Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

It's the battle of the social-conservative endorsements

November 7, 2007 |  7:50 am

As we noted the other day, Mitt Romney picked up a key endorsement over the weekend -- Paul Weyrich, one of the main figures behind the political rise of the nation's social conservatives.  Weyrich was instrumental in founding the Moral Majority and Heritage Foundation, which helped give organizational structure to the movement.

Not a bad plum for a candidate needing to bridge suspicions over his Mormon faith among the evangelical Christians within the party -- which was also helped by the recent endorsement by Bob Jones III (despite the disclaimer).

To put it in poker terms, those endorsements left Rudy Giuliani a little light in the social-conservative endorsement pot, though he did have Texas Gov. Rick Perry (who has to be in anyone's office pool of 2012 presidential wannabes).  But today Giuliani announced he had matched Romney's Weyrich raise with an endorsement by yet another member of the conservative pantheon -- Pat Robertson, the televangelist founder of the Christian Broadcasting Network who ran for the Republican presidential nomination in 1988.

Of course, sometimes endorsements can involve more baggage than a candidate really wants to carry. But it's interesting that these key figures are lining up behind candidates who, on the surface, would seem to be the least attractive to them on policy grounds.

Could be they're trying to back a winner, even if it means compromising on some issues.

(UPDATE: Our colleague Michael Finnegan reports from Greenville, S.C., that Fred Thompson chatted with reporters this morning after a breakfast speech at Tommy's Country Ham House (a great place for an actor/politician to talk) and offered this reaction to Robertson's endorsement of Giuliani: "I'm surprised. But I guess it's because I'm easily surprised.")

-- Scott Martelle


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I heard that Pat is privately an anti-Mormon, that is the only explanation of why he would choose a pro-abortion Romney over a social conservative poll-leading Romney. Robertson is worried about the Mormon church getting a boost of members, and less money for his own church, once Romney moves into the White House.

Pat Robertson sold out. Guiliani is not a conservative. I cannot believe that he would back somoene with such a low standard when it comes to the social issues that are important to conservatives.

What a disgrace!!!!! Mitt Romney is the candidate that will protect the family and also make America stronger.

It's clear Pat Robertson has lost his mind.

Wasn't it Giuliani the one who moved his Girlfriend into the New York Mayor's Ciy mansion while he was still mayor and his wife was still living there!

It's amazing what "American Moral Christian values will forget' when it comes to money and power,. Especially since the Tragedy of of 911

What an unbelievable disgrace for Robertson to do that!!! grrrrrrrrrrrrr. I've lost all respect for him. Romney would have been the ideal candidate!!! Absolutely unbelievable!

It's true that Pat Robertson is an Anti-Mormon, and that's the only reason that he would endorse a Pro-Abortion, Anti-Gun, Pro-Gay Marriage, republican like Guiliani. I have lost all respect for Robertson.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives