Breaking News: Some senior Clinton staff go unpaid
Not a good sign.
According to a bulletin recently posted on Time magazine's blog, The Page, some senior staff for Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign have begun working without pay to save money for the New York senator's cash-crunched political effort. Those reportedly working without salary include campaign manager and longtime Clinton confidante Patti Solis Doyle.
At the same time today, according to The Times' Peter Nicholas, the Clinton campaign conceded that late last month the senator loaned her own campaign $5 million of personal money. At a news conference at her campaign's Virginia headquarters Clinton said:
"I loaned it because I believe very strongly in this campaign. We had a great month fundraising in January -- broke all records. But my opponent was able to raise more money. We intended....
to be competitive and we were and I think the results last night proved the wisdom of my investment."
In fact, the Clinton campaign raised less than $14 million last month compared to the $32 million reported by Sen. Barack Obama's campaign. Although Clinton is wealthy and her $5 million pales in comparison to the $35.5 million Republican Mitt Romney gave to his own campaign, this could be a sign of serious financial trouble coming out of the indecisive Super Tuesday voting.
Late this afternoon Politico.com's Jeanne Cummings, quoting unnamed sources in the Obama campaign, reported his campaign was on a pace to raise $30 million more this month, including $2.2 million in new money in the past 24 hours.
Tuesday Clinton's campaign co-chairman Terry McAuliffe played down reports of financial difficulty. "We have done up to this point $130-something million dollars," he said. "Hillary Clinton has plenty of resources going forward. No one should ever worry about Hillary Clinton having the necessary resources -- ever. She's never worried about them before and she's not going to start worrying about them now."
But in recent weeks her campaign has clearly been economizing with the candidate herself, for instance, forgoing her usual chartered private jet to ride with her campaign press corps in a balky airliner.
Clinton is not the first candidate to experience financial challenges in this campaign season. Last summer, after severe staff cuts, Arizona Sen. John McCain began flying by himself in the economy section of commercial airliners. Now, he's the GOP frontrunner. Then, in early January in what would presage his campaign's ultimate collapse later that month, another one-time frontrunner, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani had his senior staff also take similar "voluntary" salary suspensions.
Clinton also said today she intended to resume intensive campaigning. But when a reporter sought to ask another question, she retorted, "The press conference is over."
(UPDATE: Tonight, the Obama campaign sought to take advantage of the surprising Clinton financial difficulties with an e-mail headlined "Startling news" to supporters seeking donations to match her $5 million, which campaign manager David Plouffe speculated might increase to $20 million. He said the Illinois senator has taken in $3 million since the polls closed on Feb. 5. And he praised the "more than 650,000 people like you (who've) taken ownership of this campaign" through donations.
(Additionally, Joe Trippi, former campaign manager for John Edwards, said Clinton's money troubles put the New York senator "at a tremendous disadvantage moving forward. The worst thing to be is an 800-pound gorilla who's out of money. The cultural shock for the campaign is incredible.")
--Andrew Malcolm
Johanna Neuman is a veteran Washington correspondent for both The Los Angeles Times and USA Today, having covered presidents and politics as far back as Ronald Reagan. A former president of the White House Correspondents Assn., she authored a book on media and foreign policy, “Lights, Camera, Wars.” Most recently she was co-author of the
So did the 5 million come from China, India, or Kazakhstan? I hope our future asian masters are kind to us....
Posted by: Borat | February 06, 2008 at 04:42 PM
It would be unfortunate if money determined the outcome of the primary race. But it would not be anything new.
Posted by: WylieD | February 06, 2008 at 04:46 PM
Poor Hillary, cant compete with the Obama campaign funders like the far right Christian Mean Machine and Saudi Arabians that are in bed with Bush.
I told you guys, the moneyed are piling their money on Obama so they can continue their parties and orgies while the poor and middle class fester in the sores from the wounds these ultra rich has opened.
I am sending you 1000 dollars girl. I promise. Lets prove we can fight Goliath.
Posted by: John Hirsch | February 06, 2008 at 04:48 PM
You are and idiot. No one on the Obama side is partying. There have been close to 1 million people giving as little as $5 to the Obama campaign. Obama does not have Hillraisers, or special friends. Everyone is equal.
