The naked truth about Dick Cheney's sunglasses
The power of suggestion combined with the power of the Internet is an awesome phenomenon to behold, as illustrated most vividly over the last couple of days by the saga of the reflection in Dick Cheney's sunglasses.
The Ticket, foolishly preoccupied with other matters, comes late to this, but as virtually every Web-surfer knows, a photo that had been posted on the White House Web of the vice president fly-fishing on the Snake River in Idaho, apparently a few years ago, has become a sensation. And it's not because we've become a nation of avid anglers.
No, the reason is that a blog posting earlier this week postulated that upon intense inspection, the reflection in Cheney's trademark sunglasses revealed (pardon us) a NAKED LADY. And that was all it took to generate an extraordinary buzz.
As of a few minutes ago, a Google search of "Dick Cheney" and "sunglasses" came back with more than 87,000 hits. The 100,000 mark is sure to be breached soon.
Times reporter James Hohmann this afternoon tracked down Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride, traveling with the vice president on fundraising stops he's making in Colorado and California. She reiterated what other White House staffers have had to spend time explaining -- upon close examination, it's clear the reflection simply caught the vice president in the act of casting a rod.
"He’s fly fishing," she said, understandably a bit exasperated. "That’s what he’s doing."
And no, she added, there were no naked ladies in the vicinity.
Readers, as always, are invited to comment -- give us your reflections on the reflection.
-- Don Frederick
Photo: David Bohrer / The White House via Associated Press

Of course there were no naked ladies around--his pacemaker would short-circuit! (Assuming he didn't try to shoot them first!).
Posted by: Tannim | April 11, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Why does everyone jump to the conclusion that Vice President Cheney would be torturing a nude woman while on his vacation? Was he fishing at Guantamo Bay?
Posted by: Rodney Lamprey | April 11, 2008 at 03:51 PM
Don't kid me. I know a naked woman when I see one. It is the reflective image to the left of the hand reflection in the left lens that is suspect. But, hey, leave the old boy alone. If he wants to do some naked fishing, at his age, what harm can it do? I wonder if you could enlarge the image a little more so we could ascertain the identity of the female in the reflection.
Posted by: Rattlesnake Bob | April 11, 2008 at 04:01 PM
This has to be photoshopped, I saw the original post and it is clearly either Bette Midler or Dee Snider that is naked in the photos... see for yourself!
http://FAQnews.wordpress.com
Posted by: FAQ News reporter | April 11, 2008 at 04:05 PM
come on the guy is fishing
Posted by: charles chip | April 11, 2008 at 04:10 PM
i liked him better when it was a naked lady.
Posted by: Jay Doubleyou | April 11, 2008 at 04:11 PM
I don't know..the hand holding the rod looks doctored to me.
They sure make the cia work really hard.....another government cover up I say....who is with me on this one
...raise your hand....
Posted by: bali hoo | April 11, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Nobody I have ever fly-fished with holds a rod with their reel positioned that way.
Posted by: Rick Wallace | April 11, 2008 at 04:26 PM
HEY, sometimes a bare hand DOES resemble a naked lady.
Posted by: David | April 11, 2008 at 04:32 PM
who gives a crap if it is a naked man,woman, or sheep?
isn't the fact that Cheney helps destroy the environment on a daily basis enough to be upset about? His questionable activities with Haliburton are forgotten, but when some cross eyed geek with too much time on his hands imagines he sees the woman he will never touch in the distorted reflection in a pair of sunglasses, thats national news? i despair for this country.
Posted by: C Franklin | April 11, 2008 at 04:40 PM
What naked lady in her right mind would get near him? Definitely his own hand. An old friend. hehe
Posted by: mangowild | April 11, 2008 at 04:42 PM
I think the photo has been altered because in the background of cheney there is green (forest or trees) whatever but in the sunglasses it shows blue/ocean-like background...total fake
Posted by: Angela | April 11, 2008 at 04:53 PM
That's it! That's a mans hand in those glasses!
