Hey, Ron Paul folks, Rudy Giuliani pays tribute to your guy
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who has been on the, uh, naughty list of all loyal, dedicated, fervent and vocal supporters of Rep. Ron Paul since he appeared to scoff at the Texan during one of the early Republican debates last year, gave a formal tip
of the hat to the good doctor during his Florida concession speech last night.
As one result of that debate incident, which involved Giuliani taking offense at Paul's suggestion that Americans were at least partly responsible for 9/11 by their occupation and offensive actions against Arab countries, some Paulunteers have hounded many of Giuliani's public appearances with chants and sign-waving throngs. And they have often filled the comment section of The Ticket with scores of denunciations of the man who successfully turned life in New York City around.
These thousands have also reveled in the several times that Paul drew more primary or caucus votes than Giuliani in early states where the New Yorker did not seriously compete, starting with....
Iowa. Many will no doubt delight now in the expected end to Giuliani's campaign later today followed by his anticipated endorsement of Sen. John McCain. Ron Paul, on the other hand, has the endorsement of THE Jane Roe, is working on Tom McClintock. and has launched an eight-state ad blitz including California.
But Tuesday night as he was preparing to bow out, as first reported on the Ticket Monday noon, Giuliani gave a gracious concession speech in which he listed all of his Republican competitors and called them good men.
He added Ron Paul on the end, smiling, and said after all the debates he'd go back to his hotel room and watch television and how every time, according to the texted tallies, Ron Paul won all the debates, much, he did not say, thanks to the determined voting of his many busy-fingered followers. "Ron Paul won every debate!" Giuliani said.
Alas for Paul's followers, who have given many millions to his campaign treasury,--nearly $3.8 million so far this month, according to his website -- Ron Paul, a 72-year-old, 10-term House member who ran for president previously on the Libertarian ticket in 1988, did not win in Florida. In fact, Paul came in fifth, dead-last, well behind even Giuliani and Mike Huckabee.
In fact, the former ob-gyn received only about 3% of the vote, way less than 100,000 votes, which was about what pre-election polls measured as his support in the Sunshine State and what Paul supporters will argue was caused by a mainstream media conspiracy to run those fraudulent polls, to under-report Paul's support and to minimize his chances.
Under Florida winner-take-all rules, McCain now takes the state's 57 delegate votes at next summer's Republican National Convention in St. Paul.
So tonight's Republican debate at the Reagan Library near Simi Valley, co-sponsored by The Times and live-streamed here on this website at 5 p.m. Pacific, will likely have only four surviving Republicans -- McCain, Paul, Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney. Paul will be the strict constitutionalist who opposes the Iraq war and proposes to slash the federal government. Chances are, he will be given less time to speak than the other three.
On CNN last evening Wolf Blitzer went way out on a limb about the future of the Republican race going into Super Tuesday, Feb. 5. He boldly predicted that the results next week were "anybody's guess."
And you can take that to the bank.
--Andrew Malcolm
Photo: Richard Sheinwald / Bloomberg News






I'm from Europe and I can see that this is glaringly biased against Ron Paul. It's as if the writer could not stop adding verbs and adjectives to make Ron Paul's campaign appear stultified, with assumptions of what the Ron Paul supporters would say of the Florida results.
Why not mention that Ron Paul had abandoned campaigning in Florida, prefering to visit other states instead? Why not mention that Rudy got less than Ron Paul's 3% in many of the earlier states where he did not make an effort?
This has been the ploy of the MSM: portray RP as unelectible so even those who agree with him feel they are "wasting their vote" if they vote RP - a ridiculous mode of thinking to say the least...
Maine is next. Ron Paul is expected to do well there. But don't expect much coverage from the MSM.
Posted by: Kevin | January 30, 2008 at 02:47 AM
Thank you, Andrew. I have to say that it is true - There is blatent censoring;
Google 'Ron Paul -exclusion,censoring, unfair' and there you will see the evidence. You Tube also have video clips of this. Whether one is a Paul advocate or not, people should be concerned that this practice is going on.
