John McCain releases his tax returns -- but not hers*
John McCain has just released details from his tax returns from 2006 and 2007, and possibly the most interesting tidbit is that he did not release his wife's returns -- and McCain married into wealth. According to the campaign:
"Since the beginning of their marriage, Senator McCain and Mrs. McCain have always maintained separate finances. As required by federal law and Senate rules, Mrs. McCain has released significant and extensive financial information through Senate and Presidential disclosure forms. In the interest of protecting the privacy of her children, Mrs. McCain will not be releasing her personal tax returns."
Now you just know that's going to kick up a little dust storm. The Obamas and Clintons have made their returns available, filing jointly. So expect some political fencing over that. It's one thing to keep that kind of financial information in reserve when you're running for a safe Senate seat. It's another thing to not divulge your spouse's potential financial conflicts -- or gains -- with policy decisions you would make as president.
As for the details, McCain took in about $321,000 in 2006 and about $420,000 last year. The big jump came in book royalties, though the oldest candidate in the field also received $23,000 from Social Security last year, up slightly from the year before. And he gets a Navy Air Force pension.
In 2006, McCain and his wife donated, from community assets, about $129,000 to charity and $211,000 last year. Most of that money, though, went to the John and Cindy McCain Family Foundation, which the campaign said in turn makes contributions.
*UPDATE: No surprise, Democratic National Committee Chair Howard Dean is already teeing off on the issue, releasing this statement a little while ago:
"John McCain's lack of transparency is troubling and raises questions about what he's hiding. From his willingness to skirt FEC law to releasing less information about his tax returns than any other candidate since Ronald Reagan, John McCain continues a troubling pattern of thinking the rules don't apply to him. McCain should hold himself to the same standard set by past presidential candidates, both Republican and Democrat, and the example already set by both Democratic candidates.
"In 2004, the Republican National Committee called on the Kerry campaign to release Teresa Heinz Kerry's tax returns, saying 'Americans value disclosure and transparency in campaigns.' We expect the RNC will call on John McCain to release Cindy McCain's records just as they called on the Kerry campaign to do so in 2004. The connection between the McCains' business ventures and their political ties have been well documented and the American people deserve to know how McCain's role as a public official may have benefited their bottom line."
-- Scott Martelle
Now watch as the media shoves this under the rug and keeps asking Hillary Clinton about Bosnia and Barack Obama about flag lapel pins. Idiotic.
Posted by: Howard Roark | April 18, 2008 at 10:06 AM
McCain is retired from the Navy, not the Air Force. He is running for President, not her. If they chose to file separately that is their business not ours. Get over it.
(A couple others pointed that error out. We fixed it).
Posted by: Mike Connor | April 18, 2008 at 10:09 AM
I'm certain that the Navy will be distressed to learn that they've lost one of their most famous retirees to the Air Force!
Posted by: Bobby | April 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM
The reason that he didn't release his wife's tax return is that they have a prenuptual agreement. They file separate tax returns.Do you really think that she trusts this guy enough to give him half her money ?
Posted by: Ron | April 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM
I feel confident that a McCain or related member gets a salary for running the McCain foundation. How convenient. If the other canditates spouses tax info is available to the public, Mrs. McCain's should be also. Why is she entitled to SPECIAL treatment?
Posted by: gwen gentry | April 18, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Why are we not surprised?
I wouldn't want any of the facts to interfere with the perceptions. After all, it is Obama who is the elitist isn't it? It is Obama who cannot bowl a decent score because of his elitist and elevated status. John McCain is so unlike Senator John Kerry who married that rich woman Theresa. But this isn't ketchup this time, this is beer and alcohol of Anheuser Busch. And Senator McCain is consistent....like he was against torture before he was for it, and he was against the tax cuts before he was for them.
So let's see what the McCains have to say about this failure to reveal their finances to a jaded American audience who is tired of the same old politics of obfuscation and avoidance that we have had the past eight years.
Will the media pay attention to this? Or would they rather talk about a Northwestern University professor with a colorful past?
Or maybe we should think about Mr. Obama and his lapel pin.
