Hillary Clinton apologizes to Kennedys
In a talk with the Argus Leader in South Dakota earlier today, Hillary Clinton took a walk through political history -- and stepped on a figurative land mine. Asked about her continuing campaign against increasingly long odds, she invoked 1968 and the assassination of Bobby Kennedy fairly late in the primary calendar. Her intent seemed to be to point out that anything can happen.
But with Ted Kennedy gravely ill, and an undercurrent in the election of the risks
Barack Obama faces, well, the reaction was not quite what she expected. Which led the campaign to release this statement a few minutes ago:
"Earlier today I was discussing the Democratic primary history and in the course of that discussion mentioned the campaigns that both my husband and Senator Kennedy waged in California in June 1992 and 1968 and I was referencing those to make the point that we have had nomination primary contests that go into June. That’s a historic fact. The Kennedys have been much on my mind the last days because of Senator Kennedy and I regret that if my referencing that moment of trauma for our entire nation, and particularly for the Kennedy family was in any way offensive. I certainly had no intention of that, whatsoever. My view is that we have to look to the past and to our leaders who have inspired us and give us a lot to live up to, and I’m honored to hold Senator Kennedy’s seat in the United States Senate from the state of New York and have the highest regard for the entire Kennedy family."
Gaffes like that don't help you play catch up with the SuperDs.
-- Scott Martelle



Her intent was not to poit out that "anything can happen">
It was to point out that there is historical precidence for campaigns going well into the summer undecided. That is why she mention her husband's campaign as well as RFK's. If tragedy had not struck RFK when it did the campaign would have gone on much, much longewr.
Posted by: Destini | May 23, 2008 at 02:34 PM
No wonder why Hillary Clinton has a 50% negative rating.
Posted by: Bob Kholos | May 23, 2008 at 02:35 PM
What about Obama's gaffes, which get almost no media exposure?
--57 or is it 58 states in the US?
--The Great Lakes of Oregon?
--Iran is small threat? Or grave threat? Depends on the day that you ask Obama.
--They speak Arabic in Afghanistan?
--There's a President in Canada?
--What about the fact that he was born 4 years before the event that precipitated his birth?
His campaign said that he was "metaphorically" speaking.
--Kentucky is closer to Arkansas than Illinois even though Kentucky BORDERS ILLINOIS AND ARKANSAS DOES NOT.
--He does not know about Hanford even though Hanford is the most toxic site in the US, a security risk, and poses environmental and human health dangers.
AND HE VOTED ON A BILL REGARDING HANFORD JUST THREE YEARS AGO.
Let's start counting Obama's gaffes, especially since they appear to be growing exponentially by the day.
Posted by: brandy | May 23, 2008 at 03:04 PM
I just read on MSNBC that Hillary has referenced the Robert Kennedy assassination as a reason to stay in the race. Everybody MUST STOP supporting this sick twisted psychopath.
Posted by: N.E. BodybutHillary | May 23, 2008 at 03:14 PM
Brandy, there is a different between harmless gaffes where someone mis-states a fact and everyone knows it was an accident (e.g. Obama saying 57 states instead of 47 states) and making a remark suggesting she's staying in the race in case Obama gets assassinated in June like RFK.
In fairness to Clinton: when I first heard the reports of what she said, I was outraged, but when I listened to the interview it seemed she was inarticulately trying to make the point that nominating contests sometimes go until June. Nevertheless, it was in extremely poor taste for her to say it that way -- why couldn't she just say Bobby Kennedy didn't win the nomination until June? This is not a "57-state" caliber gaffe, this is a "bitter-gate" caliber gaffe, and she needs to make an appropriate apology (which she has yet to do). Whether HRC likes it or not, the implication of her comment (whether intended or not) was that she is sticking around in case Obama gets assassinated.
Even Mike Huckabee had enough sense to immediately apologize for his dumb joke about someone pointing a gun at Obama.
Posted by: Tex | May 23, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Hillary,
The media is getting ridiculous. I dislike Hillary just as much the next person, and I sincerely did not think she intended to be offensively shallow. The Kennedy's know that, and most sensible people know that. Hillary is not that twisted...is she?