The fear for the establishment in Washington is that ordinary people who unlike WylieD that can't afford $1000, or lobbyist that are on Hilary's payroll are changing this campaign.
Change is happening in America from bottom up, and WE ARE THE ONE'S WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR. Ordinary people matter, and ordinary people will bring the change to America, and change the world.
Go Obama
Posted by: Phil Leake | February 06, 2008 at 05:13 PM
Maybe she can get some money by contacting those individuals that her husband pardoned (a long list of crooks) before he left office. Better yet, maybe she can sell all the items she stole on her way out of the White House.
Posted by: Ronnie Smith | February 06, 2008 at 05:14 PM
I'm sure the L.A. Times' endorsement of Barack Obama has absolutely no influence on this article...
Posted by: nomadikone | February 06, 2008 at 05:19 PM
Hillary has been increasingly calling attention to her website hoping that to some degree it would substitute for paid advertising. Unless she can develop a lot of new small donors in the constituency that supports her - seniors, latinos and women- she would end up having to dip further into her personal fortune. This is a development unimaginable as little as a month back.
Posted by: John K | February 06, 2008 at 05:31 PM
Fight the Goliath? So Hillary is someone who has been continually doubted and triumphed regardless over adversity? Adversity like being on the board of directors for Wal Mart when Obama was a community organizer. Or was it when she was a part-time lawyer- I mean ceaselessly defending children.
Hillary embodies the Goliath, and her most reliable demographics remain people with little education, money or those who are ESL. I am not disparaging any of these groups, but her tactics are questionable to get their votes.
When I worked in Iowa her campaign bused people from nursing homes to the caucuses, telling them she was taking them to 'a party'.
I am not an Obama defender, but given the choices I have now I am tossing him my support. The more I read about anyone in the race still, the less I like. Still, let's try to make sense......
Posted by: slbowman | February 06, 2008 at 05:35 PM
PUBLICITY STUNT ALERT
First Obama talks about change, then Hillary see this as a successful message and copies him and starts talking about change. Then McCain campaign runs out of money and yet he somehow manages to come out on top, and Hillary sees this and now we have the above story. Come on, lets have a reality check. Hillary's campaign is getting plenty of money. Sure Obama's campaign is twice as successful, but her campaign is still quite well off. Either this is a big publicity stunt (along with a few tears shed) or Hillary is fiscally irresponsible. And doesn't that say something about her either way?
Posted by: Hans | February 06, 2008 at 05:36 PM
Clinton cannot keep up with the Obama Cash Cow...
Out of 15 million votes, hillary only got 50,000 more than barak,
out of 1164 delegates, Obama actually got four more than hillary,
so in otherwords, this race is a dead heat...if she's strapped for $$ now, how is she expecting to last throughout the rest of the campaign for the next 9 months against the GOP?
Time for Hillary to rethink her 'options'.
Posted by: FreedomOfInformationAct | February 06, 2008 at 05:36 PM
I'm sorry, what? Hillary is fighting Goliath? I thought Hillary was (until a few weeks ago) the guaranteed Democratic candidate, she decades of political infrastructure to support her campaign. The tide is apparently turning....
Posted by: Liz | February 06, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Hey John Hirsch,
I think that you have it backwards, it Clinton who was up until yesterday the clear front runner and the established candidate in this race. It just that all of her rich friends are limited to 2300 dollars for this race to be fair. Barack is raising more because he gets small donations from Americans that care how much comes out of their paychecks but are willing to contribute to a cause they truly believe in.
Posted by: David | February 06, 2008 at 05:40 PM
If Hilary Clinton had lost the huge prizes of California, New York and Florida then the headlines Wednesday would have screamed that it was all over for her.
You have to wonder what the agenda is when Obama comes crashing down in all three and the media have sealed their lips and put their keyboards to sleep.
There seems to be almost glee in the press now that Obama is winning when it comes to raising money.
Is that how the media views the nomination ? Are we being told that this election is going to be bought ?
