Breaking News: Barack Obama gets Bill Richardson nod
After weeks of personal pondering and not a little anguish, New Mexico's Gov. Bill Richardson ha
s decided to endorse Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination.
The official endorsement will come later today in Portland, Ore., according to the Associated Press.
Richardson, who ran against both of the surviving Democratic candidates, Illinois Sen. Obama and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, is the nation's only Latino governor. He gave up his own run for the White House on Jan. 10 after never really gaining much traction -- he garnered barely 2% of the caucus votes in Iowa -- amid suspicions he was really auditioning as a possible vice presidential nominee for the party's eventual winner.
That suspicion might still be there. Richardson and the less-experienced Obama could make a good fit since such a combo brings a Latino link to the nation's fastest-growing population sector, a managerial link both as a Cabinet secretary and a state chief executive, diplomatic experience as a troubleshooter and U.N. ambassador and, especially, someone not recently connected to Washington and from the once-staunchly Republican Rocky Mountain corridor.
After a series of initial stumbles, Richardson did show some flash during a summer debate in Des Moines when he referred to both Clinton and Obama. "You know," he said with a smile, "I think that Sen. Obama does represent change. Sen. Clinton has experience. Change and experience: With me, you get both."
Had it come earlier, the governor's endorsement could have helped Obama stem Clinton's victories in Texas and California, where she showed real strength in Latino communities. In fact, she won the Democratic primary in Richardson's home state with a 2-to-1 majority among Latinos.
Richardson, who is a Democratic superdelegate, gave a subtle hint to his...
choice 10 days ago, as reported in The Ticket. At a UCLA forum, he was asked which Democratic candidate could best handle today's challenges.
"I'm truly conflicted," Richardson said. "I'm torn. I see ... a lot of loyalty I owe President Clinton. He made me U.N. ambassador. He made me secretary of Energy. He's treated me extremely well. But you know what? I paid him back. Because I served well." Richardson described the former first lady as "enormously capable ... but I did run against her."
He also ran against Obama, of course. But in a prepared statement he'll release today, Richardson will say:
"I believe he is the kind of once-in-a-lifetime leader that can bring our nation together and restore America's moral leadership in the world," the Associated Press reported.
Richardson will also say: "There is no doubt in my mind that Barack Obama has the judgment and courage we need in a commander in chief when our nation's security is on the line."
Campaign sources indicate Obama hopes to roll out a series of such endorsements and announcements during the long run-up to the Pennsylvania primary on April 22 to create a sense of momentum. There's still former Sen. John Edwards out there and, of course, former senator, former vice president and former presidential candidate Al Gore, who's not always had the closest relationship with his ex-boss's wife.
Although Obama leads in the popular vote total and in delegates, more recent opinion polls seem to indicate a shift toward Clinton since Obama's twin losses in the major states of Ohio and Texas, and last week's furor over his pastor's anti-white and anti-American sermons.
-- Andrew Malcolm
Photo by Jim Cole/Associated Press



Richardson you are an idiot and we will remember this slap in the face to the Clintons !! Stay in New Mexico and get a new hairpiece. You look ridiculous in more ways than one.. GO Hillary 2008 !!!
Posted by: jimbo | March 21, 2008 at 08:04 AM
I really don't get the writer's reference to the "twin losses in the major states of Ohio and Texas".
While Clinton won the Texas primary by about 3% (thereby amassing 4 more delegates than Obama), Obama won the Texas caucus (gaining at least 7 more delegates than Clinton).
Overall, then, by delegate count Obama won Texas. At worst, it could be described as a split decision, but certainly not as a loss.
Posted by: cph | March 21, 2008 at 08:41 AM
I'm truly conflicted, Bill Richardson said — President Clinton had honored Mr. Richardson with appointments both as U.N. Ambassador and Secretary of Energy. More important than our media’s frenetic fanfare of Mr. Richardson’s endorsement would be keen inquiry into Mr. Richardson’s interest as a prospective vice president. That would be a litmus test for his touted yet 11th hour endorsement this late into this contest. Most political sycophants’ motivation is for self gain; his inexpedient endorsement leaves room for reasonable speculation; moreover, his credentials do, in fact, position him as a strong contender for a VP running mate. Richardson’s rationale leaves an edifice of transparent desire.
Posted by: Po WIn | March 21, 2008 at 08:51 AM
richardson's endorsement is big, edwards would be even bigger but Gore would be the biggest.
Here is hoping Al Gore gets on board with Obama
Posted by: JP | March 21, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Does this mean that OBAMA has now earned the solid endorsements of more that two of the former Democratic presidential candidates? First Dodd, then Richardson....hmmmm, who's next?
