Look out, Huck, Ron Paul's people are gonna be furious
OK, Disciples of Paul, here's the chance you've been waiting for to get Mike Huckabee, the only remaining contender between your guy, Rep. Ron Paul,
and the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, that nobody senator from Arizona, John McCain.
Do you know what Huckabee wrote on Tuesday? You won't believe it. Seriously.
Because he needs the publicity and doesn't have the money to buy much advertising to convince the rapidly growing number of Republicans who see the former Arkansas governor as a lingering nuisance who can't take a hint that his presidential hopes are over, smoked, done, dashed, cooked, fried, kaput, finished, completed and hopeless, Huckabee has challenged McCain to a debate. Hey, it only cost a stamp.
Huckabee's letter says: "I believe a Lincoln-Douglas debate so that voters can better understand our views on critical issues such as health care, education, energy independence, terrorism and national security is just what we need."
Of course, the Lincoln-Douglas debates occurred in....
a U.S. Senate race. There were seven of them, each three hours long. (That was in the 1850s before commercials for bathroom breaks.) And, also, the Republican lost that race.
But nevermind, Huckabee wants the spectacle of a debate before next Tuesday's March 4 primaries, when his campaign hopes could become absolute cinders. He'd also like your online signature on the letter for publicity.
But here's the real outrage that will rock the Internet in the next few hours. After paying the now-required tribute to Sen. McCain as "an American hero," Huckabee writes:
"Now that the race for the Republican nomination is down to just the two of us, I believe this is the time for a real discussion about our vision for the future of this great country."
The two of us? As in 2? One more than one and one less than three? Huckabee has no idea what he is in for, dissing the party's other remaining candidate. Just watch the comments section below for a taste. He's completely disregarded the existence of the 10-term libertarian-like congressman from Texas. Who may not have a realistic chance of beating McCain either, but don't tell that to members of the Ron Paul Revolution.
Paul, by the way, has consistently raised more campaign donations than Huckabee for the last year -- five times Huckabee's total in the third quarter of 2007 alone and more than any other Republican last quarter, nearly $20 million.
Paul has been spending a good deal of time recently in his home 14th District where, like Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich, he's facing a serious party primary challenge next Tuesday because he's been spending a lot of time not in his home 14th District.
But that doesn't mean Paul's countless thousands of fervent followers are tied up. Huckabee doesn't know the meaning of evangelical until he runs into Paul proselytizers. First, they will spread word of this Huckabee outrage within their chatrooms, meet-up groups, phone chains and message boards.
They will start leaving hundreds, then thousands of comments on blogs like this. They will, of course, politely remember that this blog has resisted the mainstream media ignorance and written often about their man. So they will direct their displeasure at the Huckmeister.
If the Paulunteers can discover Huckabee's e-mail, he'll get an electronic earful. And once they find Huckabee's campaign schedule on his website and realize that the former governor is also in Texas these days, they will march on Huckabee's campaign events as they did Rudy Giuliani's.
And remember what happened to Giuliani's candidacy.
--Andrew Malcolm
Typical Ron Paul supporter




You are so funny and so kind.
I hope Ron Paul delegates will take the seeds of revolution to the national convention. I think Paul will get some congressional district delegates from Texas. I hope he will top the 20% threshold to get some at-large delegates. This is part of what makes the continued Paul race important.
Posted by: Thomas | February 27, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Oh man.... Huck is in for about 20,000 emails.
Wherever this debate is held, there will be more Ron Paul supporters there than anyone else.
Posted by: Tommy M | February 27, 2008 at 09:47 AM
Maybe Mr. Huckabee simply miscounted. He's already admitted that he didn't major in mathematics.
Posted by: George Dance | February 27, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Hey Andy, well your right on this one, Huckerybee, I come on, It's like saying John McShame is tall, You know man I am so sick of all this, I leave for Pearl Lagoon, next week for three weeks, going fishin and laughing and drinkin with the coolest people on the planet mon. Have a good one.
Posted by: RaferJanders | February 27, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Maybe Mr. Huckabee simply miscounted. He's already admitted that he didn't major in mathematics.
Posted by: George Dance | February 27, 2008 at 09:54 AM
This Malcom fellow is still prattling on like this ?