I knew Cheney was gay.
;)
Posted by: captainkona | April 11, 2008 at 04:56 PM
Another slow news day, I guess.
Posted by: poggy | April 11, 2008 at 05:00 PM
I dont see the naked woman. To the right of his hand there is a slight curve upward, which might resemble a woman's hip, but it looks like the tapering downward of the framing/fiberglass hull port side of the boat.
The cast sucks indeed.
Posted by: chaz | April 11, 2008 at 05:04 PM
I no stretch of the imagination does this look like a naked woman. It's clearly just a hand gripping something.
Posted by: Annette | April 11, 2008 at 05:05 PM
It's perfectly obvious it's a reflection of his hand .... what is does reveal is apparently poor technique. The way his thumb is wrapped around the grip, it looks like he is choking it to death. Torturing it, even.
On the plus side, woeful technique = safe (non-renditioned) trout.
Posted by: Evilscribbler | April 11, 2008 at 05:08 PM
No, I think there is a UFO in his sunglasses. Oh wait, maybe it looks like Jesus. Hmmmm...
Posted by: Dylan | April 11, 2008 at 05:14 PM
jay doubleyou i raise my hand
it is obviously a cover up they wouldn't put the actual picture on any major news sites haha...this government knows how stupid we are obviously there would not be rumors of a naked lady unless there was one....the picture above does not even bring to mind a naked lady...of course every ignorant person would believe he was really fishing....
www.zeitgeistmovie.com learn what our government is capable over.
Posted by: Matthew Snow | April 11, 2008 at 05:15 PM
C'mon, this is Dick Cheney, the guy who couldn't shoot quail unless they were tied to the ground (and even then). If he's out fishing, it isn't with a fly rod, it's with a stick of dynamite!
Posted by: Lee | April 11, 2008 at 05:19 PM
I "cast a rod" when I saw the original picture too.
Posted by: dan | April 11, 2008 at 05:21 PM
Fly fishing??? So is that a new term that naked ladies use when they are trying to have some fun with Dick er, Cheney?
Yea, that's the ticket, we can say fly fishing and we won't be lying.
Posted by: TerryL | April 11, 2008 at 05:27 PM
HONESTLY I DON'T KNOW WHAT ALL THE FUSS IS ABOUT! COME ON FELLAS, IF I WERE FISHING AND A NAKED LADY CAME OUT OF THE WATER... I'D SMILE TOO! BIG DEAL, THE V.P. LIKES NAKED WOMEN! IM PRETTY SURE HE HAS THAT IN COMMON WITH 99% OF THE SINGLE MEN IN THE WORLD! AT LEAST HE'S HUMAN... NOT A ROBOT!
Posted by: CHONSEY | April 11, 2008 at 05:35 PM
Hey Lawrence,
Can you park your political bile for a minute. Everything bad is not Cheney and Bush's fault. Look at you, some of it must be your mother's fault. Get a grip lib.
hahahahahaha
Posted by: Dave the Man | April 11, 2008 at 05:42 PM
With a increasingly boring Pres. campaign it would seen that the Aug. Press doldrums have come early. And he's fishing.
Posted by: RgT | April 11, 2008 at 05:43 PM
I saw in this picture an arm holding an fishing rod throwing a line, I shall check with my optometrist to also check my eyes. I aren't see no naked woman, I m an normal healthy man.
a o^o i @pg 12apr08
Posted by: a o^o i | April 11, 2008 at 05:50 PM
Cheney's credibility would go UP if the reflection in fact included a nude girl. Please, give us a VP who has enough fun to have some naked women around.
Posted by: Phil | April 11, 2008 at 05:55 PM
"I think the photo has been altered because in the background of cheney there is green (forest or trees) whatever but in the sunglasses it shows blue/ocean-like background...total fake"
Nice catch. You really nailed him. The only way he could have greenery behind him and water in front of him would be if he could somehow... seek out a kind of... what would you cal it.... um....
