democrats think they can steam roller Hillary Clinton until Denver and beyond and pretend the Caucus voting was legitimate, they are probably making a foolish mistake.
That's what happens when there is a billionaire in the background pulling most if not all of the strings.
http://www.CaucusCheating.com
http://www.CaucusConfession.com
http://www.Florida-Michigan.com
http://www.Hillary-Wins.com
Posted by: Alessandro Machi | June 04, 2008 at 05:12 AM
I'm voting for Harrison Ford
Posted by: mike | June 04, 2008 at 05:14 AM
Pelosi must be defeated in her next election for doing all she could to ignore the voters choice and insert her own choice for President. This women should be an embarrassment to all women.
I would prefer that Hillary run as an independent rather than as VP on this losing ticket. I realize that if she ran as independent, that McCain may get the win easier but if she is not on the ticket McCain will win anyway. Also on the ever so slight chance that a Obama/Clinton ticket did win then Hillary would be held responsible for all Obama mistakes and likely end her chance to ever be elected.
Hillary 08
Posted by: jill | June 04, 2008 at 05:14 AM
This smacks of the travesty of the 2000 presidential campaign. Clinton got the majority of the popular vote and a very similar proportion of the pledged delegates as Obama but now the powers that be are throwing their weight for the candidate they think they can control. Superdelegates whether committed or uncommitted should throw their support to the candidates according to the will of their constituents. Given this, Clinton should be the choice of the Democratic party. This is consistent with the earlier comments made by Nancy Pelosi and other democratic party leaders. Unless there is a fair and open accounting of who got the votes and how this translated fairly to the final nomination process, we should all question whether the democratic nominee was really the choice of the people.
Posted by: jj | June 04, 2008 at 05:14 AM
I think Mrs. Clinton would be foolish to concede. Take it to the convention. Barak is most likely going to implode before then because he is not that bright and obviously surrounded by people who will bring him down.
People wake up! Barak Obama is NOT John Kennedy. This is NOT Camelot. Barak Obama is a flash in the pan and cannot win the general election.
Posted by: BillyB | June 04, 2008 at 05:17 AM
Good job Ed. You can clearly admit that voting for McCain is not what you want and bad for the country but you will do it anyway to prove a point. That is exactly what the rest of us are talking about when we say that her followers are not thinking clearly. What is it you really want, a better country or to be right? I think that Hillary just wants to be right, at any cost.
If you care about the future, then do the right thing because it's the right thing to do.
Posted by: Renee | June 04, 2008 at 05:18 AM
"I'll vote for McCain even if it's not what I want to do and it would be bad for the country."
___________________
That says it all. She is nuts. Her supporters are nuts. Obama would be nuts to put her on the ticket.
Posted by: lorax | June 04, 2008 at 05:20 AM
I am not a Hill or Bill fan.
After 15 years enduring two dynasties in American politics, I am sick of Bush AND the Clintons!
However, Dean, Pelozi and Reid are using strong arm tactics to force her out, as they have been trying to do this for months even with primaries pending. It WILL backfire on them and the Democratic Party!
After watching the tactics of the Democratic Machine, I ask... If they will do it to Hill, what will they do to America when they have Congress AND the White House???
The Republican advantage this year is that McCain is tolerable to moderates and I will most certainly give him fair consideration!
Posted by: Howard Ino | June 04, 2008 at 05:22 AM
Hilldebeast and Slick (SICK) Willie will never concede defeat. It was a vast left wing consiracy. It was the media. Obama cheated. The election was stolen from the Billary's. America will be sorry say's Billary.
Darn it all, WE ARE THE CLINTONS, WE DEMAND THE NOMINATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Darrel | June 04, 2008 at 05:24 AM
thinkresults: SAID "popular vote as well when you count all states. " falsly still claiming that Obama won the popular vote. It is very sad to think that these young voters can't count and are so easily misled by TV fools like Matthews, Olbermann and Russert.
FACT: Hillary won the popular vote which means that more people went to the polls to vote for Hillary than Obama. Hillary is ahead by over 180,000 votes according to Real Clear Politics. THE ONLY WAY ONE CAN SPIN THE POPULAR VOTE TO PUT OBAMA IN THE LEAD IS IF YOU COUNT THE "UNCOMMITTED" VOTES IN MI KNOWING THAT THOSE VOTES WERE INTENDED FOR AT LEAST 3 CANDIDATES THAT VIOLATED THE AGREEMENT AND CAMPAIGNED FOR "UNCOMMITTED" VOTES. If we gave Obama 80% of that "uncommitted" vote, Hilary is still ahead. HILLARY WON THE POPULAR VOTE!! EVEN WHEN YOU COUNT THE FAIRY TALE NUMBERS IN THE CAUCUSES.