Let's just get on with the endless coronation and silly partisan sniping (the leisure of the theory class) so we can figure out how to support ourselves as the warfare & welfare state demands its pound of flesh . . . nuff said !
Posted by: Eric Sundwall | February 27, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Neither Huckabee nor Mcain have the balls to invite Dr. Paul for a debate - they will get smacked by his message. Yeah, he got single digit votes from the republicans in the primaries, that's about right - people with any brains in the republican party, as a matter of fact is in the single digits.
Posted by: Baba Padmanabhan | February 27, 2008 at 10:08 AM
I love how you post a picture of a "typical Ron Paul supporter." Is this to convey that young, beautiful people are not allowed a voice or an opinion about our country? That young people are stupid and they have thrown their support behind the wrong person? Why must all MSM outlets bash Ron Paul supporters? We deserve respect as much as any other person who supports any other candidate.
THIS MIGHT COME TO YOU AS A SURPRISE, MR. MALCOM, BUT US YOUNG PEOPLE ARE THE FUTURE OF THIS COUNTRY. I WILL CONTINUE TO SUPPORT RON PAUL AND HIS MESSAGE MUCH LONGER THAN THIS ELECTION. ALL OF US RON PAUL SUPPORTERS WILL BE LAUGHING IN 8-10 YEARS WHEN OUR IDEAS OF FREEDOM PROSPER. AND DONT WORRY WE WONT BLOG HOW STUPID EVERYONE IS FOR NOT BELIEVING WHAT WE SAY. PEOPLE ARE ENTITLED TO THOSE BELIEFS.
RON PAUL FOR THE LONG HAUL! SEE ALL YA'LL AT THE MARCH TO FREEDOM!
Posted by: Andi | February 27, 2008 at 10:12 AM
OK Christians this should tell you that your vote should NOT go to MIKE HUCKABEE... He said there were only two left in the race (LIE) Ron Paul is still in so there is THREE and he knows this. He also has stated that he has a THEOLOGY degree .. he does not have one!! (lie) May God have mercy on him! So please for your family and their families sake please take another look at Ron Paul I am so begging you!! www.ronpaul2008.com
Thanks ... His message should be shouted everywhere and its the ONLY one that will work.. GOsh people please open your eyes!!
Posted by: PerkiDe | February 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM
I was a precinct captain in New Jersey. I canvassed, and did all the work. At my polling location, 2 out of three Diebold machines were replaced during Super Tuesday for "malfunction." Of course my local paper recorded that there were no voting anomalies. And since Diebold has no paper trails here, I'm sure we're just going on the honorable word of our local Diebold officials.
I'm not saying Ron Paul won, but we'll never know the real count till we clean up our election process.
This is something all Americans, regardless of who you support, should be concerned about.
Posted by: Dave | February 27, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Why aren't you posting our comments?
Posted by: Laura | February 27, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Huckabee must be terrified of Ron Paul. Of course in a setting of 3, (yes, 3!) candidates, RP would be given more of a chance to speak. And neither McCain or Huckabee want that. Why? Because RP --though not as well spoken-- knows what he believes and why he believes it INSIDE AND OUT. RP would absolutely demolish Huckabee and McCain in a debate. Of course they want to pretend RP isn't in the running... Cowards.
Thank you for covering this Mr. Malcom!
Posted by: Heather | February 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM
i would absolutely love to have another debate...as long as ron paul is included....everyone knows ron paul would win as always....thats why if they do have one, they will exclude ron paul....unless we rally now...we need to band together and expose this!!!!!!!
Posted by: observant | February 27, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Masquerading as communitiy leaders, bankers invaded our nation back in 1913. Destined to run up the debt, creating wars, depressions, credit expansions and contractions, they have gone unrecognized until now. How much interest do we presently pay these terrorists?
google" Federal Reserve Fraud" Is it time for a change? Ron Paul, only, might be gutsy enough to challenge these real terrorists we now face. here at home. Ron Moss
Posted by: Ron Moss | February 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Huckabee must be terrified of Ron Paul. Of course in a setting of 3, (yes, 3!) candidates, RP would be given more of a chance to speak. And neither McCain or Huckabee want that. Why? Because RP --though not as well spoken-- knows what he believes and why he believes it INSIDE AND OUT. RP would absolutely demolish Huckabee and McCain in a debate. Of course they want to pretend RP isn't in the running... Cowards.
