Breaking News: Big Nevada service union endorses Obama
On the night that he came in second in the New Hampshire primary, Barack Obama came in first with the Nevada chapter of the large Service Employees International Union. He won that important union's official endorsement a few minutes ago.
The influential union's 17,500 health care and county worker members will come in very handy for Nevada's Jan. 19 caucuses. The union's choice will come as a serious disappointment for both Hillary Clinton and John Edwards, who both coveted it too. And the timing late tonight is likely no accident.
Union president Vicky Hedderman said just before midnight that the union's decision came during a late-night conference call of the executive board Tuesday, the Associated Press reported. But the timing of such a rapid news release without elaborate media attendance comes as a convenient public relations counterpunch to Clinton's narrow New Hampshire election win Tuesday night.
It also gets the SEIU endorsement in ahead of another anticipated Obama endorsement Wednesday by Nevada's Culinary Workers Union, Local 226, which has 60,000 members.
Hedderman said Obama is a candidate "who could take the campaign all the way to November."
Obama has previously received the endorsement of SEIU state councils and locals in five states, including Illinois. Edwards has won the endorsement of SEIU's California State Council, which could make its 600,000 members available to help him.
Under SEIU union rules, the Nevada endorsement allows SEIU locals in other states to lend volunteers and resources to its Nevada counterpart on behalf of Obama.
Ten days left.
-- Andrew Malcolm



what a mistake!!!
Posted by: deborah | January 09, 2008 at 12:26 AM
Great! I don' t know why Unions stories kept saying they weren't behind Obama. Maybe Unions just didn't know him well enough.
Nevada is going to be interesting who wins.
How many people are reading life stories of these candidates? Their character is going to win the White House more than "experience". What candidate has qualities in their character to bridge political obstruction at the White House?
Has Hillary's past venom at the Right Wing Conspiracy lessoned? Her and Bill battling Obama, she hasn't had time to take on Republicans.
Will the past Clinton problems come up again stifling progress in Congress so things can't be accomplished in a bipartisan way? Are partisan walls growing larger and gulf between the parties expanding if Hillary is the nominee?
Posted by: Marks | January 09, 2008 at 01:04 AM
Thank you so much for endorsing Senator Barack Obama! One NG win does not make Clinton as she had been calling herself (before her rude wake up call in Iowa) indespinsable.
You absolutely rock! While Edwards would be a perfect fit --- I truly can understand how you had to select the best candidate who will be quaranteed to remain in the race through the duration.
You made the right choice and I'm proud of you!
Posted by: Sherry, Pasty Chef LV Nevada | January 09, 2008 at 01:48 AM
So will Obama denounce any union 527s that run ads supporting him in Nevada?
What a hypocrite - when Obama was in Iowa unions were special interests but now that he needs labor in NV Obama loves unions.
Posted by: special interests | January 09, 2008 at 04:16 AM
the culinary workers have pulled their Obama endorsement. the union will be neutral in the Nevada primary (source: Tim Russert on MSNBC). So much for labor "surge" towards Obama.
Posted by: randy duren | January 09, 2008 at 04:30 AM
"Will the past Clinton problems come up again stifling progress in Congress so things can't be accomplished in a bipartisan way?"
Because this was the Clintons' fault, right? And things will magically get done under President Obama because he's riding a pony called "Change?"
Exactly why did this union endorse him anyway?
Posted by: Elian Gonzales | January 09, 2008 at 05:22 AM
Stop the White Witch.
Go Obama !!!!
Posted by: tOd | January 09, 2008 at 06:02 AM
Well done! Both from a timing standpoint and from a decision-making standpoint. Barack is the candidate who brings about the most inspiration and hope to we, the people. That's the important point many miss. We're not voting for a dictator to do it all him/herself. We're voting for someone to do their job and inspire and enable us to do ours to our highest degree. Barack sets that tone the best.
Thank you.
Posted by: Robert | January 09, 2008 at 06:16 AM
I am so happy for Nevada and Senator Obama right now. Congrats guys!!
Posted by: Anderson Nguyen | January 09, 2008 at 06:21 AM
I have seen the Kenyans who have come to the local college to get scolarships that could have helped locals in in adepressed area. Most of these people try to mary fat white girls to stay here.
I also remember comming home from a days work to find that one of the Kenyan crack heads had broke in my apartment and trashed it, also I remember the two windshields and door glasses broke out of my
truck that resulted in my insurance being canceked.
Personally, I am not ready for one to be president
Posted by: billy humble | January 09, 2008 at 06:23 AM
bill clinton calling obama a "kid?" bill, he is a us senator buddy. regardless of his poll numbers. why do we end up in the mud?
Posted by: asdffbbxcvxb | January 09, 2008 at 06:26 AM
It's funny, I can't even remember what labor group endorsed whom the last 30 days. It doesn't hurt to have their backing and money, but Obama is not lacking in money. After this caucus thing is done and registered Democrats actually start voting in private booths, I think Obama will need a lot more than a few labor endorsements to win. Edwards got a lot of endorsements. Another twist, never count out the Hispanic vote in the Southwest. People have forgotten them it seems. Clinton will try to ride the women and Hispanic vote to the White House.
Posted by: mustkilltreemake2x4 | January 09, 2008 at 06:27 AM
QUOTE I AGREE WITH
BY ERIK RUSH RENEW AMERICA
I don't see that issues of faith โ and Obama at least claims to be a Christian โ carry much weight with the majority of voters. Frankly, I'm more concerned with his loyalty to the United States of America, and in my opinion, his public refusal to place hand over heart and recite the Pledge of Allegiance itself ought to have creamed his campaign โ but he skated.
