Barack Obama should tap the "real thing" for veep, Ed Rendell says
Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, who describes himself as the "last of the Mohicans" sticking by Hillary Clinton to the bitter end of the Democratic presidential primary, today endorsed the idea of a ticket that combines her with rival Barack Obama.
Pundits have speculated that a high-profile Clinton supporter -- such as Rendell -- would make a good running mate for Obama, should the Illinois senator finally lock down that party's nomination.
But Rendell says Obama shouldn't settle for a Clinton substitute.
"If Sen. Obama becomes our nominee and he wants . . . someone to carry the Clinton banner," Rendell told CNN, "there's no question in my mind they should ask Hillary Clinton to be that candidate."
Would she accept? Rendell, one of the Clinton family's closest advisors, conceded he's not sure.
"I don't know whether she would accept," he said. "I don't know whether he would do it. But don't settle for . . . a Clinton supporter. You've got the real thing, someone who has energized voters."
-- Christi Parsons
Christi Parsons writes for the Swamp of the Chicago Tribune's Washington bureau.



I do not think this will happen for a number of reasons. Clinton is not a fit for his change message which is at the core of his run. Clinton has said she or McCain would make a better president than Obama and the Republican no doubt will seize on this in the fall.
I would suggest Senator Obama will pick a Republican believe it or not. In the form of a reformer, a veteran or popular in a battleground state like Ohio or Florida. Perhaps the best combination of those factors.
My guess is Chuck Hagel (R) of Nebraska and I think he would be an excellent choice.
Dark horses are Palin (R) from Alaska and Webb (R) from Virginia.
Posted by: Deward Bowles | May 14, 2008 at 02:32 PM
Ed Rendell is an ass. Case closed.
Obama doesn't need him or Clinton when good people like Edwards and Richardson are there for the taking.
Posted by: captainkona | May 14, 2008 at 02:36 PM
It's up to Obama's ego.
Can he handle running with Clinton and then working a possible 8 years with her....
Or does he rather go down as the loser in one of the biggest landslides in history.
Whichever his ego can take.
Posted by: Toby | May 14, 2008 at 02:41 PM
If Barack Obama wants to tap 'the real thing' the last thing he needs to do is recruit Hillary Clinton, or one of her supporters. The entire theme of the Obama campaign has been 'the system needs fundamental change.' To utilize Clinton power is giving tacit approval to the system they epitomize. Ed Rendells logic is flawed. The pundits who support the merger of these two tickets are also espousing flawed logic. Desperation for a non-Republican president should not cause the Democratic party to force its candidate to compromise for anything less than what he campaigned for, and was nominated for.
That will be all.
Posted by: powindah | May 14, 2008 at 02:47 PM
@Toby
You talk about ego. Maybe you should look closer at your precious Clinton before pointing Ego trips. Sheesh!
Posted by: Larry Oregon | May 14, 2008 at 03:09 PM
Neither Rendell nor Clinton belong on Obama's short list for VP. If John Edwards wants it, he's best. But I like him for attorney general.
Posted by: Gaias Child | May 14, 2008 at 03:10 PM
Obama should stay away from all of the Clintons - the Bush's and the Clinton's all answer to the same bosses (very old, very large moneyed interest)
Posted by: I Love this Country | May 14, 2008 at 03:15 PM
Obama should stay away from all of the Clintons - the Bush's and the Clinton's all answer to the same bosses (very old, very large moneyed interest)
Posted by: I Love this Country | May 14, 2008 at 03:17 PM
A "marriage" of BILLARY Clinton and Barack Obama BETTER NOT happen or Obama is T-O-A-S-T!
Posted by: KYJurisDoctor | May 14, 2008 at 03:20 PM
Hillary would be a disaster as a running mate and even worse as a VP. How would Hillary respond in a debate when asked about Obama's healthcare plan, which she has said many times is a bad plan? She would either have to lie or undercut Obama. Same issue on dealing with Social Security, negotiating with enemies, etc. How do you campaign with a former president as the husband of the vice presidential running mate? What a total distraction!
Then what would happen once in office? There is no doubt that she and Bill would undercut Obama's authority and undermine his presidency. Can anyone doubt, after this campaign, that she would not fall in line behind Obama once in office and that she would peruse her own agenda? It would be a total disaster!
Posted by: Jeff | May 14, 2008 at 03:22 PM
NO, NO, NO, NO, NO!!!!! Senator Obama should NOT "tap" Mrs. Clinton for the VP spot - Governor Rendell is NOT as well loved in PA as everybody wants you to think. I know PLENTY of Democrats who voted for Senator Obama simply because they could not STAND the thought of Mrs. Clinton (and, of course, her other half - MR Clinton) back in the White House, and these people will REFUISE to vote for ANY ticket which includes Mrs. Clinton. Perhaps, she can be given an Ambassadorship - that would get them out of the country, and Senator Obama can breath easier in his Presidency.
Posted by: Sharan | May 14, 2008 at 03:24 PM
How could Hillary join someone who's character she has repeatedly questioned -
** Rendell praises Farrakhan while Hillary attacks Obama for being praised by F.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA&eurl=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/04/rendell_praised_farrakhan.html
** Hillary votes against Gun rights but calls Obama an elitist for small town gun comment
July 13, 2006 Hillary voted against amendment 4615 to H.R. 5441:
“To prohibit the confiscation of a firearm during an emergency or major disaster if the possession of such firearm is not prohibited under Federal or State law.”
