BREAKING NEWS: John McCain jettisons the Rev. John Hagee's endorsement
John McCain, who at one point actively pursued an endorsement from controversial pastor John Hagee, just severed ties after reports surfaced of yet more incendiary comments by the conservative minister -- this time targeting Jews.
The comments came in the late 1990s, when Hagee said that the Nazis were doing God's work to shepherd Jews to Palestine. Hagee also has referred to the Catholic Church as "the Great Whore." McCain earlier disassociated himself from Hagee's comments but kept the endorsement. This afternoon, he jettisoned the endorsement.
But he also tooks pains to point out his "minister problem" is different from the one that Barack Obama has been dealing with.
“Obviously, I find these remarks and others deeply offensive and indefensible, and I repudiate them. I did not know of them before Rev. Hagee's endorsement, and I feel I must reject his endorsement as well. I have said I do not believe Sen. Obama shares Rev. Wright's extreme views. But let me also be clear, Rev. Hagee was not and is not my pastor or spiritual advisor, and I did not attend his church for 20 years. I have denounced statements he made immediately upon learning of them, as I do again today."
-- Scott Martelle



So when does he 'reject and denounce' Rod Parsley? After everyone in the blogosphere posts x number of articles about Parsley's views?
McCain's reading comprehension is really low if he didn't know what Hagee had said until today. Is that why he graduated second-to-last at the US Naval Academy? Explains a lot.
Posted by: Tom J | May 22, 2008 at 01:38 PM
I’m 35, and have been following politics for quite a while, and I’ve never been so disappointed with a politician I’ve admired and respected. Yesterday’s tactics weren’t just wrong, they were offensive. For that matter, they seem to be part of a deliberate strategy to tear Democrats apart and ensure a defeat in November.
For several weeks, I’ve appreciated the fact that Clinton considers herself the superior candidate, and has kept her campaign going in the hopes, from her perspective, of saving the party from itself. But after yesterday, it’s become impossible for me to consider Clinton’s intentions honorable. Her conduct is not that of a leader.
Instead of trying to help bring the party together — Election Day is 24 weeks away — Clinton went to Florida to argue that if Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee, his nomination will be illegitimate. And if the DNC plays by the rules Clinton used to support, it’s guilty of vote-suppression — comparable to slavery, Jim Crow, and Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe.
It is disgusting for HRC to co-opt the Civil Rights struggle after weeks of transparent appeals that whites won’t vote for the black guy which JUST SO COINCIDENTALLY took form during the Appalachian primaries (which conveniently occurred after North Carolina, the last state with a large black population)
It really is disgusting, and yet another nail in the coffin of what used to be Bill and Hillary's positive legacy to the party. She is now being openly mocked across the media and political spectrum. But I'm sure mentioning that is "sexist", and that everyone criticizing the joke her campaign has become is sexist as well.
Posted by: SMS | May 22, 2008 at 01:40 PM
McCain went out of his way to get endorsements from Hagee and his so-called "spiritual adviser" Rod Parsley. I confidently predict he'll have to reject Parsley soon as well.
Posted by: Franklin | May 22, 2008 at 01:46 PM
This is just another explanation from the worst flip flopper in politics. He says one thing and then other people and McCain have to explain what he really meant, like English was a second language. McCain is as hypocritical as Hagee. They cherry pick the Bible or comments and after caught in slips of tongues, they act like they were at the site where the Holy Spirit gave the ability to the disciples of talking different tongues, languages. He could have been there. McCain is none other that another Bush, but with a tad more of I.Q. He was third from the bottom at the US Navy Academy. We need somebody with a more I.Q. This lack of brains is killing us and democracy.
Posted by: Jorge I. Gomez | May 22, 2008 at 01:49 PM
This is just another explanation from the worst flip flopper in politics. He says one thing and then other people and McCain have to explain what he really meant, like English was a second language. McCain is as hypocritical as Hagee. They cherry pick the Bible or comments and after caught in slips of tongues, they act like they were at the site where the Holy Spirit gave the ability to the disciples of talking different tongues, languages. He could have been there. McCain is none other that another Bush, but with a tad more of I.Q. He was third from the bottom at the US Navy Academy. We need somebody with a more I.Q. This lack of brains is killing us and democracy.