SHORELINE???
Posted by: francis | April 11, 2008 at 05:58 PM
"It's clearly just a hand gripping something."
Think how lucky we'd all be if it was gripping his chest in pain.
Posted by: captainkona | April 11, 2008 at 06:00 PM
If thats a naked woman..that probably isn't a fishing pole he's holding!
Posted by: trshaw | April 11, 2008 at 06:02 PM
Hey Rick;
Cheney may be a money grubbing war criminal, but he does know how to fish. His rod hand is in the correct position for his gear - above the reel holding the line.
Posted by: Crispin Glover's Maid | April 11, 2008 at 06:05 PM
A perfect example of the Democratic MEDIA being desperate for NEWS. Unfortunately this is NOT news at ALL. You have to roll your eyes up in your head to envision a naked woman out of what is clearly a HUMAN ARM and HAND holding a fishinh pole.
Use your imagination really, realy hard and you MIGHT just see AN ALIEN female with a shriveled up torso and a PENCIL for a head.
The democrats are reaching for anything they can get now. Like I said DESPERATE democratic media. How utterly childish. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaa) !!!!!
Posted by: Voysingme | April 11, 2008 at 06:11 PM
both images on the sunglasses dont match , look at the thumb position and pay close attention to the the bend in his thumb , not even.
Posted by: pete | April 11, 2008 at 06:14 PM
This is about one of the most worthless stories on the planet right now...thanks for wasting 3 minutes of my life I will never get back.
Posted by: Gary | April 11, 2008 at 06:22 PM
It looks like Monica Louwenski to me!
Posted by: David | April 11, 2008 at 06:32 PM
The picture is doctored to make it look more like his hand. However, the hand position is changed, you can tell by the shadows and the markings on the pole relative to the bars on the the edge of the boat, much less the wrinkles on his hand...would have been nice if they he had a brighter smile
Posted by: Doesitreallymatter | April 11, 2008 at 06:33 PM
If there was a naked lady in Dick Cheney's boat, I'd say he made quite a catch, considering his obtuse conservative, snarly demeanor. I despise him and his conservative, Christian-fundamentalist, fascist, oil-corporation-loving regeime, as does virtually every other person nowadays.
Why can't we return to the 60's and all be liberal? Yeah, baby! Where's the fun gone? Let's bring it back! Vote Obama! Let's go back to being American again! The land of the free! The land where it's possible to live a happy, liberal life! End the conservative staleness! Down with asphyxiating conservatism! Let's make the next generation a people-generation, not a corporate, authoritarian, rule-loving generation! We're tired of that! Yeah! Fun times ahead for me and my kids! Happy times ahead for all of us!
Posted by: Raffi Aidiniantz | April 11, 2008 at 06:36 PM
From David:
"HEY, sometimes a bare hand DOES resemble a naked lady."
Posted by: David | April 11, 2008 at 04:32 PM
Best comment ever!
And to the people not as familiar with photo editing software are I am, NOTHING you see may be true. It may or may not be, but you absolutely can not rely on visual evidence anymore. It's a fun diversion, nothing more.
Posted by: Stacie | April 11, 2008 at 06:37 PM
I don't see a naked lady and I have a vivid imagination.
I can't even tell if it is a fishing rod in his hand.
If he's fishing and he has a naked female buddy I wish
he would take me with him. I don't like to fish but I do
like naked ladies for buddies.
Posted by: Rick Morefield | April 11, 2008 at 06:40 PM
Is that a zit on his nose reflected in his right lens, or do I see a nipple?
Posted by: John | April 11, 2008 at 06:46 PM
Wow. I distrust the Vice President just as much as the next guy, but come on. Can't the man get his fly fishing on? He's not shooting anyone in the face for god's sake.
Posted by: Daniel | April 11, 2008 at 06:56 PM
Democratic media? Democrat media perhaps, but who said the Democrats are democratic?