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00202
** Hillary's pastor has strong praise for Rev. Wright but Hillary uses the contraversey to question Obama's character
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/letters/17066161.html
** Bill Clinton pardons two leaders of the Weather Underground, yet Hillary attacks Obama for just knowing a third
** Bill Clinton gets $800,000 from Columbian government, yet Hillary attacks Obama on free-trade
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/what-a-story-candidate-pe_b_96052.html
Obama should pick her IF she disavows these type of politics. Most Obama supporters like the old Hillary - they just don't like what she has become.
Posted by: Young Atheart | May 14, 2008 at 03:25 PM
McCain has promised to appoint ultraconservatives to the SCOTUS like Scalia who said on 60 minutes that the Constitution provided the right to protection from torture as punishment, but not if the authorities are seeking information. One can also expect further intrusions into the right of privacy as well as another effort to overturn Roe.
Hopefully when it comes down to it, no Democrats will vote for McCain out of spite. With the age of the Justices, most likely the next Admn will appoint one or two replacements.
Posted by: Javalation | May 14, 2008 at 03:28 PM
Ed, what are you saying? Bill is tapping that. Barack needs to steer clear of Hillary altogether.
Posted by: N.E. BodybutHillary | May 14, 2008 at 03:56 PM
Hillary should not accept a v.p. position with Obama. She should not get dragged down with Brack Hussien Obama. When he's completely vetted, let him fall flat on his a### alone.
Posted by: Jean | May 14, 2008 at 04:06 PM
Some people?! Randell, wasn't he he the one who very loudly 'procliamed' that most white in PA were not ready to vote for a black person for president?! And now your're suggesting Barak to choose Hillary as a running mate!!! Randell, you chose your side, now stick to it to the bitter end...
Posted by: AB | May 14, 2008 at 04:11 PM
Obama' s mama won't let him pick Hillary.
It wouldn't matter why would she want to be stuck on the biggest loser ticket of all time.
If Obama is the candidate, he is going to make McGovern's loss in 72 look competitive!
the media is ready to "crown" him, but the country isn't, and won't.
Posted by: BZ | May 14, 2008 at 04:23 PM
I am a Hillary supporter and I hope this never happens. If Obama is the nominee he should find someone else to be VP. Hillary can sit it out, when McCain wins the White House she can have all the democratic traitors recognize the error of their ways and then she can consider running in 2012. It is not as if she can't go back to being the senator from New York and possibly even the governor of New York.
President Hillary 08 or 2012
Posted by: mona | May 14, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Those who like to bring and use Obama middle name as some sort of pejorative, SHAME ON YOU and you can rightly be called a BIGOT, a RACIST, and a FEAR MONGER. If it wasn't Obama's name, it would be his skin color. If it wasn't his race, it would be his skin color - JUST ADMIT THE PREJUDICE rather than passing if off as some sort of "fact".
Vetting out from the short list of Democratic running mates, the best possible V.P. outcome may be Gov Kathleen Sebelius, of Kansas - her being the most aligned with Obama's message, winnable demographics for the fall, and they're compatible (friends). Johnny (Edwards) came lately but still an important endorsement towards bringing the Democratic Party "together".
Mariann (White, Christ-loving & fearless)
Posted by: 08vote | May 14, 2008 at 04:58 PM
Mrs. Clinton should stay in until the convention.
It's not a question of whether something will come up from Senator Obama's past, it's more a question of when.
The problems the current Governor is having as a result of the trial of Sen. Obama's "neighbor" shows that corruption is pandemic in Illinois politicians.
She stays in and the Democrats have a legitimate alternative. She drops out and they have issues. Nothing wrong with the party calling the roll and letting the votes fall where they may.
As for the VP nomination, why preside in the Senate when she can lead?
Posted by: Dave Atkins | May 14, 2008 at 05:06 PM
Well, Ed Rendell has been passionate for Clinton. Regardless of his behaviour in the recent primaries, I believe that Gov. Rendell is a good VP candidate.
Its in the name of bipartisanship and its to form a good partnership and to balance out the good qualities that Obama and an old-school democrat both have.
Posted by: Tim | May 14, 2008 at 05:13 PM
Okay, OBAMA...Stay AWAY from the Clintons. God forbid Hillary be second in command. You know she'll do ANYTHING to be President, perhaps even kill.
Ask Vince Foster! Ooops, too late.
Posted by: teesha | May 14, 2008 at 05:34 PM
Clinton should not be Obama's running-mate for the same reason why those in John F. Kennedy's 1960 presidential campaign didn't trust LBJ.
Things worked out eventually for LBJ. However, his reign was bittersweet as Vietnam dogged his administration to the point he didn't even run for re-election in 1968.
Things have a way of working themselves out. Even when evil is initiated in doing so.
Posted by: zammy | May 14, 2008 at 05:37 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Mr. Obama, remember what the V.P. is? "A heartbeat away from the Presidency!" Now, think about that should you nominate Hillary!
Think about that really, really, really good!
Posted by: tina | May 14, 2008 at 06:01 PM
Obama/Sebelius in '08.
Posted by: CW-in-Wichita | May 14, 2008 at 06:19 PM