Which candidate gets to be censored the election after next? This is not right especially when we are supposed to be instilling the virtues of democracy elsewhere in the world. Unless you have access to the internet you will NOT see fair appraisals of ALL the candidates. So to make up here is a website where the internet trawling has been done for your readers:
www.whattheysayaboutronpaul.com :)
Posted by: andre | January 30, 2008 at 03:13 AM
You forgot to mention Dr. Paul's 2nd place showing in the last two primaries in Nevada and Louisiana.
Posted by: David | January 30, 2008 at 03:15 AM
Andrew,
You know as well as the rest of us that Rudy's comments were a backhanded compliment. You know as well as I that he was talking about that tiny handful of crazy Ron Paul spammers, wink wink, nudge nudge.
And he seemed to mention Ron as an afterthought -- probably because, even at his concession speech, he looked out into the audience and saw a bunch of Ron Paul signs.
Anyway, I'm thrilled to see Benito Giuliani crushed and broken. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy...
Posted by: Kent | January 30, 2008 at 03:26 AM
There is self-fulfilling prophecy that won't allow a candiate with less name recognition to become recognizable through MSM channels. Now there are sensible arguments to be made in support of that, namely that channel airtime is a scarce good, that media companies are there to serve their customers (who might not be supporters of candidate A) or that reporting conflicts with the interests of a media company's shareholders. That's all fair. What is not fair is to say that this system is balanced (fair or not), that it increases citizens' participation in democracy, that young people can become more interested in politics with this system, or maybe more important, that in the end this system will create a better government.
I'm happy to see that technological advances make a campaign like the one of Ron Paul possible. Without internet sites like Youtube or Meetup, this was never possible, as it would have been to hard to self-organize or spread a message in a cost effective way. Who would have thought that Ron Paul would even come this far a year ago? Certainly not a large part of the media, which has never shown to have an affinity for or an understanding of libertarianism. I doubt that will change. I also doubt that they will fail to pick up the fundamental changes that are going on right now in society. Not that I care, as these changes make these media outlets more irrelevant each day.
Posted by: mark | January 30, 2008 at 03:37 AM
And then there were 4...
This isn't a sprint, it's a marathon. And Ron Paul is a long-haul runner.
I am not so much interested in Rudy Giuliani praising Ron Paul, as I am in whether or not he completed his homework assignment. Did Rudy ever read those books that Ron Paul suggested?
If Rudy doesn't drop out before tonight's debate, may I suggest the headline of the debate report read something along the lines of: "John, Paul, Mike and Ringo." (ah, if only Ron Paul had run in 2000 when a certain 'George' was running, the headlines would have just written themselves...)
But seriously, I think Paul should watch his back in tonight's debate. Rudy may be out for revenge. Without a credible chance of winning, he may focus, instead, on destroying Ron Paul.
Posted by: Kevin Houston | January 30, 2008 at 03:42 AM
A.M. , Keep up the good work ya crazy thing! kick ass Ron Paul!!!
Posted by: dwc | January 30, 2008 at 03:48 AM
This guy has the immaturity and anger of a 15 yeard old. Absolutely no professionalism and writes like a drunk. If you want to criticize somebody, do it professionally and not like drunken buffoon. "Veteran journalist" my rearside. Press secretary to Laura Bush. Thats right, you were indeed a pimp.
Posted by: Henry | January 30, 2008 at 03:52 AM
Unfortunately it took segregationist Governor Wallace to reveal the truth that "there's not a dime's worth of difference between" Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats willingly went along with the War in Iraq, suspension of Habeas Corpus, detaining protesters, banning books like "America Deceived' from Amazon, stealing private lands (Kelo decision), warrant-less wiretapping and refusing to investigate 9/11 properly. They are both guilty of treason.
Support Dr. Ron Paul and save this great nation.
Last link (before Google Books bends to gov't Will and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0
Posted by: Mike W | January 30, 2008 at 03:59 AM
First they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" Ghandi
Posted by: K. Fisher | January 30, 2008 at 04:04 AM
"Hey, Ron Paul folks, Rudy Giuliani pays tribute to your guy"
As he should, and should be ashamed of himself. As for you, it is clear your not a Freedom loving American, with your slanted article. Why not mention Ron Paul taking 2nd in Nevada, or the 2nd in Louisiana, that may very well be a 1st place win there? No, you would rather be a part of the system that has helped but not succeeded in keeping Ron Paul down. Ron Paul has a message of freedom, and liberty to us, and we as true Americans LOVE him for that. Rudy is an idiot, and so are the rest of the republicans that are running. The ONLY man with any integrity running is in fact Ron Paul. As for you Andrew Malcolm try being a man for once, and not part of the politically correct puppets in MSM!
