Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Naming the acolytes

October 28, 2007 |  9:24 am

So, now that we're up to our bellies in the presidential nomination battles, we've been wondering -- well, musing is probably more accurate -- about a key aspect of vital importance to the electorate: What do you call the candidates' supporters?

For Barack Obama's people, Obamans seems a natural fit. For Hillary Clinton, it's a toss up between Hillaryites which, frankly, doesn't exactly roll of the tongue or the keyboard, and Clintonites, with its echoes of the stuff that could bring down Superman. John Edwards? Well, with his poverty push it seems cruel to call them Edwardians, but then, there's the haircut and the house.

Bill Richardson? Too many syllables in the name to begin with, so adding -ites or-ists doesn't work. Richardsonian? Like Jeffersonian? Could work, given both men's predisposition to diplomacy. Chris Dodd doesn't have an easy fit, either. Dodderers? We doubt the image folks would approve. And speaking of image folks, what does one do with Dennis Kucinich's backers? Call them the Kucini?

On the other side of the aisle, the Republicans offer a similarly mixed bag of potential. Rudy Giuliani could be backed by the Rudees, Giulianians (though that sounds like a salad), or, perhaps most fitting for the ex-federal prosecutor, G-men (if you ignore the gender-specificity). Mitt Romney offers up both the Mittites, with its echo of ancient civilizations, and Romneyans, which sound like "Star Trek" figures.

The easiest fit: Fred Thompson's Fredheads. A tougher fit: John McCain. McCainiacs?

You get the idea. Got any suggestions, drop them in the comments section. But be warned -- suggesting an opposing candidate's supporters are "self-deluded backers of a self-deluded demagogue" probably won't get posted.

-- Scott Martelle


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I'm partial to "Clintonistas," and "Obamamaniacs."

Hillary supporter's could co-opt her own campaign's term for fundraiser's - Hillraisers! It just works too well to ignore.

Also, for Huckabee and Romney I've got "Huckabuddies" and "Mittens."

Barackers

Hilll's Angels

McCain Enablers

Doddlers

Romboiids

Rudy Boosters (or Roosters)

Clinton: Hill-Bill-ies
Obama: Barackstars
Richardson: He has supporters?
Edwards: John's Johns
Dodd: He has supporters?
Biden: He has supporters?
Kucinich: The Kooks

Guliani: Rudy's Rubes
Thompson: Fred's DeadHeads
McCain: Bomb Squad
Romney: MittWits
Paul: Paul-unteers
Tancredo: He has supporters?
Hunter: Duncan D'OH!-nuts
Keyes: He has supporters?

Oh, yeah,almost forgot:

Huckabee: Huckamaniacs



Advertisement

About the Bloggers



Categories


Archives