Posted by: jill | June 04, 2008 at 05:24 AM
ONe quick question: Everytime Hillary is mentioned - she is referred to as HRC- Hillary Rodham Clinton. How come we dont see Barack Obama's middle name mentioned anywhere. Everybody understands that it will and should not be used as a political gimmick- but why hide? Why cant his full name be used when the others are open to their names spelled out to the last "N"?
Posted by: Hillary Win | June 04, 2008 at 05:25 AM
This article which reports that "an unusually high number of Clinton voters indicated they were likely to reject Obama and vote for the Republican Party's presumptive nominee, Sen. John McCain of Arizona" has raised one qzeston in my mind :Have Clinton's supporters something against a Afro-Amrican candidate ? Are they a bit in between the republicans and the supporters of Obama?
I really hope that this willnot be the case.
How come they do not understand that with Republicans the politics they sustain would become a simple dream whereas it would be within reach and practically the same if a Dem like Obama won!
Posted by: melissa | June 04, 2008 at 05:26 AM
The DNC has talked about how GW stole the election from Gore. Well, just what do they think they are doing for HRC. The committee shoould have given HRC all her deligates and divided up the others according to the average percentage that each of the other canidates that were to be on the ballot would have received prior to the MI primary. Obama would not have pulled that many deligates or voters. This was not a democratic process for MI. The committee took from one canidate and unlawfully lifted another. McCain will be my choice!
Posted by: Steve H | June 04, 2008 at 05:26 AM
Eric sums it up pretty perfectly.
Posted by: FC | June 04, 2008 at 05:27 AM
"Great selection for President this time, a liberal and an socialist. Another Jimma Carter result, God help us."
Indeed. We have a conservative in command right now. result: a war, a bigger government, a failing economy, $4+ for a gallon of gas (the list is so long)
Posted by: bw | June 04, 2008 at 05:29 AM
How dare these political hatchet men tell HRC to stand aside? She has more than 18 million Americans backing her and is a major leader in the Democratic Party. She is the best candidate for president, better than McCain and Obama rolled into one. If the party leadership can not see that, then she should become an INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE and crush them both!!
Posted by: kayB | June 04, 2008 at 05:33 AM
As a Republican leaning towards Obama, when Hillary started to speak last night, it sounded like she was going to finally seek the high ground and accept defeat gracefully, and do the one thing which could have redeemed her for all the ugly vitriol she has injected into this campaign. When she finished, I felt like I'd been made a stooge once again. The boundless narcissism of this woman leaves me wishing she would simply disappear entirely from our politics, even though I recognize her energy and her expertise. Even more so when I heard Barrack Obama's very gracious comments and appreciation for her best qualities.
Someone on CNN made this observation about last night: McCain attacked Obama, Hillary was focused entirely upon herself, and Obama talked about the future of this country. I can only hope he decides to leave Hillary to her singular preoccupation, and selects a running mate like him, and not her.
Posted by: ted in pdx | June 04, 2008 at 05:38 AM
I would like to thank the speaker and Mr Ried and Mr. Dean tfor giing us at least 4 more years of republican rule in this coountry. I have always been a democrate but now I WILL for the first time vote repubican just because these 3 assholes wount let the people do the voting.. Good luck getting anything done in congress the next 4 years.. as they said in the movies.........STUPID IS ,......STUPID DOES WE NOW TURN YOU OVER TO THE 3 STOOGES
Posted by: Pat | June 04, 2008 at 05:39 AM
HRC is a cancer to the Democratic party. She lost and now she is trying to strong arm her way into the VP slot. Clinton supports vote against your own interest in the fall if you choose to that is your right. Hillary will be calling President Obama for a pardon after the Peter Paul v Hillary and William Clinton case goes to trial her in California in the fall. Since she wants all of you to writer her ask her about the 1.2 million dollars campaign finance fraud case scheduled for the fall of this year.
CNN probably won't post this because they have tried to confuse people with non-since and they are fully aware of this pending case. The Republicans would eat her for lunch if Obama puts her on the ticket.
Posted by: George | June 04, 2008 at 05:41 AM
It's the "Ed"s of this country (see above) that gave us eight years of George Bush.
Posted by: Kithara | June 04, 2008 at 05:41 AM
Face it...Obama is a phenom......like Stockard Channing...
like...Derek Jeter....like...Tiger Woods....like anyone that
breaks ground and makes history! If he chooses the
right Conservative White Male Running Mate...he could
be one of America's Greatest most popular Presidents!
Posted by: Ron Winship | June 04, 2008 at 05:41 AM
I am not really a Democrat nor a Republican. A 60 year old marrried baby boomer my wife and I vote for who we feel is the best genuine candidate at the time. UNFORTUNATELY, this year is a big letdown for us. SO FAR, from watching the coverage day & night we feel that AMERICA'S RACIAL DIVIDE STIRS ALIVE STILL TODAY IN 2008. We expect THE NEXT FIVE MONTHS TO PROVE how much BLACKS RESENT WHITE as well as WHITES still resenting BLACKS. It is a real shame.