John L Gulledge
Pensacola FL.
Posted by: John L Gulledge | January 30, 2008 at 04:05 AM
Ron Paul has run a beautiful rope-a-dope campaign. The other candidates have spent themselves and beat themselves up into oblivion. There are now only four candidates remaining, and most of the conservative base will end up going to Paul. Romney, McCain, and Huckabee cannot defeat Hillary or Obama in th fall, only Ron Paul can.
Posted by: Brian | January 30, 2008 at 04:40 AM
Let's not forget our leader's anniversary. Let's give what is necessary to reach 8.5 mil!
Posted by: Ron | January 30, 2008 at 04:56 AM
Ron Paul can use your Giuliani defense for a low showing in Iowa for himself in Florida. The interesting thing is Giuliani did campaign in both Iowa and New Hampshire he spent nearly 4.5 million in ads. Now in Florida Giuliani he spent close to 45 million and Ron Paul spent next to nothing. I unlike most RP supporters never voted in text polls, never waived signs nor gave a toss about Giuliani so please don't try and group me. No self respecting Ron Paul supporter has ever thought that getting him in the White House was going to be easy - so please don’t try to make it sound as if we did. No self respecting anybody supporter ever doubted a media bias early on. Now that he didn’t win Florida and in fact came in with 3% please don’t make it sound as if that justifies what the media has been doing since before New Hampshire - give me a break. Do I think the lack of media attention is some sort of conspiracy? No I do not.....I think it’s as obvious as the day is long that the media needs a future candidate that will bring viewers. So they cover the ones that will - nothing conspiratorial about that just basic marketing. A full on liberal or crazy war monger brings ratings pure and simple.
Posted by: JimS | January 30, 2008 at 04:58 AM
I'm glad MCain won in Florida. Don't get me wrong, I'm a dedicated Ron Paul fan. Mitt Romney was way ahead of everybody else including Mcain on the delegates untill Florida, if he had won Florida (winner takes all) he would have increased his delegates by 57 and been the clear frontrunner. MCain took that away from him so now it's still a fight. MCain is the most undesirable candidate of all and I just can't see him winning the presidency specially because he is so pro war (not to mention his freaky yellow smile) so the republicans are shooting themselves in the foot. President Paul did good in not wasting our good money and effort in Florida as again (winner takes all) there are no delegates for nobody. That's what Giuliani overlooked. He spent countless millions in Florida and 15% of the state gave him nothing, Paul still has more delegates than him. I live in Florida and there where Mittney ads everywhere, millions and millions of dollars, I saw none from President Paul. Mittney got 31% of the vote, President Paul got 3%, they both got the same amount of delegates, 0. Even Score, Smart move President Paul. While these guys are spending there funds Killing eachother in a state that really does not compensate anybody (except the winner) for there efforts, President Paul has been campaigning in Maine and many other Super Tuesday states and making inroads in all of them.
I'd say President Pauls strategy is the smartest of all.
Posted by: Orlando | January 30, 2008 at 05:02 AM
And he WON the straw poll in my state - Connecticut -- but you don't see big news of that anywhere, now do you? Interesting that these media drones attempt to dictate to us who are candidates are. And McCain - who is pro-war won in NH where most of the people are AGAINST the war. Something stinks in the water --
Posted by: Maria Harding | January 30, 2008 at 05:03 AM
I'm watching with interest from Australia. We get US cable TV via satellite and US news via radio... plus all the free to air networks of Australia. Ron Paul is not mentioned at all, but everyone seems fixated on Rudy for some bizzare reason. I think this is the election the world is watching - and the world is starting to see America for what it really is.... f#cked!
Posted by: Pete | January 30, 2008 at 05:09 AM
You might want to check out the fact that Giuliani campaigned more in Iowa and New Hampshire than Ron Paul did... he just didn't win any votes.
