Obama's one-point plan to lose the Wisconsin Democratic primary
February 15, 2008 | 2:22
pm
« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
| Advertisement |
|
|
I don't think Packers fans read the L.A. Times
(Good thing this is online then.)
Posted by: HillaryIsMoreQualified | February 15, 2008 at 04:21 PM
Barack is an excellent politician and has succesfully developed the strength of his base during his campaign to a point where it appears that he will overcome Hillary, who was considered to be the inevitable Democratic nominee.
The White House is a large organisation of senior advisors and administrators and will provide Barack with the necessary position papers and advice on issues so Barack won't be making decisions involving US national security alone.
The question tis whether he has the temperament of a previous Democratic President like JFK who historians say saved the world from potential catastrophe during the Cuban Missile crisis?
The jury of over 100 million people will make that decision in the Nov 08 general election.
Posted by: Gregory | February 15, 2008 at 05:05 PM
Sure, some will vote for Hillary because Obama is wearing a Bears hat in Wisconsin.
That Bears logo on national TV means money for his campaign as well!
Most people say, be yourself! It's a reference that Obama has a home state and people from Wisconsin work in Illinois. Or did before. Former Illinois live somewhere in Wisconsin. It brightens their heart.
Some report said he's not traveling until Tuesday getting back to Hawaii on voting day. He'll be wearing a cheesehead getting off the plane in Honolulu.
Conversion to some Wisconsin values isn't done in a day! If he had a Packer hat on that's pandering.
Posted by: Marks | February 15, 2008 at 05:16 PM
HELLO...it's a CUBS hat !!!...last time I checked Wisconsin does not have a MLB team...
(Dear Roy--It's a BEARS hat. The Cubs hat is lighter blue. And you better check one more time. You might find the MILWAUKEE Brewers.)
Posted by: ROY MITCHELL | February 16, 2008 at 05:47 AM
I believe the media has been soft on Barack Obama and it will cost him if he is the nominee in the November general election, I also believe the conservatives are pumping him up so that they have an easier time with him in November.
The Democrats have an opportunity this November to win more seats in both houses, but if Barack Obama is the nominee he will lose big and so will the party.
He has not won a big Democratic state yet in these primaries and not one news outlet has brought that fact up to him.
Posted by: Mike Ryan | February 16, 2008 at 08:51 AM
GO OBAMA! Mr. Obama is EXACTLY what this nation needs. Someone who actually UNDERSTANDS what it is he is presented with. Someone who does not find the military option sitting ON TOP of his bag of resolutions. One only need to listen to Mr. Obama to understand that he is the one we need at this time in our nations history. It should be outlawed for ANY IMMEDIATE MEMBER of a presidents family to run for president. It just STINKS of favors owed. And as for McCain, being a captive DOES NOT make one a hero... and being a hero DOES NOT qualify an individual to make decisions regarding the economy, ecology, and hyper-delicate international decisions that a president must make. Frankly, if it were not for his media attention on his captivity, he would have NEVER won the sympathies of Arizona to become their governor... a job that he failed at by the way. He is simply riding the wave of this media attention... his solutions are not there. he opts for continued military input to the TOTAL MESS that little bush created in Iraq and Afghanistan. Like bush, he does NOT ask questions as to WHY many want to attack us, but rather swallows the GOP tripe dished out that they "hate our freedom" ... a sure sign of someone who DOES NOT know what the h&ll is going on.
Posted by: RW | February 16, 2008 at 09:04 AM
So, in order for McCain to get female votes, should he sport a T-Shirt that says "I am woman, here me roar?"
Posted by: luz | February 16, 2008 at 09:24 AM
But Clinton was supporting the Giants this year...the team that knocked the Pack out of the playoffs...I'd say it's a draw.
Posted by: Cal | February 16, 2008 at 09:44 AM
Hillary grew up in Chicago going to Cubs games. When she ran for Senator in New York, she was suddenly a Mets fan..She's probably a Packer fan this week.
Posted by: Jason | February 16, 2008 at 10:01 AM
Andrew, he's already been up there joking about that, campaigning with Packers linebackerBrady Poppinga.
(So? What happened there? He got booed. Not a good sign at a political rally.)
Posted by: t.a. barnhart | February 16, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Hillary was asked a few months ago if she was a Cubs fan, because she grew up on the north side of Chicago, or a Yankees fan, because she is now a Senator from NY. She never actually answered the question, instead sitting on the fence. That should cost votes. I think voters in Wisconsin will recognize that Obama says what he means and doesn't pander!
Posted by: Justin | February 16, 2008 at 11:40 AM
I don't think the majority of Packerfans can read let alone read the LA Times.
(Good one. Alas, by not spending time on books, the Packers finished ahead of da Bears this time. But then, oh my goodness, Sen. Clinton's Giants knocked them out of the playoffs. What a quagmire--vote for a Bears fan or a Giants fan. And on the Republican side you've got McCain, who likes the DBs, and Huckabee, who's a diehard Cardinals fan, and whomever Ron Paul cheers for, maybe the Astros. Good luck choosing, cheeseheads.)
Posted by: DDP | February 16, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Uh, last time I checked people voted last time based upon voting preferences, not on the fact that a politician supports a specific professional sports team. Also, last night at a rally in GB, Obama got the endorsement of a Packers player, Brady Poppinga. Oh, and yeah people in WI can read people, guess what, in fact people in this state have some of the best schooling systems the country has to offer. We also have one of the best public universities in the nation.
Yeah, WI has a professional baseball team too. Milwaukee is in WI.
Man, like Obama said in GB...It is better to be upfront with the people that he is a Bears fan than simply run from the issues like Miss Clinton has the entire time.
This is a stupid article.
(As opposed to the brave person who left this msg without a real name.)