Posted by: Jorge I. Gomez | May 22, 2008 at 01:49 PM
I know this is a minor, minor quibble, but could someone please fix that typo in the second graph? Nzais?
[Done. And thanks for the sharp eye.]
Posted by: Andrew | May 22, 2008 at 02:10 PM
to SMS: I'm twice your age and have been following politics since the ninth grade, and I, too, have never been as disappointed in a politician before as i am now in McCain. True, I found Clinton disappointing, too, but I never expected from him in the first place. McCain I had come to admire and respect. No longer.
Posted by: Aexander Mac Donald | May 22, 2008 at 02:18 PM
Wow! That was fast. Thank you.
On an unrelated note, wouldn't mind seeing an item commenting on this row in the blogosphere:
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/page/news/50836-conservative-critics-raise-stink-over-decemberistsbarack-obama-rally
Posted by: Andrew | May 22, 2008 at 02:20 PM
There is no God. These so called ministers are inventing messages from no one and conveying them to a superstitious flock who cling to a ancient myths. Note how often this spiritual nonsense interferes with the consideration of very real problems of war and economic deprivation.
Posted by: Mr Nerdbird | May 22, 2008 at 02:34 PM
I'd rather have Hagee's endorsement than that of HAMAS. If you blame McCain for Hagee's views, you have to blame Obama's for HAMAS'.
Posted by: truthful witness | May 22, 2008 at 02:34 PM
McCain is right !!! He denounced the off color remarks by Hagee and the endorsement after he was informed of their content. This is the correct action and the same should have been done 20 years ago by Obama, who participated, condoned and acted an an enabler to Rev. Wright. There is a measurable diffeence in maturity and integrity exhibited by McCain which is lacking in Obama.
This, along with other major important issues places Republican party ahead of Dems. I hope they register more voters and win the election! Monty Ousley weddell
Posted by: Monty Ousley Weddell | May 22, 2008 at 02:34 PM
Why did he bother? The media didn't cause HALF the fuss it did over Reverend Wright's much less controversial views.
Posted by: TruthIsTreasonComplianceIsPatriotic | May 22, 2008 at 02:36 PM
I am so pleased at the growing education of the American people of the racist ties that Obama has. That closet racist man was not properly vetted and it is a national discrace. If his ties to racists (Wright and Farrakhan) had been published months ago, the racist would not be on top now. I'm sick of our rigged political process that would permit this racist to become a leading candidate.
Posted by: Elrey Jones | May 22, 2008 at 02:39 PM
Did you know the founder of Zionism encouraged anti-Semitism as a way to manipulate us?
“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews. . . become worse. . . this will assist in realization of our plans. . . I have an excellent idea. . . I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . . The anti-semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends”
-- Theodor Herzl, Founder of Zionism in 1897
Posted by: LatinAmericanview | May 22, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Way to be an idiot 'truthfulwitness'.
Hamas never endorsed Barack Obama. One of their top officials mentioned in an interview that 'we like Obama'. Maybe they're hoping something will actually change in our foreign policy which will stop us from turning the whole region into a warzone. (Unlike Clinton's threats of obliteration...)
Obama has repeatedly stated that they never have endorsed him and that he completely rejects any positive comment they may have made towards him.
Let's just hold McCain accountable for every crazed Republican dirtbag that prefers him in this election then (including our commander in chief whose endorsement he actively accepted.)
Posted by: Franklin | May 22, 2008 at 02:45 PM
Mc went to FL to kiss jewish voter butts and they nailed him on this - it has been around every since the got the endorsement but NOT until he was forced into doing something did he speak out. He tried to dance around this by having hagee apologize; hagee has offended both Catholics and Jews amongst other but I guess that Jewish votes are paramont at the moment.
Now if Mc could address Parsley, Farwell and the fact that he was hugged up with Bush will New Orleans was in dire need?
What about the Lobbiest, GI Bill ... there are more but this should start the flip-flop dance Mc loves him some GWB
Posted by: Daly | May 22, 2008 at 02:46 PM
As a conservative, I deplored the dems. After almost 8 years of Republican rule, I sadly realize that politicians are all the same. Obama, Clinton, McCain -- No real difference. They say what is necessary and expedient in dealing with the topic of the moment.