Also Paul saved his money by not campaigning in Florida, where everyone else blew through their remaining money. There was no conspiracy in FL, Paul wasn't there to get coverage. And why should he have been? This is about delegates, and there are plenty of those that can be gotten much cheaper than wasting tens of millions trying to out spend McCain and Romney to come in at the top of one state. This is a new kind of election, one that will be decided at the convention, and you can bet that the revolution will be there.
Paul probably has half the money he has raised in the bank still. If he ran the government like he runs his campaign, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in.
Posted by: Jason | January 30, 2008 at 05:09 AM
Why is it so hard for the media to do their job and simply report on what is happening? You get commentary like that that makes Ron Paul look like a moron and Giuliani look like a hero. When opinion is the only thing reported in an election cycle no one gets a fair shake. You can joke all you want about this but it is a serious problem. We are not supposed to be voting for Mr. Popular. We are choosing our President. Based on the one we have now we should be very freakin’ careful.
Posted by: gjothesen | January 30, 2008 at 05:18 AM
Perhaps it is MSM bias and corruption, but how much of it has to do with the fact that his supporters can't face the reality of Ron Paul losing? It is like religious cults always thinking that they are the smartest ones, the one's who know everything and everyone else is wrong. At least I could understand this whining if he wasn't running as a Republican and maybe an independent instead. He has no chance in the Republican Party because he is not one of them. His best chances lie on a 3rd party ticket.
Posted by: DB | January 30, 2008 at 05:18 AM
"Busy-fingered" ??? You guys never stop. Technology prevents multiple voting, and I think you know it
Posted by: Randy | January 30, 2008 at 05:21 AM
Florida was a winner take all (delegate state) and Ron Paul moved on to campaign in states that are more fair in the distribution of delegates. Ron Paul understands and demonstrates how to use his time and energy very efficiently. He focuses on the important stuff, like delegates to the National Convention.
It is obvious to the rest of the world and most people in the United States, that the powerful major media is attempting to control the election and control our lives. Obviously the major media's conduct in this matter is violating the trust of the world. One more way, forces used destructively, will destroy our nation and the Liberty and freedom for which it stands. We then wonder why the so many other nations mistrust and despise our meddling in their affairs. The citizens of the United States should join the Ron Paul revolution in taking back our country, renew our belief in the constitution and our previous world enfluence.
A must read for "Supporters of Ron Paul " http://www.blackhillsportal.com/npps/story.cfm?ID=2426
Posted by: Dale Pettit | January 30, 2008 at 05:26 AM
Rudy successfully turned around NYC?!?!? I assume you're not referring to the blatant disregard for the workers health at ground zero. I'll also assume you're not referring to his spending of NYC's taxpayers dollars for his affair. I'll also assume you're just another herded sheep that wants nothing more than your own personal desires to be realized. Baahhh bahhhhh.
Posted by: Ken in NH | January 30, 2008 at 05:29 AM
No, this time, Paul was chosing not do much campaining in Florida. He knew it was not a good state for him so he spent the time sreading his campaining around the other Super Tuesday states. (basically the complete opposite of Giuliani's Strategy) If anything we will probably here more MSM propaganda about Paul, and his "dismal Florida results", as "proof" of his unelectability. Never mind that there is still the issue with the Louisiana caucus (what is going on there by the way, Paul may win that state or come in second? Where is the MSM coverage on that?)
Posted by: Jay_C | January 30, 2008 at 05:41 AM
You'll get no thanks from me...
ANOTHER smear at RON PAUL.
You mention Paul beat Giuliani in states where Rudy did not campaign.
You FAILED to mention RON PAUL did not campaign in Florida.
Yet he still drew a better percentage than Rudy did when not campaigning.
When will someone just get it right?
We don't need you to think for us. We don't need you to hold our hand and lead us. We need unbiased reporting.
Ah, it is only a no name's blog.........
Posted by: akaye | January 30, 2008 at 05:44 AM
Let Rudy have his last digs...he ran an historically bad campaign. Paul got zero press coverage, Rudy's was 24/7. The media will act like contortionists avoiding Paul now with just four left running.