Posted by: robinia | May 23, 2008 at 04:22 PM
When I heard this, I immediately thought, how apropos. Obama's campaign is now trouncing on 'much to do about nothing' the way Clinton has trounced since his Iowa win. Turnabout is fair play.
Posted by: marla OC, Ca. | May 23, 2008 at 04:27 PM
To think that I actually considered voting for HRC early in the campaign. Her comments and intractability in the face of insurmountable odds speak of sheer desperation. She is embarassing herself and possibly harming a potential future run for the presidency. And frankly at this juncture, she would make a lousy running mate for Sen. Obama. She thinks she is somehow special and entitled to continue this charade and refuses to recognize the inevitablility of the process. This is the most selfish display by a candidate I can recall in recent presidential elections.
Posted by: Mark | May 23, 2008 at 04:28 PM
Last i checked, the Democratic Party convention in 1968 was one of the most violent, tumultuous political events in modern US history, and that was in the midst of a social revolution, AND it signaled the ascendance of the conservative movement on a nationwide scale. Maybe Hillary longs for a return to that chaos... when she was a true progressive btw, not the triangulating chameleon she's become.
Posted by: Ezes | May 23, 2008 at 04:47 PM
Funny how the media ignored Hillary after she won WV by 41 points and KY by 36 votes. Now she makes a silly comment and all of a sudden the media remembers who she is. I dont care about Hillary's gaffes. I am loyal and will thus support her until the end. HIllary is the best candidate running for president. PERIOD
Posted by: Robert | May 23, 2008 at 04:53 PM
Of course Hillary Clinton is trying to squirm her way out of this gaffe and make it appear she was just misunderstood. It won't work. The implications of her remarks were all too clear. Clinton needs to apologize not only to the Kennedy family but also to Barack Obama and the American people. She should be ashamed ... thoroughly ashamed.
Posted by: jamesincalifornia | May 23, 2008 at 04:58 PM
Hillary Clinton has made too many statements for which she 'apologized'. Apologies only accentuate the blunder or lie. So she had better be careful not to 'misspeak' again. Are these 'misspoken' statements signs of a disquieting mental state or condition which disqualifies her candidacy for the world's most demanding and important job? Her 'sell-by' date is not that distant.
Posted by: San Ying | May 23, 2008 at 05:06 PM
Actually, if you listen to the apology from her campaign, they're saying, essentially, "we're sorry you guys didn't understand us". Another classic HRC refusal to just say "I'm sorry, I was wrong". It's pathological with this woman, just like it's pathological with Bush. Probably why they both wanted the Iraq War.
Posted by: Harry Grace | May 23, 2008 at 05:15 PM
Hillary will never leave the stage. And she would like someone to help her out by eliminating Obama. But she didn't "mean it that way." Of course she didn't. Right.
Posted by: abdul rahim | May 23, 2008 at 05:18 PM
Swift and absolute action is required on behalf of all Democrats, all Americans and all People to denounce such hideous analogies. This is not the first time Senator Clinton has used the specter of death as a call to action in her campaign, and it is certainly not the worst (showing a willingness to obliterate an entire nation certainly wins the award for most awful). We cannot stand for politics that play on fear, we cannot stand for politics that play such overt games with the psyche of a nation. We cannot stand for a candidate who raises the issue of the destruction of lives as the reason to support their candidacy, and worse, the reason for their own hopes for the future.
Support Senator Obama, denounce the comments and tactics of Senator Clinton and send a message to the people of this great nation and the world that we see a future of Promise, Hope and Peace.
Posted by: BRFK | May 23, 2008 at 05:27 PM
CNN reports that this is the second time she made the very same assertion. Last time it was in a Time interview. She is indeed one sick puppy. This is beyond bad taste. This now bespeaks the lack of ethics for those those who would continue to cast a blind eye to her vile tactics. She is essentially saying let's wait and see if Barack lives to become the nominee. Nobody, absolutely nobody should condone her actions or put any spin on them.