Posted by: APIAVoter | March 21, 2008 at 08:56 AM
If I am correct, Richardson and Obama are biracial, even though is really is no such thing as "race," only subspecies variation and cultural upbringing--and least we forget their cultural upbringing, both are Americans. The talk of black/brown/yellow coalitions is ludicrous and actually funny to me. As if there is a conspiracy against the "white" majority by America's minorities to bring them down. Any enlightened person understands that in order for us, as a nation, to move upward, we must embrace everyone, equally, with an open-mind, so that we can expose the societal assumption of "racial" differences for the biological empty-shell that it truly is.
Our nation stands at a crossroads, and this election will determine the greater future for our lifetime and that of our youngest children. If we can, as a nation, finally unite as a nation of Americans, not along so-called racial lines, we will truly make a positive difference for the future of our planet. But that is a big "if," as it will take courage and foresight, and a proactive approach to politics and society. We saw we want change, and most of us truly understand the need for it, but The Few hold the reigns of power and access to to power and will fight and say and do anything to maintain that power. Clinton is part of The Few, and her recent ridiculous, laughable and politically dangerous statements and announcements by her campaign officials just makes that readily apparent.
An Obama presidency is but the beginning of a movement that can bring about a restoration of the common good, for all of us, and not just for the super powerful, rich, and connected. An America that has the potential to hold the promise that the founding fathers hoped for. We must strive for a more perfect union, indeed. The key word being "union." If it does not start now, it will never start. And the planet, and life as we know it, may be in the balance.
The Hillary campaign has not been fully vetted, and her nomination will not bring about victory for the Democratic Party. If the neo-conservatives are asking Republicans to crash the Democratic primaries and vote for Clinton, then that should be warning enough for all of you that support her that they know they can beat her, and will beat her. And not only will we lose the presidency, we will lose the senate, perhaps the congress, and many local offices as well. The occupation of Iraq will continue, and we will invade Iran, and billions and billions of dollars will go to making The Few even more powerful. Even if McCain is a one term president, the Supreme Court will be lost for a generation to the neo-conservatives and that will truly be the ruination of our civil liberties and our constitution.
Hillary has lost. Wishing will not make it come true. Gaming the system will, and even then she will lose, and the Democratic Party will be nohing but a mockery of the ideal it is named after--democracy. The crossroad we are at can take us one direction or the other. And Hillary and her supporters are trying to take control of the wheel. So I ask of her supporters to, please, understand the bigger reality, and think of the long-term future and not short-term gain. It's difficult, and takes a paradigm shift in thought and understanding, but it must happen, or all that you hold dear and the very reasons you support her will be lost to you as well.
Posted by: SV | March 21, 2008 at 08:58 AM
I'm truly conflicted, Bill Richardson said — President Clinton had honored Mr. Richardson with appointments both as U.N. Ambassador and Secretary of Energy. More important than our media’s frenetic fanfare of Mr. Richardson’s endorsement would be keen inquiry into Mr. Richardson’s interest as a prospective vice president. That would be a litmus test for his touted yet 11th hour endorsement this late into this contest. Most political sycophants’ motivation is for self gain; his inexpedient endorsement leaves room for reasonable speculation; moreover, his credentials do, in fact, position him as a strong contender for a VP running mate. Richardson’s rationale leaves an edifice of transparent desire.
Posted by: Po Win | March 21, 2008 at 09:03 AM
Are you sure that Richardson is the only Latino governor...isn't the Gov from Arizona Latina?
Posted by: Jose | March 21, 2008 at 09:23 AM
Bill Richardson's endorsement of Barack Obama
explains why Hispanic voters failed to vote for him
when he was trying to secure the Democratic
presidential nomination. POOR JUDGEMENT.
Posted by: Leah | March 21, 2008 at 09:42 AM
Thank you, Bill Richardson, for speaking out about why you support Barack Obama.
Posted by: Angelica | March 21, 2008 at 10:35 AM
It's not over till the fat lady sings. Now, Barack, it's time to bring out Aretha!
Posted by: bluevillage | March 21, 2008 at 10:52 AM
Now, it is time for Hilary to endorse Obama...but wait a minute ...she is still there.....oh l quess it will not be long before she drops out.
After she drops out, we can now concentrate on McBush!!...sweet.....
Thanks Bill Richardson.
Posted by: Julie | March 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Too bad Obama is still unelectable in the general. No endorsement is going to unring the bell Rev. Wright sounded. The Obamabots are too tone deaf to notice, but McCain is the real winner in all of this.
Posted by: Jenna | March 21, 2008 at 11:32 AM
As a hispanic voter who knows many other hispanic voters, Richardson's endorsement doesn't mean a thing. I am offended by all the news commentators who think it will matter. As if we are not intelligent enough to think for ourselves. Who ever said Richardson himself is highly regarded amongst hispanics. As a Mexican-american, no hispanic endorsement can erase the images of Mr Jeremiah Wright referring to the 9-11 terrorists attacks as 'chickens coming home to roost'. He said this on 9/16/01 5 days after the tragedy. Remember how all of us felt after 9-11. I remember people of all races pulling together as if race did not exist as we were all attacked as a country. The images on tv of people holding up pictures of their loved ones as missing and this man Jeremiah Wright response was so low. I guess he and the members of his church did not feel that need to pull together as a country. No this man is definitely anti-American and so is Obama. Richardson CAN NOT change that, Hispanics love this country too.