Posted by: Gene | January 30, 2008 at 05:44 AM
If by "the man who successfully turned life in New York City around," you mean ensuring the FD had outdated communication systems, and forcing kids back to school before the air quality standards were met in and around Ground Zero then you're right on point. Also you failed to mention Paul didn't "seriously compete" in Florida. Next, just to clarify, we weren't reveling against Guiliani, we were reveling for our freedoms. The same ones that the Bush regime has suppressed, and the ones that Guiliani would continue to suppress. All in the name of "patriot"-ism, how's that for irony?
To Guiliani and his, MSM backers/pollsters, that since the summer have wanted so desperately for him to be the GOP candidate, I'd like to dedicate a song to you from the late, great Ray Charles:
"Hit the road jack and don't you come back, no more, no more, no more"
Posted by: chrisinaustin | January 30, 2008 at 05:49 AM
Why not mention that Romney spent millions on Florida, and WON'T GET a SINGLE DELEGATE out of the deal. That's a huge part of this story. Paul barely campaigned in FL. Giuliani, however, DID campaign in New Hampshire... he hosted the most political events in the state of all the GOP candidates! What did it get him? Jack squat.
Many doubt the accuracy of Florida's voting system. You might remember the hearings after the 2000 election when the programmer of the voting machines admitted the machines had code that could flip any election to 51-49%. Jeff Dean, the senior programmer and VP of Diebold was later convicted on 23 felony counts. But who cares about facts, or about criminals controlling our elections? At least we're 'safe', right?
Posted by: Tony Andrews | January 30, 2008 at 05:52 AM
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
Those who count the votes decide everything."
quote attributed to Joseph Stalin
Posted by: Justin Zane | January 30, 2008 at 05:57 AM
Thank you Europe for noticing we are in a bit of a fascist pickle here in the USA. A place where the paradigm of thinking for ones self has been traded in for mindless TV and trips to the peoples republic of WalMart, We managed to elect Mr Bush the 2nd time even with blatant lies about WMD etc.... Sorry I can not report we are making any progress over here. Ron Paul has the only intelligent message out there. However, the bankers and their friends will control the situation to what ever extent necessary to secure their multi trillion dollar per year cash flows from our pockets to theirs. I am sure, where Fl is a winner take all state for the GOP delegates, it made no sense for Ron Paul to spend dollars there without really good odds to capture the delegates. Hence I think he made the correct moves. The censorship of our media is so obvious, it speaks to the extent of the issues here. Go Ron 2008!
Posted by: Guesswhotoo6 | January 30, 2008 at 05:59 AM
Florida was a difficult state for Dr. Paul. Florida's was the first primary where only Republicans could vote. Many of Ron Paul's supporters are Democrats or independents. Moreover, Dr. Paul seems to do better in caucuses than in primaries.
One needs a computer and access to the Internet to obtain an adequate coverage of election news. The mainstream media often pretends that Dr. Paul does not exist. Are the media afraid of the Ron Paul Revolution? Are they afraid of limited Constitutional government, ending the Iraq War, ending American military involvement in foreign countries, restoring our civil liberties, ending the income tax, balanced budgets, and money and banking reform?
Posted by: Free Arthur | January 30, 2008 at 05:59 AM
How nice of the LA Times, who is co-sponsoring this debate, to let us know ahead of time that it will be unfair and biased against Paul by not giving him equal amount of airtime. Us Dr. Paul supporters are used to getting snubbed in real time, we appreciate being told that our candidate is going to get screwed ahead of time. THANKS SO MUCH LA TIMES!!!
www.ronpaul2008.com
Posted by: Mike Knapp | January 30, 2008 at 06:00 AM
I would hope to see Ron Paul given fair treatment in the press and the next debate. It wont happen. Our media "pundits" lack the least awarness of our countries plight. They live in the other America. The elite ,over paid, im not responsible for anything America. Lap dogs of the media empire. When did pursuit of the dollar and power replace responsible journalism? Thomas Paine where are you? The mindless crude they produce sucks the brains out of the bubba, what are you going to give me populace. Instead of rebate checks how about granite counter tops? Just an old Marine on a mission.