No wonder McCain and Huckabee seem popular. The Republicans have rejected the guy who believed it could be bought.
Posted by: david Hopcroft | February 06, 2008 at 05:42 PM
Hillary NEEDS money FAST because her supporters are so low-income that they cannot donate like the better off Obama supporters.
PLEASE paste the link below into YAHOO to donate online .
Thanks
Amy Dugan
www.hillaryclinton.com/contribute/JMA4
Posted by: Amy Dugan | February 06, 2008 at 05:43 PM
I noticed she keeps wearing the same ugly yellow outfit. This is so sad to see. Lets send Banana Girl some green. Nah it would be a waste. She's done.
Posted by: Adam Schifter | February 06, 2008 at 05:44 PM
Hillary is a fighter. Never gives up. She has been fighting for women right and poor since her college age. She will overcomes any hardship for her life and America.
Posted by: Yasuko Kitago | February 06, 2008 at 05:46 PM
Terry McAuliffe: "No one should ever worry about Hillary Clinton having the necessary resources -- ever. She's never worried about them before and she's not going to start worrying about them now."
No kidding. During her first run for the Senate, House appropriators -- both Democrat and Republican -- noted the First Lady's taxpayer-funded expenses (plane trips to campaign stops etc) within the White House budget, wondered aloud in appropriations markups and hearings what to do about this situation, and concluded that because it was unprecedented whatever would be decided would have to apply going forward, not to Ms. Clinton.
Posted by: tk | February 06, 2008 at 05:59 PM
I hate to say it, but if she can't even manage her campaign's budget, how on God's earth is she going to manage the country's finances?
This is a sure sign that Clinton is on the ropes already, and that she is not solvent enough to last for the long haul. In debt already and this is only the democratic primary -- and we're only halfway through at that. Do we even have to ask ourselves why voters want a change in this election?
Let's clear out this mess in Washington and reset the computer that runs this country. This financial slip-shod operation has gone on long enough!
Posted by: Hate to SayIt | February 06, 2008 at 06:01 PM
I think actually that Hillary's donors are well off, that is why they have already donated the maximum of $2300 for the primary and cannot donate any more.
Obama has less well off donors. He just has thousands and thousands and thousands more of them.
Posted by: Edgar | February 06, 2008 at 06:02 PM
I have been putting in $25 each month to Obama for almost a year. I'm going to do it again after hitting this Post button.
Yes We Can
Posted by: Paullee257 | February 06, 2008 at 06:05 PM
I have a simple queation. Was Senator Clinton the only candidate who expressed concerns over the tornado situation in the south during the speeh to their supporters? who else mentioned the loss of lives and damages caused by the tornadoes? This says a lot about these candidates. I am not a citizen yet, so I can not vote, but I want some of the folks to pay attention to these kind of things. Thanks all. Great day yesterday. US is the best democracy.
Posted by: Kenji | February 06, 2008 at 06:07 PM
John Hirsch,
I think you have it backwards. As reported by the Associated Press:
"An analysis by the Campaign Finance Institute, which tracks trends in political money, found that Obama raised about a third of his money in 2007 from donors who gave $200 or less. Only one-third of his money came from donors who have given the legal maximum of $2,300, compared to Clinton. She has raised about half of her money from "maxed out" donors and only 14 percent from donors of $200 or less."
It's the last paragraph: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080207/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_money;_ylt=Akv8PCDzOHPxPLZxJCovlc35R9AF
Posted by: Chung Tang | February 06, 2008 at 06:07 PM
I agree Amy Dugan, Hillary supporters are lower income and they can't donate or fundraise like Obama's big wigs. Hillary speaks for the working class. She wins them in almost every exit poll. Wake up people, Hillary wants to help the average joe. Obama does not identify with ordinary people.
I've donated $185 so far. I'm a student and it's all I can afford. Even if you can only give $5. Give something. Hillary is our only hope!
Posted by: MJC | February 06, 2008 at 06:07 PM
John McCain and Mike Huckabee have both proven you dont need tons of cash to win. Hillary will be fine financially. As for Obama, contrary to the spin his campaign puts out, 75% of his money comes in the form of soft donations dontaed at private parties by, yes, Washington insiders and the very rich. His campaign is anything but scrappy.It is incredibly well organized and advised primarily by Tom Daschle, former Dem head of Senate who by the way voted FOR the war. when will the Obama people wake up? Your guy is a phony.