Posted by: Stephanie Mal | March 21, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Note to "Top of the Ticket" you write, " ... more recent opinion polls seem to indicate a shift toward Clinton since Obama's twin losses in the major states of Ohio and Texas ..." Obama won Texas.
Posted by: Jeff | March 21, 2008 at 12:07 PM
I am glad to see someone else endorse Obama. The attacks on him in the press have been unforgiveable, & they are just wasting time. We have huge issues to deal with in this country. We have to decide if we want to make a better future for our descendants, or do we want to keep falling for negative campaigns that are designed to keep us from solving anything? Don't fall for negative campaigns, America!
Btw, I am a white woman who is ready for a black president.
Posted by: tlsmith1963 | March 21, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Uh, do you have proof that Obama is "anti-American?" He IS American!! It is amazing that if you criticize or expect better from your country, you are labeled anti-American. McCarthyism lives and on this blog too.
The race is over
Posted by: Barbara | March 21, 2008 at 01:02 PM
BREAKING NEWS:
Bill Richardson is a opportunist that waited for the perfect offer to endorse one or the other i am sure. For that i don't trust him. I am Hispanic and i would never vote for Obama nor Richardson.
Posted by: Persio | March 21, 2008 at 03:39 PM
It would be amazing to see a diverse government representing the diverse population.
This is amazing
Posted by: Jason | March 21, 2008 at 03:44 PM
I agree with you, Barbara. I think that people on the left need to fight back against this myth that we aren't patriotic, or that we hate America. The worst label they have put on us since Bush came to power is "traitor". I am sick & tired of this offensive name-calling. It's time for us to say, No! You are no longer going to call us horrible names.
Posted by: tlsmith1963 | March 21, 2008 at 04:11 PM
YES!
Posted by: chris | March 21, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Lets pls keep all racial comments out of this, as they all rest on flawed presmises. Obama is BI-RACIAL and hence when he speaks of unity it comes from the fact of who he is-he really represents most Americans. His black father abandoned him and white mum and grandparents raised him. He is married to a black woman and has kids with her. Given all this he absolutely cannot be racial from EITHER side! so everyone should give the race politics a rest and judge him on his policies where he outshines all other candidates through his integrity and consistency. He has earned everybody's support!
Posted by: Anne | March 21, 2008 at 05:23 PM
Does this mean that OBAMA has now earned the solid endorsements of more that two of the former Democratic presidential candidates? First Dodd, then Richardson....hmmmm, who's next?
Posted by: APIAVoter | March 21, 2008 at 07:14 PM
It seems to me that the Democratic machine's are destroying themselves to gain the White House, If the trend continues with the racist BARACK, no matter what the politicians and the newsmedia does, we the populations are not stupid the way they want us to believe, I for one will vote for Mccain than rather to vote for BARACK.
They are a lot of peoples that I talk to and they all feel the same.
I do not want Sharpen or any other blacks to cover BARACK ASS for his racist preaching for 20 YEARS.
They antiamerican, they do not belong in the higher up government.
Posted by: Tina | March 21, 2008 at 08:25 PM
You what I think Barack Obama is saying? Everyone's a little bit racist: My pastor was a little racist, Geraldine Ferraro was a little racist, heck, even my grandmother was a little racist. WE ALL ARE A LITTLE BIT RACIST. Yes, that means Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain are a little bit racist. If you say "I'm not racist" then you are a liar! We've all discriminated against someone else because of their perceived race or ethnicity. Let's all just stop trying to be perfect and admit our mistake so we can move on from this.
That's what I think Barack Obama is saying, but DANG, he has to be brave as heck to try to express that. That "I'm not racist" attitude, that "Politically Correct" attitude, that's just a flavor of "The Emperor's New Clothes," a band-aid for the real problem. What we really need to do is start working together, not as blacks, whites, latinos, asians, native americans, pacific islanders, etc, but as AMERICANS. We need to stop stepping all over each other and start working together to fix our country. That means stop oppressing other blacks, whites, latinos, asians, native americans, pacific islanders, etc, and start cooperating with them. I want improved national security, I want a healthier economy, I want better health care, but national policy means nothing if we refuse to work together.
Also, let's not forget that our instinct to discriminate transcends race and includes qualities such as: gender, sexuality, age, etc. We need to overcome these obstacles as well.
Posted by: Paul | March 22, 2008 at 01:04 AM