Posted by: tom brown | January 30, 2008 at 06:02 AM
It' is freightning to those of us who are not americans when we hear presidential candidates like giuliani speak about terrorism and why they attack america because america is a free country. The world needs an american president who logically understands the world outside america and the real causes of terrorism. giuliani's hopes at a presidential run ended months ago when he and ron paul exchanged views on terrorism. rudy thinks that america was attacked because terrorists hate freedom. rudy should tip his hat to ron paul, for educating him.
Posted by: Nicholas | January 30, 2008 at 06:02 AM
The results in Louisiana have not been tabulated yet. The second place announcement was made before the votes were even counted which is not done in a race this close not to mention most of the McCain delegates were not eligible to run. The Paul campaign has contested the caucus and caucus results are still open.
Posted by: Sandra | January 30, 2008 at 06:04 AM
The mainstream media is a disgrace. I need to get news about the election so I can cast my vote. When I go to the likes of CNN or Foxnews or MSNBC, they only post videos 3 minutes or less in length or pathetically short articles that 'analyze' essential nothing important happening in the race. They barely discuss issues. They never get into details. They never do full overviews of the candidates' records and positions. They never treat the candidates the same. There is a complete disconnect. The election is covered as if it's a game of football not something that can actually affect the people's well-being.
Look at this article! Candidates name here. 34.56% there. Some million dollar amount raised over here. Another endorsement over there. I DON'T CARE! I want to vote for the candidate based on his ideas. The mainstream media fails us by making the campaign everything but ideas. American democracy has a lot of evolving to do.
Posted by: Joe McFarley | January 30, 2008 at 06:05 AM
Mr. Malcolm, I'm an RP supporter and I send kudos for you article. Out of all the opinions expressed on the net, I really do enjoy reading yours. I would have added more frills and dressings, but overall, compared to your competition out there, your opinions are fairly well written and non-biased. Thanks for the good work.
Posted by: Steve Grycel | January 30, 2008 at 06:10 AM
Bah, Ron Paul didn't try very hard in Florida and for good reason. If it's a winner-take-all state, and McCain and Romney are clearly leading, there's no point in even trying, since a 2nd or 3rd place showing won't win any delegates. It's all about the strategy in maximizing the chance for a brokered convention.
Posted by: Egosumabbas | January 30, 2008 at 06:14 AM
It was gracious of Rudy to remember to mention ALL of the candidates, including Ron Paul. That's more than news channels have been doing recently.
However, contrary to Rudy's insinuation (and yours) you can only vote once per cell phone in those text message polls. Ron Paul didn't win the debate polls because his supporters voted multiple times -- he won because we cared enough to vote.
Posted by: Steve Dasbach | January 30, 2008 at 06:16 AM
In a winner take all state that only allows registered Republican party members to vote in the primary, Florida would have been a waste of time and money for Dr. Paul. His campaign's goal is to accumulate delegates in a cost effective manner. Does anyone really think Hillary would have trounced Obama in Florida the way she did, if Obama had actually campaigned in the state?
What's really interesting to me is what will happen if, after Tuesday, Mccain truly has the nomination locked up, and Hillary wins the Demo nomination. I believe more than half the electorate would be highly motivated to vote against both parties.
Posted by: James | January 30, 2008 at 06:19 AM
I wonder why you tried to make us look bad in this article when you've been so gracious towards us lately? Such a tiny fraction of Paul's supporters would even dream of barging in on one of Giuliani's speeches. And I join the chorus in pointing out that you underplayed Ron Paul's victories over other candidates and second places finishes (but I guess it would have been too much to ask that you look into the egregious vote fraud in the Louisiana GOP caucuses, which stole an outright victory from Ron Paul.) But no hard feelings, you do good work. Cheers.
Posted by: patty | January 30, 2008 at 06:20 AM
Funny, I didn't see it as a "tribute" or homage or even a good-natured "okay, you got me" - sounded to me like one last time to ridicule Ron Paul and his supporters. Maybe I read him wrong and I'm just used to being laughed at for supporting Ron Paul. Either way, I'm glad he's out of the race.