We don't need 100 years of this kind of politics in America. Time for change.
Posted by: BobsAdvice | April 18, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Who cares??? He's part of the Bush regime.
Posted by: Bob | April 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM
So he has to draw social security when his wife is a millionaire- great
Posted by: Concerned citizen | April 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM
McCain gets a salary from being a senator , Social Security , Navy pension , book fees and free health care. Talk about a free ride. People are struggling to make ends meet , unemployed and no health insurance. He has the audacity to say Obama is out of touch. I know that he has earned a pension and social security but the man is working full time. My tax dollars are paying him 3 times. Give us a break.
Posted by: Danny | April 18, 2008 at 10:31 AM
McCain was in the Navy, not the Air Force.
Posted by: Wethal | April 18, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Does this really surprise anyone? After the crucifixion they gave John Kerry and Teresa Heinz Kerry, they probably thought it best to keep Cindy McCain's income underwraps. I hope they get swiftboated to the Hanoi Hilton.
Posted by: catpurrson | April 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM
I'm sure a lot of Obama and Clinton supporters (I'm a Clinton supporter, but soon to be McCain supporter when she loses) are going to raise a big stink over this, but it honestly doesn't make a bit of difference to me that he doesn't release his wife's tax returns. Out of all 3 of the candidates McCain is by far the most trustworthy and I think it would be a tough argument to make that there is something hidden in his wifes tax returns.
Posted by: Caleb | April 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Senator McCain doesn't receive an Air Force pension because he never was in the Air Force... He served in the Navy.
Posted by: Drew Warwick | April 18, 2008 at 10:33 AM
I don't think McCain receives an Air Force pension given that he served in the Navy...
Posted by: J Smith | April 18, 2008 at 10:36 AM
If viewing the tax returns of a candidate is a valid way to understand how money coming to him or her from different places might influence that candidate, then it is certainly valid to look at the tax returns of that candidate's spouse.
~
How do we know where the McCains' finanical interests lie? How do we know what special interests Mrs. McCain might be making millions off of? We don't, unless she releases her tax returns.
~
To say that a man won't be swayed in his actions by the financial interests of his wife is ridiculous. In fact, his wife's income is a double temptation: he will be tempted by the prospect of sharing in the benefits of that wealth, and he will be tempted to make his wife happy by seeing her interests pursued, independent of any direct financial benefit to himself. We as voters have a right to know what influences will affect a man we are being asked to vote for for President. Otherwise, Mr. McCain should stay in his present job.
Posted by: ts | April 18, 2008 at 10:45 AM
I bet you meant Navy pension, not Air Force.
Posted by: Bob Loblaw | April 18, 2008 at 10:47 AM
John McCain went to the Naval Academy and was a naval aviator, I doubt be gets an Airforce pension. What else is inaccurate in the blog?
Posted by: Bob | April 18, 2008 at 10:49 AM
I thought McCain was in the US Navy
Posted by: John Bennett | April 18, 2008 at 10:51 AM
To protect her children? What does that even mean?
Posted by: KirLiz | April 18, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Senator McCain should be ashamed of taking $23,000 in social security money. Even if it wouldn't make a dent in the finances of social security, McCain should never have accepted this money when he already has other income over $400,000. As a symbolic gesture to help the elderly of this country, not to mention the future of today's youth, the senator should have publicly returned his social security check un-cashed to demonstrate that he's willing to help the country in every way possible, big and small. Could we possibly expect less from a presidential candidate?
Posted by: Matt Aggleton | April 18, 2008 at 10:58 AM
Oh gawd, here we go again...this is like shooting yourself in the foot on purpose. Wifey needs to open up the tax returns and get used to the idea that a president's wife (if he is elected) is under the microscope just as much as he is. This is the first genuine mistake of the McCain campaign and will haunt him for the next 7 months.
Posted by: Bill | April 18, 2008 at 11:00 AM
In light of now understanding the privacy I've lost to the IRS and the federal government when I could have my privacy intact with the Fairtax, I now find it simply unreal that the gov't can plunder, unimpeded, into every citizen's life without consequence, or apparently, public outrage. We've been so brainwashed the past 95 years (1913 fed income tax amendment) we simply expect it...horrible.