Posted by: Hey! | April 11, 2008 at 06:56 PM
SHE is NOT Naked - she is a decent woman !
Posted by: Richard | April 11, 2008 at 06:58 PM
By just enlarging a part that appears to be nipples, you can easily find the part was pasted with a small rectangular image. This is a very primitive way to make a fake. I would say it is not a professional work.
Posted by: Terao | April 11, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Okay...all the comments got me curious. I enlarged it several hundred times. As a photographer I can see what is going on, and it is interesting, at least from a photography standpoint. There is the reflection of someone in HIS right hand lens (on your left), to the left of the reflection of his arm and the fishing rod. She is speaking (mouth open) and is wearing an outfit made with a striped plaid, that is reflected to the outside of her body on either side, but not on the face, due to the position of the curve of the lens in relation to her. A very neat picture; she is definitely dressed in what appears to be at least a mid thigh, and long sleeved outfit, talking while he fishes. No big deal...a great shot if the photographer had gotten her reflection a little clearer. Whoever she is, she should get a 20x30 enlargement and frame it as art...
Posted by: vhc61 | April 11, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Nobody has said what part of his sunglasses that they're looking in. In Cheney's right lense (my left) I don't see anything. BUT, in at the bottom right quadrant of Cheney's left lense (my right) I see a naked woman just under the arm holding the fishing pole. Anybody else see that?
Posted by: hesingswithfrogs | April 11, 2008 at 07:17 PM
It's clearly a baby's arm holding an apple.
So, the question arises, who is THAT?
Posted by: lexicon | April 11, 2008 at 07:50 PM
I believe he spared his rod and toiled too shallow. :)
Posted by: joe | April 11, 2008 at 08:02 PM
GO Cheney GO!
xo
You are a good sport!
Posted by: Patricia Paredes | April 11, 2008 at 08:12 PM
Dick Cheney hasn't been that close to a naked woman in 40 years.
Posted by: JC | April 11, 2008 at 08:31 PM
"I think the photo has been altered because in the background of cheney there is green (forest or trees) whatever but in the sunglasses it shows blue/ocean-like background...total fake"
This comment is so stupid that I can't believe it was even posted. Of course there's a blue/ocean-like background, where else would he throw his fishing rod?
Posted by: Skeptical | April 11, 2008 at 08:33 PM
If that's a naked lady it must be 'ma kettle
Posted by: David Oder | April 11, 2008 at 08:36 PM
What a totally screwed up country we are.
This man is reaping obscene profits as a [former] Halliburton CEO and current shareholder (and arranged to have this company "rebuild" Iraq), while he sends our young men to fight and DIE in a war initiated by his lies.
I suggest EVERYONE read the list of illegalities and fraud this company has committed against the U.S. taxpayer:
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/about_hal/chronology.html
And people are more concerned over whether or not it's a naked person being reflected in his sunglasses.
Posted by: Native Angeleno | April 11, 2008 at 08:43 PM
Thats a hand looks like its holding a fishing pole..or a bow
Posted by: Gawngal | April 11, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Naked lady? I see the image of Jesus... on a piece of toast, of course.
Posted by: johnzero | April 11, 2008 at 08:51 PM
That still looks like a jacked up, tore up from the floor up naked woman to me. I bet its Lynn Cheney.
Posted by: Ralph Wiggum | April 11, 2008 at 09:37 PM
Looks more like one of those high tech battery operated whips to me
Posted by: Carlos Solis | April 12, 2008 at 02:50 AM
We Americans have become ... the lowest common denominator, congrats
Posted by: Tim Griffin | April 12, 2008 at 03:53 AM
To bad he isn't holding an M-16 in Iraq.
Fishing? While our men and women in uniform are
in a war that he and Bush started with their lies.
How shameful. Blame the Democrats for this story?
It is the Republicans who put these two idiots in
the white house not once but twice.