Posted by: Daniel from Winder | January 30, 2008 at 06:20 AM
Andrew - Ron Paul was crushed in Florida, but this was to be expected. The campaign ignored Florida, because it is a winner-take-all state, and would have been a huge financial drain. How much money did Romney, McCain, and Giuliani spend on Florida? TONS. Romney ran an aggressive, expensive campaign there, and he comes away with no delegates... Rudy staked his whole campaign there, in what will come to be known as the worst campaign strategy EVER.
Instead, Ron Paul has been campaigning in states where he can pick up delegates even without coming in first. Sure, First place finishes would be nice... In fact, they are necessary heading into the national convention, but skipping Florida was the right thing for Paul, allowing him to put his time and resources into states where he might be competitive.
John McCain appears to be hitting critical mass... If he gets the nomination, it will result in a landslide defeat in November. He does not have the chops to stand on a debate stage with either Hillary, or Obama, and he doesn't have the conservative credentials to consolidate the Republican base. His stances on immigration, his dedication to the war in Iraq, and his complete bewilderment on economics and monetary policy will result in disaster come election time.
Say what you will about Ron Paul - It cannot be denied that he's the real agent of change in this race. He recognizes that the 9.5 trillion dollar debt is going to be America's undoing. He recognizes that America's absurd foreign policy is the primary motivation of our enemies abroad. He recognizes the de-stabilization of our currency, and the ready supply of cheap money, are the root causes for our current financial situation, and that it cannot be remedied by lower interest rates (more cheap money), and a $600 rebate check that will no doubt be spent on more imported goods.
Ron Paul is the candidate of ideas, and of principle. If the Republican Party doesn't wake up to that, they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction.
As for Giuliani... Goodbye, and Good Riddance. Paul has a better chance of becoming President than Rudy does - he's still in the race.
Posted by: Alan | January 30, 2008 at 06:21 AM
Hey why not mention that as the lone candidate, republican or democrat, who opposes the Iraq war Ron Paul has brought in more funding from troops, both retired and on duty, than any other candidate?
Posted by: stephen | January 30, 2008 at 06:22 AM
After reading articles about the candidates, or watching them on television or other media, ask yourself one question: do I know anything about this candidate's positions that I didn't know before? Did this reporting help me to understand what this candidate stands for or what his record is? In almost every case, I think the answer will be an emphatic "no". We are not told anything about the character, the positions or the records of the candidates that we are voting for, and I think that is a horrible thing. Instead, we are told who is "crazy", who is "unelectable", who "has an edge", who is talking trash about whom, and many other worthless details that are really only fit for tabloid celebrity reporting. Who cares what hillary clinton is trying to imply about obama, or whether she meant something insulting when she said such and such? Let her say what she wants, but don't report on it constantly! Tell us her POSITIONS! People, we have to disconnect from this media circus and think for ourselves or this experiment in democracy is OVER!
Posted by: Nate | January 30, 2008 at 06:23 AM
Just wanted to clarify something Andrew. You stated "Paul supporters will argue was caused by a mainstream media conspiracy to run those fraudulent polls, to under-report Paul's support and to minimize his chances". However, this is not the opinion of most supporters.
What we believe is that BECAUSE the media did not give Congressman Paul fair time in their coverage, they have essentially given millions of dollars worth of advertising to the front runners (one of whom has benefited greatly from that "free media"... Mr. McCain who has no money and is only winning because of that free media).
Our issue all along has been this. In this country people make their decisions based on what they see... as sad as that may be. Many (if not most) Americans today have gotten lazy. They don't want to read... or do research... or have to go looking for a candidate. They want that little box that sits in their living room to tell them who is running and what they stand for. This inherently is one of the major problems with our country and why in my humble opinion our Republic is dead.
When people have to go on YouTube to find out the views of a candidate because the mainstream media doesn't give him any play on ANY of their controlled stations... something is wrong. It's like that James Bond film where the villian wanted to control all of the worlds media stations... because control the news... control the world.
Time after time Dr. Paul was basically ignored in debates, given questions completely off topic and given 1/3 to 1/4 the amount of time other candidate were given, including ones he had beated several times in a row in other primaries. How can this be considered fair treatment by the media? When he wins text polls the hosts of the show say... ahhh, he's hacking it... it's not real... they're voting more than once. I doubt they would say anything like that if one of their crowned "front runners" won the poll.