Thank you for covering this Mr. Malcom!
Posted by: Heather | February 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM
The Republicans need to get a clue and get behind the most conservative ELECTABLE candidate, Hilary Clinton. McCain is all over the board.
Posted by: Fern Dolearn | February 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Huckster is on his way out to join the televangelist scam-wagon. His campaign was an opportunity to obtain national recognition and hone his fund-raising skills. Kenneth Copeland showed him the ropes and dropped a million in his campaign coffers.
So, you heard it here first: with Falwell pushing daisies and Robertson so senile that he can't distinguish Julie-Annie from the Pope, a new scam artist is much needed in the land of the blind. Old one-eyed Huckster will ride into the rescue.
By his own admission he has sunk his political ship by staying in the race. Fear not, reverent, a lucrative profession awaits; as seedy and fraught with ethical issues as the Governor’s office in Little Rock. You will feel quite at home.
Posted by: Albert Meyer | February 27, 2008 at 10:38 AM
jkhutz.... I'm sorry! ...and you are who,... specifically? I don't find anyone named "LOSER" on my invite list!
Posted by: ricknhouston | February 27, 2008 at 10:44 AM
I voted in the Texas primaries yesterday (early voting). I voted for Ron Paul. -J
Posted by: Jay in Texas | February 27, 2008 at 10:45 AM
of course the Huckaturd doesn't want to acknowledge Ron Paul... He's scared of the dude.. and so is McCain. Dr. Paul is quite capable of making both of those Neo-Cons look like idiots in the debate arena... how many times has he proven this already?... It's a shame that most Americans aren't even watching those debates though... then they'd know Ron Paul is the ONLY option... unless you're evil and don't have a soul... in that case.. vote for ANY of the other candidates.
Huck's gonna get a good tongue lashing from us RP folks... you can't count on that!
Posted by: JiveTurkey | February 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM
The problem is that this has been going on the whole time. Since the start of Dr. Paul's campaign. There is a large number of Republicans out there that do not know what Dr. Paul stands for. If they did they would vote for him.
Without the close to a billion dollars in free advertising that CNN, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, and FOX have given to McCain he would have dropped out back in August.
On name mentions alone the MSM has given him millions in free ads.
It is all bull crap and until the real patriots out here in America wake up this crap will continue.
As Einstein stated.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over (Electing the same idiots) and expecting different results (good governance)
It may take a total economic collapse before that happens though.
Posted by: ThomasJ | February 27, 2008 at 10:52 AM
Right on Kathy Smith
Posted by: Ionikios | February 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM
Wow Andrew,
Either that post is highlighted with sarcasm or jabs at Pauls base, or you sir are becoming one of us! If you are I say congratulations on your wise decision. The fact of the matter is Huck has to try to make himself appear as the difinitive second place in order to maintain his run for president. We both know he cant afford it otherwise. I expecially like the "typical ron paul supporter" picture at the bottem.
If I was to try and describe what a "typical" ron paul supporter looked like to you. I would say just look at anyone you see every day on the street, From the guy that just gave you your non-fat mint latte to the guy that just perscribed you vicadin for your tennis elbow. All walks of life.
But you can pick a really cute girl too. Whatever gets his message across.
Pretty sure history has proved that innovative ideas and ideals allways get branded "crazy" untill the people in the mainstream realize their stupid.
good thing that crazy printing press idea took flight huh? or the crazy internal cumbustion engine? So glad those loonies never gave up.
Good article, allways like to hear about Paul. Even if its just on the web.
Posted by: J Jones | February 27, 2008 at 11:08 AM
I'm a registered Republican, and I really don't understand why my party has offered up this war-hungry lobby-loving crazy McCain for President (along with his war chief, Lieberman)! I guess they have been neoconned. Real Republicans will vote for Ron Paul.
Posted by: L.Step | February 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM
@jkhutz "I do like obama but just because he's kennedy esque and would probably stick it to the CFR. "
Are you making reference to Mrs. Obama sitting on the board of directors of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs? Yes, Obama will probally stick it to her, as for the rest of the CFR gang don't count on it.
Anyone hear Barney Frank say the economy is bad because we don't have enough government regulations on the banking industry?
Posted by: TJF | February 27, 2008 at 11:14 AM