Posted by: Elizabeth | February 06, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Fighting for the poor? You're under some kind of delusion, Kitago. She was a fatcat with anti-union walmart. Her healthcare plans failed b/c she sold out to her fatcat friends. She's been a rich, greedy, corrupt politician all her life. Did I mention she cried a SECOND time, the night before Super Tuesday? She looks either weak or way too theatrically dirty with the tears. And let's not forget the Kyle-Lieberman bill, sept 2007. She voted for what is essentially war in Iran- Iraq wasn't enough for her.
Posted by: S | February 06, 2008 at 06:08 PM
This sounds like a complete publicity stunt. First she cries twice -- both on nights before voting days. Now -- after Obama gives her a run for her money -- like HANS said above, she's pulls a McCain re-do and has the press circulating a sympathy ploy.
Works with some people. Good luck with that.
This country needs Obama and Edwards like crazy.
Posted by: Julie B. | February 06, 2008 at 06:15 PM
It's my understanding, from reading articles across the web, that Clinton's campaign money (not the $ she "loaned"), came from people who donated the legal max. Obama's campaign money is coming mostly from people who are contributing $200 or less. So *she* has gotten big donations from a few, and *he* is getting smaller donations from a much higher number of people, and more frequently.
I can't think of a single reason to feel sorry for her. She thought it would be a slam-dunk, and it hasn't been... and won't be.
Posted by: LisaW | February 06, 2008 at 06:18 PM
Frankly, I find it funny people are saying Obama won super Tuesday. Last Time I checked Hillary has more delegates now, won the largest and most important states, while Obama won states that have 900-50,000 democratic voters, states that have lots of African Americans, on top of advantage in states that caucus vs. a primary. Which the former last time I checked is a bit more undemocratic (I admit there are exceptions). The Media is *clearly* biased toward Obama and refuse to report his rule breaking ads (a deal he signed) in Florida, and money from crooks (which he *claims* to have returned). Honestly, if Hillary did any of that the media would jump on her and declare her "politically dead" and instead they try to make it seem like she broke the rules in Florida by holding a fund raiser which wasn't against the rules at all.
My point is that the Obama campaign is becoming more and more an oxymoron. He claims to be against the "old gaurd" per say in Washington ruling while he accepts high profile (and media covered) endorsements from Senator Kerry, Senator Kennedy etc, etc, etc. My point being all considered, Hillary is doing very very well right now and she has leads in Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania --once again--last I checked. So I think with Media bias, and Obama being one heck of a poet Hillary is doing VERY well right now and I don't doubt her campaign at all.
Also I agree, Hillary supporters are lower class and cannot afford to give as much which brings me to my final point. If Obama promises change, and loads of his supporters are "rich" what kind of change are we going to get? More tax breaks for upper America? Obama hasn't been too clear on what kind of change at this point....
But we will all stay turn...
Posted by: jake501 | February 06, 2008 at 06:19 PM
Somebody in that campaign better cut back on Bill's expense and entertainment account.
Posted by: JimF | February 06, 2008 at 06:22 PM
I agree Hillary's Campaign is DEAD!!! Just proves that women are simply bad at managing finances. And somehow we expected her to manage our economy?
Posted by: Angel Savio | February 06, 2008 at 06:27 PM
Oh wow 14 million isnt enough for her boo hoo she cant zip around in a private jet. Give me a break, she doesnt need any more money. She either lavishly spent way more than she had the resources to, OR she spent money counting on future donations to continue to finance her campaign... either way thats financially irresponsible.
Is she going to take money out of her own pocket once she's president?
Posted by: mike | February 06, 2008 at 06:31 PM
She's done. Spending her own money and having staff work for free. She even sent out a new round of Snail Mail propaganda.
We are the ones we have been waiting for.