Bottom line is Dr. Paul is basically running for President solely on the advertising dollars his campaign has raised. No other candidate in history has raised the kind of money Dr. Paul has... but that is basically ignored ONCE AGAIN by the media. Meanwhile, they have McCain, Guliani and Huckabee on their newscasts EVERY NIGHT... GIVING THEM MILLIONS IN FREE PUBLICITY.
What it comes down to in the end is that most of these primaries are being voted by the older generations. Older folks who only get their news from the TV and newspapers. Most I have talked to don't even know who Ron Paul is. How can this be... with the fundraising success he has had and the poll victories he has taken? "Well (they tell me)... I have never heard of him on the news".
Ding ding... Most of the articles I read online are all Blogs... and what senior citizen do you know is surfing the cusp of blogs across the globe? Answer... none.
Now... let's talk about how Dr. Paul is going to win this thing. It's not going to be because of you Andrew, and certainly not because of the Times. It is going to be because people are fed up. They are tired of this garbage and the same old crap. So we win... even if we don't win... because people are awake... and waking up even more every day as we spread this message of freedom. And we THE PEOPLE will have this country back... whether through democracy... or by other means... we are a resiliant people... and we will take nothing less.
Posted by: John B. in Florida | January 30, 2008 at 06:24 AM
Ron paul got more funding from troops, both on duty and retired than any other candidate who does not want to withdraw troops, i posted this before but i can't see it i think it might not have gone through.
Posted by: stephen | January 30, 2008 at 06:24 AM
Mr. Malcolm,
Having read your column prior to the election cycle I have noticed many times you have either provided incorrect information by accident or lie about the subject matter, the case in point is based on Florida's delegates.
Perhaps you should contact Florida's Secretary of State and receive a short education regarding Florida's states delegates. The fact is the states delegates are only awarded early February - April 30 at delegate selection caucuses-so why didn't you explain this fact? Ron Paul does have a very strong chance of winning delegates...
As far as a mainstream media conspiracy to underreport Paul's support.... For sure even the left is aware of this fact. My uncle who is a well known writer for a major media source has been told not to write about Ron Paul based on his editors direction for sure word have been handed down to every major media source to surpress Paul's campaign. According my uncle they were told to underreport Paul's success but present any negative news starting 4 days prior to the Iowa. We have witnessed Mel attempt to remove Paul from the debates and actually noted Fox news removal of Paul prior the NH debates. CBS news doesn't even list him on there guide and even James Dobson's foundation has omited Ron Paul. Mr. Malcolm there is no conspiracy at all but rather based on fact that the media isn't fair to Ron Paul at all. Do you need more examples?
Just watch CNN of FOX today and I'm sure they will mention Mr. 9-11 and not even mention Paul's name other then to suggest he doesn't have a chance or his last place finish which still looks like he received over 100,000 votes in a pro neocon state.
Mr. Malcolm I'm going to deem you as part of the MSM issue who does not report the truth nor are you interested in reporting the truth.
Posted by: Darel | January 30, 2008 at 06:26 AM
The Ron Paul rEVOLution has been marginalized profoundly in CA where MeetUp groups reported papers refused to publish paid ads for Ron Paul, and yet, I see Ron Paul everywhere I go. My own Ron Paul bumper sticker has turned road rage into a thumbs up, hand waving, big smile e- ticket with a few one finger salutes, but not often. This has been a great race, a incredible experience. I'm PROUD to be a Ron Paul rrEVOLutionary!
Posted by: Jeanette Doney | January 30, 2008 at 06:26 AM
WOW! Ron Paul has climbed from 11th place to 4th place in the last few months.
No I did not read that in the news. unfortunately I had to do the math myself. (I must have attended private school as a kid.)
After Super Tuesday, I expect Dr. Paul to take it up another notch, quietly inching into 3rd place.
It will be so entertaining to watch the two remaining fat RINO's slinging the other guys voting record around like the liberal mud it is, trying to make the other seem more liberal, while our beloved STATESMAN slowly moves into 2nd place, all the while keeping his powder dry.
Posted by: steven orrange | January 30, 2008 at 06:30 AM