Posted by: Bert Webb | May 22, 2008 at 02:48 PM
What a slime bucket! Why did he have to bring politics into it to smear Obama? He should have just repudiated the endorsement and kept his integrity, instead of being such a politician.
Posted by: Rose | May 22, 2008 at 02:51 PM
I laugh at the Obama supports that disguise themselves as Hillary supporters. I still support her enthusiastically! After this repudiation of Hagee, John McCain is starting to look better all the time!
Posted by: Steve Sanchez | May 22, 2008 at 02:56 PM
Its nice that Hagee can say what he wants about Catholics and McCain wouldn't reject but when he says something against the jews, he does. Shows he doesn't think much of Catholics.
Posted by: ed | May 22, 2008 at 02:57 PM
John McCain is not only 100% medically handicapped but his brain has been severely affected during the captivity and at this age he has lost his hearing, skill and tamper too. He is afraid to release his full medical report. I am my self 70 years old and I know how much I can remember and how much I can do skill work. I go to the Church where people like me are worrying about the America under John McCain very much because he may not only be our oldest President but he will follow the foot-steps of King George Bush and that will really make America the most hated Nation on the Globe.
If he was not knowing about HAGEE, WHY NOT HE ASKED SOME ONE TO SEE HIS BIODATA ON GOOGLE? I KNOW HE CANNOT OPERATE COMPUTER BY HIMSELF. ALSO, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE HE SHOULD FIND OUT ABOUT PARSLEY TOO. GOD SAVE AMERICA FROM THESE HYPOCRITES.
Posted by: john baguta | May 22, 2008 at 02:57 PM
Its nice that Hagee can say what he wants about Catholics and McCain wouldn't reject but when he says something against the jews, he does. Shows he doesn't think much of Catholics.
Posted by: ed | May 22, 2008 at 02:58 PM
Tom J,
I am a full Dem supporter. However, I will never vote for a black man. I will turn my suport to McCain as all of my friends will do. I believe that this will be demonstrated that there are stilli issues in this country based on race and sexism. The only thing having Obama as the presidential candidate will do is assure that McCain will be the next president.
Posted by: Big D | May 22, 2008 at 02:58 PM
As a jew, I find McCain's decision completely arbitrary and wrong.
Indeed, at about the time Hagee made his comment on the Shoa, I was discussing this very question with my friends and several rabbis.
And without a doubt I confirm that THE RABBIS were ALL in agreement that it is possible that G-D wanted to 'prune' the jewish people before opening the way to the re-establishement of the State of Israel.
I recall that, initially at the time, my friends and I were a bit 'uneasy' at this suggestion. The rabbis made it clear that NOTHING happens to the jewish people unless G-D lets it happen. Hence, it is perfectly reasonable to emit the hypothesis that G-D was behind this horrible event in human history.
To determine a reason for the Shoa is NOT a matter for politiciens to decide just like that in an instant. Many learned people spent years and years thinking about this event without concluding one way or other whether the Lord played any part in bringing about the Shoa.
If we jews ask ourselves these questions, why would other people, especially learned people such as the good Mr. Hagee, not be allowed to express their own suggestions ?
It is most intollerant to condemn these remarks because they do not show any hatred towards jews but they merely suggest possible reasons and G-D's intent.
This is in no way comparable to Wright's statements which have forged Obama's beliefs. A very worisome source as far as I am concerned.
Disclosure: I support Clinton. Should Obama be the nominee, I appeal to all to vote for Mc Cain. Obama will bring abomination to the USA.
Posted by: Leon Fiss - Geneva - Switzerland | May 22, 2008 at 02:59 PM
If you hate Hamas, "truthful witness,"and I assume you do, why would you even give a tiny bit of credence to their so-called "endorsement?" It sounds like you're just looking for ways to justify voting for McCain or possibly even a justification for voting for Bush. The Hamas endorsement doesn't mean anything to people with a modicum of intelligence.
Posted by: Steve | May 22, 2008 at 03:00 PM