Posted by: Stop Hillary | May 23, 2008 at 05:32 PM
This election is some sort of Battle of the Outrage All-Stars. Obama - Rev. Wright, Hillary - Bosnian fire, Obama - Michelle's patriotism, Hillary - Bill, Obama - bitter white people with guns and religion, Hillary - RFK's assassination late in the primary season.... So, does the candidate who has inspired the least outrage win? What an insightful way to choose a presidential candidate...!
Posted by: Benny | May 23, 2008 at 05:55 PM
Come one folks, even as a non-supporter, I know what she meant and she didn't mean what people are criticizing her for. I think it was just a stupid mistake and of course, it just makes her look bad. Why didn't she just that both her husband and RFK campaigned into June?why would you invoke the memory of someone getting assasinated--regardless of what your point is?
I am critical however of all the new ways she's trying to justify why she should stay in the race. First, it's because of the super delegates. Then, it's because i will do better against McCain. Then it's because i won the bigger states. Then, it's making sure Florida and Michigan are represented. Then, it's because i can get the racist white vote. Then, it's the popular vote. Now it's because other candidates have done so in the past? What's next?
Her story changes each time Obama proves her wrong. Of course, God forbid, we actually go with whomever wins the delegate count.
Posted by: Dennis | May 23, 2008 at 05:59 PM
To brandy: "Let's start counting Obama's gaffes, especially since they appear to be growing exponentially by the day."
Clinton voted in support of the Iraq war. Oops.
Posted by: Dennis | May 23, 2008 at 06:03 PM
Ouch. Some things you just don't incite. She is done. Unforgivable.
Posted by: Scott | May 23, 2008 at 06:04 PM
Clinton is beyond vile.
Please contact Howard Dean (deanh@dnc.org) and Nancy Pelosi (http://speaker.house.gov/) to let them know how you feel. You can also go to this website and lobby the Uncommitted Superdelegates in each state (https://www.lobbydelegates.com/)
Please take action.
Posted by: Andi | May 23, 2008 at 06:05 PM
Who gives a rip? Anybody remember Chappaquiddick? Kennedy is a slime ball not fit to lick Hillary's boot!
Posted by: Joe American | May 23, 2008 at 06:24 PM
Hilary has NOTHING to apologize for.
This is another example of OBAMAS DIRTY POLITICS, DIVISIVE POLITICS and RACE BAITING.
Obama is willing to hurt this nation for his own self interests.
This has only done one thing....helped me MAKE UP MY MIND ....I will NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA.....even if I have to vote Republican.
I cannot in good conscious vote for a person who sat in a racist church for 20 years and applauded, cheered, supported and funded RACISM and ANTI-AMERICAN propoganda.
Yet this is the same man that is willing to TRASH a former First Lady and make ridiculous insinuations in order to win this election.
This latest action by Obama was the LAST STRAW ....
I will NO LONGER be able to Vote for Obama
Posted by: annie | May 23, 2008 at 06:25 PM
I agree with Brandy.
Obama gets more free passes than Hillary, and the big to-do about the "Bosnia" remarks were about as harmless as Obama's gaffes. It's not like she lied about Bosnia having a war.
Obama gets to "joke away" his gaffes, but Hillary has to apologize profusely for hers.
But overall, this contest has been more about non-issues than the real problems that are facing our nation. It's kind of silly when "mis speaks" garner more coverage between supporters than what is going on in the world... such as, the earthquake in China, the cyclone in Myanmar, the war in Irag, etc.
I understand this presidential election is one of the most important ones we will have in the history of the US, so it's really sad that so many of us are saying so many nasty things to each other. Let us just agree to disagree, without using profane language against each other, or the candidates we support. They are both good people, with good intentions.
Posted by: Justice | May 23, 2008 at 06:36 PM
A new LOW in politics has been descended into by the AWFUL Clintons.
Now, if you can't beat your opponent with ideas and BOGUS "experience" and you CANNOT incite racial hatred against your opponent, you speak of a wish that your opponent be off'ed in June before the primary!
SHAME on BILLARY. You ARE UNFIT to be President!!
Posted by: KYJurisDoctor | May 23, 2008 at 06:39 PM