| Main |

After a tame start, Obama and Clinton spar over words

The overall tenor of the first half of tonight's much-anticipated Democratic debate was summed up by Barack Obama's first comment as he followed Hillary Clinton in answering a question on immigration policy: "Well, this is an area where Sen. Clinton and I almost entirely agree."

Obama also became more spirited in his responses as the immigration issue was hashed over, getting in a well-received dig at the No Child Left Behind education program.

As the debate's second half began, questioner John King launched an effort to change that, asking Clinton about her increasing effort to depict Obama as more style than substance. And the effort succeeded as the issue of plagiarism -- i.e., Obama's recent use of speech lines first used by one of his staunch supporters, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick -- was raised.

Obama dismissed the flap as part of the campaign's "silly season."

But Clinton wanted to engage on the dispute, using a line that obviously had been cooked up in advance.

Lifting "whole passages" from someone else's speech, she said, isn't "change you can believe in" (one of Obama's patented lines) but "change you can Xerox."

The barb didn't play well, at least with those in the debate hall -- it sparked some boos and hisses.

-- Don Frederick

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e550750fb58834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference After a tame start, Obama and Clinton spar over words:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I haven't heard "go Xerox that" in a long time. My scanners and printers haven't been Xerox. Scan, print, copy, not using Xerox as a verb anymore.

Go Hewlett Packard that doesn't work.

Go Kinko that, more common.

Zing, her get Obama fell flat. Her plagiarism claim has to include the other party's work being stolen and they don't know it.

On notes speech writers hand Obama, it's easy to say "quote" before getting into the rant. So many speeches and in many places, some manners are lost.


She's made the claim and going to keep repeating the accusation?

It's up to Obama's campaign staff to hand him notes with QUOTE in bigger letters so he can remember to say it.


It belittled her stature making fun of that Texas Senator on Hardball. She can't be saying Obama's done nothing in Congress to him directly.

She tried to infer his followers are Obama juiced on hope and change. They don't know what he stands for and votes for him.

Hillary has to know, many just don't like her and Bill anymore. He's winning streak is proving that.

I don't want Bill having some job to jaunt around on Air Force 2 and White House helicopters to anywhere he wants to go.

I don't want him in the Oval Office again, unless he's just visiting.

He has to accept the First Lad role and all it stands for. Roles of First Ladies, that's his job.

If he doesn't take those duties why would future First Ladies or Lads, have to do it?

A future First Lady says she wants to roam around the world promoting policy decisions or takes a job at the State Department.

There is a defined role for spouse of the President. Bill would set a new standard what a First Lad role would be.

Why mess with traditions, vote Obama!

Bill can still jaunt around the world supporting American policies but his supporters or himself has to pay for the flights. Keep his Mr. President title too.

He doesn't want to be labeled "Laddy"


It's too odd a former President can influence the current President as a spouse. He has a role in White House policy and talks to Congress.

That would weaken the Vice President's office. Bill should run as her Vice President already! Or is that too close to a third term if she is incapacitated?

Bill's role in President Hillary's White House would be problematic because he wants to keep his stature as a former President.

A former Senator or Governor Husband, that's no problem. There can be a future Lady President.

Hillary Clinton sounded like and looked like a programmed joke. The cheap shot was stale. It sounded written for her. It showed that she is not a big enough person to move on. When asked to describe "the moment in time that you were tested most", Obama was concrete. His response was that he has been tried and what he has gone through is what a lot of people can identify with. He showed that he came through his "tested" time in life and he is now prepared to help others as POTUS. I got it! Hillary provided no personal test that she, herself, has gone through. She answered that everyone knows what she has gone through and then she goes into someone else's suffering. She left what she has gone through to the imagination. What is she talking about? Her husband's infidelity 16 years ago? She mention the soldier having "his" face blown off. She rambled. What she said was just an attempt to conjure up emotions for the moment. What faith? The connection to the public people to tilt the scale for her was lost. Her having the last word gave the impression that the standing ovation was for her and what she said. It was just the end of the Debate!! No more debates are needed. The same things have been said over and over. Coming back to the table for cheap shots and coached words is a waste of time. I feel sorry for Xerox! Poor Xerox caught up in a need to take a jab. She sounded as if she was conceding. 11-0 is not a good place to be for her. She really didn't put up a fight! Empty jabs. A true Warrior is needed! Not Hillary. Not now. Momentum trumps cheap shots.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







Follow us on ... »

Follow @latimestot for political news and backgrounders sent direct to your Twitter page or mobile device.
Our Bloggers

Andrew MalcolmAndrew Malcolm's immigrant parents repeatedly stressed the importance of active participation in a democracy. Early lessons included learning the alphabetical list of states by watching televised roll calls of national political conventions. That childhood exposure led to a lifelong fascination with politics, including 40-plus years of covering them and a brief stint practicing them as press secretary to Laura Bush in 1999-2000. A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Malcolm served on the Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four.

Johanna NeumanJohanna Neuman is a veteran Washington correspondent for both The Los Angeles Times and USA Today, having covered presidents and politics as far back as Ronald Reagan. A former president of the White House Correspondents Assn., she authored a book on media and foreign policy, “Lights, Camera, Wars.” Most recently she was co-author of the Countdown to Crawford blog here at The Times.
The daily destination for breaking news from The Times and other top political sources on the Web.
Political blog from the Chicago Tribune.

All L.A. Times Blogs

All The Rage
American Idol Tracker
Angels Unplugged
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Booster Shots
California Consumer
Comments Blog
Company Town
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Dodger Thoughts
Fabulous Forum
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. at Home
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pop & Hiss
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Technology
Ticket to Vancouver
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Categories