| Main |

And then there's the Bill Clinton-Joe McCarthy remark

While part of the increasingly hard-edged, mean-spirited chatter between the warring Democratic presidential campaigns centered on the "Judas" analogy directed at Bill Richardson for having -- in James Carville's eyes -- the audacity to back Barack Obama, another portion focused on the Bill Clinton-Joe McCarthy comparison.

Hillary Clinton aides already were in a lather over Obama advisor Merrill "Tony" McPeak raising the McCarthyite charge against Bill Clinton. That accusation arose out of what McPeak saw as a sin of omission by the ex-president: he did not mention Obama when, late last week, he said a presidential race between his wife and Republican John McCain would feature "two people who love their country."

Many -- including an unlikely Clinton defender, Kathleen Parker, in a blog posting for National Review magazine -- took McPeak to task for overreacting. But then another Obama supporter went even further overboard.

Gordon Fischer -- an obscure figure nationally but known within party circles because he formerly chaired the Iowa Democratic Party -- wrote this on his personal blog:

“Bill Clinton cannot possibly seriously believe Obama is not a patriot, and cannot possibly be said to be helping — instead he is hurting — his own party. B. Clinton should never be forgiven. Period. This is a stain on his legacy, much worse, much deeper, than the one on Monica's blue dress."

That would be Monica Lewinsky, of course, and that was enough ...

to send Hillary Clinton's already perturbed aides through the roof.

Spokesman Phil Singer today said Fischer's post was proof positive that the Obama campaign was “fueled by insult and slander.”

The Obama campaign quickly disavowed any link to Fischer's missive. Spokesman Tommy Vietor said "comments like this have no place in our political dialogue" and that Obama (vacationing in the Virgin Islands at the moment) "strongly rejects them.”

Fischer himself, upon reflection (and perhaps a nudge from some Obama aides), took down his posting and this morning put up  a "sincere and contrite" apology. This afternoon, he apologized some more.

The Clinton folks, though, were in no mood to accept these mea culpas. Besides, McPeak's Joe McCarthy comment still rankled.

The result: A letter sent out to Clinton backers from campaign chairman (and former Democratic National Committee honcho) Terry McAuliffe. Here's how it starts:

"Do you think Bill Clinton is like Joe McCarthy?

"Of course you don't. Neither do I. But Barack Obama must because this past weekend, his campaign compared President Clinton to Joe McCarthy. Joe McCarthy!

"Ever since we won in Ohio and Texas we have been seeing these kinds of personal attacks from the Obama campaign. It's hard to believe that a campaign that talks so much about changing the tenor of our politics would employ these kinds of tactics, but it's the kind of thing we are seeing every day from Senator Obama and his campaign.

"Here is just a small sample of the words they have used to describe Hillary and her campaign: 'disingenuous,' 'divisive,' 'untruthful,' 'dishonest,' and much more.

"Well I'm not going to stand for it, and neither should you. ..."

And how does one fight back? Well, McAuliffe recommends a campaign donation.

The ongoing descent into daily bickering over real and perceived insults between the Clinton and Obama factions can't help but obscure more meaningful discussions (such as Clinton's discourse today on the housing market crisis).

It also caused us to read with special attention a major New Republic piece by Noam Schieber, headlined "Slouching toward Denver" (the site of the Democratic convention). The subhead is even more evocative: "The Democratic death march."

Schieber lays out in gory detail the disaster the party could be headed for, cutting to the chase with his first sentence:

"When Democrats contemplate the apocalypse these days, they have visions of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton slugging it out à la Ted Kennedy and Jimmy Carter at the 1980 convention."

That campaign, of course, ended with the election of one Ronald Reagan.

-- Don Frederick

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/27420128

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference And then there's the Bill Clinton-Joe McCarthy remark:

Comments

Bill Clinton did imply that Obama was not patriotic, which is disgusting. The McCarthy analolgy is appropriate. Obama must hit back hard to avoid being swiftboated.

"I'm here because of Ashley."

Obama 2008

Is Bill Clinton like Joe McCarthy? He says he's not. I take him at his word. There isn't any reason to doubt that...as far as I know.


why do obama and his sycophantic campaign people easily resort to argumentum ad hominems whenever barack is vetted, or whenever hillary raises a valid point against the illinois senator?

but i thought obama was a product of harvard, where low blows like ad hominems are no-nos?

isn't it true that name callings are the refuge of the mentally bankrupt and intellectual pgymies? is obama of these types? are his staffers similarly so?

just asking.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







Our Bloggers

Don FrederickDon Frederick has served as an editor helping guide coverage of every presidential election since 1984. He is a third-generation Washingtonian, so watching the political world comes naturally to him.

A graduate of Northwestern University, he was a reporter for newspapers in Colorado, New Mexico and Texas before joining the (now-defunct) Los Angeles Herald Examiner in 1983. Hired by The Times in 1989, he has worked in its Washington bureau since 1996 — a perch providing him a close-up view of the impeachment of President Clinton, the government's response to 9/11 and the day-to-day wrangling of the two major parties.
Andrew MalcolmAndrew Malcolm's immigrant parents repeatedly stressed the importance of active participation in a democracy. Early lessons included learning the alphabetical list of states by watching televised roll calls of national political conventions. That childhood exposure led to a lifelong fascination with politics, including 40-plus years of covering them and a brief stint practicing them as press secretary to Laura Bush in 1999-2000.

A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Malcolm served on the Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four.

The daily destination for breaking news from The Times and other top political sources on the Web.
Political blog from Chicago Tribune's Washington, D.C., bureau.

All L.A. Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Bit Player
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Olympics: Ticket to Beijing
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pardon Our Dust
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
The Big Picture
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog
Categories