Be proud of your Vice-President for going fishing
when we are suffering as a nation.
God Bless our Military!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Connie Velasquez | April 12, 2008 at 08:18 AM
To bad he isn't holding an M-16 in Iraq.
Fishing? While our men and women in uniform are
in a war that he and Bush started with their lies.
How shameful. Blame the Democrats for this story?
It is the Republicans who put these two idiots in
the white house not once but twice.
Be proud of your Vice-President for going fishing
when we are suffering as a nation.
God Bless our Military!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Connie Velasquez | April 12, 2008 at 08:20 AM
The depths of human ignorance and conspiracy theorist never ceases to amaze me.
So many wonder about a doctored photo, naked lady, or what ever and yet.... billions are mishandled daily by congress and not enough care or lifts a finger to stop it.
Sad. America gets what it has been begging for, communistic, socialistic, entitlement minded sheep. Hurray for the USA.
Posted by: Ankharan | April 12, 2008 at 08:29 AM
Why does it look like a bug to me, a grasshopper or something? I do have a bad monitor, though.
Posted by: tlsmith1963 | April 12, 2008 at 08:45 AM
Looks like a turkey to me, duck!
Posted by: Dan | April 12, 2008 at 09:22 AM
When Dick Cheney debatted Lieberman and then John
Edwards he sure made them look ,sound and smell fishy
Of course the J. Fonda,J Wright, Judas Richardson and
Rezko types will never say anything good or truthfull about this fine gentleman.
Posted by: Girl with th bushy armpits | April 12, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Hilarious!
Posted by: JohnRV501 | April 12, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Please get a life.
There was no naked woman involved and even if there was, so what?
Posted by: Web Smith | April 12, 2008 at 11:20 AM
It looks like the Virgin Mary to me. Perhaps someone should notify the Vatican or at least have the sunglasses sent to Rome for proper verification.
Posted by: Billy | April 12, 2008 at 02:04 PM
hey dan - hahahahahah - nope - i can't do it. actually everything bad is the fault of george. dick was just a facilitator & general behind the scenes manipulator. they are both draft-dodging scum. these 2 men are directly responsible for every plague afflicting America. let's all remember george's fine comment after 'katrina' - 'great job brownie, in a few years we'll be sitting on the front porch laughing about the good old days.' so there you go - dick is fishing, george is re-decorating, & the middle-class is having a mighty hard time. with every passing day, the issues simplify, our choice becoming clear. we can vote for hope, or we can vote for fear.
Posted by: lawrence | April 12, 2008 at 03:59 PM
Since the two lenses create a stereoscopic image, you can unfocus your eyes slightly and see a three-dimensional image of the hand. (NOT a naked woman.)
Try it!
Posted by: California Girl | April 12, 2008 at 04:20 PM
It is clearly his hand while he is fishing.
Just more sensationalism to send viewers and readers into a frenzy.
Posted by: Judi | April 12, 2008 at 04:39 PM
it is characteristic of the media coverage/coverup of the political circus to be reflecting on reflections projected on the pitch dark surface of blind objects put in place to shield and hide the naked eye from any truthful inquiry. so instead of discussing cheney's abominal, treasonous actions, we yet again are purposefully dealt distorted imagery, to see matters derailed, deflected and diverted, so to scatter any ray of light that might illuminate reality, and call for consequence.
Posted by: dave | April 14, 2008 at 01:59 AM
sounds more like a learning disability or a freshman in high school. Come on, do better.
Posted by: er | April 14, 2008 at 12:01 PM
This is pretty funny especially with all the interest it has generated! Dick cheney does not fish with naked woman
I am just glad he has taken up fishing instead of shooting his buddies hunting. Come on don't we all feel safer now?
http://naked-fishing.com
Who would want to get naked around Dick Cheney? thats about as sexy as a meatloaf sandwich.
Posted by: spankem | August 29, 2008 at 08:06 AM