Posted by: LA times=Idiots | February 16, 2008 at 02:41 PM
I'm sure Packers fans in WI will give Obama a break, because at least he's representing for his hometown team, and not nauseatingly trying to ingratiate himself to them by adorning himself with Packers gear, which would reek of falseness. Hillary would probably pull some shameless maneuver to ingratiate herself just like Rudy Giuliani (Yankees sell-out) wearing a Red Sox hat trying to pull Boston votes. She's probably down in Tejas right now wearing Cowboys or Longhorns gear.
Posted by: Joey | February 16, 2008 at 03:55 PM
OK, Mike Ryan, how about the state of Illinois? Big enough and Democratic enough and Obama enough for ya? I also think of Washington as a big Dem state, but what do I know.
I am completely in agreement with other people posting here. If a politician wears your local team's hat, what other hat is s/he willing to wear just to please the crowd? Sports team loyalty is the first place where US citizens agree to disagree agreeably. We respect the other for playing the game fairly, and for being a worthy opponent.
Sadly, not all people in this country, including those who seek to lead us, understand these basic propositions.
According to the Washington Post yesterday: Among well-informed voters in Missouri: Obama +36. Among voters not well informed in Missouri, Obama -20. A 56 point swing! But here's my guess: there's an even larger split among those who think games should be played fairly, and those who think cheating is OK, because the ends justify the means.
The Clinton way:
Gerald Ford stated to Thomas DeFrank that he played golf with Bill Clinton, and that Bill not only cheated but cheated on every hole!
[TIger]] Woods described a hole on the back nine."President Clinton rolls one in the bushes, then hits another one off the tee. ... It was 6-7 feet and he walked off the green. ...
Lt. Col. James “Buzz” Patterson slams in his White House memoir Dereliction of Duty, “My first inklings into the makeup and personality of Bill Clinton and those he surrounded himself with came during these golf outings…Even in these inconsequential golf games, he would cheat with ball placements and extra shots. The way he played golf, I came to understand, was not just a peccadillo but symptomatic of the way he approached life.”
Posted by: Ronald Loui | February 16, 2008 at 04:38 PM
I have, however, heard that Barack Obama has sharp elbows under the basketball net.
(How well-informed you are! And you may have read about it right here in The Ticket. He took on a Sports Illustrated writer for fun.)
Posted by: Ronald Loui | February 16, 2008 at 04:40 PM
I used to be a republican, but after Bush & Iraq, I cast my absentee ballot for Obama. No, I did not do it solely based on emotions; I read about the man. It was a privilege to be at the rally in Oshkosh. You can not help but be impressed with this man: he is visionary & definitely inspirational. I heard his speeches on TV several times before, & decided this time to be an audience to a very impressive human being. Thank you, Barack.
Posted by: Elsa | February 16, 2008 at 06:06 PM
I'm a Packer fan and I read the LA Times, at least the online edition. I'm also voting for Obama on Tuesday.
(Well, you're welcome here. Now, if you were a Lions fan, that might be something else...)
Posted by: Joe Vanden Plas | February 16, 2008 at 06:13 PM
most of the teenagers believe Obama's ideas and change our country.. because Obama has a puerility thinking.and teenagers love Obama's puerility thinking
other side, senior citizen believe Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton because their experience telling them Hillary can be trust. one more what are we goin to change? Are goin to get worse because Obama's puerility thinking. Obama just talk n tells solution but we never know his solution can solve our problems. Bill Clinton president did well job for us during his 8 years president. he n his wife already solved so many problems for us during his president years.
Posted by: peter | February 16, 2008 at 07:36 PM
That's it? That's all you got? Oh please.
Posted by: Cldp | February 16, 2008 at 08:03 PM
Harold Ickes, a Clinton operative, said that Clinton will win due to the superdelegates and that it doesn't matter if Obama wins the popular vote. He is also reversing himself on the status of Michigan and Florida. As a member of the DNC he supported the decision to strip Michigan and Florida of their delegates. Now as a Clinton operative he wants the delegates to go to Clinton even though there was no campaign in these state and Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan. If the "party leaders" give the election to Clinton even though Obama has won the popular vote I will not vote or support any Democrat in any election for the next 40 years.
Posted by: Jim B | February 16, 2008 at 08:59 PM
O yes Packer fans do read the LA times. Blankity Blank Bears did it twice. Why it's enough to make bankrupt America McCain seems like someone other then Satins's latest attempt to destroy freedom and democracy. Oh well at least it isn't a NY cap.
Bill Couture
Posted by: Bill Couture | February 16, 2008 at 09:58 PM
What are we gonna do if we actually have a politician who shows a bit of loyalty and doesn't kiss our collective home town/market segment fanny? Obama had better run off and get that operation politicans have to surgically remove their soul. Otherwise, it's puerility thinking from here on out (is it just me, or do the comments of Hillary supporters always seem to read like they were written by a mid-nineties Eastern European spam program?).
P.S. Hillary doesn't support the Yankees. Hillary is the Yankees.
P.P.S. Wait, didn't Guiliani lose the nomination when he tried to pander over the Red Sox? Maybe we are growing up...
Posted by: spence | February 17, 2008 at 03:27 AM
obama has ran a great campiagn. i hope he atleast wins the nomination.
clinton really lacks a message. that is her central problem....she is at her best when bashing obama....not so convincing when selling clinton
Posted by: elis | February 17, 2008 at 04:31 AM
Since Hillary and Obama have basically the same policies, this primary election winner will prove whether America is more sexist or racist. Personally, I like Hillary, because she knows the ropes. But Obama has style, soul, and strength. I would be happy with either one as the President.
Posted by: Steve Wimer | February 17, 2008 at 04:43 AM