A mixed bag for Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain
Looking for a sign that your candidate is destined for the White House?
Go no further than Rasmussen Reports daily presidential tracking poll, which today offered nuggets of hope to every candidate left in the race.
For Hillary Clinton: a one-point lead among Democrats nationwide over Barack Obama. That's within the margin of error, but she and her camp will take it (as they also bask in the strong lead she's staked out in Pennsylvania roughly four weeks out from its April 22 primary).
For Obama: the enduring faith of Rasmussen's predictions market, which gives him a nearly 80% chance of capturing the Democratic nomination and a 46% chance of winning the presidency (which is higher than the figure for Clinton or Republican John McCain). Also, equal or better poll numbers than Clinton against McCain in swing states such as Ohio and Colorado.
For McCain: An eight-point lead over either Democrat in national polls. Much higher "favorable" ratings than either Clinton or Obama, likely the bi-product of the Democrats' continued skirmishing. Fifty-four percent of poll respondents view McCain favorably compared with 42% who view him unfavorably. Forty-two percent view Clinton favorably versus 55% unfavorably. Obama has also dipped into more-unfavorable-than-favorable territory, with 47% favorable and 51% unfavorable.
Still, for either Democrat, Rasmussen projects a lead over McCain in electoral college results based on state-by-state polling.
Like we said, something for everyone.
-- Jim Tankersley
Jim Tankersley writes for the Swamp of the Chicago Tribune's Washington bureau.



When the Titanic hit the iceberg and sank, was it a combination of perhaps bad rivets in ice cold water, or perhaps the beginning of global warming that sent those icebergs so far south? I'll go with human error: the Captain was proud of his ship, perhaps too proud of being captain of the biggest and fastest and safest ship ever built. Damn the icebergs. Full Speed Ahead!
So, when the democrats choose their captain, and perhaps the captain of all of us Americans, do you think they'll choose the one who presumed "I WILL BE the next president of the United States or the one, who said "with your help I will be the next President of the United States?"
Which candidate when elected, will listen most carefully and steer us clearly past those melting icebergs?
Are we too busy partying in the grand ballroom to notice?
Posted by: David Dawdy | March 23, 2008 at 08:40 PM
What is next armageddon?
Posted by: captain democracy | September 17, 2008 at 03:15 PM