Obama 2008
Posted by: Jason from CA | February 06, 2008 at 06:31 PM
Honestly, not trying to be rude, but to the person who said Hilllary's supporters are all low income and can not afford to donate, does that not tell us something?
People who have managed in their life to be so financially poor off they cannot even kick in $10 are her support base? Damn, makes me wonder why. Is she going to dish tons of welfare to them?
Obama has`raised almost $5 million since the polls shut. He has people pouring money at him.
Hillary is not paying staff, and is not getting many donations. Plus, where the hell did this $5 million come from? The Clintons were flat broke when they left office, even borrowed the down payment for the house. How many arms deals did Bill broker for this money?
Hillary is headed down. People do not like a sinking ship, it will only get worse for her. Media lambasting, Bill's deals coming under greater scrutiny, appearing to be fiscally irresponsible etc...
Stick in fork in her, she's done.
Posted by: Me | February 06, 2008 at 06:35 PM
I like the "experts' analysis" that Obama is winning over the more educated, the more affluent and the younger voters. Am I supposed to believe that the younger voters are mostly responsible for Obama's raising $ 32 mil+ recently in addition to last year?? Can we add up all the votes Obama has received and multiply that by $200.00(before it gets tracked)?
Stop bringing up Hillary's "dirt". At the young age of 46, he's already got mud on his reputation for his association with questionable characters in Illinois. Let's wait til he turns 60 and see how "clean" he remains.
Stop listening to his beautiful speeches, ask him how he will do it????? If you just got hope yesterday, where have you been? The country needs help/solutions!!! Not someone who will say to you 4 years from now "oops, sorry but at least I tried!!"
Posted by: Art | February 06, 2008 at 06:36 PM
The Obama money is an acknowledged reality. Count the number of times the media talks favorably of Obama and its significance can be felt. Unfortunately for Obama money can't always buy votes, as Super Tuesday showed.
Vote for the change the media establishment fears, vote for Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: Jim & Z. | February 06, 2008 at 06:37 PM
Oh, she's been fighting her whole life alright... fighting for power, fighting for Bill, fighting for Walmart, fighting for Israel, fighting for corporate America, carpet-bagging her way from Arkansas to Washington, to New York and now, hopefully back to Washington.
Hillary is Goliath, Obama is David. Go David.
Posted by: Brad | February 06, 2008 at 06:40 PM
I would just add that she has been supporting poor people while on the board of Walmart approving more part time jobs to exclude individuals from healthcare benefits. Yeah she is for the poor if it means more millions for her and Bill.
GO NADER
Posted by: Jim | February 06, 2008 at 06:46 PM
Actually Hillary has far more large donor and corporate money than Obama -- check out Opensecrets.org.
Hillary has take 56% of her contributions from Business interests. Sizable percentage from PACs.
Obama has taken only 26% from business. All of his money comes from individual donors, no PACs.
Posted by: Brad | February 06, 2008 at 06:46 PM
I don't understand why nobody really says anything about Obama. After Tuesday results and the video on the web it is obvious that Obama is courting the Black vote and people under thirty. It makes sense consiidering it worked. It saddens me how people are being racist and only voting for him because he is Black. I use to be for him , before it was cool to be now I'm for Hilary. How ironic, in the web video all those celebrities quoting MLK, yet his whole message was no to be judged on the color of one's skin but the content of thier character. How unlike celebs to be for a fashionable cause. The guy said it was the first time he was political, I guess the supreme court , abortion, gay rights, and the war weren't as important as having a Black president. Personally, it terrified having the idoit appoint a sumpreme court justice. It already is showing, with some of thier descion and other judges little bush appointed.
Posted by: Andrea | February 06, 2008 at 06:47 PM
One thing should be clear, Clinton should not lose because Obama has more money. We should see this out to the end with both candidates, not with one because he got John Kerry's phone book.
Unfortunately, I am one of those poorer Clinton supporters that cannot donate. I hope, however, that she gets the funds she needs and continues to run. Our country deserves it, no matter who you support.
Posted by: Jwal | February 06, 2008 at 06:47 PM
What political junkies forget...