This year, we will NOT be voting. GOD BLESS AMERICA but 20 years of listening to Trinity United Church affirm OBAMA as either "DUMB" which he is NOT or as he puts it a 46 year old "ORGANIZER" who is hiding anti-white resentment FOR NOW.
Posted by: Steve Baum | June 04, 2008 at 05:43 AM
All of you who posted about Hillarys arrogance and her self centeredness are correct-amundo - she beleived strongly that she couldn't lose and couldn't do no wrong. the irony is that belief cost her the nomination. Thank Goodness.
When I first heard of her years ago when Bill was running I read and article that when she was 16 she started planning -not thinking about but actually conceiving of a plan to become the first female president.
I knew nothing else about her other than that was pretty sick. Her and Bill combined are pretty sick people.
Posted by: C Firsbay | June 04, 2008 at 05:44 AM
I cannot support mirrors and smoke Obama. Clinton has been malaigned this entire process. And you cannot discount all the voters who support her. I will not vote for Obama unless CLinton is on the ticket.
Posted by: D. Madsen | June 04, 2008 at 05:44 AM
HRC's current behavior is exactly why I couldn't support her. I believe her motives are self serving and she is out of touch with reasonable behavior. Does anyone remember the look on her face during the state of the union address following 9/11, a time of unprecedented national unity? Sour.
Posted by: SDF | June 04, 2008 at 05:45 AM
Hillary is allowed to leave the race gracefully. Sheesh!
Dean, Pelozi and Reid are being too pushy about this process.
I have been a Democrat forever but because of how rude they are being, I will be voting for McCain this time around.
Posted by: Texasfan | June 04, 2008 at 05:46 AM
Ed,
"Howard Dean is a failure and a DNC chairman, Nancy Pelosi is a failure as the Speaker of the House after having high hopes for a strong leadership, she caved into to G.W. and Harry Reid may have been an amateur boxer and is an amateur senator who can't get anything done. Where do they come off telling Hillary Clinton who is tougher than all three of them put together? Hillary will be a factor in this election and she's earned it. If the DNC stiff arms her I'll vote for McCain even if it's not what I want to do and it would be bad for the country. "
Stop crying. We, America, think Obama will make a better president the Hillary. How about you join our country.
Posted by: Tim | June 04, 2008 at 05:47 AM
It doesn’t matter if she doesn’t concede. The game is over; unless we start making new ones, Hillary has run out of states. At the end of the fourth quarter, if you’re down by 10 points – you loose. Your concession isn’t necessary. It doesn’t matter if you really want to win, it doesn’t matter if you want to keep playing; the game is over.
I hope HRC continues with her vulture policy and insists on remaining on the field. The more she refuses to be graceful the less politically viable she will be in the future. Hopefully this will be her only presidential bid. I would like to see this stunt hurt her when she runs to keep her seat in the Senate. I think this is too much to ask though. You cannot underestimate Clinton survivability.
Posted by: Ich | June 04, 2008 at 05:47 AM
Posted by: Alessandro Machi, blah, blah, blah, caucus are bad, blah. Listen, I dare ou to go to one of these states and tell the people that their selection process is illegitimate. I dare you! But you won't, as you're a coward who loves to spit out garbage about democracy being thwarted, all the while actually working against it. Clintonista's remind me of Communists. Everything is ok, as long as you select her! So, why was Bill Clinton such a fan of caucuses? Reason, because at least he had skill. Hillary is a hack! A not talent, borderline communist, narcissistic HACK, that lost a campaign to a new guy! The pure fact she has a vagina is not a reason for her to be POTUS, there must be skill, and judgment, and she is sorely lacking in each. I look forward to hers and the rest of the Clinton's political demise!
Posted by: Disgusted Democrat | June 04, 2008 at 05:48 AM
For the first time in almost 20 years I am not voting this time. This primary process has left it clear that democracy does not exist in this country. It has also made it clear that the "CHANGE" Obama keeps insisting upon is not change at all.
Biased irresponsible journalism constantly in the news, unconstitutional election processes, hatchet jobs, sexism, misogyny. That is what this primary was all about. It's the same way Bush won the election twice. I see no "CHANGE."
What I saw was a strong powerful candidate that ended up on the wrong end of a smear job. That is what pisses me off. Obama did not win this race, it was handed to him by people stronger than he is.
Posted by: Ryan | June 04, 2008 at 05:48 AM
Way to go Obama!