Posted by: vanno | April 18, 2008 at 11:04 AM
soooo....wow. He's a politician and acts just like one. Does anyone expect differently? No one seems to mention the Social Security bit. Sure, you pay into it, you deserve to take out. But isn't there some ethical responsibility from people who have money (and remember - he's got a boatload more than his individual tax return shows) to not collect Social Security considering that the system is slowly going under? Does he really need that money?
Posted by: Dave | April 18, 2008 at 11:05 AM
The amazing thing is he paid $3500 to have his taxes prepared.... He should have used my people. :-)
Posted by: TNT | April 18, 2008 at 11:06 AM
The guy managed to "marry up." Good for him. Too bad for the others.
Posted by: Ed Woodward | April 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Why should McCain not releasing his wife's returns "kick up some dust." John Kerry files seperately from his wife and did not release her returns when he ran for President in 2004. Seems like apple to apple to me, oh of course, how silly of me, you're comparing Red to Blue so this couldn't possibly be considered a "gotcha" statment. And I was beginning to believe that this was a new type of politics! I guess if you keep saying that enough you might even start to practice it...but as of now, it the same ole, same ole...
Posted by: nylram | April 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Who cares?! Seriously, is she running for President? It's NONE of anyone's business if McCain's wife does not want to show her tax records. Why should she? Is she obligated by law to do so? No!.. This article is ridiculous and an utter waste of people's time - seriously!
Posted by: Time Wasted | April 18, 2008 at 11:08 AM
Target is the new Kmart. Don't be fooled. McCain is Bush re-packaged.
Posted by: Matt | April 18, 2008 at 11:10 AM
You want to run for President? You must disclose everything.
Clinton was nailed to the wall re: her tax returns.
Why hasn't McCain been equally pressed by the media?
Yet another tiresome example of the double standard, and blood thirst for Clinton.
Posted by: double standard | April 18, 2008 at 11:12 AM
Seems to me McCain does not want the hurting middle class to know he does not understand there pain. Otherwise he would admit to being a very wealthy man. I never knew a partner who was married to a wealthy person who did not reap the rewards of that wealth. Maybe he needs some "Straight Talk" about true honesty. He is not ready to be President if he can"t be honest.
Posted by: Marshall | April 18, 2008 at 11:14 AM
NOT releasing his wife's income tax returns is going to be fodder for the press. It looks like he is hiding something!
Posted by: KYJurisDoctor | April 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM
NOT releasing his wife's income tax returns is going to be fodder for the press. It looks like he is hiding something!
Posted by: KYJurisDoctor | April 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM
How dare he collect Social Security!!! With his wealth he should be ashamed even though he will cry that he is entitled to it. Sometimes something may be legal but is it moral???And the Repubs are always playing boogy man about the fund going broke. What a piece of work he is.
Posted by: Robert Gates | April 18, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Who Cares?? He's running for President, not her. It's NONE of anyone's business. This article is a waste of time...just another Democratic putting down a Republican nominee. NOTHING new.
Posted by: Jenny | April 18, 2008 at 11:55 AM
So it was vital that Teresa Heinz Kerry must release all her tax returns, but not Cindy McCain. What a surprise (not).
Posted by: IOKIYAR | April 18, 2008 at 12:11 PM
The BIAS here is astounding.
John gave 50% of his earning to charity last year and 1/3 the year before. Obama gave less than 1%
AND Obama and clinton make millions upon millions
You need to do a brain check and analyize your bias thinking because its almost to the point of insanity
Posted by: Jim Nasium | April 18, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Better question - where is McCain's health history?
Posted by: Malj | April 18, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Get over it people!! If you are going to serve our Country in the greatest military in the world if you are deserving of the pension you should get it. If you have paid taxes and are deserving of social security you should get it. His job is a U.S. Senator he gets paid for doing his job and gets benefits just like any other Senator.
