| Main |

Eesh. Yet ANOTHER thing to divide us politically

You could probably have figured this out without a poll, but, well, that's what polls do sometimes, confirm what we know. And a fresh CNN/Opinion Research poll cuts right to the key issue now that the clock is nearing happy hour here on the West Coast: How do the beer and wine votes break down?

Elephant beer label New poll shows beer drinkers favor Republican presidential candidate John McCainDonkey wine label New poll shows wine sippers tend to favor Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama or Hillary ClintonThe answer: Beer drinkers are leaning Red, while wine drinkers are tipping toward Blue. Yep, beer drinkers give a slight nod to the presumptive Republican candidate, John McCain, in the fall match-up, while the wine sippers are leaning toward either Democrat, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.

We didn't delve into the subgroups deeply enough to figure out where the scotch drinkers go, but apparently the hard liquor folks don't vote. [Oh, put a cork in it, we're kidding].

But even here there's a further Democratic divide. As CNN reports, registered voters opting for beer over wine also pick McCain by 53% to 46% over Clinton. McCain and Obama, though, are essentially tied. But "in the head-to-head match-ups with McCain, Sens. Obama and Clinton each win a majority among registered voters who prefer wine to beer."

By the way, the margin of error was +/- 6.5%, which makes this a 13-proof poll. And it brings out a whole new approach to the "get out the vote" efforts, or GOTV: BYOB.

-- Scott Martelle

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/27229740

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Eesh. Yet ANOTHER thing to divide us politically:

Comments

To: Scott Martelle
Hey Scott...haven't you noticed CNN polls are famous for
coming out as furthest from reality. And now you are
highlighting one taken from drunken participants...HELLO ?
I'll bet you are high on wine.

Interesting....

I remember a survey done in New Zealand before the last election (2005) which seemed to come up with the same results - wine drinkers were fans of the (centre-left, liberal*) Labour government, while beer drinkers favoured the (right-wing, conservative**) National Party. (It was also noted that Green Party members favoured fish over chicken and beef).

So what I'm wondering if this is a universal thing - right-wing = beer, etc - can any Brits or Aussies comment? Canadians?


*in converting these terms to the American politcal spectrum please read as "far-left liberals".
**"moderates"

you failed to mention the rapidly growing group of all those 'connoisseurs' who might have taken a little sip here and there, and have in time found out the true exquisite treasures to their probing taste... knowing that real and timeless quality is not determined by labels or even by price - and who will give a friendly, but dismissive nod to anyone trying to con them into savoring
insipid, toxic brew. and yes, you guessed it - you again
'forgot' ron paul.

that's just a poll on affluence.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







Our Bloggers

Don FrederickDon Frederick has served as an editor helping guide coverage of every presidential election since 1984. He is a third-generation Washingtonian, so watching the political world comes naturally to him.

A graduate of Northwestern University, he was a reporter for newspapers in Colorado, New Mexico and Texas before joining the (now-defunct) Los Angeles Herald Examiner in 1983. Hired by The Times in 1989, he has worked in its Washington bureau since 1996 — a perch providing him a close-up view of the impeachment of President Clinton, the government's response to 9/11 and the day-to-day wrangling of the two major parties.
Andrew MalcolmAndrew Malcolm's immigrant parents repeatedly stressed the importance of active participation in a democracy. Early lessons included learning the alphabetical list of states by watching televised roll calls of national political conventions. That childhood exposure led to a lifelong fascination with politics, including 40-plus years of covering them and a brief stint practicing them as press secretary to Laura Bush in 1999-2000.

A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Malcolm served on the Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four.

The daily destination for breaking news from The Times and other top political sources on the Web.
Political blog from Chicago Tribune's Washington, D.C., bureau.

All L.A. Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Bit Player
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Olympics: Ticket to Beijing
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
The Big Picture
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog
Categories