Posted by: JOHN LONGENECKER | June 04, 2008 at 05:50 AM
I will never vote for Obama. Hillary forever. What a shame. McCain will get my vote. I have been Democrat for all my life. It's a shame a women can never stand a chance in a man's world. Hillary could change that all for us she is so strong.
Posted by: McGee | June 04, 2008 at 05:50 AM
I like that. HRC should run as an independent now... This will make the race more interesting...:)
Posted by: Tony | June 04, 2008 at 05:50 AM
JJ,
"Clinton got the majority of the popular vote and a very similar proportion of the pledged delegates as Obama but now the powers that be are throwing their weight for the candidate they think they can control. "
Well, for starter she didn't get the majority of the vote. It may have been close depending on what math you use, but the only way she is ahead is if you count votes for hillary that she doesn't diserve(all the michigan votes) and you dont count the votes in the caucus states(which cant be counted). Basically, if you fudge the math you can make it look however you want, Clinton is good for telling a long fairy tale without actually lying.
Posted by: Tim | June 04, 2008 at 05:52 AM
Pretty amazing, how many people think like Ed... "I'll vote for McCain even if it's not what I want to do and it would be bad for the country."
I can only hope, people like Ed wake-up, because it's analogous to a steer saying, "I don't want to die, but I sure like the color of that slaughter house's walls."
As for anyone saying that Hillary won the popular vote, it just shows that the Dems have as many non-thinking sheep, as the GOP. The only way HC won the popular vote, is if you don't count most of the caucuses, and think nobody in the State of Michigan would have voted for him, had he been on the ballot. Just because someone says something, doesn't mean it's true.
And by the way, I voted for Hillary in the primary - - I'd really like to see a woman Pres.
I suspect some of the anti-Obama sentiment, among Hillary voters, is racially-based, unfortunately. Just remember, electing McCain is in essence, ensuring 2 or 3 more Roberts/Alitos on the Supreme Court.
Posted by: jon | June 04, 2008 at 05:53 AM
"Howard Dean is a failure and a DNC chairman, Nancy Pelosi is a failure as the Speaker of the House after having high hopes for a strong leadership, she caved into to G.W. and Harry Reid may have been an amateur boxer and is an amateur senator who can't get anything done. Where do they come off telling Hillary Clinton who is tougher than all three of them put together? Hillary will be a factor in this election and she's earned it. If the DNC stiff arms her I'll vote for McCain even if it's not what I want to do and it would be bad for the country. "
Wow! so you are willing to have the country in the worst position that it already is because government figures are askingto unite as soon as possible so we can fight the one that mess up the country.
One question I want to ask you who will benefit from you voting for McCain instead of a democrat, not Hillary she has millions in the bank, not Obama he also have some millions in the bank whop right is struggling to pay for bills, to put gas in their car, to get healthcare, who is stying home because their job has been move overseas?
Wake Americans and stop this madness, stop taliking likeyou are stupid, the only one who will get hurt by voting for McCain is you not the candidate just you.
Posted by: Martine Joseph | June 04, 2008 at 05:55 AM
I am so sorry that Hillary is not going to lead this country out of the dilema that Bush has gotten us in. I am also sorry that Barrack Hussin Obama might be the nominee...He will try to make this country a ghetto.
Posted by: freedom_diva | June 04, 2008 at 05:56 AM
All you Hillary supporters are unbelievable. You remind me of a bunch of rabid, ignorant republicans. Your candidate made mistakes and lost. So what do you want to do? You want to take your ball and go home. That's just childish! You are either complete idiots or your republicans in disguise. Either way the only person who wins is McCain. As for Dean, Pelosi, Reid, their biggest problem is they don't have the courage to stand up and be counted themselves. It's time for Hillary to step aside and her supporters to get behind our nominee. Obama/? '08
Posted by: Cos | June 04, 2008 at 06:01 AM
Go Hillary! Run as an independent! You can do it girl. GO, Go, Go.
Posted by: Jerry | June 04, 2008 at 06:04 AM
As I volunteered for the campaign here in KY, I was struck by the sheer nastiness of the Obama supporters. As evidenced here in this post. McCain supporters were civil to us...Obama people were profain and harrassing, taunting us and physically destroying signs just yards from where we legally stood, spreading our message. The police were called, but the young hoodlums were gone. These new young voters are too idealist, like Obama. Too untried and untested. These new young voters are unaware of the huge block of older voters who are just unable to vote for a black man. It's just a societal reality.
Real change would be a woman in the oval office for the first time in history, but the good ole boy network will not allow it. They want that young black guy to push around, and they already are. They are afraid of Hillary's power, and well they should be. If I can't vote for her for president, I'll vote for her for vice president. If Obama doesn't have the sense to do that, she'll be my write in choice, or my independent. I won't stand behind a Democratic party that does not support the will of this voter!
Posted by: laura in KY | June 04, 2008 at 06:04 AM