John McCain has served our great Country longer than I have been alive and I have nothing but respect for somebody like that.
Even if you don't like republicans you have to give this man credit for his service to the United States.
Peace
Posted by: scott | April 18, 2008 at 12:33 PM
How can anybody think this is OK? McCain has tried to hide/coverup anything unseemly having to do with his wife since her drug abuse problems. Why should Americans think this is perfectly OK? People with lots of money have lots of special interests to protect. Anyone serving as President needs to reveal ALL of theirs including their wifes. We need to know that Bill Clinton has deals with foreign countries. We need to know who Cindy McCain profits from.
Posted by: MrFaces | April 18, 2008 at 12:35 PM
All the canidates are rich, so what? I would be more concerned if they were poor. If you don't have enough brain cells to make a decent living then you don't have what it takes to be president. Making money is easy, being president is not.
Posted by: reason | April 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM
the worse thing that happened to this country was not getting John Kerry for President.
Karl Rove managed to take America to a new low by constantly bombarding the airwaves with petty sound bites - I was for it before I was against it. Kerry did not think in black and white because he was intelligent and knowledgable. As when he came home from Viet Nam he said he had hope but also depression. Everything has shades of gray if you have any thought at all. Unfortunately for McCain he has lost the ability to see grays.
Posted by: Virginia McMahon | April 18, 2008 at 12:51 PM
McCain is still hiding behind the fiction that he and his wife have seperate finances. Why not? It worked for him during the Keating Five scandal when he greased the wheels for the criminal dealings of Charles Keating while his wife, Cindy, was neck deep in crooked deals with the S&L theif. Then, McCain claimed that his wife's finances had no influence on the bonehead decisions he made to help Keating along. The gullible folk in Arizona bought that line of crap and re-elected him rather tan seeing through his ruse and demanding jail time for bribery. Now, he he and Cindy think the entire country is just as dumb and as amnesiac as the voters in Arizona have been. If they come clean, he'll be headed for a federal penitentiary and not the White House. Don't look for Cindy McCain to say anything about her finances to the public.
Posted by: eddie | April 18, 2008 at 01:01 PM
Somebody needs to remind the Democrats that the issue was settled during the last election when they made sure Mrs Kerry got a free ride. Considering Mrs Kerry claims to live in PA, with it's low tax rates, instead of in high tax MA with her husband, perhaps the Democrats might wish to take a look at her if they're truly so interested in making sure the rich pay their fair share.
Posted by: Bob | April 18, 2008 at 06:48 PM
Wow a guy who donated a quarter of his income to charity last year. Sounds really generous doesnt it? Problem is that the money went to the John and Cindy McCain Foundation. If you look at the tax returns for the McCain Foundation for the last seven years you find $500,000 in donations to:
Xavier College Preparatory
Brophy College Prep
Christ Lutheran School
What do these private schools have in common?
Why they are all private schools that his children attend or have attended.
The Senator is taking tax breaks supporting elite private schools for his kids.
All Perfectly Legal but….
Posted by: mike | May 03, 2008 at 06:37 PM
Wow. Do you guys fact check at all, or is it always just opinion pieces masquerading as real facts. Way to go with the Air Force thing. Another reason I read the latimes just to know what idiotic spew is coming from the other side.
Posted by: k | May 23, 2008 at 12:51 PM
You would think that the Times could address the real issue. Why is Senator McCain getting a $58000 disability pension. I dont question that he qualifies for a pension as an 06 with 22 years of service but why the disability status. The injuries that support his disability came during his time in Vietnam. When he returned from Vietnam a Navy Flight Surgeon apparantly certified that he was 100 percent capable of returning to active flight status. So how and when did he go from being 100 percent capable of flying military aircraft to being 100 percent disabled in his pension status? Was there some kind of additional injury that occurred (did he hurt himself chasing tall blondes around odeur tables in Hawaii). In short what was the rationale for returning him to flight status and then turning around several years later and giving a 100 percent disability status on his pension. The two things don't jive.
Posted by: mike | June 07, 2008 at 05:43 PM