300,000,000 people in the United States
650,000 contributors to the Obama campaign so far
? contributors to the Clinton campaign so far (but I think it's about half of Obama's number)
Can you spot the gap? VERY few people actually contribute to presidential campaigns. Mostly they whine about the people who do.
As for the 'Goliath' comparison...Obama accepts no money from federal PACs, and he has lots of small-amount contributors. The intention is to avoid having contributors thiinking they're 'owed' favors in return. The only thing they' going to get ia honest government and a new direction. Which of course is a bargain, when you think about it.
Check here and scroll down:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/donordems.asp?cycle=2008
Compare Obama and Clinton. Then click on some other choices in the lefthand banner. Lots of interesting stuff.
There's also:
http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureSearch/mapApp.do
Want more?
http://www.dmoz.org/Regional/North_America/United_States/Society_and_Culture/Politics/Candidates_and_Campaigns/Presidential/2008/
This campaign season has so much more data available, easily searched, sliced and diced, than every before. Take advantage of it!
imo: The more you know, the more you support Obama! :-)
Posted by: Tom J | February 06, 2008 at 06:49 PM
I'm an immigrant, father of 2, unemployed, uninsured, my house close to foreclosure. Every dollar in my pocket is important to me and my young family.
But I believe so much in what Hillary Clinton can do for people like us, who struggle every day to put food on the table and provide for our families... that I willingly will part with my precious $10 and contribute to Hillary's campaign which I see now to be in some financial difficulties.
You don't know what $10 mean to me now, but I'll give it to Hillary because I believe in what HILLARY CAN AND WILL DO --- not what Obama says and hopes he will do --- for our country.
Posted by: Oscar | February 06, 2008 at 06:51 PM
Let us face it. Obama is a legitimate candidate (whether one likes him or not). Hillary is a politician's wife. Her first and only "independent" job was that of a US senator; her only achievement is a botched health care reform. If she is nominated, McCain will have her for dinner (and will need Pepto-Bismal afterwards). If by some fluke she is elected, she will have to be impeached within a year because of some stupidity of other. Let us get over this sordid story, and elect a real president.
Posted by: Lordcanning | February 06, 2008 at 06:52 PM
How many LATimess Obama bias letters have I to read. You don't suppose that the LATimes may have endorsed him for a reason, like he's the best American for the job?
Posted by: Mister Wu | February 06, 2008 at 06:55 PM
Yasuko Kitago,
Yeh, Hillary has been fighting for women right and poor since her college age. How does she manage to loan the campaign $5 million of her own money?
Guess if she can turn a $1,000 investment into $100,000 overnight, she can accumulate lots of cash. Unfortunately she won't tell us her secret. It may have something to do with occupying the white house.
Posted by: zakk | February 06, 2008 at 06:55 PM
I love how you can tell Amy Dugan is working for Hillary...
What she says is not true at all, quote the Chicago Tribune, "Obama raised $6.9 million—more than a quarter of his total—over the Internet from more than 50,000 online donors, a base of supporters his campaign hopes to cultivate into regular givers. His campaign said 90 percent of the online contributions were for $100 or less," and he reported DOUBLE the number of donors Hillary did.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-070404obama-money,0,7560926.story
Posted by: Natali | February 06, 2008 at 06:56 PM
Yes. Let's look into who is giving money to Obama.
I'm sure we'll see more Rezkos come out of the woodwork.
Come out come out wherever you are!
NO-BAMA NO WAY!
Posted by: FJ Stratford | February 06, 2008 at 06:59 PM
It is not that Hillary is anything terrible. It is just that OBAMA is so AMAZING.
Posted by: david Goolkasian | February 06, 2008 at 06:59 PM
Reply to Phil Leake. Come on with this statement
"Obama does not have Hillraisers, or special friends. Everyone is equal."
Have you never heard of Opraha the great and her blind followers.
Posted by: Ed Martinez | February 06, 2008 at 07:11 PM
So, Hillary goes from being inevitable, to underdog and now to financially broke, all of that in a mere 4 months. The world is changing, fast. May be she will do another tear, as she tried to do at Yale the other day. It has worked once, it might work again.
Posted by: jsahiri | February 06, 2008 at 07:13 PM