| Main |

The debate words those Democrats used

Well, The Times' Ben Welsh has done it again. For the third time this week, he's created a word cloud examining the words used over time in public, this time by Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in Thursday night's Democratic presidential debate in Hollywood.

Ticket readers will recall this website published Welsh's creative word clouds twice before this week, once on the Republicans' debate and once examining the word patterns in all of President Bush's State of the Union Addresses.

Just put your cursor on the slider here and move it to the left, going back in time through 18 Democratic debates to last April 26 in South Carolina. Watch how the choice of words changes; the bigger the letters the more often they were used in that debate.

-- Andrew Malcolm

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e55009d3d18833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The debate words those Democrats used:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

These are cool, and I appreciate the work that goes into them. As a suggestion, I think it would be more meaningful to compare the frequency of each word in a given debate to the frequency of that word over a big corpus of English-language debates. For example, "think" is a popular word when people opine ("I think...") but it was probably not much more common in these debates than in all English-language debates over the last half-century. It is large in almost every single debate you've analyzed, but not terribly informative in any of them.

I see that common words like "a", "the", "of", "for", et cetera are omitted and that is good, but a further comparison as I've suggested might do more in that regard. Also, if you can do the analysis I suggest, you could show words that are underused as well. That might be even more interesting.

Anyway, thanks for all the coverage and work. I hope you don't take my suggestion as a complaint -- it certainly isn't!

Was the word, "I" omitted? I know Senator Clinton said that word several times in last night's debate, but I don't see it in the tag cloud. It may be a common word, but as many times she repeated it she showed a streak of egoism.

Keith, Jerry,

If you're interested in reviewing American political rhetoric over a larger sample, you should check out Chirag Mehta's Presidential Speeches tag cloud at the link below. Our clouds are created with my modification of an open-source application he developed.

http://chir.ag/phernalia/preztags/

If you want to get a look at the most common words, with omissions, you might enjoy wordcount.org, which says it's plotting out the most common words in the English language.

In response to your question Jerry, yes, the word 'I' was omitted from our debate analysis. Deciding what to keep and what to toss is a judgment call I made, for better or worse.

The angle you raise is interesting though. Lets tease it out. If you wanted to measure the number of self-referencing words the candidates used, what words would you need to pull? I, me, my? What else?

Ben Welsh.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







Follow us on ... »

Follow @latimestot for political news and backgrounders sent direct to your Twitter page or mobile device.
Our Bloggers

Andrew MalcolmAndrew Malcolm's immigrant parents repeatedly stressed the importance of active participation in a democracy. Early lessons included learning the alphabetical list of states by watching televised roll calls of national political conventions. That childhood exposure led to a lifelong fascination with politics, including 40-plus years of covering them and a brief stint practicing them as press secretary to Laura Bush in 1999-2000. A veteran foreign and national correspondent, Malcolm served on the Times Editorial Board and was a Pulitzer finalist in 2004. He is the author of 10 nonfiction books and father of four.

Johanna NeumanJohanna Neuman is a veteran Washington correspondent for both The Los Angeles Times and USA Today, having covered presidents and politics as far back as Ronald Reagan. A former president of the White House Correspondents Assn., she authored a book on media and foreign policy, “Lights, Camera, Wars.” Most recently she was co-author of the Countdown to Crawford blog here at The Times.
The daily destination for breaking news from The Times and other top political sources on the Web.
Political blog from the Chicago Tribune.

All L.A. Times Blogs

All The Rage
American Idol Tracker
Angels Unplugged
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Booster Shots
California Consumer
Comments Blog
Company Town
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Dodger Thoughts
Fabulous Forum
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. at Home
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pop & Hiss
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Technology
Ticket to Vancouver
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Categories