Top of the Ticket

Politics and commentary, coast to coast, from the Los Angeles Times

« Previous Post | Top of the Ticket Home | Next Post »

Gay forum not marked by disagreements

August 9, 2007 |  8:03 pm

The crowd began gathering in the late afternoon heat along Vine Street a couple of hours before the first gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender meeting with presidential candidates. The site: a video production house in Hollywood.

There was tight security for the 200 invited guests including Camille Tovar and her friend Rhonda Ashby. "It's really a huge deal," said Tovar. "It's bringing gay issues to the forefront and the candidates have to recognize that this is not just about a small percentage of people, but has to do with human rights."

Guests were carefully instructed on when they could talk, stand, leave, etc. "It's best to think of this as a Broadway play," one producer told the crowd.

It certainly wasn't a debate. The set looked more like a living room with a couch and easy chairs. It wasn't widely available across the country on a broadcast network but was streamed online at logoonline.com.

The forum was more of a love-fest among most of the Democratic presidential candidates (Joe Biden and Chris Dodd did not attend) and an audience and panel that appreciated finally being courted by national candidates.

The crowd was more interested in applause and affirmation than confrontation. The applause was frequent and enthusiastic, and there was even some laughter. "Are there many gays in Alaska?" panelist Melissa Etheridge asked Mike Gravel. The audience erupted in laughter.

Etheridge later asked Gov. Bill Richardson if he thought homosexuality was a choice or if they were born that way. He stumbled somewhat saying he was no scientist and preferred to deal with people as people, all of them equal, that he had experienced some discrimination as a darker-skinned Latino and it was a question of equality. The issue of overwhelming gay voter participation in elections was covered here in a previous item, as was the danger that being so closely identified with the gay community might pose for Democrats in some key swing states.

The Times' Joel Rubin was on the forum scene and has a full story on this website and in Friday's print editions.

--Andrew Malcolm


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

As a gay man who has been in a committed partnership for 17 years, I believe that Ethridge's characterization of being "thrown under the bus" by the Clintons strains incredulity.

The fact remains that Ethridge left her wife and children from the Clinton years, moved on to another wife, and had additional children with her.

It seems to me that Ethridge herself threw her commitment and marriage "under the bus".

What Richardson said on choice and sexual orientation was flat wrong and disappointing to his supporters. He's trying to remedy the situation today.

Advocate: I understand what you're saying about your record on LGBT issues, but I respectfully think you came off last night as lacking a little bit of empathy for gays and lesbians. Even with your record, can you expect the community to get behind you if they perceive you that way?

Richardson: I became very engaged in gay and lesbian issues when a good friend of mine, who was one of my workers in my congressional campaign [in the early 1980s], by the name of Billy Griego, got involved in helping me, and he then died of AIDS. That's when I felt a real recognition and empathy for gay issues, because of my friendship with him. Years later, with the [state] legislature, I named an initiative that I pursued, which was more funding and a new structure to deal with AIDS at the state level, the Billy Griego HIV Act.

That means none of the presidential candidates want to meet the gay, lesbians, transgenders. By these type of activities having placed in society, then what happens to next future.
_______________________________________________
Maverick
http://www.treatmentcenters.org/washington

Hi Even Black Hat Marketers have a code, (although most of it is how to make Google cry and put your competition in the poor house) you can download it here for free ... (27 page underground PDF) http://blackhat.1add.net And don't worry, you can keep your wallet in your pants AND you don't even have to opt in. Consider it a gift from my friend Howie Schwartz. It's a blueprint on how he annihilates everything in his path when he decides to e



Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts
A (silent) way for Americans to thank the troops |  December 1, 2009, 7:44 am »
'Meet the Press' sweeps TV's November Sweeps, but... |  November 30, 2009, 4:48 pm »
Contest for Atlanta mayor might hinge on race |  November 30, 2009, 1:17 pm »


Categories


Archives