Posted by: Leigh | January 09, 2008 at 06:54 AM
Now Obama can help bring in more impoverished immigrants to bring wages down further. Is that what the union want?
Posted by: jjj | January 09, 2008 at 07:00 AM
I just watched Obama on FOX news this AM and he said he thought he was going to get the union backing, but nothing has been secured or anounced as yet.
Is this story just wishful thinking based on hopes?
Atleast wait to announce endorsements until after a candidate is informed that the information is factual.
Posted by: Anne | January 09, 2008 at 07:47 AM
Sherry, are you retarded? Why are you speaking to the LA Times as if they made the decision to endorse Obama? And what the hell does "indespinsable." mean?
Posted by: Willy Lee | January 09, 2008 at 08:23 AM
I like all the talk about Sen. Obama being the candidate to run all the way to November. Unfortunately its flawed.
We live in a nation of color, especially when it comes to politics. Red and Blue states. Yellow-dog democrats. It is sad but true to say that Mr. Obama is the wrong color. Its not that he's too black -- he's too green. He's too inexperienced to win a general election.
For all of his comparisons to JFK, Mr. Obama did not have 14 years in Congress under his belt, nor was he a war hero.
Could you imagine an Obama-McCain election? Sen. McCain will trounce Sen. Obama on experience and national security. The realism of fear always trumps the poetry of hope. Look at how the Republicans swiftboated Kerry. They'll do worse to a man who has no military background and has openly admitted to hard drug use.
If the rest of the Democratic party is half as smart as those party goers in New Hampshire, Sen. Clinton or Sen. Edwards will get the nomination.
Posted by: Matthew | January 09, 2008 at 08:55 AM
After Obama blasted SEIU as a special interest in Iowa -- this makes no sense.
THe Union has no self esteem.
Posted by: bluestatevoter | January 09, 2008 at 09:03 AM
Do all of the union members vote in lock step or do they think for themselves?
I have often wondered about that. It seems to me that people should be free to make up their own minds as to who they want to vote for. I thought unions were to help employees seek benefits from their employers, not to drive a stake into their voing heart.
Posted by: Steve Wurtzel | January 09, 2008 at 09:28 AM
I am glad Obama is getting the support in Nevada. He and Edwards are genuiine humans, class acts. Not bogged in the traditional politicking that Hillary and Slick Willy are masters of. I was a supporter of Willy, I met him, spoke with him, believed in his message. But after recent comments I see he is nothing but another greasy politician out to get power.
I found it glaring that Hillary was so classless as to barely acknowledge her competitors in her speech last night. Both Edwards and Obama acknowledged their competition straight away and she just gushed, stole lines from Obama and Edwards speeches, soaking it all in.
Posted by: kaput | January 09, 2008 at 09:31 AM
I beleive this was a that the decision to endorse Obama was indeed a decision of change, and that you beleive in change to.
Here is what change should mean to America. Change should mean getting rid of political control and allowing someone in there who has a fresh record w/o being controlled by politics and understanding that this is a democratic nation. This is a nation where the people speak and politicians should listen.
However, what has happened over the years is that the politicians lie, lie, lie to get the position they want. Then they change their position once they get in, Barack shows that he is willing to stand up for the people and knock down the barriers of the political wall and make change immenent.
Thanks, he deserves a chance to show us this can and will happen. I actually trust him more than I trust the Clinton's, and yes, I am female.
Posted by: Martisa | January 09, 2008 at 09:51 AM
If SEXIST Nepotism gets Hillary nominated I'm voting against the Democrats for the first time ever.
America is a Democracy = Not a Monarchy
Posted by: PulSamsara | January 09, 2008 at 09:57 AM
Wow. The unions made another terrible mistake, just like howard dean a few years back. Watch hillary win this.
Posted by: John | January 09, 2008 at 09:59 AM
Excellent choice. This is the candidate with the freshest/brightest ideas. I'm thrilled about the Obama support. He undoubtedly has a better chance of winning the general election than the HIllary camp. Go Barack!
Posted by: Jose | January 09, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Obama admits campaign/PAC donation linksBad news for the Barack Obama camp and his politics of hope clean-guy image.The Washington Post reveals today that there was, indeed, close coordination between the Illinois senator's presidential campaign and his leadership PAC, Hopefund, in deciding which local, state and federal politicians around the country were to receive thousands of dollars in contributions from Obama's PAC.Such coordination appears to be forbidden under Federal Election Commission rules because it, in effect, would give a candidate another, less regulated financial fund to influence the outcome of his own campaign. But Obama officials express confidence they violated no rules. The Post's John Solomon reported the other day that Obama's Hopefund had distributed money in the early voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire to people like New Hampshire state Sen. Jacayln Cilley, who got $1,000 from Obama last summer. Six days later the Democrat in the nation's first primary state announced her endorsement of his candidacy because she said she believed in him.Likewise, Obama's PAC gave $9,000 to U.S. Rep. Paul Hodes, who was New Hampshire's first congressional member to endorse Obama. In the earlier story Obama spokesmen denied any connection between the PAC and Democratic presidential campaign.But today's piece alters that account and says the PAC has distributed $180,000 to groups and candidates in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Iowa and another $150,000 to similar destinations in states with primary balloting through mid-February.Bob Bauer, private counsel for both Obama's campaign and PAC, named names of those from the campaign who'd help select the PAC's recipients and professed confidence the Obama entities had met all FEC regulations.But Scott Thomas, a Democrat and former FEC chairman, says: "He is clearly pushing the envelope."
Posted by: Chuck | January 09, 2008 at 10:36 AM